Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The state of voting: July 11, 2022

State of voting - election law changes

This weekly update summarizing legislative activity affecting voting and elections is powered by the Voting Rights Lab. Sign up for VRL’s weekly newsletter here.

The Voting Rights Lab is tracking 2,183 bills so far this session, with 578 bills that tighten the rules governing voter access or election administration and 1,040 bills that expand the rules.

Arizona enacted a bill that will remove individuals from the voter registration list based on poor information – sometimes without any notification – and another ensuring voters across the state can track the status of their mail ballots online.

Meanwhile, the Pennsylvania legislature approved a ballot initiative that would require voters to provide ID when casting a ballot, even by mail, and the Wisconsin Supreme Court found that state law does not allow municipalities to provide drop boxes.

Looking ahead: We will be watching how the first director of the Florida Office of Election Crimes and Security focuses the attention of the newly created office.

Here are the details:


The governor of Arizona signed two bills, one restricting ballot access and one improving it. On Wednesday, Gov. Doug Ducey signed H.B. 2243, requiring election officials to conduct investigations of registered voters using data sources that are not designed to determine voter eligibility and contain incomplete information. Some voters who would have their registrations canceled pursuant to these new requirements would not receive notice prior to cancellation or have an opportunity to contest the cancellation. This new law is nearly identical to H.B. 2617, a bill the governor vetoed earlier this year.

Ducey also signed S.B. 1411, which requires statewide ballot tracking, ensuring all voters across the state are able to track the status of their mail ballot online by the end of 2023. The bill also appropriates $250,000 for the implementation of the policy.

The Pennsylvania General Assembly offers initial approval to a ballot question on voter ID. The legislature approved a ballot initiative that would require voters to show government-issued identification when they vote, whether in person or by mail. If the bill passes again in the 2023-24 session, the proposal will appear on the ballot for final approval by the voters.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court found that drop boxes are not permissible under state law. For years, some Wisconsin municipalities provided drop boxes for voters. The practice became widespread in 2020, as Covid-19 drove many more voters to choose to vote by mail. In a decision issued July 8, the Wisconsin Supreme Court rejected the Wisconsin Election Commission’s drop box guidance and held that ballots must be returned by mail or by the voter to the clerk at either the clerk’s office or a designated alternative site.

New director named to Florida elections investigation unit. Gov. Ron DeSantis named Peter Antonacci as the new head of the newly created Office of Election Crimes and Security, which was created by S.B. 524 earlier this year. Under the supervision of new Secretary of State Cord Byrd, Antonacci will oversee an office that includes 15 investigators with instructions to follow up on reports of election irregularities. Currently, it is unclear whether this office will primarily focus on voters, election officials, parties or candidates.


Read More

Protestors holding signs at a rally, one reads, "Trump is not above the law."

Protesters gather at a Nobody Is Above the Law rally protesting President Trump's interference in the Mueller investigation on November 08, 2018 in Washington, DC.

Larry French/Getty Images

The Double Standard Presidency: When We Watch Leaders Act Above the Law

Americans are told that no one is above the law. Yet every day, they watch a president behave in ways that would get any ordinary citizen fired, disciplined, confronted, or held accountable — and they watch some Americans excuse it. What makes this moment even more striking is that critics across the political spectrum, including conservatives, now warn that the presidency is operating on a dangerous double standard. This is not a partisan concern. It is a constitutional one. And it is tearing at the fabric of our democracy.

For generations, the Constitution has provided guardrails — separation of powers, checks and balances, oversight mechanisms, and limits on executive authority — designed to prevent any leader from functioning above the law. The framers feared concentrated power more than anything else. They believed that the presidency must be constrained not only by written law but by norms of restraint, dignity, and respect for institutions. Those norms held for centuries because presidents understood that the office was larger than any individual, and Congress understood that oversight was not optional.

Keep ReadingShow less
Study Reveals Sharp Generational Divide in How Latino Identity Influences Daily Life

Study Reveals Sharp Generational Divide in How Latino Identity Influences Daily Life

Latino immigrants and U.S.-born Latinos differ sharply in how much their identity shapes their daily lives, according to recent findings from the Pew Research Center’s 2025 National Survey of Latinos. The survey shows that Latino immigrants are far more likely than U.S.-born Latinos to say their identity is central to who they are, and that it influences their experiences in the United States. Pew researchers Gabriel Piña, Mark Hugo Lopez, Sahana Mukherjee, Dalia Fahmy, and Alexandra Cahn report that the divide reflects differences in cultural connection, lived experience, and generational distance from immigrant roots.

Pew’s analysis finds that Latino immigrants are significantly more likely to say their origins are central to their identity, while U.S.-born Latinos — especially those in the third generation or higher — are less likely to feel that connection. The report notes that “U.S. Hispanics are divided on whether their identity helps or hurts them in America,” with some respondents describing their Latino identity as a source of pride and connection, and others saying it is tied to discrimination or barriers.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Democracy Cannot Run on an AI Model

Clerk Matthew Sandbar, 34, demonstrates part of the ballot-sorting process to members of the media attending a walkthrough of the Philadelphia Ballot Processing Center used to process the ballots of the 2022 US midterm elections, in Philadelphia on October 27, 2022.

Photo by Ryan Collerd / AFP via Getty Images

A Democracy Cannot Run on an AI Model

Tallying the results of Washington, DC’s first ranked-choice election in June took about 10 days—longer than many voters are used to. In an age when artificial intelligence can generate an answer in seconds, waiting days for election results can feel old-fashioned, inefficient, even suspicious. And it is about to matter far more widely. This November, 17 states, cities, and counties will use ranked-choice voting, including Maine and Alaska statewide, in races that could help decide control of Congress. More voters than ever will watch results take days to resolve, and more will be asked to trust a count they cannot see.

But that slowness may be one of its most democratic features.

Keep ReadingShow less