Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Reducing gun violence requires differentiation of mass shootings

Reducing gun violence requires differentiation of mass shootings
Getty Images

Jiao is a professor of criminal Justice at Rowan University. His research focuses on policing issues in the U.S. and other countries and regions. Overarching themes of Jiao’s writings include Consent Decrees on Police, Policing Gun Crimes, and Police reforms.

Current media portrayal of and public debate about gun violence are big on shock values but short on solutions. Broad definitions of mass shootings with no differentiation of types of shootings, victims, and circumstances, lumping gang violence, home invasions, armed robberies, familicides, and personal vengeance together with random public mass killings are not conducive to effective interventions.


Only incidents involving four or more shot and killed randomly during a singular event in a public place should be considered mass shootings to differentiate them from more common types of gun violence and allow the police and society to develop relevant and effective strategies tailored to specific types of incidents.

With this definition, there are usually a handful of mass shootings involving fewer than 80 murdered victims out of more than 15,000 total gun violence deaths in a given year. There were 31 mass shootings from 2017 through 2021, about six per year (Marshall Project) and four in 2022 in Buffalo, New York; Uvalde, Texas; Tulsa, Oklahoma; and Highland Park, Illinois. There were 74 mass shooting deaths among about 15,000 gun homicides in 2019 (CDC.gov and Wilson, 2021). From 1966 -2020, there were 420 mass shootings, 1449 deaths, which account for 27 deaths per year (Rockefeller Institute of Government).

Even including shootings in both public and private spaces, any number of shooters, and regardless of motives, there were 206 incidents in the last ten years from 2012 to 2022, an average of about 20 per year (Every Town for Gun Safety). But there were 15,448 total gun crime deaths in 2019, 19,411 in 2020, 20,100 in 2021, and about 19,592 in 2022 (CDC). Even expansive definitions that include about 550 to 650 events as mass shootings (Gun Violence Archive) still account for less than 1% or only a fraction of all gun murders that occur each year.

Recommendations on Addressing Public Mass Shootings

With random public mass shootings being extremely rare and over 99% of gun homicides involve more routinely occurring incidents, our police and society should differentiate different types of gun violence and implement strategies that capture their nuances and contexts. Due to mass shootings’ rarity and lack of patterns, they are extremely difficult to prevent by police themselves. While gun legislations might be important at the national level, the most immediate and realistic ways to address mass shootings are risk assessment and target hardening at the state and local level (Capellan and Jiao, 2019).

  • State-level risk assessment centers should be established to identify and analyze risks and disseminate risk information to local establishments.
  • At-risk entities should fortify their facilities, making their environments unattractive, increasing the effort and risks of offenders, and thus disrupting opportunities for mass shootings.

Recommendations on Addressing Routine Gun Homicides

For the overwhelming majority of gun homicides that occur routinely, the police and the public should be able to discern their patterns and apply strategies according to their natures. Several strategies have been proven effective, including problem-oriented policing, comprehensive policing, situational/routine activities, and ten-driven law enforcement (Jiao, 2022).

  • Problem-oriented policing involves directed patrols and focused deterrence and may have a significant effect in reducing gun homicides due to street fighting and gang rivalries.
  • Comprehensive policing combining immediate tactical responses and community-oriented policing may achieve a sustainable impact on gun violence rooted in underlying social, economic, and cultural conditions such as home invasions and armed robberies.
  • Situational/routine activities involve deploying resources in areas and contexts prone to gun violence by using a variety of situational measures such as risk analysis, traffic/pedestrian stops, firearm removal, differential licensing, and sting operations to reduce gun homicides due to drugs, personal vengeance, and family violence that tend to recur in specific locations and domestic settings.
  • Tech-driven law enforcement utilizing gun tracing/ballistics analysis can improve gun homicide clearance and thus have a deterrence effect on premeditated gun murders.

Meanings tend to be lost in broad discussions of gun violence data. Accurate definitions and understandings of true mass shootings and other more common types of gun homicides would allow our police and society to focus on specific intervention strategies and reduce gun violence deaths. Research has demonstrated that there are effective strategies at the disposal of our police and society in addressing various forms of gun violence as outlined above.

For more information:

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). CDC.gov
  • Every Town for Gun Safety. Everytown.org
  • Gun Violence Archive. Gunviolencearchive.org
  • Marshall Project. Themarshallproject.org
  • Rockefeller Institute of Government. Rockinst.org

For further readings

  • Capellan, Joel A. and Allan Y. Jiao. (2019). Deconstructing Mass Public Shootings: Exploring Opportunities for Intervention. Albany, New York: Rockefeller Institute of Government, Regional Gun Violence Research Consortiu
  • Jiao, Allan Y. (2022). Policing Gun Crimes: A Comprehensive Review of Strategies and Effectiveness. The Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles. DOI: 10.1177/0032258X221113454 Wilson, Chris. (2021). 41 years of mass shooting

Read More

Paul Ehrlich was wrong about everything

Crowd of people walking on a street.

Andy Andrews//Getty Images

Paul Ehrlich was wrong about everything

Biologist and author Paul Ehrlich, the most influential Chicken Little of the last century, died at the age of 93 this week. His 1968 book, “The Population Bomb,” launched decades of institutional panic in government, entertainment and journalism.

Ehrlich’s core neo-Malthusian argument was that overpopulation would exhaust the supply of food and natural resources, leading to a cascade of catastrophes around the world. “The Population Bomb” opens with a bold prediction, “The battle to feed all of humanity is over. In the 1970s and 1980s hundreds of millions of people will starve to death in spite of any crash programs embarked upon now.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Bravado Isn’t a Strategy: Why the Iran War Has No Endgame

People clear rubble in a house in the Beryanak District after it was damaged by missile attacks two days before, on March 15, 2026 in Tehran, Iran. The United States and Israel continued their joint attack on Iran that began on February 28. Iran retaliated by firing waves of missiles and drones at Israel, and targeting U.S. allies in the region.

Getty Images, Majid Saeedi

Bravado Isn’t a Strategy: Why the Iran War Has No Endgame

Most of what we have heard from the administration as it pertains to the Iran War is swagger and bro-talk. A few days into the war, the White House released a social media video that combined footage of the bombardment with clips from video games. Not long after, it released a second video, titled “Justice the American Way,” that mixed images of the U.S. military with scenes from movies like Gladiator and Top Gun Maverick.

Speaking to reporters at the Pentagon, War Secretary Pete Hegseth boasted of “death and destruction from the sky all day long.” “They are toast, and they know it,” he said. “This was never meant to be a fair fight... we are punching them while they’re down.”

Keep ReadingShow less
A student in uniform walking through a campus.

A Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) cadet walks through campus November 7, 2003 in Princeton, New Jersey.

Getty Images, Spencer Platt

Hegseth is Dumbing Down the Military (on Purpose)

One day before the United States began an ill-defined and illegal war of indefinite length with Iran, Pete Hegseth angrily attacked a different enemy: the Ivy League. The Secretary of War denounced Ivy League universities as "woke breeding grounds of toxic indoctrination” and then eliminated long-standing college fellowship programs with more than a dozen elite colleges, which had historically served as a pipeline for service members to the upper ranks of military leadership. Of the schools now on Hegseth’s "no-fly list," four sit in the top ten of the World’s Top Universities for 2026. So, why does the Secretary of War not want his armed forces to have the best education available? Because he wants a military without a brain.

For a guy obsessed with being the strongest and most lethal force in the world, cutting access to world-class schools is a bizarre gambit. It does reveal Hegseth doesn’t consider intelligence a factor–let alone an asset–in strength or lethality. That tracks. Hegseth alleges the Ivies infect officers with “globalist and radical ideologies that do not improve our fighting ranks…” God forbid the tip of the sword of our foreign policy has knowledge of international cooperation and global interconnectedness. The Ivy League has its own issues, but the Pentagon’s claim that they "fail to deliver rigorous education grounded in realism” is almost laughable. I’m a veteran Lieutenant Commander with two Ivy League degrees, both paid for with military tuition assistance, and I promise: it was rigorous. Meanwhile, are Hegseth’s performative politics grounded in reality? Attacking Harvard on social media the eve of initiating a new war with a foreign adversary is disgraceful, and even delusional.

Keep ReadingShow less
Are We Prepared for a World Where AI Isn’t at Work?
Person working at a desk with a laptop and books.

Are We Prepared for a World Where AI Isn’t at Work?

Draft an important email without using AI. Write it from scratch — no suggestions, no autocomplete, and no prompt to ChatGPT to compose or revise the email.

Now ask yourself: Did it feel slower? Harder? Slightly uncomfortable?

Keep ReadingShow less