Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Beyond Virginia, pushes against gerrymandering in several states

United States
Mina De La O/Getty Images

Update: The Virginia House cleared the measure Friday night, 54 to 46, assuring a statewide referendum vote in November.

While the world of democracy reform holds its collective breath about Virginia, which is just one day from a do-or-don't deadline for ending partisan gerrymandering, campaigns to combat such behavior got underway this week in two more states.

The way political district boundaries get drawn has come under intense scrutiny in recent years, with a steadily expanding campaign to give the task to independent outsiders rather than politicians interested only in preserving their own power. This spring's census, which will provide the population numbers mapmakers must use, has magnified the issue yet again.


The Virginia House has only until Saturday night to clear a proposal for turning redistricting over to an independent panel. Such a vote would put the matter to a statewide vote in November, where approval would be widely expected — making Virginia the second biggest state (after California) where the drawing of congressional and state legislative lines is controlled by nonpartisans.

But passage by the newly Democratic General Assembly, which seemed assured a few days ago, was tied up Friday in a confusing debate in Richmond over scheduling and last-minute alternative proposals that seemed designed to kill the reform effort. Most of those efforts were made by lawmakers worrying their African-Amercian-majority districts would not survive if the commission takes control.

Two reliably Republican states in the Midwest are the most recent to see life for the anti- gerrymandering movement. A pair of good-governance groups, Arkansas Voters First and Civic Nebraska, unveiled measures Thursday that would establish independent redistricting commissions. If the groups gather enough signatures (122,000 in Nebraska and 89,000 in Arkansas) voters will decide the fate of those proposals in November as well.

Petition signatures are also being gathered to get such ballot initiatives before the voters this fall in solidly Republican Oklahoma and reliably Democratic Nevada and Oregon.

The Maryland General Assembly is also once again considering several bills addressing redistricting — many of them being pressed by the Republican minority in Annapolis at the urging of GOP Gov. Larry Hogan. Prospects before adjournment in April appear slim.

The state is one of the prime examples of a place where the maps were Democratically gerrymandered a decade ago, when most state legislatures were run by the GOP. Another one of those places is Illinois, and a legislative drive for an impartial redistricting panel has some bipartisan support in Springfield. But the governor there, Democrat J.B. Pritzker, is not on board.


Read More

Republican, Democratic and independent checkboxes, with the third one checked

Analysis of California’s open primary system, political reform, and voter empowerment amid gubernatorial tensions and calls to restore party control.

zimmytws/Getty Images

California Schemin’

Both before and after Eric Swalwell’s resignation, the California Gubernatorial race has partisan insiders screaming that California’s innovative, voter-friendly, open primary system should be scrapped. Why? Seven Democrats and two Republicans are running. If all the Democrats stay in the race, and none surges, there is a statistical possibility that the two Republicans advance to the general election.

The attacks are pure opportunism, from people who oppose open primaries, period. Never mind that seven million independent voters have been enfranchised and elections are much more competitive, according to these critics, the fact that the Gubernatorial race might feature two Republicans is absolute proof that the old system needs to be restored.

Keep ReadingShow less
Official ballots with a chain and lock over them, and the USA flag behind them.

The impact of election fraud claims and voting laws on democracy in the United States. Daniel O. Jamison examines voter suppression concerns, mail-in ballot policies, and the broader political struggle over election integrity.

Getty Images, JJ Gouin

If It Ain’t Broke, Don’t Fix It

For nearly ten years, claims that our elections are riddled with fraud have threatened the foundation of our democratic republic.

It is alleged that Democrats have flooded the country with illegal immigrants who then illegally vote for Democrats. Purportedly to protect the country from this, Republicans seek legislation that would, among other provisions, restrict vote-by-mail, require potentially expensive and onerous proof of citizenship to register to vote, and require potentially expensive photo identification to vote.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Fahey Q&A with Elizabeth Rasmussen

An in-depth interview with Elizabeth Rasmussen of Better Boundaries on Utah’s redistricting battle, Proposition 4, and the fight to protect ballot initiatives, fair maps, and democratic accountability.

The Fahey Q&A with Elizabeth Rasmussen

Since organizing the Voters Not Politicians 2018 ballot initiative that put citizens in charge of drawing Michigan's legislative maps, Fahey has been the founding executive director of The People, which is forming statewide networks to promote government accountability. She regularly interviews colleagues in the world of democracy reform for The Fulcrum.

Elizabeth Rasmussen is the Executive Director for Better Boundaries, a Utah-based organization fighting for fair maps, defending the citizen initiative process, preserving checks and balances, and building a better future. Currently making headlines in the state, Better Boundaries is working to protect Proposition 4, and with it, the rights of Utah voters.

Keep ReadingShow less
A sign that reads, "Voter Registration," hanging from the cieling, pointing to an office with the words, "Voter registration," above its doorway.

The voter registration office at the Nueces County Courthouse in Corpus Christi, Texas on Sept. 11, 2024. Voting rights groups are challenging the state's use of a federal database to check the citizenship status of people on the state's voter roll.

Gabriel Cárdenas for Votebeat

Voting Rights Groups Challenge Texas’ Removal of Potential Noncitizens From the Voter Roll

What happened?

Voting rights groups are suing the Texas Secretary of State’s Office and some county election officials to prevent the removal of voters from the state’s voter roll based on use of a federal database to verify citizenship. They also claim the state failed to crosscheck its own records for proof of citizenship it already possessed before seeking to remove voters.

Keep ReadingShow less