Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The attack on Salman Rushdie and freedom of expression

News

The attack on Salman Rushdie and freedom of expression
Getty Images

Savenor serves as the Executive Director of Civic Spirit.

At a session that was supposed to address freedom of expression in our fractured world, Salman Rushdie and moderator Henry Reese were brutally attacked. August 12, 2022, was not the day any of us at Chautauqua Institution expected.


I was in the audience on the day of the attack. My five seconds of footage of the attack posted on Twitter went viral.

Our experience tragically morphed into something surreal and horrific immediately after Rushdie and the moderator took their seats to great applause. A man jumped on the stage and began pummeling Mr. Rushdie. With every vicious movement of the assailant’s arm, silence descended on this usually pacifist community of learners.

For 150 years, Chautauqua Institution in the northwest corner of New York state has developed a reputation as a forum for convening conversations about big ideas and wrestling with assumptions, all in the hopes of making contemporary society and our shared future stronger and more secure. Chautauqua personifies Mr. Rushdie’s view that, “A mature society understands that at the heart of democracy is argument.”

I attended this event not just for my own edification but also because it connects to my work at Civic Spirit, an organization that provides training in civic education for the 4.5 million students who attend faith based day schools - Jewish, Catholic, Christian, and Islamic – in the United States.

You can imagine my dismay by the irony that the session devoted to freedom of speech was abruptly canceled by an attack on the speaker. Later that day we walked over to the amphitheater, where a pile of flowers, placards of hope and a candle filled the entrance that had been closed since the attack. Watching the maintenance team scrub blood off the stage, I gasped at the realization that this platform for inspiration and wisdom had been transformed into a crime scene.

I was in New York for 9/11. I was in Israel in 2002 when daily bombings killed scores of innocent civilians. And now this.

Truth be told, doubt overcame me. How can we talk about building bridges across differences when some among us will go to great lengths - and literally drive hundreds of miles - to assault and silence those with whom they disagree? Can our social contract withstand this relentless trauma?

The night after Mr. Rushdie’s attack we returned to the amphitheater to witness its reopening. The president of Chautauqua Institution, Michael E. Hill, framed the moment: “We are called to take on fear and the worst of all human traits – hate... The response must be love, of course, but also action. We must return to our podiums and pulpits. We must continue to convene the critical conversations that can help build empathy; obviously, this is more important now than ever.”

These words laced with purpose, confidence, and resilience offered this community a way forward, myself included. I needed to be reminded that with a growing sense of helplessness and hopelessness among today’s youth, civic education – and hope itself -constitutes a constructive course of action. At this polarized moment with hate crimes on the rise, it is vital that we not only ensure that our faith based day schools focus on civics, but also students, teachers, and administrators are supported in this endeavor at their families’ kitchen tables and spiritual leaders’ pulpits.

At Chautauqua, we expected to learn how our society can encourage and support open dialogue and foster understanding across divides. Sadly what we witnessed was a violation of the fundamental values of the Institution and America itself. This attack reinforced that we can never take the open exchange of ideas for granted.

Sadly, the attack on Mr. Rushdie last year is not an isolated event. News around the country of speakers being canceled for sharing different opinions, assaults on elected officials and their families, and attacks on those with different backgrounds showcase that this conflict has unfortunately become a part of American life. The sobering truth is, we can never take the open exchange of ideas for granted.

On that beautiful summer day, Mr. Rushdie lost sight in one eye and the use of one hand. While Mr. Rushdie did not get the chance to speak on that summer day, his unfailing commitment to free speech and vision for a healthy democracy continue to guide and inspire.


Read More

Nicolas Maduro’s Capture: Sovereignty Only Matters When It’s Convenient

US Capitol and South America. Nicolas Maduro’s capture is not the end of an era. It marks the opening act of a turbulent transition

AI generated

Nicolas Maduro’s Capture: Sovereignty Only Matters When It’s Convenient

The U.S. capture of Nicolás Maduro will be remembered as one of the most dramatic American interventions in Latin America in a generation. But the real story isn’t the raid itself. It’s what the raid reveals about the political imagination of the hemisphere—how quickly governments abandon the language of sovereignty when it becomes inconvenient, and how easily Washington slips back into the posture of regional enforcer.

The operation was months in the making, driven by a mix of narcotrafficking allegations, geopolitical anxiety, and the belief that Maduro’s security perimeter had finally cracked. The Justice Department’s $50 million bounty—an extraordinary price tag for a sitting head of state—signaled that the U.S. no longer viewed Maduro as a political problem to be negotiated with, but as a criminal target to be hunted.

Keep ReadingShow less
Red elephants and blue donkeys

The ACA subsidy deadline reveals how Republican paralysis and loyalty-driven leadership are hollowing out Congress’s ability to govern.

Carol Yepes

Governing by Breakdown: The Cost of Congressional Paralysis

Picture a bridge with a clearly posted warning: without a routine maintenance fix, it will close. Engineers agree on the repair, but the construction crew in charge refuses to act. The problem is not that the fix is controversial or complex, but that making the repair might be seen as endorsing the bridge itself.

So, traffic keeps moving, the deadline approaches, and those responsible promise to revisit the issue “next year,” even as the risk of failure grows. The danger is that the bridge fails anyway, leaving everyone who depends on it to bear the cost of inaction.

Keep ReadingShow less
White House
A third party candidate has never won the White House, but there are two ways to examine the current political situation, writes Anderson.
DEA/M. BORCHI/Getty Images

250 Years of Presidential Scandals: From Harding’s Oil Bribes to Trump’s Criminal Conviction

During the 250 years of America’s existence, whenever a scandal involving the U.S. President occurred, the public was shocked and dismayed. When presidential scandals erupt, faith and trust in America – by its citizens as well as allies throughout the world – is lost and takes decades to redeem.

Below are several of the more prominent presidential scandals, followed by a suggestion as to how "We the People" can make America truly America again like our founding fathers so eloquently established in the constitution.

Keep ReadingShow less
Money and the American flag
Half of Americans want participatory budgeting at the local level. What's standing in the way?
SimpleImages/Getty Images

For the People, By the People — Or By the Wealthy?

When did America replace “for the people, by the people” with “for the wealthy, by the wealthy”? Wealthy donors are increasingly shaping our policies, institutions, and even the balance of power, while the American people are left as spectators, watching democracy erode before their eyes. The question is not why billionaires need wealth — they already have it. The question is why they insist on owning and controlling government — and the people.

Back in 1968, my Government teacher never spoke of powerful think tanks like the Heritage Foundation, now funded by billionaires determined to avoid paying their fair share of taxes. Yet here in 2025, these forces openly work to control the Presidency, Congress, and the Supreme Court through Project 2025. The corruption is visible everywhere. Quid pro quo and pay for play are not abstractions — they are evident in the gifts showered on Supreme Court justices.

Keep ReadingShow less