Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Recalibrating our national moral compass

Recalibrating our national moral compass
Getty Images

Molineaux is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and president/CEO of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

Each of us has a moral compass. This internal sense of right and wrong guides our behavioral choices throughout our lives. A navigational compass always points true north unless a magnet is nearby. Then it will point to the magnet.


Our moral compass can also be magnetized. Instead of pointing to our values of integrity, loyalty, compassion and so on, it points to those who are polarizing us, telling us that only THEY hold the moral high ground and we should give them our attention, money and power. Our moral compass needs to be recalibrated on a national scale. Can we even step out of the toxic polarized conditioning to assess what our individual moral compasses are today?

What is the north star for you? What are the values and ethics by which you guide your life? I imagine yours will be a similar to mine:

  • Be honest with self and others.
  • Honor family and friends before other commitments.
  • Contribute to the betterment of the community.
  • Stand up for what is right and good; i.e. the dignity of others.
  • Be myself and allow others to be themselves. “You do you.”

In my personal life, these are the results of alignment with my moral compass:

  • Relationships with family and friends are strong.
  • I apologize when I make mistakes or harm others.
  • I work every day to evolve myself and those around me to be better citizens.
  • I have pledged “dignity first” for all interactions.
  • I am mostly non-judgmental about other’s choices.

What about our national moral compass? A national moral compass is the weaving of all of us together that results in a national ethos. Here are the results of our national moral compass:

  • Name calling and public demonization of any person as bad, evil, ugly, etc., is OK.
  • Doxxing is part of serving the public; where people are unsafe in their homes and jobs when called out.
  • Rigid belief systems keep us from liking each other based on labels and assumptions.
  • It’s OK to strip voting rights and bodily autonomy away from people via the courts and legislation.
  • Threats of violence will be used to enforce one belief system on all of us.

What are the values that lead to these results?

  • Winning is everything.
  • Money is power.
  • Time is money.
  • Fame is priceless.

Just reading this list of values, I am angry. Angry that We the People have allowed The Politics Industry and Conflict Profiteers to magnetize the good hearts of Americans, turning them against one another. What we need is for millions of Americans to:

How might we bring better alignment between our personal and national moral compasses? This is the work of our lifetime.


Read More

computer keyboard
a black keyboard with a blue button on it

America at 250 Needs a First-Rung Compact

A country asking what it wants to become over its next 250 years should pay close attention to the first opportunity it gives its young adults to become useful, trusted and independent.

The Fulcrum’s Letters to America project has deliberately elevated voices ages 14 to 30 as the generation carrying the American story forward. That civic invitation deserves an economic counterpart: a credible path into the work where young adults gain responsibility, judgment and a stake in institutions.

Keep ReadingShow less
Diverse People At Voting Booth. Vote Here Elections Sign

A political scientist examines how automatic voter registration is quietly turning non-affiliation into America's largest voting bloc.

AndreyPopov/Getty Images

When Neither Party Is the Default: Rethinking Representation As America’s Electorate Changes

For most of my career as a political scientist, representation was the central theme of my teaching and research. Early on, I studied how legislators understood their responsibilities to constituents — whether they saw themselves as delegates carrying out constituent mandates, trustees exercising independent judgment, or politicos combining both. That work asked a question that still matters: What does it mean to represent the public in a changing democracy?

Today I find myself asking a related question: What happens when the electorate changes but the institutions built to represent it do not?

Keep ReadingShow less
“We Will Not Let This Destroy Our Sacred Sites”: Indigenous Leaders Fight Trump Administration’s Border Wall

Lorraine Marquez Eiler, a Hia-C’ed O’odham elder, listens as Tohono O'odham Chairman Verlon Jose speaks during a news conference at the Quitobaquito Springs site on Monday, Aug. 24, 2026.

Stephanie Casanova

“We Will Not Let This Destroy Our Sacred Sites”: Indigenous Leaders Fight Trump Administration’s Border Wall

Standing near the pond at Quitobaquito Springs, Lorraine Marquez Eiler, a Hia-Ced O’odham elder, shared how her ancestors held ceremonies at the sacred site — a desert oasis in a national park that the federal government is set to bulldoze for a new border wall.

She pulled out a photo of her great-great grandparents and her great-grandparents, who would walk about 50 miles through the Sonoran Desert to the springs. The O’odham call the water flow A’al Vaipia. She showed the image of her ancestors to a group that included Indigenous leaders and a U.S. congressional representative — all there on Monday to condemn the border wall construction.

Keep ReadingShow less