Three weeks ago the Supreme Court decided what had once seemed like an obscure corner of constitutional law, but which might have huge ramifications for this year's presidential election and beyond: The court ruled unanimously that states could punish or remove members of the Electoral College who refuse to vote for the candidate they were pledged to support.
The "faithless elector" decision is the topic of the latest installment of our podcast partnership with The Democracy Group, a podcast network at Penn State University, to share thought-provoking discussions about efforts to fix the American political system.
In this episode, Democracy Works podcast host and producer Jenna Spinelle leads a discussion with:
- Lawrence Lessig, Harvard law professor and prominent democracy reform advocate who argued before the court that electors should be free to vote as they please.
- Meredith McGehee, executive director of Issue One, one of the advocacy groups that filed briefs in the case arguing the states should have the power to punish electors who go rogue.
- Michael Baranowski, a political scientist at Northern Kentucky University who is focused on the practical implications of the court's decision.
delete
The “Primary Problem” is a Lack of General Election Competition 
The Case for a Constitutional Right to Vote
Restoring Voting Rights to Citizens with Past Felony Convictions
Ballotpedia as a National Voter Guide 365 Days a Year
Timely Links