Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

What is your take?

What is your take?
Credit: Rudzhan Nagiev/Getty Images

This week’s question is: “What change would most quickly strengthen or restore your faith in our democratic system of governance?” This was timed to sync with the Biden administration hosting the Summit for Democracy.

Activists in the reform community were generally united around four changes.


  1. Overcome the Supreme Court’sCitizens United ruling (or engage in other forms of campaign finance reform).
  2. End gerrymandering (or other forms of redistricting to reduce partisanship).
  3. Open the primary system to more voters.
  4. Pass voting protections in Congress.

Outside of electoral reform, we had varied responses:

  • Ending the filibuster.
  • Canceling student debt and easing other fiscal pressures for everyday Americans.
  • Increasing accountability for elected officials.
  • Addressing and minimizing toxic polarization.
  • Shoring up our information integrity.

Still others mentioned the need for ongoing and quality civic education so we can fulfill our responsibilities as citizens. There are many nuances and good ideas to explore.

A sampling of responses:

Electoral Reforms

I think the U.S. has a lot of nerve hosting a “summit on democracy.” America has lost her way. We no longer even have a functioning democracy. We can’t even choose our representatives to the U.S. House. They’ve already been chosen for us by gerrymandered redistributing maps. That is not how a democracy works.
- Dwight Willis

If Congress were to support a constitutional amendment to adopt, establishing for presidential elections: nonpartisan primaries nationwide, final-five ranked-choice voting and eliminate the Electoral College.
- Mike O

I think a geographic approach should be required in the redistricting process. Redistricting should be required to encompass entire communities when their population does not exceed the requirements. Representative democracy becomes meaningless if no single representative is responsible and accountable to a community. The current system destroys lines of accountability when two, three or four legislators represent pieces of a neighborhood or municipality.
- Steve Yaffe

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Term limits. Federal legislation to overrule Citizens United.
- Amelia Bland Waller

Preclearance on gerrymandering and voting laws. Eliminate state laws providing partisans the authority to overturn elections
- Jon Thomas

There are so many things that it is hard to choose one! It seems that the beginning of the end of our democracy was the Citizens United decision that truly opened the floodgates to big money ruling politics and guiding legislation. Long live democracy!
- Eileen Henderson

The important election innovations must be implemented at the state level --- the "laboratories of democracy" that write most election laws and administer our elections. I agree with those who call for a healthy, robust "New Federalism" as one antidote for the unnecessary nationalization and polarization of every single political issue (and election). After all, isn't it okay if, within constitutional limits, Tennessee decides to do things differently from California? Onward!
- Eric H. Bronner

Restoring faith in our failing democracy: 1.Preventing party gerrymandering: District boundaries should be agreed upon by representatives from Republican, Democratic and independent voters, not just the party in power in the state in question. Representatives should not be picking their voters using gerrymandered districts. 2. Allow open primaries. Closed ones tend to choose the far left or far right. We need the far middle (check out this video for that concept as it applies to the climate issue).
- Peter Garrett

Voting

Our democracy is at the edge of a Grand Canyon precipice of authoritarians who just want office to control the majority of Americans. If there is something we must do now, it is abolishing the filibuster and immediately pass voting rights legislation at the federal level.
- Fernando F Seisdedos

The only thing that would restore my faith in a democratic system of governance is if the "red" states would stop passing voting laws that prohibit people of color from voting and reverse the laws that have already been passed. Barring that, Congress needs to pass all three voting rights acts.
- Nancy Ray

Voter suppression and disenfranchisement are raging across the country. Our house (aka democracy) built by Democrats, Republicans and independents is on fire -- and the fire brigade doesn't go on recess to watch the building burn down!
- David Goodman

Securing the integrity of our voting system such that every eligible voter gets one vote, and the preference of an independently verified majority cannot be superseded by elected officials. We can tackle campaign finance reform and ending gerrymandering at the same time, or as a separate, next priority action.
- Morris Effron

Easing economic burden

Literally the only thing the Democrats or Biden could do at this point to restore my faith in “democracy” is cancel student loan debt effective immediately.
- Jennifer Stefanow

Pass support for youth and children including Romney’s permanent child credit legislation. Suspend filibuster for voting rights now. Expand Medicare to older employees with company premiums for revenue. Reclaim market negotiation for Medicare pharmaceuticals. Need I go on?
- Tom C

I'd like to see our elected government officials working together instead of feeding the division in our country. I'd also like to see free trade, fewer restrictions on companies large and small, more conservative spending focused on encouraging self-sufficiency. Many of the big-spending bills are full of "pet projects" that really have nothing to do with helping the country as a whole.
- Cathy Pfeifer

Civic education and being better citizens

Giving the next generation of citizens - today's public school students - the skills to talk to people with different perspectives, and to work towards finding common ground in order to address issues that affect them directly.
- David K. Hutchinson

The system of democracy is fine. The problem is in the thinking of the people who are currently speaking out within/from the system that protects their freedom of speech. A democracy works when the individuals comprising that democracy are educated/trained in how to support the system that protects their democratic rights. It requires democratic individuals who are competent to sustain their democratic rights.
- Charlie

Polarization

Seeing people who represent “the system” invite people with no faith in it into conversations about improving the system. That’s why I’m attracted to bridging work. As an individual, I see “the system” as having an elasticity that many do not observe. But, I see why it isn’t readily observable for many folks.
- Pedro

Effectively addressing our intractable differences.
- Lou

The president needs to set forth a plan to do what he said on Inauguration Day: Unite our divided, polarized country. This could begin with a White House meeting of Pelosi, McCarthy, Schumer, and McConnell. He must ask them to give "A Pledge to Put America before Party," focusing on reforming Congress to operate in a bipartisan way going forward. This might include a bipartisan committee to make specific reforms of procedures and policies that incentivize bipartisanship to find common ground.
- Al Smith

The celebrating and showcasing of bipartisanship initiatives and policies -- I'm interested in how they came to be and were implemented/achieved, who was involved, timeline, really the nitty gritty -- and plans to make space for more of this plus expanding grantmaking in bridge-building work.
- Justine Lee

Information integrity

Since I'm not sure how to prevent disinformation or to stop threats of violence (and actual violence) against public officials, which may be the most acute problems.
- Riley Hart

Accountability of elected officials

When Trump and his minions still holding public office, appointed or elected, are arrested and held accountable for treason, including Sen. Mitch McConnell.
- Barb Rogers

What change?? How about taking care of Americans? What about not forcing people to take medicine or allowing rioting, looting? Biden? So far in the past 12 months, this man has changed our country for the worse. Why hasn't this Marxist takeover stopped? Who is profiting from this? Stop placating We have all had enough Shame on all of you.
- Gloria Graham

Other responses

I would lose the filibuster.
- Terry Shoemaker

The thing that would restore my faith in the system is the abolish of all political parties and restore the federal government to its Constitutional role by removing non federal duties such as education. Also, remove the Federal Reserve from the Treasury.
- Jack Closson

I'd also like to see the Electoral College and the Senate tweaked so that they come closer to proportional representation while still allocating some power to each state regardless of its population. This seems quite unlikely, though (at least until a new Constitution is created as democracy is re-established after the period of de facto autocracy that seems likely to start within a few years).
- Riley Hart

A balanced Supreme Court and a program/promotion/guidelines for scientific studies that are independently funded. Or barring that, independent reviews of studies.
- Leah Spitzer

Read More

Understanding the Debate on Presidential Immunity

The U.S. White House.

Getty Images, Caroline Purser

Understanding the Debate on Presidential Immunity

Presidential Immunity: History and Background

Presidential immunity is the long-standing idea that the president of the United States has exemption from liability or legal proceedings for acts related to the duties of presidential office. Contrary to popular belief, presidential immunity is not explicitly enumerated in the Constitution; only sitting members of Congress are explicitly granted judicial immunity through the Constitution’s Speech or Debate Clause. Rather, the concept of presidential immunity has arisen through the Department of Justice’s longstanding policy against prosecuting presidents in office and the Supreme Court’s interpretation of Article II, which has developed through a number of Supreme Court cases dating back to 1867.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump
President Donald Trump.
Brandon Bell/Getty Images

Trump 2.0: Navigating the New Political Landscape

With Trump’s return to the White House, we once again bear daily witness to a spectacle that could be described as entertaining, were it only a TV series. But Trump’s unprecedented assault on our democratic norms and institutions is not only very real but represents the gravest peril our democratic republic has confronted in the last 80 years.

Trump’s gradual consolidation of power and authoritarian proclivities, reminiscent of an earlier era, are very frightening on their own account. But it is his uncanny ability to control the narrative that empowers him to shred our nation’s fabric while proceeding with impunity. His actions not only threaten the very republic that he now leads but overturn the entire post-WWII world order, which is now in chaos. Trump has ostensibly cast aside the governing principle with the U.N. Charter of Sovereignty. By suggesting on multiple occasions that the U.S. will “get Greenland one way or another,” and that Canada might become our 51st state, our neighbor to the north is now developing plans to protect itself from what it views as the enemy across the border.

Keep ReadingShow less
Free Speech and Freedom of the Press Under Assault

A speakerphone locked in a cage.

Getty Images, J Studios

Free Speech and Freedom of the Press Under Assault

On June 4, 2024, an op-ed I penned (“Project 2025 is a threat to democracy”) was published in The Fulcrum. It received over 74,000 views and landed as one of the top 10 most-read op-eds—out of 1,460—published in 2024.

The op-ed identified how the right-wing extremist Heritage Foundation think tank had prepared a 900-page blueprint of actions that the authors felt Donald Trump should implement—if elected—in the first 180 days of being America’s 47th president. Dozens of opinion articles were spun off from the op-ed by a multitude of cross-partisan freelance writers and published in The Fulcrum, identifying—very specifically—what Trump and his appointees would do by following the Heritage Foundation’s dictum of changing America from a pluralistic democracy to a form of democracy that, according to its policy blueprint, proposes “deleting the terms diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), plus gender equality, out of every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation and piece of legislation that exists.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Devaluing Truth Makes America Weak

Blocks with letters on them, spelling out "Fake" or "Fact".

Getty Images, Constantine Johnny

Devaluing Truth Makes America Weak

Truth matters. You wouldn’t know that from watching the president address Congress earlier this month. The assault on truth since January has been breathtaking. The removal of data from government websites, the elevation of science deniers to positions in charge of scientific policy, and the advancement of health policy that flies in the face of scientific evidence are only the tip of the iceberg. We are watching a disaster in the making: Our leaders are all falling in line with a program that prioritizes politics and power over American success. But, we ignore the truth at our own peril—reality has a way of getting our attention even if we look the other way.

As a philosophy professor, my discipline’s attention to truth has never seemed more relevant than today. Although, there may be disagreement about the ultimate nature of truth, even the most minimal theory agrees that truth requires alignment with the way the world is. It is neither negotiable nor unimportant. Devaluing the importance of truth is a fool’s game, and it is incompatible with American success. It makes us weak and vulnerable; epidemics, deaths, and unrest will follow.

Keep ReadingShow less