Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Ask Joe: Conviction in fierce civility

Ask Joe: Conviction in fierce civility

Hello Joe,

I have a couple of people in my team that I supervise that are diametrically opposed politically. I have done my best to keep politics out of work, but it’s only getting worse. I’ve spoken to them both individually and I’ve given them warnings, but that doesn’t seem to work. I don’t want to lose them; they are good workers. But I don’t know what to do. Any ideas?


Done

Hey Done,

When I’m working with organizations on issues like this, I, of course, gather information from all sides before I offer a strategy. With the information you have given, I can offer general suggestions.

I think your “pen name” says it all: done. It sounds like you’ve done your best to deal with this situation in a civil way, expecting the two to step up and work it out. They are not. So, now it’s time to add some fierceness to your civility. In other words, I would suggest that this be the underlying message: “I need to see right away some movement towards finding solutions to this.” Has it gone so far for you to talk to HR to see what steps you can take? You may want to do that as part of your preparation for a conversation.

If you’ve read my past articles, you may have heard me say a number of times, “You can’t change people but you can influence behavior. People don’t change; they transform.” You are not asking them to become something they are not; you are not asking them to change their viewpoints and beliefs. You are letting them know that their behavior is working against the core values of how you would like you and your team to treat one another, and it must shift.

I would start with speaking with each of them individually to let them know that you want to schedule a meeting with the three of you. Let them know the urgency of the situation. And before you meet, make sure you are well prepared – facts, documentation, knowledge of company procedure, your strategy and approach.

Something to remember is that nobody wants to have these kinds of conversations, so they will most likely revert to patterns to avoid the issue. An important part of the strategy is to prevent these fight-flight-freeze responses from others and help them be more receptive and malleable to hear and receive the urgency of what you want to communicate.

In order to do that, remember these 4 key points:

  • Do your best to keep your nervous system regulated so you can stay clear, in your power and not easily thrown off.
  • Meet the others where they are. Some of us need more time to process and open up to change. While you want to see concrete shifts in behavior, the best way to ensure a lasting effect is to let them start from where they are and progress from there.
  • Create a space of more safety and trust. This minimizes their reactivity and also helps them open to working together to come up with solutions to the problem.
  • Speak your truth. When you commit to sharing your perspective on the situation, you give the other the benefit of the doubt and give them a chance to share their truth. By doing this, you get more buy-in and usually learn something new.

As you start the meeting, set some clear guidelines and rules of engagement to ensure respect and safety. When I am working with individuals or groups who are at odds with each other, or in opposition with each other, I introduce a question that is key to the Fierce Civility mediation approach: “Acknowledging the fact that you will not necessarily get everything you want, are you prepared to put in the work to find a solution that works for both of you, as well as the rest of us?” This can take minutes, hours, days or weeks to get all parties to buy in. But the dialogues that transpire help facilitate the necessary truth-telling, healing, reconciliation and finding common ground that needs to precede working towards solutions.

If you get a direct “no,” then you have your answer as to whether they are in alignment with your company’s values, and at this point you can discuss if this is the best work environment for them. If they say “yes,” then you have the buy-in needed to ensure that they take responsibility for their actions and take some concrete steps towards resolution of the issue.

The Rolling Stones knew what they were talking about: Not getting everything you want doesn’t mean that you can’t get what you need. When all involved can clarify their needs, then you have plenty of creative material for all of you to work together to make the situation work for everyone. Win-win.

I hope this gives you some sense of clarity and confidence to move forward, Done. Again, without knowing the specifics or your situation, I can’t tell if this will work in this context. If you’d like to explore this approach more, check out my book, Fierce Civility.

Find the conviction, clarity, focus and compassion in your fierceness,

Joe

Check out Joe’s new bestselling book Fierce Civility: Transforming our Global Culture from Polarization to Lasting Peace.

Have a question for Joe? Send an email to AskJoe@fulcrum.us.

Read More

Iguanas on the Tombstones: A Poet's Metaphor for Colonialism​
Photo illustration by Yunuen Bonaparte for palabra

Iguanas on the Tombstones: A Poet's Metaphor for Colonialism​

Iguanas may seem like an unconventional subject for verse. Yet their ubiquitous presence caught the attention of Puerto Rican poet Martín Espada when he visited a historic cemetery in Old San Juan, the burial place of pro-independence voices from political leader Pedro Albizu Campos to poet and political activist José de Diego.

“It was quite a sight to witness these iguanas sunning themselves on a wall of that cemetery, or slithering from one tomb to the next, or squatting on the tomb of Albizu Campos, or staring up at the bust of José de Diego, with a total lack of comprehension, being iguanas,” Espada told palabra from his home in the western Massachusetts town of Shelburne Falls.

Keep ReadingShow less
Does One Battle After Another Speak to Latino Resistance?

Leonardo DiCaprio, Benicio del Toro, Chase Infiniti, and Paul Thomas Anderson pose during the fan event for the movie 'One Battle After Another' at Plaza Toreo Parque Central on September 18, 2025 in Naucalpan de Juarez, Mexico.

(Photo by Eloisa Sanchez/Getty Images)

Does One Battle After Another Speak to Latino Resistance?

After decades of work, Angeleno director P.T. Anderson has scored his highest-grossing film with his recent One Battle After Another. Having opened on the weekend of September 26, the film follows the fanatical, even surrealistic, journey of washed-up revolutionary Bob Ferguson (Leonardo DiCaprio), who lives in hiding with his teenage daughter, Willa (Chase Infiniti), some fifteen years after his militant group, French 75, went underground. When their nemesis Colonel Lockjaw (Sean Penn) resurfaces, Bob and Wila again find themselves running from the law. When Wila goes AWOL, her karate teacher, Sensei Sergio St. Carlos (Benicio del Toro), is enlisted to help Bob find his daughter. Although ambitious, edgy, and fun, the political message of the hit film is generally muddled. The immensely talented director did not make a film matching the Leftist rigor of, say, Battleship Potemkin. Nor can the film be grouped among a veritable cavalcade of fictional and non-fictional films produced during the last twenty years that deal with immigrant issues along the U.S.-Mexico Border. Sleep Dealer, El Norte, and Who is Dayani Cristal? are but a few of the stronger offerings of a genre of filmmaking that, for both good and bad, may constitute a true cinematic cottage industry.

Nevertheless, the film leans heavily into Latino culture in terms of themes, setting, and characters. Filmed largely in the U.S.’s Bordertown par excellence—El Paso, Texas—we meet the martial arts teacher Sergio, who describes his work helping migrants cross the border as a “Latino Harriet Tubman situation.” We learn that the fugitive revolutionary, Bob, is known by several aliases, including “The Gringo Coyote.” His savior, Sensei Sergio, explains to him outrightly that he’s “a bad hombre”—cheekily invoking the hurtful bon mots used by then-candidate Donald Trump in a 2016 debate with Hilary Clinton. The epithet is repeated later on in the film when Bob, under police surveillance in the hospital, is tipped off to an exit route by a member of the French 75 disguised as a nurse: “Are you diabetic? You’re a bad hombre, Bob. You know, if you’re a bad hombre, you make sure you take your insulin on a daily basis, right?” All this, plus the fact that the film’s denouement begins with a raid on a Mexican Restaurant in Northern California.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Jimmy Kimmel onstage during the 67th GRAMMY Awards

Jimmy Kimmel onstage during the 67th GRAMMY Awards on February 01, 2025, in Los Angeles, California

Getty Images, Johnny Nunez

Why the Fight Over Jimmy Kimmel Matters for Us All

There are moments in a nation’s cultural life that feel, at first, like passing storms—brief, noisy, and soon forgotten. But every so often, what begins as a squall reveals itself as a warning: a sign that something far bigger is at stake. The initial cancellation of Jimmy Kimmel by Disney, along with the coordinated blackout from network affiliates like Nexstar and Sinclair, is one of those moments. It’s not merely another skirmish in the endless culture wars. Actually, it is a test of whether we, as a society, can distinguish between the discomfort of being challenged and the danger of being silenced.

The irony is rich, almost to the point of being absurd. Here is a late-night comedian, a man whose job is to puncture the pompous and needle the powerful, finding himself at the center of a controversy. A controversy bigger than anything he’d ever lampooned. Satire that, depending on your perspective, was either too pointed or simply pointed in the wrong direction. Yet, that was not the ostensible reason.

Keep ReadingShow less
Bad Bunny preforming on stage alongside two other people.

Bad Bunny performs live during "No Me Quiero Ir De Aquí; Una Más" Residencia at Coliseo de Puerto Rico José Miguel Agrelot on September 20, 2025 in San Juan, Puerto Rico

Getty Images, Gladys Vega

From Woodstock to Super Bowl: Bad Bunny and the Legacy of Musical Protest

As Bad Bunny prepares to take the Super Bowl stage in February 2026—and grassroots rallies in his honor unfold across U.S. cities this October—we are witnessing a cultural moment that echoes the artist-led protests of the 1960s and 70s. His decision to exclude U.S. tour dates over fears of ICE raids is generating considerable anger amongst his following, as well as support from MAGA supporters. The Trump administration views his lyrics and his fashion as threats. As the story unfolds, it is increasingly becoming a political narrative rather than just entertainment news.

Music has long been a part of the American political scene. In 1969, Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young released “Ohio,” a response to the Kent State shootings that galvanized antiwar sentiment.

Keep ReadingShow less