Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Honoring the best congressional offices

Opinion

Rep. Anthony Brown

When Rep. Anthony Brown ends a town hall meeting, he often stays an additional two to three hours to greet every constituent in the room.

Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call/Getty Images

Fitch is the president and CEO of the Congressional Management Foundation and a former congressional staffer.


It's no secret that this has been a tough year for Congress. The pandemic and the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol have left a malaise over the congressional community. The public continues to hold Congress is low regard. One public opinion survey asked what words they would use to describe Congress: "incompetent," "inept," "terrible" and "bad" topped the list.

The challenge for many Americans (and even some journalists) is to see past the caricatures, show horse politicians and Hollywood narrative to get a real understanding of Congress at work. The Congressional Management Foundation aims to open such a window to Capitol Hill and highlight the best in Congress through the Democracy Awards. The program is kind of like the "Oscars for Congress" (without the red carpet and fancy outfits).

The vision and goals for the Democracy Awards are simple and based on the success CMF has seen in our 44-year history of improving Congress. First, we wanted to recognize legislators and their staffs, identifying best practices in congressional offices. It should be noted that this award actually goes to the office, including staff, not just the member of Congress. That is of course because we all know that while the member is the crucial leader of the office, he or she cannot succeed without the support of an outstanding team. Second, the Democracy Awards seeks to provide examples of best practices to other members of Congress, offering them roadmaps to improving their operations and services to constituents. Finally, we hope the Democracy Awards will increase public understanding of Congress.

We all know that Congress is not held in high regard by the American public. But those who really know the institution also know the real Congress is made up of amazing and dedicated public servants, tirelessly working for their constituents. CMF hopes that we can shine a light on those members and offices, if only for a brief moment, then perhaps we can chip away, if only a little bit, at the wall of cynicism in our nation.

And this is no easy award to win! The process for being selected as a winner is thoughtful, extensive and based on clear criteria. Offices self-nominate by providing some information on why they think they are an award-winning office. CMF staff will interview senior staff in the offices of candidates for the award and collect corroborating information and documents. The winners are selected by a committee primarily comprised of former members of Congress and staff. The results are an amazing display of outstanding public service and a roadmap to excellence for other congressional offices.

This year's winners include:

  • Rep. Dusty Johnson (R-S.D.), who employed a creative way to stay connected to his constituents during the pandemic while social distancing: He held "drive thru" town hall meetings in parking lots, where constituents could shout questions from their cars.
  • Rep. Katie Porter (D-Calif.), who empowers her team by giving a "Truth to Power" award every month to an outstanding staffer in the office who has shown individual initiative.
  • Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.), who created a nonpartisan Congressional Youth Advisory Academy designed to educate students on how Congress operates and the process by which public policies are formed.
  • Rep. Anthony Brown (D-Md.), who is so intent on demonstrating accountability to his constituents he often waits two to three hours after the end of a town hall meeting to wrap up, insisting on greeting and talking with every constituent attending until they leave the room.

The Democracy Awards are still nascent, only in their fourth year. But they are already generating the competitive spirit we hoped to create in Congress. At a 2020 panel briefing that included the previous year's winners, when a staffer described their innovative or award-winning practice, the other winners on the panel were feverishly taking notes!

At a time when partisan rhetoric is exacerbating the differences in the nation and Congress, it is refreshing to hear that a group of members of Congress have something in common: a passionate desire to serve their constituents and demonstrate excellence in public service. The denizens of the broader congressional community yearning to lift the August doldrums would be wise to study the successful practices of Democracy Awards winners. They might just be the tonic America needs to restore a little faith in government.

Read More

Pro-Trump protestors
Trump supporters who attempted to overturn the 2020 election results are now seeking influential election oversight roles in battleground states.
Andrew Lichtenstein/Getty Images

Loving Someone Who Thinks the Election Was Stolen

He’s the kind of man you’d want as a neighbor in a storm.

Big guy. Strong hands. The person you’d call if your car slid into a ditch. He lives rural, works hard, supports a wife and young son, and helps care for his aging mom. Life has not been easy, but he shows up anyway.

Keep ReadingShow less
Project 2025 Drives Trump’s State Dept Overhaul

U.S. President Donald Trump in the Oval Office of the White House on December 15, 2025 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

Project 2025 Drives Trump’s State Dept Overhaul

In May 2025, I wrote about the Trump administration’s early State Department reforms aligned with Project 2025, including calls for budget cuts, mission closures, and policy realignments. At the time, the most controversial move was an executive order targeting the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), shutting it down and freezing all federal foreign aid. This decision reflected Project 2025’s recommendation to scale back and "deradicalize" USAID by eliminating programs deemed overly politicized or inconsistent with conservative values. The report specifically criticized USAID for funding progressive initiatives, such as policies addressing systemic racism and central economic planning, arguing that U.S. foreign aid had become a "massive and open-ended global entitlement program" benefiting left-leaning organizations. The process connecting the report’s ideological critiques to this executive action involved a strategic alignment between key administration officials and Project 2025 architects, who lobbied for immediate policy adjustments. This coalition effectively linked the critique to policy by framing it as a necessary step toward realigning foreign aid with national interests and conservative principles.

Back then, I predicted even more sweeping changes to the State Department. Since May, several major developments have indeed reshaped the department:

Keep ReadingShow less
SNAP Isn’t a Negotiating Tool. It’s a Lifeline.
apples and bananas in brown cardboard box
Photo by Maria Lin Kim on Unsplash

SNAP Isn’t a Negotiating Tool. It’s a Lifeline.

Millions of families just survived the longest shutdown in U.S. history. Now they’re bracing again as politicians turn food assistance into a bargaining chip.

Food assistance should not be subject to politics, yet the Trump administration is now requiring over 20 Democratic-led states to share sensitive SNAP recipient data—including Social Security and immigration details—or risk losing funding. Officials call it "program integrity," but the effect is clear: millions of low-income families may once again have their access to food threatened by political disputes.

Keep ReadingShow less
Democrats’ Redistricting Gains Face New Court Battles Ahead of 2026 Elections
us a flag on white concrete building

Democrats’ Redistricting Gains Face New Court Battles Ahead of 2026 Elections

Earlier this year, I reported on Democrats’ redistricting wins in 2025, highlighting gains in states like California and North Carolina. As of December 18, the landscape has shifted again, with new maps finalized, ongoing court battles, and looming implications for the 2026 midterms.

Here are some key developments since mid‑2025:

  • California: Voters approved Proposition 50 in November, allowing legislature‑drawn maps that eliminated three safe Republican seats and made two more competitive. Democrats in vulnerable districts were redrawn into friendlier territory.
  • Virginia: On December 15, Democrats in the House of Delegates pushed a constitutional amendment on redistricting during a special session. Republicans denounced the move as unconstitutional, setting up a legal and political fight ahead of the 2026 elections.
  • Other states in play:
    • Ohio, Texas, Utah, Missouri, North Carolina: New maps are already in effect, reshaping battlegrounds.
    • Florida and Maryland: Legislatures have begun steps toward redistricting, though maps are not yet finalized.
    • New York: Court challenges may force changes to existing maps before 2026.
    • National picture: According to VoteHub’s tracker, the current district breakdown stands at 189 Democratic‑leaning, 205 Republican‑leaning, and 41 highly competitive seats.

Implications for 2026

  • Democrats’ wins in California and North Carolina strengthen their position, but legal challenges in Virginia and New York could blunt momentum.
  • Republicans remain favored in Texas and Ohio, where maps were redrawn to secure GOP advantages.
  • The unusually high number of mid‑decade redistricting efforts — not seen at this scale since the 1800s — underscores how both parties are aggressively shaping the battlefield for 2026.
So, here's the BIG PICTURE: The December snapshot shows Democrats still benefiting from redistricting in key states, but the fight is far from settled. With courts weighing in and legislatures maneuvering, the balance of power heading into the 2026 House elections remains fluid. What began as clear Democratic wins earlier in 2025 has evolved into a multi‑front contest over maps, legality, and political control.

Hugo Balta is the executive editor of the Fulcrum and the publisher of the Latino News Network