Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Ask Joe: Pivot from opposition to connection

Opinion

Graphic image reading "Ask Joe" with photo of Joe Weston, The Fulcrum's advice columnist.

Hello, Joe

I read your last article and found your tips for the holidays with family helpful, but I’m having trouble with your suggestion that we don't “offer opinions and declarations of condemnation.” There are terrible things happening. We need to say something, don’t we? Are you suggesting I sit back and let them happen?


Doubtful

Hello, Doubtful.

I appreciate your question. I can feel your passion and desire to be of service. Thank you for that. If you are already doing things that can help those in need, please keep doing what you are doing!

In all of my work I mostly focus on the “how” more than the “what.” Yes, of course there are injustices and great harm being done to people, and I am trying to “do” what I can to alleviate some of that suffering. And in the process of finding ways to offer support, I am also taking time to make sure that my words and assertions don’t create more animosity and hatred.

As I mentioned, I had been working for years with different women’s rights organizations in Israel and the Palestinian territories, as well as other countries in the region. One thing I learned is that the problems in that region are so complex that it is impossible for any of us to fully grasp them. I also remind myself that, like with other conflicts in the United States and various parts of the world, the issues are so multifarious that I don’t believe:

  • It is clear-cut who the victim is and who is the perpetrator.
  • There is one right answer to the problem and all other answers are wrong.
  • That if one side “wins” and the other side “loses,” the problem will go away.

These statements are not necessarily meant to be used in your expression of your views or debates about current events, Doubtful, but more as your own internal practice to ensure you don’t get stuck in the familiar patterns of fighting or defending your viewpoints. Instead, being informative, respectful and reflective, while at the same time challenging, is likely to lessen separation and opposition with those you will be spending time with this holiday season. They are designed to inspire you to activate being the nurturer and protector. And when integrating both fierceness as well as civility, being a nurturer and protector doesn’t exclude the use of force if that is the only option available. The motivation of a protector is different from that of a fighter.

I start chapter one of my book “Fierce Civility” with a quote from Eleanor Roosevelt that she shared in an early 1960s speech, when the world was on the brink of a nuclear world war:

“We have to face the fact that either all of us are going to die together, or we are going to learn to live together; and if we are to live together, we have to talk.”

This for me is a strong warning for what happens when we don’t consider the consequences of our words and approaches to serious issues – the “how.” Here we are, more than 60 years later, and I would take it a step further:

In a world that is so interconnected and interdependent (whether we are aware of it or not, or whether we like it or not), we either ALL win, or we ALL lose.

In my previous article, Doubtful, I suggest that instead of offering opinions and declarations of condemnation, what we need at this time is to find ways to offer nurturing and protection. The world is filled with enough fighters and defenders; we need more nurturers and protectors! And for me, nurturing and protecting is not passive. In fact, with so much suspicion, cynicism and animosity, it takes great courage and resilience, maybe even heroism, to actively nurture and protect others – to those you love, to strangers, and maybe even to those you consider adversaries.

I’d like to offer a way to shift patterns when you find yourself in tense or challenging situations, pivoting from fighting and defending to staying connected with curiosity and compassion, and consequently appealing to the humanity of others:

First notice that you are activated, and find a way to restore some sense of internal balance. Then ask yourself these thre questions:

  • “Is one side 100 percent all good and is the other 100 percent all bad?”
  • “Do I want to be right or do I want to be effective?”
  • “Do I want to win, or do I want to co-create new emergent solutions to our problems?”

These questions are designed to help you pivot from a more oppositional stance to one of connection and collaboration. It takes practice to be able to call on this in the heat of the moment. If this resonates with you, I lay out in more depth various skills and strategies in my book.

Remember, Doubtful, that my last article offered suggestions on how to more peacefully navigate the holiday times with people who may have different viewpoints on world events. Imagine adding these principles as a way to make the time with friends, family and colleagues more nourishing.

Wishing you great ease and peace during the holiday time,

Joe

Have a question for Joe? Send an email to AskJoe@fulcrum.us.

Learn more about Joe Weston and his work here.

Read More

Iguanas on the Tombstones: A Poet's Metaphor for Colonialism​
Photo illustration by Yunuen Bonaparte for palabra

Iguanas on the Tombstones: A Poet's Metaphor for Colonialism​

Iguanas may seem like an unconventional subject for verse. Yet their ubiquitous presence caught the attention of Puerto Rican poet Martín Espada when he visited a historic cemetery in Old San Juan, the burial place of pro-independence voices from political leader Pedro Albizu Campos to poet and political activist José de Diego.

“It was quite a sight to witness these iguanas sunning themselves on a wall of that cemetery, or slithering from one tomb to the next, or squatting on the tomb of Albizu Campos, or staring up at the bust of José de Diego, with a total lack of comprehension, being iguanas,” Espada told palabra from his home in the western Massachusetts town of Shelburne Falls.

Keep ReadingShow less
Does One Battle After Another Speak to Latino Resistance?

Leonardo DiCaprio, Benicio del Toro, Chase Infiniti, and Paul Thomas Anderson pose during the fan event for the movie 'One Battle After Another' at Plaza Toreo Parque Central on September 18, 2025 in Naucalpan de Juarez, Mexico.

(Photo by Eloisa Sanchez/Getty Images)

Does One Battle After Another Speak to Latino Resistance?

After decades of work, Angeleno director P.T. Anderson has scored his highest-grossing film with his recent One Battle After Another. Having opened on the weekend of September 26, the film follows the fanatical, even surrealistic, journey of washed-up revolutionary Bob Ferguson (Leonardo DiCaprio), who lives in hiding with his teenage daughter, Willa (Chase Infiniti), some fifteen years after his militant group, French 75, went underground. When their nemesis Colonel Lockjaw (Sean Penn) resurfaces, Bob and Wila again find themselves running from the law. When Wila goes AWOL, her karate teacher, Sensei Sergio St. Carlos (Benicio del Toro), is enlisted to help Bob find his daughter. Although ambitious, edgy, and fun, the political message of the hit film is generally muddled. The immensely talented director did not make a film matching the Leftist rigor of, say, Battleship Potemkin. Nor can the film be grouped among a veritable cavalcade of fictional and non-fictional films produced during the last twenty years that deal with immigrant issues along the U.S.-Mexico Border. Sleep Dealer, El Norte, and Who is Dayani Cristal? are but a few of the stronger offerings of a genre of filmmaking that, for both good and bad, may constitute a true cinematic cottage industry.

Nevertheless, the film leans heavily into Latino culture in terms of themes, setting, and characters. Filmed largely in the U.S.’s Bordertown par excellence—El Paso, Texas—we meet the martial arts teacher Sergio, who describes his work helping migrants cross the border as a “Latino Harriet Tubman situation.” We learn that the fugitive revolutionary, Bob, is known by several aliases, including “The Gringo Coyote.” His savior, Sensei Sergio, explains to him outrightly that he’s “a bad hombre”—cheekily invoking the hurtful bon mots used by then-candidate Donald Trump in a 2016 debate with Hilary Clinton. The epithet is repeated later on in the film when Bob, under police surveillance in the hospital, is tipped off to an exit route by a member of the French 75 disguised as a nurse: “Are you diabetic? You’re a bad hombre, Bob. You know, if you’re a bad hombre, you make sure you take your insulin on a daily basis, right?” All this, plus the fact that the film’s denouement begins with a raid on a Mexican Restaurant in Northern California.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Jimmy Kimmel onstage during the 67th GRAMMY Awards

Jimmy Kimmel onstage during the 67th GRAMMY Awards on February 01, 2025, in Los Angeles, California

Getty Images, Johnny Nunez

Why the Fight Over Jimmy Kimmel Matters for Us All

There are moments in a nation’s cultural life that feel, at first, like passing storms—brief, noisy, and soon forgotten. But every so often, what begins as a squall reveals itself as a warning: a sign that something far bigger is at stake. The initial cancellation of Jimmy Kimmel by Disney, along with the coordinated blackout from network affiliates like Nexstar and Sinclair, is one of those moments. It’s not merely another skirmish in the endless culture wars. Actually, it is a test of whether we, as a society, can distinguish between the discomfort of being challenged and the danger of being silenced.

The irony is rich, almost to the point of being absurd. Here is a late-night comedian, a man whose job is to puncture the pompous and needle the powerful, finding himself at the center of a controversy. A controversy bigger than anything he’d ever lampooned. Satire that, depending on your perspective, was either too pointed or simply pointed in the wrong direction. Yet, that was not the ostensible reason.

Keep ReadingShow less
Bad Bunny preforming on stage alongside two other people.

Bad Bunny performs live during "No Me Quiero Ir De Aquí; Una Más" Residencia at Coliseo de Puerto Rico José Miguel Agrelot on September 20, 2025 in San Juan, Puerto Rico

Getty Images, Gladys Vega

From Woodstock to Super Bowl: Bad Bunny and the Legacy of Musical Protest

As Bad Bunny prepares to take the Super Bowl stage in February 2026—and grassroots rallies in his honor unfold across U.S. cities this October—we are witnessing a cultural moment that echoes the artist-led protests of the 1960s and 70s. His decision to exclude U.S. tour dates over fears of ICE raids is generating considerable anger amongst his following, as well as support from MAGA supporters. The Trump administration views his lyrics and his fashion as threats. As the story unfolds, it is increasingly becoming a political narrative rather than just entertainment news.

Music has long been a part of the American political scene. In 1969, Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young released “Ohio,” a response to the Kent State shootings that galvanized antiwar sentiment.

Keep ReadingShow less