Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Maryland primary offers glimpse into state of the Republican Party

Kelly Schulz

Republican gubernatorial candidate Kelly Schulz has been endorsed by the man she hopes to replace, Gov. Larry Hogan.

Michael S. Williamson/The Washington Post via Getty Images

The results of the Maryland gubernatorial primary, which wraps up Tuesday, may provide insight into the state of the Republican Party with the leading candidates serving as proxies for the MAGA and moderate wings of the GOP.

Among the four candidates seeking the party’s nomination are Del. Dan Cox, who has been endorsed by former President Donald Trump, and former state Commerce Secretary Kelly Schulz, who has been endorsed by the man she hopes to succeed, Gov. Larry Hogan.

The winner will face one of 10 candidates for the Democratic nomination. There are another 10 people seeking the Republican nomination to challenge Sen. Chris Van Hollen, and every U.S. House race has at least one competitive primary.


Maryland has term limits, preventing Hogan, a popular moderate Republican in a state that has Democratic supermajorities in the legislature, from seeking a third term. Recent polling had Cox slightly ahead of Schulz, but with nearly half of GOP voters undecided.

About 175,000 people cast ballots during Maryland’s eight days of early voting. The state has closed primaries, meaning only people registered with a party may participate in the primary.

Since the outbreak of Covid-19, Maryland’s divided government has instituted a number of legislative changes that have made it easier for people to vote.

In 2020 and 2021, the state enacted a pair of laws expanding the use of mail-in voting. The first requires that absentee ballots include prepaid postage and the second created permanent absentee voter lists, open to anyone eligible to vote by mail.

Among other changes:

  • A 2021 law requires public safety officials to provide voter registration materials to eligible voters upon their release from correctional facilities.
  • Another 2021 law punishes anyone who engages in campaign activities that obstruct access to drop boxes.
  • Two laws, one enacted in 2019 and another in 2020, expanded the use of voting centers.

The state hasn’t done a lot this year to change election laws this year. One enacted bill allowing the Board of Elections to place polling places in buildings where a business may have a liquor license. Another makes changes to campaign finance laws.

More notable is a bill that didn’t become law. In May, Hogan vetoed a bill that would have allowed voters to fix, or “cure,” rejected ballots and election officials to verify mail ballots earlier than currently allowed. While Hogan said he supported those provisions, he also wanted the bill to include a signature matching section.

Read more about voting changes in Maryland.


Read More

Fueling the Future: The Debate Over California’s Gas Tax and Transportation Funding
person in red shirt wearing silver bracelet holding red and black metal tool
Photo by Wassim Chouak on Unsplash

Fueling the Future: The Debate Over California’s Gas Tax and Transportation Funding

This nonpartisan policy brief, written by an ACE fellow, is republished by The Fulcrum as part of our partnership with the Alliance for Civic Engagement and our NextGen initiative — elevating student voices, strengthening civic education, and helping readers better understand democracy and public policy.

Key Takeaways

Keep ReadingShow less
A person looking at social media app icons on a phone

Gen Z is quietly leaving social media as algorithmic feeds, infinite scroll, and addictive platform design fuel anxiety, isolation, and mental health struggles.

Matt Cardy/Getty Images

Gen Z Begs Legislators: Make Social Media Social Again

Lately, it seems like each time I reach out to an old acquaintance through social media, I’m met with a page that reads, “This account doesn’t exist anymore.”

Many Gen-Z’ers are quietly quitting the platforms we grew up on.

Keep ReadingShow less
Open Letter to Justice Roberts: Partisan Gerrymandering Is Unconstitutional
beige concrete building under blue sky during daytime

Open Letter to Justice Roberts: Partisan Gerrymandering Is Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court, in holding that partisan gerrymandering is permissible—unless it "goes too far"—stated that the argument made against this practice based on the Court's "one person, one vote" doctrine didn't work because the cases that developed that doctrine were about ensuring that each vote had an equal weight. The Court reasoned that after redistricting, each vote still has equal weight.

I would respectfully disagree. After admittedly partisan redistricting, each vote does not have an equal weight. The purpose of partisan gerrymandering is typically to create a "safe" seat—to group citizens so that the dominant political party has a clear majority of the voters. It's the transformation of a contested seat or even a seat safe for the other party into a safe seat for the party doing the redistricting.

Keep ReadingShow less