Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

No mail ballot arrived, so many Ohioans risk health and head to the polls

Ohio state flag
Patra Kongsirimongkolchai/Getty Images

The delayed finish of the Ohio primary is in a few hours, but many voters are grappling with a difficult decision at the last moment: Confront the health risks of heading out to vote in person Tuesday or else be forced to sit this one out.

Three weeks after Wisconsin earned global criticism for pushing ahead with its primary in the teeth of the coronavirus pandemic, Ohio is threatened with similar ridicule — because thousands never received ballots they requested for what was supposed to be an all vote-by-mail election.

The back-to-back problems point to the level of logistical and legal impediments the country must overcome for there to be a fair, complete and healthy presidential election in November.


After Gov. Mike DeWine cited a public health emergency and postponed the primary hours before it was to happen March 17, his fellow Republicans in charge of the Legislature said the finish would happen seven weeks later and entirely by mail, with only the disabled or homeless voting in person. That led to widespread confusion, frustration with the election process and some successful lawsuits from voting rights groups.

Republican Secretary of State Frank LaRose called in reinforcements for the Postal Service after mail delivery slowed considerably last week. But despite these last-minute efforts, thousands lined up in person Tuesday to drop off ballots or vote provisionally at county offices before 7:30 p.m.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Voting rights groups opened a hotline for voters with troubles and at midday briefed reporters on what they'd heard: People waiting more than two weeks for a ballot that never came, and others who tried contacting their local elections board only to receive no answer or confusing, and sometimes incorrect, information.

"This process has been anything but smooth and clear to voters, and also election officials," said Mike Brickner of All Voting is Local, one of the hotline operators. "We want to make sure what's happening in Ohio will not happen again in another state."

Ohio's election is the first since Wisconsin's. While seven in 10 Wisconsinites were able to vote by mail, thousands said they had to don masks and gloves to vote because they never got the absentee paperwork they requested.

In order to be counted in Ohio, ballots had to be postmarked by Monday and received within 10 days. But the state plans to announce results Tuesday night.

LaRose announced Monday that almost 2 million Ohioans had requested a vote-by-mail ballot and more than 1.4 million had been returned.

"In a matter of weeks, we've done something that's taken other states years to do — transform our state into one capable of voting entirely by mail," he said in a statement.

Still, it's clear this primary will have had significantly less participation than four years ago when more than 3.2 million voted.

Several states have delayed their primaries or resorted to vote-by-mail due to concerns about the pandemic. New York on Monday canceled its presidential primary altogether. Voting rights activists are pushing Congress to spend at least $2 billion so states can provide easier access to voting by mail.

Former Vice President Joe Biden is expected to win the Ohio presidential primary with ease, so much of the suspense and turnout was driven by down-ballot contests for both parties' nominations for Congress, the Legislature, judgeships and local offices.

"No doubt the state could have, and should have, done more to make the balloting process easier," said Kristen Clarke, executive director of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law. For starters, she said, Ohio lawmakers should have decided to mail absentee ballot applications to all active voters.

Read More

Half-Baked Alaska

A photo of multiple checked boxes.

Getty Images / Thanakorn Lappattaranan

Half-Baked Alaska

This past year’s elections saw a number of state ballot initiatives of great national interest, which proposed the adoption of two “unusual” election systems for state and federal offices. Pairing open nonpartisan primaries with a general election using ranked choice voting, these reforms were rejected by the citizens of Colorado, Idaho, and Nevada. The citizens of Alaska, however, who were the first to adopt this dual system in 2020, narrowly confirmed their choice after an attempt to repeal it in November.

Ranked choice voting, used in Alaska’s general elections, allows voters to rank their candidate choices on their ballot and then has multiple rounds of voting until one candidate emerges with a majority of the final vote and is declared the winner. This more representative result is guaranteed because in each round the weakest candidate is dropped, and the votes of that candidate’s supporters automatically transfer to their next highest choice. Alaska thereby became the second state after Maine to use ranked choice voting for its state and federal elections, and both have had great success in their use.

Keep ReadingShow less
Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

The United States Supreme Court.

Getty Images / Rudy Sulgan

Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

Fourteen years ago, after the Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional the popular blanket primary system, Californians voted to replace the deeply unpopular closed primary that replaced it with a top-two system. Since then, Democratic Party insiders, Republican Party insiders, minor political parties, and many national reform and good government groups, have tried (and failed) to deep-six the system because the public overwhelmingly supports it (over 60% every year it’s polled).

Now, three minor political parties, who opposed the reform from the start and have unsuccessfully sued previously, are once again trying to overturn it. The Peace and Freedom Party, the Green Party, and the Libertarian Party have teamed up to file a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Their brief repeats the same argument that the courts have previously rejected—that the top-two system discriminates against parties and deprives voters of choice by not guaranteeing every party a place on the November ballot.

Keep ReadingShow less
Supreme Court
Nicolas Economou/NurPhoto via Getty Images

Gerrymandering and voting rights under review by Supreme Court again

On Dec. 13, The Fulcrum identified the worst examples of congressional gerrymandering currently in use.

In that news report, David Meyers wrote:

Keep ReadingShow less
Rear view diverse voters waiting for polling place to open
SDI Productions/Getty Images

Open primary advocates must embrace the historic principles of change

This was a big year for the open primaries movement. Seven state-level campaigns and one municipal. Millions of voters declaring their support for open primaries. New leaders emerging across the country. Primary elections for the first time at the center of the national reform debate.

But with six out of eight campaigns failing at the ballot box, it’s also an important moment of reflection.

Keep ReadingShow less