Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

A different take on social media and democracy

A person looking at social media app icons on a phone
Matt Cardy/Getty Images

This episode of the “Democracy Works” podcast featured an engaging interview with V, the creator behind Under the Desk News on TikTok. V discussed the evolution of their social media presence, emphasizing the role of social media as a modern day "third place" for community, replacing traditional physical spaces for socializing. They highlighted the importance of online spaces, particularly for marginalized groups, providing a sense of belonging and connection.

The conversation delved into the impact of social media on loneliness, with V asserting that it serves as a remedy to the lack of physical third places. They argued that social media, despite its criticisms, plays a crucial role in fostering community, especially for individuals who might feel isolated in their local environments.


V debunked the notion that social media is the cause of loneliness, attributing it instead to the lack of stability and comfort in real-life interactions. Drawing on personal experiences and examples, they highlighted how social media platforms like TikTok create spaces for representation and connection, especially for those in less accepting or diverse environments.

The discussion also touched on the changing dynamics of news consumption among Generation Z. V challenged stereotypes, emphasizing that young people are actively engaged in civic matters, particularly issues like gun activism, racial equality, women's rights and climate change. They stressed the importance of respecting and understanding Gen Z's perspectives rather than dismissing them based on misconceptions.

Towards the end, V talked about the future of news media and its integration with social platforms. They highlighted the challenges and opportunities for traditional media to adapt to new formats like TikTok and YouTube shorts. V's insights shed light on the evolving landscape of news dissemination and the need for a collaborative approach between traditional media and social media creators.

The episode concluded with a discussion about democracy, focusing on how Gen Z perceives it. V challenged the idea that young people are disinterested in democracy, asserting that they care deeply but are disillusioned with the current political system. They emphasized the importance of understanding and addressing the concerns of younger generations to foster meaningful civic engagement.

In the latter part, V introduced their new podcast, "American Fever Dream," which aims to spotlight down-ballot candidates making impactful changes at the state and local levels. The podcast seeks to provide a comfortable space for reflection on democracy, politics, and pop culture, incorporating humor and analysis.

Read More

Fox News’ Selective Silence: How Trump’s Worst Moments Vanish From Coverage
Why Fox News’ settlement with Dominion Voting Systems is good news for all media outlets
Getty Images

Fox News’ Selective Silence: How Trump’s Worst Moments Vanish From Coverage

Last week, the ultraconservative news outlet, NewsMax, reached a $73 million settlement with the voting machine company, Dominion, in essence, admitting that they lied in their reporting about the use of their voting machines to “rig” or distort the 2020 presidential election. Not exactly shocking news, since five years later, there is no credible evidence to suggest any malfeasance regarding the 2020 election. To viewers of conservative media, such as Fox News, this might have shaken a fully embraced conspiracy theory. Except it didn’t, because those viewers haven’t seen it.

Many people have a hard time understanding why Trump enjoys so much support, given his outrageous statements and damaging public policy pursuits. Part of the answer is due to Fox News’ apparent censoring of stories that might be deemed negative to Trump. During the past five years, I’ve tracked dozens of examples of news stories that cast Donald Trump in a negative light, including statements by Trump himself, which would make a rational person cringe. Yet, Fox News has methodically censored these stories, only conveying rosy news that draws its top ratings.

Keep ReadingShow less
U.S. Flag / artificial intelligence / technology / congress / ai

The age of AI warrants asking if the means still further the ends—specifically, individual liberty and collective prosperity.

Getty Images, Douglas Rissing

Liberty and the General Welfare in the Age of AI

If the means justify the ends, we’d still be operating under the Articles of Confederation. The Founders understood that the means—the governmental structure itself—must always serve the ends of liberty and prosperity. When the means no longer served those ends, they experimented with yet another design for their government—they did expect it to be the last.

The age of AI warrants asking if the means still further the ends—specifically, individual liberty and collective prosperity. Both of those goals were top of mind for early Americans. They demanded the Bill of Rights to protect the former, and they identified the latter—namely, the general welfare—as the animating purpose for the government. Both of those goals are being challenged by constitutional doctrines that do not align with AI development or even undermine it. A full review of those doctrines could fill a book (and perhaps one day it will). For now, however, I’m just going to raise two.

Keep ReadingShow less
An illustration of AI chat boxes.

An illustration of AI chat boxes.

Getty Images, Andriy Onufriyenko

In Defense of ‘AI Mark’

Earlier this week, a member of the UK Parliament—Mark Sewards—released an AI tool (named “AI Mark”) to assist with constituent inquiries. The public response was rapid and rage-filled. Some people demanded that the member of Parliament (MP) forfeit part of his salary—he's doing less work, right? Others called for his resignation—they didn't vote for AI; they voted for him! Many more simply questioned his thinking—why on earth did he think outsourcing such sensitive tasks to AI would be greeted with applause?

He's not the only elected official under fire for AI use. The Prime Minister of Sweden, Ulf Kristersson, recently admitted to using AI to study various proposals before casting votes. Swedes, like the Brits, have bombarded Kristersson with howls of outrage.

Keep ReadingShow less
shallow focus photography of computer codes
Shahadat Rahman on Unsplash

When Rules Can Be Code, They Should Be!

Ninety years ago this month, the Federal Register Act was signed into law in a bid to shine a light on the rules driving President Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal—using the best tools of the time to make government more transparent and accountable. But what began as a bold step toward clarity has since collapsed under its own weight: over 100,000 pages, a million rules, and a public lost in a regulatory haystack. Today, the Trump administration’s sweeping push to cut red tape—including using AI to hunt obsolete rules—raises a deeper challenge: how do we prevent bureaucracy from rebuilding itself?

What’s needed is a new approach: rewriting the rule book itself as machine-executable code that can be analyzed, implemented, or streamlined at scale. Businesses could simply download and execute the latest regulations on their systems, with no need for costly legal analysis and compliance work. Individuals could use apps or online tools to quickly figure out how rules affect them.

Keep ReadingShow less