Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The danger of mandating the sacred: A Christian cleric's plea

Ten Commandments

Some states are requiring public spaces include displays of the Ten Commandments.

Michael S. Williamson/The Washington Post via Getty Images

Johnson is a United Methodist pastor, the author of "Holding Up Your Corner: Talking About Race in Your Community" and program director for the Bridge Alliance, which houses The Fulcrum.

As an African American Christian cleric, I am deeply troubled by the recent legislative mandates from states like Oklahoma and Louisiana. New laws, passed under the guise of promoting religious freedom and moral values, require Christian biblical education and the display of the Ten Commandments in public spaces. While I believe in the power and wisdom of Scripture, I fear we are misapplying God's commandments to serve man's commands.


We risk using the sacred texts of our faith to impose a particular religious viewpoint rather than allowing them to guide us toward justice, compassion and love. This misuse of religious texts in legislation is not just a cause for concern; it is a serious issue that demands our attention, as it may lead to unintended and potentially harmful consequences.

The heart of Black Liberation theology is freedom from oppression and flourishing as God's children. This tradition, born out of the struggle for racial justice, emphasizes the biblical message of deliverance and equality. Yet, when we use the Bible as a tool of legislation, are we not risking a new form of spiritual bondage? Do we not threaten the principles of religious liberty and pluralism that our nation was founded upon? The state cannot compel faith, for faith is a response to the loving call of God. It is a matter of the heart, not a matter of law. Legislation may force outward compliance, that is, adherence to the letter of the law, but it cannot reach the inner depths of the soul where true faith resides, which is the essence of inward transformation.

The Wesleyan tradition, too, emphasizes the personal and transformative nature of faith. John Wesley preached a gospel of grace that changes lives from the inside out. He spoke of a faith that warms the heart and motivates us to live a life of love and service to others. The transformative nature of faith is a gift from God that must be freely given and received; it cannot be legislated. When we try to mandate its tenets, we risk cheapening the very concept of grace. Let the potential for positive change from a genuine, transformative encounter with the living God inspire us. This transformative nature of faith should not just inspire us, it should fill us with hope for a better future.

The Ten Commandments are a gift from God, a revelation of His holy character. But they were given to His covenant people, those already in a relationship with Him. They were a guide for living as a community of faith, not a set of rules to impose on others. They are a guide for living as people of God, not a code for controlling others. Displacing them as a symbol of moral order, devoid of their covenant context, may lead to legalism, a strict adherence to the law at the expense of the spirit of the law, rather than true righteousness. It may lead to a focus on outward obedience rather than inward transformation.

I am not advocating a naked public square devoid of faith. On the contrary, faith plays a vital role in shaping our values and inspiring us to work towards the common good. This role of faith in shaping our values and society cannot be achieved through legislation. Responsibility and duty come from a deeper understanding of faith — faith is a transformative encounter with the living God. Only such faith can bring about actual social change.

The prophet Micah said, "What does the Lord require of you? Act justly, love mercy, and walk humbly with your God." This is the heart of biblical faith. Can legislation achieve this? Can laws and regulations inspire us to love our neighbors, to care for people experiencing poverty, and to work towards justice and equality? No, it is our faith and our understanding of it that must guide us in these endeavors. This emphasis on the importance of faith in shaping our values should not just guide us; it should empower us and make us feel responsible for our actions.

As a nation, we must wrestle with the role of faith in the public square. We must navigate the complex issues of religious freedom, pluralism and the common good. But let us be careful. The power of faith lies not in its ability to control others but in its power to transform hearts. It is the power to inspire us to live lives of love, compassion, and service.

A word of caution may be our modeling the transformative love of God rather than trying to mandate the presumed imperatives of God. Only then can we hope to see true renewal and justice roll down like a mighty stream. Only then can we expect to build a society that reflects the values of justice, equity and love at the heart of the gospel.

Read More

DEI Dilemma? Start Building Community within Your Organization

Team of male and female entrepreneurs working on computers at office

Getty Images

DEI Dilemma? Start Building Community within Your Organization

Amid the pushback to DEI, an essential truth often gets lost: You have agency over how you approach building diversity, equity, and inclusion into your organization.

No executive order or unhinged rant can change that.

Keep ReadingShow less
White Books and Curriculum Damage Black Children

The rise of book bans and erasure of Black history from classrooms emotionally and systematically harms Black children. It's critical that we urge educators to represent Black experiences and stories in class.

Getty Images, Klaus Vedfelt

White Books and Curriculum Damage Black Children

When my son, Jonathan, was born, one of the first children’s books I bought was "So Much" by Trish Cooke. I was captivated by its joyful depiction of a Black family loving their baby boy. I read it to him often, wanting him to know that he was deeply loved, seen, and valued. In an era when politicians are banning books, sanitizing curricula, and policing the teaching of Black history, the idea of affirming Black children’s identities is miscast as divisive and wrong. Forty-two states have proposed or passed legislation restricting how race and history can be taught, including Black history. PEN America reported that nearly 16,000 books (many featuring Black stories) were banned from schools within the last three years across 43 states. These prohibitive policies and bans are presented as protecting the ‘feelings’ of White children, while at the same time ignoring and invalidating the feelings of Black children who live daily with the pain of erasure, distortion, and disregard in schools.

When I hear and see the ongoing devaluation of Black children in schools and public life, I, and other Black parents, recognize this pain firsthand. For instance, recently, my teenage granddaughter, Jaliyah, texted me, asking to visit the National Museum of African American History and Culture in Washington, D.C., because she had heard that the President planned to close it. For what felt like the millionth time, my heart broke with the understanding that too many people fail to rally on behalf of Black children. Jaliyah’s question revealed what so many Black children intuitively understand—that their histories, their feelings, and their futures are often treated as expendable.

Keep ReadingShow less
Pluralism or DEI - or Both - or None?

equity, inclusion, diversity

AI generated

Pluralism or DEI - or Both - or None?

Even before Trump’s actions against DEI, many in the academic community and elsewhere felt for some time that DEI had taken an unintended turn.

What was meant to provide support—in jobs, education, grants, and other ways—to those groups who historically and currently have suffered from discrimination became for others a sign of exclusion because all attention was placed on how these groups were faring, with little attention to others. Those left out were assumed not to need any help, but that was mistaken. They did need help and are angry.

Keep ReadingShow less
Two people in business attire walking into an office.

Dr. Valentina Greco reflects on how accent bias, internalized gatekeeping, and hidden prejudices shape academia—and how true change begins by confronting our own discomfort.

Getty Images, Marco VDM

How Do We Become the Gatekeepers?

“Do you have a moment?”

I turned and saw my senior colleague, Paul (not his real name), a mentor and sponsor, at my office door.

Keep ReadingShow less