Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

The path to safe voting in an ailing democracy

Opinion

Our Common Power

Domke and Douglas are co-founders of Common Power, a civic action organization based in Seattle working "to foster, support and amplify a democracy that is just and inclusive."


This November, millions of Americans will choose between their safety and their right to vote. Those hardest hit will be people of color. In a nation founded on the sanctity of self-government, this is unacceptable. With just four months until an unprecedented election, only five states offer universal mail-in voting.

This is not a new problem. It's a new symptom of a larger disease. Since 1776, this country has seen strategic efforts to control who votes — from wealth and gender restrictions, to Jim Crow discrimination, to today's voter ID laws and the targeted removal of polling opportunities.

It's a problem so immense that two years ago we both upended our lives to fight it. Charles left a corporate management role at Starbucks and David took leave from a tenured faculty post at the University of Washington. We brought together a group of Seattleites — mostly people of color — and founded an organization dedicated to the belief that all citizens have the right to vote and should be encouraged to exercise it.

And we have some good news. We all have the power to fight for safe voting right now, even from home. And we have the duty to do so, even if our ballot comes in the mail.

As a first step, Common Power has launched a national campaign to push leaders to make it easier and safer to vote this November. This means expanding early in-person voting and reducing barriers to voting by mail, like required rationales. We have forms, scripts, elected officials' contact information — everything needed to advocate safely.

So far this year, 11 states have reduced barriers to safe voting, with several more on the way. But we must keep pushing — as we just saw in Maryland, the transition to safer voting is simply a matter of political will, and it's up to all of us to continue fighting for everyone's voice in government.

Second, we've created tailored registration and mobilization methods that range from old-school letter-writing to texting voters. For example, in partnership with the Voter Participation Center and Sister District, our volunteers mailed 10,000 hand-written letters encouraging Pennsylvanians to register to vote. Matching this effort with actual registrations will give insight into civic action and engagement in an increasingly remote-only world.

We believe in the power of collective action. Wouldn't be in this fight otherwise. Together with 2,000 Seattle-area volunteers and nationwide partners like BlackPAC and New Virginity Majority, we've registered and mobilized 100,000 potential voters in 20 states through texting, calling, postcards and door-knocking.

Today, clearing the path to a "more perfect" democracy looks a lot like it did 100 years ago — collective, citizen-led activism leading to incremental progress, with the occasional great leap forward in policy.

Now is the moment for a leap.


Read More

A male senior stands in the shadow of a Social Security card with bite missing.

Social Security faces automatic cuts in 2032 and Medicare in 2033. New polling suggests that gives Democrats a powerful election issue. Here’s the case.

DNY59 / Getty Images

Will the Debt Crisis Engineered by Republicans Succeed in Cutting Social Security and Medicare?

Overview

The Republican Party’s long game to reduce administrative state entitlement spending centers on creating a debt crisis to provide an excuse for limiting such spending. It may soon pay off. That strategy involved a quarter-century of engineered tax cuts responsible for the stunning rise in sovereign U.S. debt, threatening an eventual economic crisis.

Social Security benefits are projected under current law to be automatically cut in 2032. And Medicare benefits are projected to be automatically cut in 2033. Congressional Republicans intend for those automatic cuts to occur, opposing new taxes to prevent cuts. And they are using the ballooning national debt as an excuse to also oppose new general revenue spending to prevent benefit cuts.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Chinese President Xi Jinping (L) and U.S. President Donald Trump followed by Chinese first lady Peng Liyuan and U.S. first lady Melania Trump arrive for a state dinner at the White House.

Chinese President Xi Jinping (L) and U.S. President Donald Trump followed by Chinese first lady Peng Liyuan and U.S. first lady Melania Trump arrive for a state dinner in the East Room of the White House on September 24, 2026 in Washington, DC.

Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images

When Leaders Disagree, Ceremony Plays an Important Role

When Chinese President Xi Jinping arrived at the White House on 24 September, the U.S. welcomed him with an elaborate display of ceremony. The Army Herald Trumpets sounded a fanfare, the Chinese and American national anthems were played, and the Old Guard Fife and Drum Corps performed. A military review was followed by a flyover involving a B-2 bomber and four F-22 fighter jets, according to the White House. It was an extraordinary production for two countries that still disagree on some of the most important issues in international politics.

Talks between President Donald Trump and Xi touched on trade, artificial intelligence and Taiwan. The visit was marked by warm words and some signs of cooperation, but it did not erase the fundamental competition between the United States and China. So why was all this ceremony staged? It is tempting to dismiss political pomp as mere window dressing: an expensive historical relic surrounding the serious business taking place behind closed doors. As a music historian, however, I think this misunderstands what ceremony does. Ceremony can become particularly valuable when words alone are not enough.

Keep ReadingShow less
Americans Voting in an Election

Americans Voting in an Election

Getty Images

Voting Is Not Just a Privilege It Is Every Citizens’ Responsibility

Despite the consistent determinations that US elections are secure across the country and there is virtually no evidence of non-citizens voting, in reports released as recently as September 2026; President Trump has doubled down on his claims that voter fraud is a major problem in America and on October 20th, he announced a new $25 Million Fraud Whistleblower program to be administered by the Department of Justice.

This announcement achieves a variety of the president’s goals: (i) It intentionally perpetuates the misinformation, that voter fraud is a serious problem in the United States; (ii) it undermines the trust in the voting systems, as well as in the states administering the elections; (iii) it fosters distrust amongst neighbors, who are more likely to suspect people of color and report them for a reward. This has the concomitant benefit of (iv) intimidating people who are in fear of going to the polls and (v) It gives the illusion that the federal government is prepared to give away more free money (along with the Tariff rebate checks, the Trump Accounts, the DOGE dividend, the direct payments for healthcare and the $5,000 for supporting GOP midterm candidates.)

Keep ReadingShow less
Capitol building with American flag behind it

Political Polarization and Extremism

Getty Images

Both Parties Have Forgotten How to Lose: It’s Time for Guardrails

On November 3 Americans vote in the midterm elections, and the most important question may be whether the losers accept the result. A Pew survey this summer found that just 55 percent of Americans are confident the midterms will be run fairly and accurately, down from 64 percent in 2022. The partisan detail is more revealing. Since 2024, Republican confidence has risen and Democratic confidence has fallen from 77 percent to 58 percent. Trust in the referee now depends on who holds power.

Democracy rests on a kind of sportsmanship agreement. The theologian Reinhold Niebuhr put it well: man’s capacity for justice makes democracy possible, but his inclination to injustice makes it necessary. B. R. Ambedkar, the chief architect of India’s constitution, called democracy a method of bringing revolutionary change without bloodshed. Both understood that the system works only if the losing side agrees to try again next time instead of burning down the field. Americans in both parties are forgetting how to do that.

Keep ReadingShow less