Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Meet the reformer: Jason Fierman, creating connections and drawing lines

Jason Fierman, The Redistricting Network

"Whether it is school, judicial or legislative boundaries, the lines change your life, and it is one of the reasons I fight for fair maps."

Jason Fierman

While working toward his master's degree at George Mason University, Jason Fierman researched the lack of synergy among advocates against gerrymandering, the centuries-old practice of the people in power drawing tortuous political boundaries in order to keep them in power. That capstone project evolved into The Redistrict Network, a collection of political operatives, mathematicians, students and other experts who are dedicated to remaking the nation's electoral maps so their districts are compact, keep communities together, promote partisan competition and reflect the relative strengths of different ethnic groups. Fierman has been the network's managing director since founding it in 2018. His answers have been lightly edited for length and clarity.

What's the tweet-length description of your organization?

When we share stories, strategies and resources across fields and disciplines we create a momentum that advances redistricting reform across the country. Let's end #gerrymandering together!


Describe your very first civic engagement.

As a 10th grader in Westchester, N.Y., I ran a campaign and was elected treasurer of my high school class government. As treasurer, it was my responsibility to oversee and manage the finances for our big trip to Philadelphia!

What was your biggest professional triumph?

Starting The Redistrict Network. As a topic, redistricting used to be siloed between fields and industries. It was also generally an unknown or obscure topic to the public. Our platform is allowing specialists and professionals to associate, collaborate and advance redistricting reform across the country. We are also proud to be informing, educating and engaging a whole new generation of young leaders on the importance of ending gerrymandering.

And your most disappointing setback?

A few years ago I was a finalist for a full tuition fee waiver to study politics at Stockholm University. Unfortunately I did not win that competition and it forced me back to the drawing board on going to graduate school. I eventually decided to pursue an MPA in applied politics at George Mason. The curriculum prepared me to be a public leader and it's an education I wouldn't trade for anything!

How does your identity influence the way you go about your work?

My grandparents were Holocaust survivors and escaped Europe after World War II. My grandfather was born in Prussia. My grandmother fled atrocities in Ukraine. They often talked about changing borders to avoid autocratic government. Whether it is school, judicial or legislative boundaries, the lines change your life, and it is one of the reasons I fight for fair maps.

What's the best advice you've ever been given?

A professor once told me "If something can be solved locally, it shouldn't be determined nationally." It's a piece of advice and philosophy that still guides my work today.

Create a new flavor for Ben & Jerry's.

Covfefe Cake

What's your favorite political movie or TV show?

"The Americans." It explored the diametrically opposed ideologies between the Soviets and United States in the 1980s, and it did so in a new and engaging way.

What's the last thing you do on your phone at night?

I'll probably be checking Twitter or reading the Daily Kos Voting Rights Round Up.

What is your deepest, darkest secret?

I am obsessed with backyard lawn games. I own everything from badminton and cornhole to spikeball and kan jam!


Read More

Voters lining up to vote.

Voters line up at the Oak Lawn Branch Library voting center on Primary Election Day in Dallas on March 3, 2026. Republicans' decision to hold a split primary from the Democrats and to eliminate countywide voting forced Dallas County voters to cast ballots at assigned neighborhood precincts, leading to confusion. Republicans have now decided to use countywide polling locations for the May 26 runoff election.

Shelby Tauber for The Texas Tribune

Dallas County GOP Will Agree To Use Countywide Voting Sites for May 26 Runoff Election

Dallas County Republicans will agree to allow voters to cast ballots at countywide voting sites for the May 26 runoff election after a switch to precinct-based voting sites caused chaos, the county party chair said Tuesday.

Dallas County Republican Chairman Allen West supported the use of precinct-based sites earlier this month, but said using precincts again for the runoff would expose the county party to “increased risk and voter confusion” because the county is planning to use countywide sites for upcoming municipal elections and early voting.

Keep ReadingShow less
A person signing a piece of paper with other people around them.

Javon Jackson, center, was able to register to vote following passage of a 2019 Nevada law that restored voting rights to formerly incarcerated individuals.

The Nation Is Missing Millions of Voters Due to Lack of Rights for Former Felons

If you gathered every American with a prison record into one contiguous territory and admitted it to the union, you would create the 12th-largest state. It would be home to at least 7 million to 8 million people and hold a dozen votes in the Electoral College.

In a close presidential race, this hypothetical state of the formerly incarcerated could decide who wins the White House.

Keep ReadingShow less
With the focus on the voting posters, the people in the background of the photo sign up to vote.

An analysis of Trump’s SAVE Act strategy, the voter ID debate, and how Pew data is being misused—exploring election integrity, voter suppression, and the political fight shaping U.S. democracy.

Getty Images, SDI Productions

Stop Fighting Voter ID. Start Defining It.

President Trump doesn't need the SAVE America Act to pass. He only needs the debate to continue. Every minute spent arguing about voter suppression repeats the underlying premise — that noncitizen voting is a real and widespread problem — until it feels like an established fact. The question is whether Democrats will contest Republicans’ definition before the frame hardens.

Trump's claim that 88% of Americans support the bill traces to a Pew Research Center survey — a survey that found 83% support a “government-issued photo ID to vote,” not extreme vetting for proof of citizenship. That support included 95% of Republicans and 71% of Democrats, indicating genuine, broad, bipartisan support for a basic civic principle. That's worth taking seriously.

Keep ReadingShow less
People standing at voting booths.

The proposed SAVE Act and MEGA Act would require proof of citizenship to register to vote, risking the disenfranchisement of millions of eligible Americans.

Getty Images, EvgeniyShkolenko

The SAVE Act is a Solution in Search of A Problem

The federal government seems to be barreling toward a federal election power grab. Trump's State of the Union address called for the Senate to push through the SAVE Act, which has already passed the House, in the name of so-called "election integrity." And the SAVE Act isn’t the only such bill. Like the SAVE Act, the Make Elections Great Again (MEGA) Act—introduced in the House—would require voters to provide a document outlined in the Act that allegedly proves their U.S. citizenship. We’ve been down this road before in Texas, and spoiler alert: it was unworkable.

Both the SAVE and MEGA Acts would disenfranchise millions of eligible U.S. citizens without making our federal elections more secure. They seek to roll out a faulty federal voter registration system, despite the existing separate registration and voting process for state and local elections. And these Acts target a minuscule “problem”—but would unleash mass voter purges and confusion.

Keep ReadingShow less