Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

The danger of technology discrimination

technology discrimination
Two technology balancing acts
d3sign/Getty Images

Stefflbauer is a Middle East expert and the founder and CEO of FrauenLoop, a computer programming school for resident, immigrant and refugee women in Germany. She is a Public Voices Fellow with The OpEd Project.

If you’re tired of hearing individuals weakly apologize for racism, then you’re probably exasperated by technology companies that do the same thing. The latest technology bias story has Instagram apologizing for adding “terrorist” to some Palestinian user profiles. That news provides another example of how tech companies regularly amplify social discrimination. Rather than being an alleviator of racial bias and a tool of racial justice, online technologies have the power to super-charge the dissemination of dehumanizing stereotypes and racist, sexist labels. Whereas, previously, you might have risked facing one person’s biased opinions off-line, online technologies can now reduce millions of people to stereotypes and caricatures that its victims are powerless to fight.

Black people already know that technology can be discriminatory, whether it identifies a person as an ape or fails to work altogether when dark-skinned people use it. Women have been raising alarms about bias in tech for years, as was the case when a secret Amazon hiring algorithm was found to discriminate against women. Or when Apple Pay’s credit algorithm awarded women lower credit scores than men. But women and Black people aren’t alone: In 2017, Chinese customers received refunds from Apple after claiming that the iPhone X face recognition couldn’t tell them apart. These examples show that technology is able to replicate human biases, in part, because discrimination by humans is restricted by law, while discrimination via computerized technologies oftentimes is not.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter


The public is quick to assign blame when it comes to people who are found to behave in a discriminatory manner. However, when technology products encourage discrimination, the public response may be too little, or come too late. For Rohingya, Turkish, Uighur and now Palestinian Muslims, a legal settlement after the fact may not be as effective as proactive regulations that prevent discrimination in the first place.

As a Black American, I am witness to repeated discrimination in our country by police and educational figures who choose to treat people differently based solely on their race. As a scholar of Middle East history who spent years studying in North Africa and the Arab Levant, I see the same type of bigotry encoded into popular technologies. To be sure, you don’t need to personally suffer discrimination in order to recognize that it’s wrong. Many American Jews, for example, protested against the discriminatory treatment of Black Americans during the U.S. civil rights era. Today, Jewish Voice for Peace is publicly taking a stand against bigotry towards other groups. You don’t need to be Arab or a Muslim to recognize that tech companies discriminating against those groups leads us to becoming a two-class society — something this country has seen before.

It’s time for unequal treatment of consumers by the largest tech companies on earth to end. Remember the fictional country Wakanda depicted in the movie “Black Panther”? That film drew millions of viewers worldwide in 2018, partly because audiences of color knew that they would visit a place where racial stereotypes would not appear. Tech companies have been promising people of color an online Wakanda for years, but none of them — not even Mark Zuckerberg’s immersive Metaverse — have delivered. We never know when harmful social or cultural biases will show up, but whether it is chatbots, algorithmic photo filters or predictive algorithms, examples of tech-enabled discrimination still abound.

When we have leaders in Congress who either don’t understand tech or don’t care, and a tech industry that seemingly is more concerned with profits than justice, it is up to citizens to make a difference. We can speak up in protest, the way that people all over the world are protesting against the spread of offline ethnic and racial discrimination and violence. We can also write to elected representatives to demand appropriate regulation, audits and heavy fines for companies whose technology biases harm us all by stereotyping us or by arbitrarily labeling us as “undesirables.”

With the integration of artificial intelligence into our lives at an ever increasing rate, now is the time to take action to prevent human biases getting regurgitated by technology. As the latest Instagram example proves, that future may already be here.

Read More

Just the Facts:  Has Trump Made Stock Market Volatility Great Again?

A person viewing stock market trends on their phone.

Getty Images, manusapon kasosod

Just the Facts: Has Trump Made Stock Market Volatility Great Again?

Our ongoing series, “Just the Facts,” strives to approach news stories with both an open mind and skepticism, so we may present our readers with a broad spectrum of viewpoints through diligent research and critical thinking. As best we can, we look to remove personal bias from our reporting and seek a variety of perspectives in both our news gathering and selection of opinion pieces.

Has the stock market been more volatile than usual since Trump was inaugurated this January?

Keep ReadingShow less
Conflict of Interest Complaints Against Musk Grow

U.S. President Donald Trump and White House Senior Advisor, Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk deliver remarks next to a Tesla Cyber Truck and a Model S on the South Lawn of the White House on March 11, 2025 in Washington, DC.

Getty Images, Andrew Harnik

Conflict of Interest Complaints Against Musk Grow

On Friday, March 14, 2025, The Fulcrum published a news report entitled, “Complaint Filed Against Elon Musk for Potentially Violating Laws to Benefit His Satellite Business,” in which we reported on a complaint filed by the Campaign Legal Center (CLC) with the U.S. Department of Transportation’s acting Inspector General. The complaint asks them to investigate if Elon Musk unlawfully influenced government decision-making and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) contracts involving his satellite business.

Two days after The Fulcrum report, Evan Feinman—the outgoing director of the Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) Program—publicly criticized the Trump administration for allegedly diverting funds from rural broadband projects to Elon Musk's Starlink satellite internet company. This criticism was expressed in an email to colleagues on March 16, 2025. Feinman described the diversion of funds as a betrayal to rural America, emphasizing the importance of providing reliable and affordable internet access to underserved areas.

Keep ReadingShow less
Trump’s tariff strategy hammers Wall Street

Traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on March 11, 2025 in New York City. Following the worst day for the markets this year, the Dow was down nearly 500 points in morning trading.

(Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

Trump’s tariff strategy hammers Wall Street

The chaos that gripped Wall Street on March 10, 2025, was no accident.

The plummeting stock market, the sharp decline in Bitcoin, and the spike in volatility all pointed to a single, undeniable factor: President Donald Trump’s economic policies, particularly his tariff-heavy approach, have unnerved investors and accelerated fears of an impending recession.

Keep ReadingShow less
Just the Facts: 2025 Canada vs. United States Tariff War

Trucks head to the Ambassador Bridge between Windsor, Canada and Detroit, Michigan on the first day of President Donald Trump's new 25% tariffs on goods from Canada and Mexico on March 4, 2025, in Windsor, Canada.

Getty Images, Bill Pugliano

Just the Facts: 2025 Canada vs. United States Tariff War

Our ongoing series, “Just the Facts,” strives to approach news stories with both an open mind and skepticism, so we may present our readers with a broad spectrum of viewpoints through diligent research and critical thinking. As best we can, we look to remove personal bias from our reporting and seek a variety of perspectives in both our news gathering and selection of opinion pieces.

On Sunday, March 9th, The Fulcrum ran a story called “Just the Facts: Canadian Tariffs”. Since Sunday, there has been a mind-boggling flurry of activity in the ongoing trade battle between the United States and Canada.

Keep ReadingShow less