Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Who Are the Trespassers?

Opinion

A child's hand holding an adult's hand.
"Names have meanings and shape our destinies. Research shows that they open doors and get your resume to the right eyes and you to the corner office—or not," writes Professor F. Tazeena Husain.
Getty Images, LaylaBird

Explaining cruelty to a child is difficult, especially when it comes from policy, not chance. My youngest son, just old enough to notice, asks why a boy with a backpack is crying on TV. He wonders why the police grip his father’s hand so tightly, and why the woman behind them is crying so hard she can barely walk.

Unfortunately, I tell him that sometimes people are taken away, even if they have done nothing wrong. Sometimes, rules are enforced in ways that hurt families. He seemingly nods, but I can see he’s unsure. In a child’s world, grown-ups are supposed to keep you safe, and rules are meant to protect you if you follow them. I wish I had always believed that, too.


This past year, the headlines have not stopped: ICE raids, families separated at airports and bus stations, and two-year-olds holding hands with strangers in crowded detention centers. A kindergartener named Liam was detained, processed, and treated like a problem to fix instead of a child to love. These stories are not new. They are just the latest part of a long, painful history that started before we were born.

As an African American father and pastor, I know that “the talk” is never only about traffic stops. In 2014, writing in Time, I described that conversation Black parents have with their children—a ritual of instruction about how to survive encounters with authority, how to remain visible yet nonthreatening, compliant yet dignified. That talk was born of grief and necessity. It was also born of love.

A decade later, I realize the conversation has widened. The talk is about how this country decides who belongs and who does not; who is presumed citizen and who is presumed trespasser; who is granted the benefit of innocence and who must prove humanity on demand. My parents had that conversation with me. I now have it with my own children. Each time, it grows heavier. Each time, it carries more history.

The Old Story

This is not the first time our country has separated families. Enslaved families in the American South knew the sound of footsteps at night and the sudden loss of a mother, father, or child. Native families saw their children taken to “schools” meant to erase their language and history. The names and uniforms may change, but the message stays the same: some people are not meant to stay together. Some families are treated as expendable.

What troubles me most, as a parent and a pastor, is how ordinary it all seems. Cruelty can look official, with a badge or a clipboard, and is carried out with careful, routine precision. There is no obvious villain, just neighbors doing their jobs and following the law.

Who Are the Trespassers?

We hear the word “trespass” often in public discourse. People talk about “illegal entry,” “border crossings,” and “violations.” We set boundaries, build walls, and draw invisible lines. But Christian scripture asks us to see trespass in a different way.

When Jesus, our greatest example, teaches his followers to pray, he says, “Forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us.” This is not the language of courts or borders. It is about relationships, about harm and forgiveness, about crossing lines and restoring love. This prayer calls for humility, not suspicion, and for mercy, not exclusion.

In times of fear, it is easy to think that trespassers are always those on the other side of the line. But the gospel changes this view. The real trespass is failing to see the image of God in the stranger. The real violation is refusing to love our neighbor as ourselves.

On Forgiveness and Grace

Grace is not a loophole or a technicality. It is a scandal, an undeserved kindness given freely. The Christian story is based on the idea that God’s love is for everyone, without exception: “There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.”

What does this mean for us in a time of ICE raids? It means our first loyalty is not to a border, but to a person. It means that when we meet someone, we do not ask for their papers. It means we resist policies that treat people as problems to fix rather than neighbors to love.

Living the Prayer

I do not have easy answers for parents who must explain these things to their children. I do not know how to take away the fear in a child’s eyes when they hear a knock at the door. But I do know that our faith gives us ways “we must” to resist and to heal.

We must tell the truth. We cannot heal what we do not name. Our children need to know that injustice is real but so is the strength of standing together and having hope.

We must show mercy. When we pray the Lord’s Prayer around dinner and communion tables, “forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us,” we commit to a way of life that does not draw hard lines between “us” and “them.” Thus, teaching our children and one another that everyone deserves dignity.

We must act. Faith without works is dead. We can join protests, support immigrant families, and call for policies that respect everyone’s humanity. We can build communities that practice radical hospitality, not only in our churches, but also in our neighborhoods and schools.

Hope Beyond the Headlines

I wish I could promise my son that the world will always be fair. I cannot. But I can promise him that we will always stand with those who are vulnerable. We will never stop seeing the image of God in every face, no matter what the headlines say.

When I think about the scores of persons detained, and their family and neighbors waiting for news of their whereabouts, I ponder how we are remaining answerable to the words of Jesus: “I was a stranger, and you welcomed me.”

The question for our time is not, “Who are the trespassers?” The real question is, “Will we be the ones who forgive, who protect, who love, even when it costs us something?” May we have the courage to answer with our lives.


Rev. Dr. F. Willis Johnson is a spiritual entrepreneur, author, scholar-practioner whose leadership and strategies around social and racial justice issues are nationally recognized and applied.


Read More

Shadow on a wall of Judge hitting gavel in court, concept of justice, law, and legal protection

The Rule of Law depends on action, not blind optimism. Explore how critical hope, civic engagement, and accountability can strengthen democracy.

Aitor Diago / Getty Images

Only Collective Action Can Turn Outrage Into Accountability and Protect the Rule of Law

The past year has shaken our faith in institutions and, perhaps, in each other. If not already eviscerated, the Rule of Law is under attack. In this atmosphere of constant chaos, we have become numbed by the events of each day and the scope of unprecedented executive action. Yet, even in the face of growing autocracy and oligarchy, the Rule of Law can prevail.

“There is a crack, a crack in everything. That’s how the light gets in.” In the current moment, it is tempting to reach for hope as comfort, or to repeat familiar lines about resilience, unity, or the promise of American ideals—such as this one from Leonard Cohen. But as educator Jeffrey Duncan-Andrade warns, not all hope is created equal. The kind of hope that ignores suffering, that insists the Rule of Law will revive itself without action, is not hope at all. It is what he calls “hokey or “mythical hope,” a passive optimism that ultimately deepens despair. What this moment demands instead is “critical hope”: a form of hope grounded in struggle and action.

Keep ReadingShow less

Are State Courts More Protective of Transgender People than Federal Courts?

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday that state laws prohibiting trans women and girls from participating on female sports teams do not violate the Equal Protection Clause — the seventh Supreme Court ruling curbing the rights of trans people in just the past 14 months. Since May 2025, the Supreme Court has allowed the Trump administration to ban trans people from serving in the military, upheld a Tennessee law banning gender-affirming care for trans minors, given anti-LGBTQ+ parents a veto over LGBTQ+-inclusive content in their children’s classrooms, endorsed Trump’s policy requiring trans people to list their sex assigned at birth on their passports, reinstated an injunction against policies barring schools from outing trans students to their parents against students’ wishes, and determined that Colorado’s ban on anti-LGBTQ+ conversion therapy must be subjected to strict scrutiny, a form of judicial review that almost no law survives.

However, there may be some cause for optimism. In an article published in The Virginia Journal of Social Policy & the Law, I conducted a comprehensive survey of state court cases that impacted the rights and lives of trans people between 2022 and 2024. The survey showed state courts have an essential role to play in protecting trans people in an increasingly hostile political environment. Amongst some ominous signs for trans rights, there were important signals of hope in the survey.

Keep ReadingShow less
A gavel.

The rule of law, American democracy, constitutional rights, and judicial independence.

Getty Images, David Talukdar

In Texas, People Don’t Kill People, Guns Kill People

It has been said that a good prosecutor can get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich. Apparently, that’s not the case in very red Collin County, Texas, where a self-described recovering alcoholic fatally shot his daughter in the chest, only to be let off the hook by a sympathetic grand jury. As a retired justice of the New York State Supreme Court, the case intrigued me and I tried to understand why the prosecutor, upon failing to obtain an indictment, did not try again.

In January 2025, the victim and her boyfriend traveled from England to visit her father at his home in Collin County where the shooting occurred. Although evidence presented to a grand jury cannot be disclosed, it is reasonably assumed that the grand jury was provided with the statement made by the father to the police at the scene immediately following the shooting. In that statement, the father related how he had taken his daughter, at her request, to see his gun, and that when he brought her to his bedroom and removed the gun from a cabinet in which he kept it, “it went off.” He could not recall if his finger had been on the trigger.

Keep ReadingShow less
Citizens in Name Only: What the Supreme Court Can’t Fix
beige concrete building under blue sky during daytime

Citizens in Name Only: What the Supreme Court Can’t Fix

This month, the Supreme Court will rule on Trump v. Barbara, the case that could upend birthright citizenship as we have known it for over a century.

But the current debate over birthright citizenship overlooks the fact that legal citizenship — by birthright or naturalization — has never fully protected marginalized Americans. People of color, women, LGBTQ, and lower-income Americans have long been CINOs: Citizens in Name Only. Throughout our 250-year history, they have lacked full social citizenship - access to social/welfare entitlements, political citizenship – access to voting rights, and cultural citizenship – recognition as members of the American family. So, while a court ruling can determine who gets a U.S. birth certificate, it cannot guarantee societal inclusion.

Keep ReadingShow less