Skip to content
Project 2025
Donate to support
diverse voices
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories
As Pressures Mount, Trump Faces the Most Precarious Moment of His Presidency

As Pressures Mount, Trump Faces the Most Precarious Moment of His Presidency

People voting at voting booths.

The Quiet Campaign That Could Rewrite the 2028 Election

The Minneapolis Shooting Is Not an Aberration — It’s a Warning of What Comes Next

The Minneapolis Shooting Is Not an Aberration — It’s a Warning of What Comes Next

Vance’s Claims on ICE Shooting Don’t Match the Evidence

Vance’s Claims on ICE Shooting Don’t Match the Evidence

Can Things Get Even Worse for Mike Johnson?

Can Things Get Even Worse for Mike Johnson?

Ask Joe: Respectful confrontation and fierce civility

Ask Joe: Respectful confrontation and fierce civility
Joe Weston
By Joe WestonMar 10, 2023
Joe Weston

Joe is an advice columnist, conflict resolution specialist, trainer, coach, advocate for lasting peace, and founder of the Fierce Civility Project.

See More Writings by author

Joe’s book, Fierce Civility: Transforming our Global Culture from Polarization to Lasting Peace, launched on March 9, 2023.

Dear Joe,

I have enjoyed your articles. I like that you approach everything from a human place. It seems we’ve stopped doing that. I wanted to know though why you are so focused on odd titles of your work? Respectful Confrontation, Fierce Civility? What about something like compassionate conversations or something like that?

Intrigued

Hey Intrigued,

I love your response! I received your response a while back, but I decided to save it for this week because I thought it would be appropriate to respond to you in the week of the launch of my new book, Fierce Civility: Transforming our Global Culture from Polarization to Lasting Peace. We had our launch yesterday on March 9th with a special one-day discounted price of $.099 for the pre-order of the ebook; but for The Fulcrum readers I’m extending it one more day. Feel free to purchase if you are interested.

Yes, I think things would be easier for me if I used less provocative phrases, but while I believe that there are many great models of communication that focus more in that direction, I personally think we need approaches that can meet and stand up to the level of volatility, agitation and sometimes violent ways we are currently treating each other without adding to the aggression or noise. Bullying and niceness are not going to solve our current challenges; a fierce level of cooperation will.

I guess this quest starts with me growing up in a volatile family situation. There was a lot of fighting and arguments. And I saw very clearly, even as a boy, that it wasn’t leading us anywhere productive. I had to learn at an early age how I could be authentic, get my voice heard and needs met, and still stay in alignment with my core values.

Without knowing it, we get pidgeon-holed into polarizing categories. What I mean by polarizing, is that when we don’t take the time to investigate, we only think we have two options. The tough “guy” OR the nice “guy,” the bully OR the pushover. We see it in our political discourse, in movies and cartoons. We get limited to only this OR that, and we get stuck, being forced to choose one or the other.

Being stuck in these unintentionally self-assigned roles, we perpetuate these patterns that have led to an increased breakdown of civil discourse and any hope of finding new solutions to our problems. If that is the case, until we break out of these patterns, we get more aggressive, or apathetic and cynical.

Both Respectful Confrontation and Fierce Civility create a kind of tension that breaks us out of these patterns. By unifying these seemingly polarizing approaches, we open the door to more than two options. Suddenly we increase our choices in how we approach situations; the more choices we have, the more power we have.

These phrases are designed to make us a little uncomfortable in order to wake us up out of habitual patterning. It’s only in the uncomfortable moments that we can get back to presence, connection and the capacity to access our creativity. Notice I say uncomfortable and not unsafe. We all know too well how unsafe moments or traumatic events can get us activated in a new way. Think of events in your life, or global events, like September 11th or the Covid-19 pandemic. These moments certainly woke us up out of our daily habitual routines; it caused us to think and evaluate how we were currently doing things and forced us to find new ways to engage with ourselves, others and the world. But staying in states of trauma is not a good long-term strategy.

When we can train ourselves to not be overly respectful or confrontational but an exciting moment-to-moment balance of the two, when we can approach the challenges of our lives with a dynamic interplay of both fierceness and civility, we call ourselves and others to a level of presence and connection that can be transformational. We create a necessary friction that somehow alchemizes our conversation and interactions in a way that inspires, uplifts and challenges one another to be our best selves.

This is not easy; it has taken me years to harness and embody the skills and strategies necessary to both achieve and maintain this, even in challenging conversations and with people who hold different views. But I truly believe that our world is calling all of us to upgrade our current communication skills and strategies to bring about lasting change. Both methods of mine give practical guidance on how to achieve that.

The seeds of our solutions to our personal and global problems already exist, Intrigued, ready to spring forth with vibrant life. We just need a way to engage that cultivates and ensures that they take root, grow and thrive, and doesn’t continue to stomp any hopes for a better future into the ground. We need a model of communication that brings us back to our hearts, ensures that we set clear boundaries and take care of ourselves, where we step into a level of boldness that nurtures and protects the best of who we are as human beings.

Let’s be uncomfortable,

Joe

Learn more about Joe Weston and his work here. Make sure to c heck out Joe’s bestselling book Fierce Civility: Transforming our Global Culture from Polarization to Lasting Peace, published March 2023.

Have a question for Joe? Send an email to AskJoe@fulcrum.us.


Latest news

The Lie of “Safe” State Violence in America: Montgomery Then, Minneapolis Now
Ethics & Leadership

The Lie of “Safe” State Violence in America: Montgomery Then, Minneapolis Now

Two groups of glass figures. One red, one blue.
Governance & Legislation

How Congress Lost Its Capacity to Act and How to Get It Back

America’s Two Economies - Soaring Stocks and Slashed Food Stamps
Economy

America’s Two Economies - Soaring Stocks and Slashed Food Stamps

Trump Signs Defense Bill Prohibiting China-Based Engineers in Pentagon IT Work
Media & Technology

Trump Signs Defense Bill Prohibiting China-Based Engineers in Pentagon IT Work

Read More

Baltazar Enríquez: Perspectives from Little Village Community Council President

Baltazar Enriquez stands with "ICE OUT OF CHICAGO" sign in Chicago's Little Village neighborhood

Teresa Ayala Leon

Baltazar Enríquez: Perspectives from Little Village Community Council President

Baltzar Enríquez was born in Michoacán, Mexico, and moved to Chicago at the age of three. Little Village, often called “The Mexico of the Midwest,” became his new home, a community he has grown to love and serve. In 2008, Enríquez joined the Little Village Community Council, a nonprofit organization originally founded in 1957. Upon becoming a member, he noticed the lack of participation and limited community programs available for residents. In 2020, he was named president of the council and began expanding, introducing initiatives such as Equal Education for Latinos, among other resources for the Little Village community. Enríquez reflected on his years of involvement and how he has navigated leading the council amid the current political climate.

Question: What inspired you most to get involved in the council?

Keep ReadingShow less
Freezing Child Care Funding Throws the Baby Out with the Bathwater
boy's writing on book
Photo by Andrew Ebrahim on Unsplash

Freezing Child Care Funding Throws the Baby Out with the Bathwater

In the South, there is an idiom that says, “Don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater.” It means not discarding something valuable while trying to eliminate something harmful. The Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) proposed response to unsubstantiated child care fraud allegations in Minnesota risks doing exactly that.

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has frozen child care and family assistance grants in five states, and reports indicate that this action may be extended nationwide. Fraud at any level is wrong and should be thoroughly investigated, and once proven to be true, addressed. However, freezing child care payments and family assistance grants based on the views of a single social media “influencer” is an overcorrection that threatens the stability of child care programs and leaves families without care options through no fault of their own.

Across the nation, Americans rely heavily on child care. According to the Center for American Progress, nearly 70 percent of children under age six had all available parents in the workforce in 2023, underscoring how essential child care is to family and economic stability.

Child care funding, therefore, is not optional. It is a necessity that must remain stable and predictable.

Without consistent funding, child care operations are forced to significantly reduce capacity, and some are forced to close altogether. In 2025, a longtime family child care owner made the difficult decision to close her business after state budget cuts eliminated critical child care funding. While this example reflects a state-level funding failure, the impact is the same. When funding becomes unreliable, as is the case with the current funding freeze, child care business owners, employees, parents, and children all suffer.

The economic consequences extend well beyond families. According to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, when parents cannot find or afford child care, they are pushed out of the workforce, and businesses lose skilled employees. Child care gaps disrupt staffing across industries and cost states an estimated $1 billion annually in lost economic activity.

Child care is no longer just a family issue. It is an economic issue. It is one of the few sectors that directly affects every other industry. At a time when women are being encouraged to have more children, a strong support system must also exist, and that includes consistent, reliable child care funding.

Misuse of government funds is not a new concept. During the COVID-19 pandemic, more than $200 billion in federal relief funding across programs was reportedly misused. Fraud occurs in every industry, and no system is immune to it.

If allegations of child care fraud are substantiated, safeguards should absolutely be implemented to prevent future misuse; however, freezing child care funding would further delay payments to a sector already plagued by late reimbursements, disrupt services for children and families, and destabilize small businesses that operate on thin margins.

The solution is straightforward. Strengthen oversight to mitigate risk, without punishing the entire field. We must acknowledge that the vast majority of child care programs operate in good faith and in compliance with the law, providing care to millions of children nationwide. According to a 2020 report by the United States Government Accountability Office, only seven states since 2013 have had errors in more than 10 percent of their child care fund payments.

Yes, accountability matters, but solutions must be precise and measured. Sweeping actions based on unsubstantiated claims destabilize the entire child care system. When child care collapses, families lose care, caregivers lose income, small businesses close, and the economy suffers.

We can strengthen safeguards without dismantling the system that families and the economy depend on. We can address misuse if and where it exists. But we cannot afford to throw the baby out with the bathwater.

Eboni Delaney is the Director of Policy and Movement Building at the National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC), and a Public Voices Fellow of the OpEd Project in Partnership with the National Black Child Development Institute.

Keep ReadingShow less
It’s The Democracy, Stupid!

Why democracy reform keeps failing—and why the economy suffers as a result. A rethink of representation and political power.

Getty Images, Orbon Alija

It’s The Democracy, Stupid!

The economic pain that now defines everyday life for so many people is often treated as a separate problem, something to be solved with better policy, smarter technocrats, or a new round of targeted fixes. Wages stagnate, housing becomes unreachable, healthcare bankrupts families, monopolies tighten their grip, and public services decay. But these outcomes are not accidents, nor are they the result of abstract market forces acting in isolation. They are the predictable consequence of a democratic order that has come apart at the seams. Our deepest crisis is not economic. It is democratic. The economy is merely where that crisis becomes visible and painful.

When democracy weakens, power concentrates. When power concentrates, it seeks insulation from accountability. Over time, wealth and political authority fuse into a self-reinforcing system that governs in the name of the people while quietly serving private interests. This is how regulatory agencies become captured, how tax codes grow incomprehensible except to those who pay to shape them, how antitrust laws exist on paper but rarely in practice, and how labor protections erode while corporate protections harden. None of this requires overt corruption. It operates legally, procedurally, and efficiently. Influence is purchased not through bribes but through campaign donations, access, revolving doors, and the sheer asymmetry of time, expertise, and money.

Keep ReadingShow less
Washington Loves Blaming Latin America for Drugs — While Ignoring the American Appetite That Fuels the Trade
Screenshot from a video moments before US forces struck a boat in international waters off Venezuela, September 2.
Screenshot from a video moments before US forces struck a boat in international waters off Venezuela, September 2.

Washington Loves Blaming Latin America for Drugs — While Ignoring the American Appetite That Fuels the Trade

For decades, the United States has perfected a familiar political ritual: condemn Latin American governments for the flow of narcotics northward, demand crackdowns, and frame the crisis as something done to America rather than something America helps create. It is a narrative that travels well in press conferences and campaign rallies. It is also a distortion — one that obscures the central truth of the hemispheric drug trade: the U.S. market exists because Americans keep buying.

Yet Washington continues to treat Latin America as the culprit rather than the supplier responding to a demand created on U.S. soil. The result is a policy posture that is both ineffective and deeply hypocritical.

Keep ReadingShow less
© Copyright 2026