Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Fellowship brings Gen Z voices into democracy and podcasting

podcast mic in the middle of a red and blue America
Topdesigner/Getty Images

Spinelle is the founder of The Democracy Group podcast network and the communications lead for the McCourtney Institute for Democracy at Penn State.

According to Edison Research, nearly half of Gen Z are monthly podcast listeners. But their voices are largely absent from podcasts about democracy, civic engagement and civil discourse. The Democracy Group’s podcast fellowship, which recently completed its third cohort, aims to change that.


This spring, five high school and college students from across the country were mentored by the hosts and producers in the network, along with Network Manager Brandon Stover, to create their own podcasts. Thanks to support from the Bridge Alliance Education Fund (publisher of The Fulcrum), we were able to purchase recording equipment for each fellow.

The shows the fellows created represent their diverse backgrounds and interests, and each is a foundation that can be sustained beyond the initial episode. I hope you enjoy listening to these episodes as much as I did.

‘Democracy Beyond Borders,’ hosted by Aprile Kim

Drawing from Kim’s experience of growing up and living in Guam, “Democracy Beyond Borders” seeks to explore the complexities of democracy in the modern world and examine the international impact of American policies. The podcast will take listeners through America's current affairs and political ideas to examine democracy. In the first episode, we hear about the contradictory behaviors in American politics and the intricacies of American democracy.

Kim is a rising fourth-year student at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor and is pursuing a double major in political science and philosophy and a double minor in Japanese and international studies, with a thematic focus on international security, norms, and cooperation.

‘Jonesin’ Around,’ hosted by Virginia Jones

Through “Jonesin' Around,” Jones will explore political topics and engage in meaningful discussions that bring people together from all walks of life and across the political spectrum. Using a light and accessible tone, “Jonesin' Around” wants to find the common ground between opposing political ideas and change conversation manners one at a time. Each episode will tackle a national issue and the first two weeks feature discussions with leading academics who examine all sides of the political topic.

Jones is a student at the University of South Carolina majoring in public relations with a minor in political science. A few years ago, she discovered her interest in politics, particularly in political media, and decided to incorporate this passion into her education.

‘Make America Great for Everyone,’ hosted by Kayla Anderson

“Make America Great For Everyone” will take a deep dive into the American justice system through conversations with police officers, ex-prisoners and people who experienced injustice firsthand. Anderson will talk about all of the different issues currently plaguing the American system that is supposed to be just, starting with a heartfelt conversation with her brother in the first episode.

Anderson is a rising fourth-year political science major on the pre-law track at Ohio State. She currently serves as the vice president of the Undergraduate Black Law Student Association, treasurer of the Minority Collegiate Outreach and Support Team, and DEI committee co-chair for her Law and Society Scholars Program.

‘Laws Across Borders,’ hosted by Simran Gupta

Utilizing Gupta’s network of friends from all over the world, “Laws Across Borders” will explore educational topics like the school systems, technology or academic pressure and how they vary from country to country. The first episode will focus on school environments, touching on both the technological and academic sides.

Gupta is a rising high school senior in Georgia. She believes that life is all about learning new things, but interpreting information in a way that’s meaningful is difficult, especially in this day and age where news is readily available and shared whether it’s accurate or not.

‘Uneven Grounds,’ hosted by Maggie LeBeau

Using a solutions-based approach, “Uneven Grounds” will discuss inequalities in geography and navigate geographic social issues in each episode. LeBeau wants to bring attention to the many problems people across America encounter daily because of where they live, with a solution to each of the issues. The first episode explores election inequality and how they are related to geography, with gerrymandering being a key issue. LeBeau recently graduated from Glenbard East High School in Lombard, Ill., where she served as editor-in-chief of the school’s newspaper, the Echo. Outside of school, she is a part of the Media Wise Teen Fact-Checking Network and PBS Student Reporting Labs.

The next podcast fellowship cohort will begin in the fall. For more information, visit democracygroup.org/fellowship or subscribe to our newsletter to receive information when fellowship applications open.


Read More

AI - Its Use, Misuse, and Regulation
Glowing ai chip on a circuit board.
Photo by Immo Wegmann on Unsplash

AI - Its Use, Misuse, and Regulation

There has been no shortage of articles hailing the opportunity of AI and ones forecasting disaster from AI. I understand the good uses to which AI could be put, but I am also well aware of the ways in which AI is dangerous or will denigrate our lives as thinking human beings.

First, the good uses. There is no question that AI can outthink human beings, regardless of how famous or knowledgeable, because of the amount of information it can process in a short amount of time. The most powerful accounts I've read have been in the field of medical research: doctors have fed facts into AI, asking for a diagnosis or a possible remedy, and AI has come up with remarkable answers beyond the human mind's capability.

Keep ReadingShow less
Overbroad AI Export Controls Risk Forfeiting the AI Race
a black keyboard with a blue button on it

Overbroad AI Export Controls Risk Forfeiting the AI Race

The nation that wins the global AI race will hold decisive military and economic advantages. That’s why President Trump’s January 2025 AI Action Plan declared: “It is the policy of the United States to sustain and enhance America’s global AI dominance in order to promote human flourishing, economic competitiveness, and national security.”

However, AI global dominance does not just mean producing the best AI systems. It also means that the American “AI Stack” – the layered collection of tools, technologies, and frameworks that organizations use to build, train, deploy, and manage artificial intelligence applications – will become the international standard for this world-changing technology. As such, advancing a commonsense export policy for American AI chips will play a decisive role in determining whether the United States remains embedded at the core of global AI development or is gradually displaced by rival systems.

Keep ReadingShow less
Digital generated image of green semi transparent AI word on white circuit board visualizing smart technology.

What can the success of SEMATECH teach us about winning the AI race? Explore how a bold U.S. public-private partnership revived the semiconductor industry—and why a similar model could be key to advancing AI innovation today.

Getty Images, Andriy Onufriyenko

A Proven Playbook for AI Leadership: Lessons from America’s Chip Comeback

Imagine waking up to this paragraph in your favorite newspaper:

The willingness of the U.S. government to eschew partisanship and undertake a bold experiment -- an experiment based on cooperation as opposed to traditional procurement, and with accountability standards rooted in trust instead of elaborate regulations -- has led the U.S. to a position of preeminence in an industry which is vital to our nation's security and economic well-being.

Keep ReadingShow less
A large group of people is depicted while invisible systems actively scan and analyze individuals within the crowd

Anthropic’s lawsuit against the Trump administration over a Pentagon “supply-chain risk” label raises major constitutional questions about AI policy, corporate speech, and political retaliation.

Getty Images, Flavio Coelho

Anthropic Sues Trump Over ‘Unlawful’ AI Retaliation

Anthropic’s dispute with the Trump administration is no longer just about AI policy; it has escalated into a constitutional test of whether American companies can uphold their values against political retaliation. After the administration labeled Anthropic a “supply‑chain risk”, a designation historically reserved for foreign adversaries, and ordered federal agencies to cease using its technology, the company did not yield. Instead, Anthropic filed two lawsuits: one in the Northern District of California and another in the D.C. Circuit, each challenging different aspects of the government’s actions and calling them “unprecedented and unlawful.”

The Pentagon has now formally issued the supply‑chain risk designation, triggering immediate cancellations of federal contracts and jeopardizing “hundreds of millions of dollars” in near‑term revenue. Anthropic’s filings describe the losses as “unrecoverable,” with reputational damage compounding the financial harm. Yet even as the government blacklists the company, the Pentagon continues using Claude in classified systems because the model is deeply embedded in wartime workflows. This contradiction underscores the political nature of the designation: a tool deemed too “dangerous” to be used by federal agencies is simultaneously indispensable in active military operations.

Keep ReadingShow less