Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The path to safe voting in an ailing democracy

Opinion

Domke and Douglas are co-founders of Common Power, a civic action organization based in Seattle working "to foster, support and amplify a democracy that is just and inclusive."


This November, millions of Americans will choose between their safety and their right to vote. Those hardest hit will be people of color. In a nation founded on the sanctity of self-government, this is unacceptable. With just four months until an unprecedented election, only five states offer universal mail-in voting.

This is not a new problem. It's a new symptom of a larger disease. Since 1776, this country has seen strategic efforts to control who votes — from wealth and gender restrictions, to Jim Crow discrimination, to today's voter ID laws and the targeted removal of polling opportunities.

It's a problem so immense that two years ago we both upended our lives to fight it. Charles left a corporate management role at Starbucks and David took leave from a tenured faculty post at the University of Washington. We brought together a group of Seattleites — mostly people of color — and founded an organization dedicated to the belief that all citizens have the right to vote and should be encouraged to exercise it.

And we have some good news. We all have the power to fight for safe voting right now, even from home. And we have the duty to do so, even if our ballot comes in the mail.

As a first step, Common Power has launched a national campaign to push leaders to make it easier and safer to vote this November. This means expanding early in-person voting and reducing barriers to voting by mail, like required rationales. We have forms, scripts, elected officials' contact information — everything needed to advocate safely.

So far this year, 11 states have reduced barriers to safe voting, with several more on the way. But we must keep pushing — as we just saw in Maryland, the transition to safer voting is simply a matter of political will, and it's up to all of us to continue fighting for everyone's voice in government.

Second, we've created tailored registration and mobilization methods that range from old-school letter-writing to texting voters. For example, in partnership with the Voter Participation Center and Sister District, our volunteers mailed 10,000 hand-written letters encouraging Pennsylvanians to register to vote. Matching this effort with actual registrations will give insight into civic action and engagement in an increasingly remote-only world.

We believe in the power of collective action. Wouldn't be in this fight otherwise. Together with 2,000 Seattle-area volunteers and nationwide partners like BlackPAC and New Virginity Majority, we've registered and mobilized 100,000 potential voters in 20 states through texting, calling, postcards and door-knocking.

Today, clearing the path to a "more perfect" democracy looks a lot like it did 100 years ago — collective, citizen-led activism leading to incremental progress, with the occasional great leap forward in policy.

Now is the moment for a leap.


Read More

Post office trucks parked in a lot.

Changes to USPS postmarking, ranked choice voting fights, costly runoffs, and gerrymandering reveal growing cracks in U.S. election systems.

Photo by Sam LaRussa on Unsplash.

2026 Will See an Increase in Rejected Mail-In Ballots - Here's Why

While the media has kept people’s focus on the Epstein files, Venezuela, or a potential invasion of Greenland, the United States Postal Service adopted a new rule that will have a broad impact on Americans – especially in an election year in which millions of people will vote by mail.

The rule went into effect on Christmas Eve and has largely flown under the radar, with the exception of some local coverage, a report from PBS News, and Independent Voter News. It states that items mailed through USPS will no longer be postmarked on the day it is received.

Keep ReadingShow less
Congress Must Stop Media Consolidation Before Local Journalism Collapses
black video camera
Photo by Matt C on Unsplash

Congress Must Stop Media Consolidation Before Local Journalism Collapses

This week, I joined a coalition of journalists in Washington, D.C., to speak directly with lawmakers about a crisis unfolding in plain sight: the rapid disappearance of local, community‑rooted journalism. The advocacy day, organized by the Hispanic Technology & Telecommunications Partnership (HTTP), brought together reporters and media leaders who understand that the future of local news is inseparable from the future of American democracy.

- YouTube www.youtube.com

Keep ReadingShow less
People wearing vests with "ICE" and "Police" on the back.

The latest shutdown deal kept government open while exposing Congress’s reliance on procedural oversight rather than structural limits on ICE.

Getty Images, Douglas Rissing

A Shutdown Averted, and a Narrow Window Into Congress’s ICE Dilemma

Congress’s latest shutdown scare ended the way these episodes usually do: with a stopgap deal, a sigh of relief, and little sense that the underlying conflict had been resolved. But buried inside the agreement was a revealing maneuver. While most of the federal government received longer-term funding, the Department of Homeland Security, and especially Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), was given only a short-term extension. That asymmetry was deliberate. It preserved leverage over one of the most controversial federal agencies without triggering a prolonged shutdown, while also exposing the narrow terrain on which Congress is still willing to confront executive power. As with so many recent budget deals, the decision emerged less from open debate than from late-stage negotiations compressed into the final hours before the deadline.

How the Deal Was Framed

Democrats used the funding deadline to force a conversation about ICE’s enforcement practices, but they were careful about how that conversation was structured. Rather than reopening the far more combustible debate over immigration levels, deportation priorities, or statutory authority, they framed the dispute as one about law-enforcement standards, specifically transparency, accountability, and oversight.

Keep ReadingShow less
ICE Monitors Should Become Election Monitors: And so Must You
A pole with a sign that says polling station
Photo by Phil Hearing on Unsplash

ICE Monitors Should Become Election Monitors: And so Must You

The brutality of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the related cohort of federal officers in Minneapolis spurred more than 30,000 stalwart Minnesotans to step forward in January and be trained as monitors. Attorney General Pam Bondi’s demands to Minnesota’s Governor demonstrate that the ICE surge is linked to elections, and other ICE-related threats, including Steve Bannon calling for ICE agents deployment to polling stations, make clear that elections should be on the monitoring agenda in Minnesota and across the nation.

A recent exhortation by the New York Times Editorial Board underscores the need for citizen action to defend elections and outlines some steps. Additional avenues are also available. My three decades of experience with international and citizen election observation in numerous countries demonstrates that monitoring safeguards trustworthy elections and promotes public confidence in them - both of which are needed here and now in the US.

Keep ReadingShow less