Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

One form of viral spread: Groups promoting '20 civic engagement

voter registration
iNueng/Getty Images

With less than 25 weeks left in a campaign season remade by the coronavirus, another two groups sprung up Wednesday to bolster civic engagement and voter turnout.

Backed by $5 million in initial funding, VoteAmerica describes itself as a nonprofit aiming to connect with millions who are not registered or don't vote very often — and giving them the information and resources they need to participate in November, regardless of their perceived political leanings.

By contrast, Vote From Home 2020 said it would be all about mobilizing progressive voters in battleground states. The grassroots initiative will engage with these voters remotely and encourage them to vote by mail.


VoteAmerica is the creation of prominent voting rights advocate Debra Cleaver, who founded the registration nonprofit Vote.org four years ago. Vote From Home 2020 is led by Ben Tyson and Suzy Smith, who both have previous experience working on presidential campaigns and with voting rights groups.

Thanks to the nationwide call for social distancing during the Covid-19 outbreak, arranging for most Americans to cast ballots far from a polling station has become the year's top priority for voting rights and good-government groups — who are pressing lawsuits against restrictive absentee rules, seeking billions in funding to promote vote-by-mail and clamoring to educate the electorate about its options. That's where both new groups fit in.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

On its website, VoteAmerica outlines mail-in voting requirements and election deadlines for each state. Visitors may use the site to apply for an absentee ballot.

VoteAmerica is also researching best practices for mail-in voting outreach and participation. The nonprofit has partnered with Christopher Mann, a Skidmore College professor who conducted a study on the topic in 2013, to test how effective mail ballot programs are in the June primaries in order to prepare for the general election.

Vote From Home 2020 will use mailers, phone calls and text messages, online advertising, and social media to reach young and minority voters. The group is prioritizing outreach in Michigan, Pennsylvania and North Carolina because all three will be highly competitive in the presidential election and allow no-excuse absentee voting — but have historically low rates of voters using this option.

"While some states make it easy to vote by mail, many swing-states don't proactively communicate to voters that they have that same option," Tyson said. "Vote From Home 2020 will educate voters about their options and make sure they have a voice in the most consequential election of our generation."

Cleaver believes the 2020 elections will be "the most chaotic in American history" due to Covid-19, threats of foreign interference, polarization, disinformation and gaps in election technology. These issues will disproportionately impact vulnerable voting populations, including first-time voters, young people and communities of color.

"That is where VoteAmerica comes in," she said.

Read More

A better direction for democracy reform

Denver election judge Eric Cobb carefully looks over ballots as counting continued on Nov. 6. Voters in Colorado rejected a ranked choice voting and open primaries measure.

Helen H. Richardson/MediaNews Group/The Denver Post via Getty Images

A better direction for democracy reform

Drutman is a senior fellow at New America and author "Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop: The Case for Multiparty Democracy in America."

This is the conclusion of a two-part, post-election series addressing the questions of what happened, why, what does it mean and what did we learn? Read part one.

I think there is a better direction for reform than the ranked choice voting and open primary proposals that were defeated on Election Day: combining fusion voting for single-winner elections with party-list proportional representation for multi-winner elections. This straightforward solution addresses the core problems voters care about: lack of choices, gerrymandering, lack of competition, etc., with a single transformative sweep.

Keep ReadingShow less
To-party doom loop
Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop: The Case for Multiparty Democracy in America

Let’s make sense of the election results

Drutman is a senior fellow at New America and author of "Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop: The Case for Multiparty Democracy in America."

Well, here are some of my takeaways from Election Day, and some other thoughts.

1. The two-party doom loop keeps getting doomier and loopier.

Keep ReadingShow less
Person voting in Denver

A proposal to institute ranked choice voting in Colorado was rejected by voters.

RJ Sangosti/MediaNews Group/The Denver Post via Getty Images

Despite setbacks, ranked choice voting will continue to grow

Mantell is director of communications for FairVote.

More than 3 million people across the nation voted for better elections through ranked choice voting on Election Day, as of current returns. Ranked choice voting is poised to win majority support in all five cities where it was on the ballot, most notably with an overwhelming win in Washington, D.C. – 73 percent to 27 percent.

Keep ReadingShow less
Electoral College map

It's possible Donald Trump and Kamala Harris could each get 269 electoral votes this year.

Electoral College rules are a problem. A worst-case tie may be ahead.

Johnson is the executive director of the Election Reformers Network, a national nonpartisan organization advancing common-sense reforms to protect elections from polarization. Keyssar is a Matthew W. Stirling Jr. professor of history and social policy at the Harvard Kennedy School. His work focuses on voting rights, electoral and political institutions, and the evolution of democracies.

It’s the worst-case presidential election scenario — a 269–269 tie in the Electoral College. In our hyper-competitive political era, such a scenario, though still unlikely, is becoming increasingly plausible, and we need to grapple with its implications.

Recent swing-state polling suggests a slight advantage for Kamala Harris in the Rust Belt, while Donald Trump leads in the Sun Belt. If the final results mirror these trends, Harris wins with 270 electoral votes. But should Trump take the single elector from Nebraska’s 2nd congressional district — won by Joe Biden in 2020 and Trump in 2016 — then both candidates would be deadlocked at 269.

Keep ReadingShow less