Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

National Voter Registration Day was one step to reclaiming our democracy

Opinion

National Voter Registration Day was one step to reclaiming our democracy

"If we want to recognize the full promise and potential of American democracy, then we must continue working on the principles of National Voter Registration Day," writes Sayu Bhojwani.

File image

Bhojwani is the founder and president of New American Leaders, a nonpartisan organization promoting political participation by first and second generation Americans.

In an era when rampant voter suppression, partisan gerrymandering and electoral corruption threaten our democracy, Tuesday's National Voter Registration Day offered an important call to action.

To protect our democracy from further erosion we will need to take back the White House and remove bad actors from office in 2020. A new math offers a path to those victories and it includes first-generation and second-generation immigrant voters — or "New Americans." They hold the key to swinging this election if they're inspired to vote in large numbers. National Voter Registration Day focused us on ensuring that all Americans who are eligible to vote have the opportunity to do so.

First, it reminded us that we need to level the playing field by bringing voter education and mobilization directly to the doorsteps of these communities. The bureaucracy of the voter registration process can be especially difficult for new Americans to navigate. Every year, millions are unable to vote because they miss registration deadlines, don't update their registration or aren't sure how to register. Real investment is required to educate and mobilize New American voters. In 2018, Georgia had record-breaking turnout because of efforts by groups like New Georgia Project to leave no voter behind. Among Latinos, for example, voter turnout more than doubled.


The second benefit of National Voter Registration Day was activating new American organizers and candidates on the state and local levels. They serve as trusted messengers and ambassadors who inspire immigrant and first-time voters to cast ballots. Their efforts are particularly important since both major political parties largely ignore immigrant communities, especially Asian-Americans and Pacific Islanders. Nearly 40 percent of them do not identify as Democrats or Republicans, and those votes are literally up for grabs. Engaging these ignored voters can pave the path to victory in 2020, but few presidential candidates seem interested in prioritizing it.

Case in point: At the annual Islamic Society of North America convention over Labor Day weekend — the largest gathering of American Muslims — the first-ever presidential forum in this budding community saw participation from just two of the Democrats, Bernie Sanders and Julián Castro. At the only Asian-American and Pacific Islander forum for presidential candidates, the AAPI Progressive Democratic Presidential Forum, low-polling candidates Tulsi Gabbard, Andrew Yang and Tom Steyer were the only participants.

How can campaigns connect with first-time or low-propensity voters? One way is to engage with diverse elected officials and candidates who share the lived experience of potential voters. A second and critical strategy is to continue hiring local and diverse staff members from new American communities and communities of color. Mobilizing new American voters in these ways can change the equation of elections.

National Voter Registration Day has been observed since 2012, but the problem it addresses is decades old, and it's a problem that should never exist in the first place. Low rates of registration and turnout should be a non-issue in one of the world's largest democracies. In Australia, where voting is mandatory, voter turnout is at 96%, compared to 56% in the United States (in 2016).

On paper, voting in the United States is a right, not a privilege. In practice, who can and does vote varies by race and geographic location, among other factors. Currently voting is reserved for those with control over their work schedules and easy access to polling locations.

Presidential candidates must see National Voter Registration Day for what it is: just one tool to build an inclusive democracy. Any candidate who wants to win the White House and win the trust of the emerging New American majority must make democracy reform a top-tier priority, not just a talking point. Long-term solutions would include making Election Day a paid holiday; creating abundant polling locations including options like the vote centers in Larimer County, Colo.; and overturning regressive voter ID laws such as Georgia's exact match law, which disproportionately affected African-Americans and other voters of color last year.

If we want to recognize the full promise and potential of American democracy, then we must continue working on the principles of National Voter Registration Day. It is just one milestone on our journey toward reshaping our democracy to work for "we the people."


Read More

Person looking at computer screen at work.

Brenda Núñez, voter registration supervisor for Nueces County, shows the home screen of the state's voter registration system in 2024. Election officials say they're still struggling to use the system, known as TEAM, to complete essential tasks.

(==Gabriel Cárdenas for Votebeat

Election Officials Are Scrambling To Process Voter Registration Backlog Using a System They Say Does Not Work

At 6 p.m. a few days after the state sent Randall County election administrator Shannon Lackey a backlog of 3,388 of voter registration records, she was still at her desk, processing them after a full day of work.

She planned to stay late and get as much done as she could, then keep working from home. Lackey, whose department has five employees, isn’t expecting overtime pay or compensatory time off to make up for the extra work caused by the state error.

Keep ReadingShow less
multiethnic American voters participating in the US election, showcasing the concept of choice in a democracy

Presidents who lost the popular vote often faced economic turmoil. See the pattern from Harrison to Trump and how a 50-state strategy could change it.

Alan Mazzocco/Getty Images

Path Forward from Economic Consequences of Non-Popular Vote Presidents

While losing the popular vote does not inherently cause economic ruin, the structural political weakness of entering office without a democratic majority mandate often compounded the economic challenges their administrations faced. These terms were marked by distinct economic hardships, structural imbalances, or severe financial crises.

Destabilizing Partisan Protectionism

Keep ReadingShow less
people filling out their ballots at voting booths and submitting their vote.

Independent voters may hand Democrats control of Congress this fall — but as history shows, they'll get nothing in return. Here's how to change that.

Pressmaster/Getty Images

Swinging Outcomes Is Not Enough

The midterms are six weeks away, and polls predict that independent voters, who broke for Donald Trump in 2024, are planning on voting for Democrats by wide margins. Among Latinos, the numbers are staggering, to the point that the Republican gerrymanders in Florida and Texas may actually result in Democratic victories.

If the Democrats take control of Congress, it will be because of independents. And what do independents get in return?

Keep ReadingShow less
Diverse People At Voting Booth. Vote Here Elections Sign

A political scientist examines how automatic voter registration is quietly turning non-affiliation into America's largest voting bloc.

AndreyPopov/Getty Images

When Neither Party Is the Default: Rethinking Representation As America’s Electorate Changes

For most of my career as a political scientist, representation was the central theme of my teaching and research. Early on, I studied how legislators understood their responsibilities to constituents — whether they saw themselves as delegates carrying out constituent mandates, trustees exercising independent judgment, or politicos combining both. That work asked a question that still matters: What does it mean to represent the public in a changing democracy?

Today I find myself asking a related question: What happens when the electorate changes but the institutions built to represent it do not?

Keep ReadingShow less