Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The state of voting: May 2, 2022

State of voting - election law changes

This weekly update summarizing legislative activity affecting voting and elections is powered by the Voting Rights Lab. Sign up for VRL’s weekly newsletter here.

The Voting Rights Lab is tracking 2,446 bills so far this session, with 573 bills that tighten the rules governing voter access or election administration and 1,088 bills that expand the rules.

Georgie and Arizona made changes on both fronts in recent days. Georgia. Gov. Brian Kemp signed legislation granting the Bureau of Investigation authority to investigate election crimes while the sate also restored automatic voter registration for drivers. Meanwhile in Arizona, it was a busy week for the Senate Rules Committee, with advance one bill that would mandate drop box monitoring as well as a voting rights restoration bill.

Looking ahead: New Hampshire’s bill placing new restrictions on voter ID is slated for a House floor vote this week.

Here are the details:


Florida secretary of state issues guidance on new voting restrictions. Shortly after Gov. Ron DeSantis signed S.B. 524 into law last week, Secretary of State Laurel Lee issued guidance concerning some provisions of the new law that may be subject to preclearance, pursuant to a federal court decision regarding another Florida bill, and therefore will not be enforced until further notice. The provisions on hold pending the state’s appeal of the district court ruling include the new restrictions on the use of drop boxes for mail-in ballots, increased penalties for third-party voter registration organizations and line warming.

Arizona’s rights restoration bill eligible for governor’s signature; Legislation restricting drop boxes advances. H.B. 2119 would allow people ineligible for automatic restoration to apply for their voting rights to be restored immediately upon discharge, instead of having to wait two years as they do under current law. The bill would also ensure that citizens convicted of or facing felony charges are notified about whether, when or how their voting rights will be restored. The bill has passed the Senate and passed a House vote on concurrence with the Senate amendments. It is now eligible for the governor’s signature.

Meanwhile, legislation restricting drop boxes ( H.B. 2238) passed out of the Senate Rules Committee. This bill would require drop boxes to be located in a facility at which election staff are present and monitoring the drop box. Otherwise, 24-hour video surveillance of the drop box would be required. Opponents have argued that these restrictions would be cost-prohibitive and threaten to eliminate drop boxes in many areas, especially on tribal lands.

Georgia governor signs criminal investigation law; officials restore automatic voter registration. Kemp signed S.B. 441 into law last week, expanding the authority of the Georgia Bureau of Investigations to independently investigate purported election crimes and issue relevant subpoenas. Georgia is one of 14 states to introduce bills that would escalate the investigation or prosecution of purported election crimes this year.

Last year voter registrations dramatically declined at the Georgia Department of Driver Services. The likely cause of the decline was a technical change making voter registration a confusing opt-in process, rather than offering eligible voters the opportunity to opt out of registration. This past week, following significant media coverage, Georgia officials announced they would restore the opt-out process to automatically register eligible voters.

New Hampshire’s strict voter ID bill passes the House Finance Committee. S.B. 418 passed the House Finance Committee despite a subcommittee’s recommendation to refer the bill to an interim study. This bill would make the state voter ID law more restrictive. Current New Hampshire law allows voters without ID to cast a regular ballot if they complete an affidavit affirming their identity, under penalty of perjury. This bill would eliminate that alternative, and instead rescind their vote from the count if they are unable to provide an ID. Most states with voter ID laws offer an alternative method of voting to ensure the identity of voters without ID can still be verified. This new bill would put New Hampshire in the minority of states. It is expected to face a House floor vote this week.

Oklahoma Legislature revives a bill that would allow interference in election litigation. The Oklahoma House adopted the most recent version of S.B 523 and sent it back to the Senate for concurrence. This bill would prevent litigants from changing election law by settlement or legal agreement and only permit state actors – including state courts – to alter election law to the extent authorized by statute.

Read More

Does either party actually want to win the Senate race in Texas?

US Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) speaks during an "Oversight and Government Reform" hearing on Capitol Hill, in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 12, 2025. (Alex Wroblewski/AFP/Getty Images/TNS)

(Alex Wroblewski/AFP/Getty Images/TNS)

Does either party actually want to win the Senate race in Texas?

One of the worst features of the election primary system in our polarized “Red vs. Blue” time is the tendency of primary voters to flock to the candidate they most want to “destroy” the other party, not the candidate best positioned to do so.

Let’s say a zombie is scratching at your door. You’ve got a shotgun, a handgun and your favorite frying pan. The shotgun has the greatest chance of success, the handgun — if one is careful and skilled — has a solid chance of working, and the frying pan? It probably won’t dispatch the threat but, come on, how cool would it be to take out a zombie with a frying pan? So, you go with that.

Keep ReadingShow less
artificial intelligence

Rather than blame AI for young Americans struggling to find work, we need to build: build new educational institutions, new retraining and upskilling programs, and, most importantly, new firms.

Surasak Suwanmake/Getty Images

Blame AI or Build With AI? Only One Approach Creates Jobs

We’re failing young Americans. Many of them are struggling to find work. Unemployment among 16- to 24-year-olds topped 10.5% in August. Even among those who do find a job, many of them are settling for lower-paying roles. More than 50% of college grads are underemployed. To make matters worse, the path forward to a more stable, lucrative career is seemingly up in the air. High school grads in their twenties find jobs at nearly the same rate as those with four-year degrees.

We have two options: blame or build. The first involves blaming AI, as if this new technology is entirely to blame for the current economic malaise facing Gen Z. This course of action involves slowing or even stopping AI adoption. For example, there’s so-called robot taxes. The thinking goes that by placing financial penalties on firms that lean into AI, there will be more roles left to Gen Z and workers in general. Then there’s the idea of banning or limiting the use of AI in hiring and firing decisions. Applicants who have struggled to find work suggest that increased use of AI may be partially at fault. Others have called for providing workers with a greater say in whether and to what extent their firm uses AI. This may help firms find ways to integrate AI in a way that augments workers rather than replace them.

Keep ReadingShow less
Our Doomsday Machine

Two sides stand rigidly opposed, divided by a chasm of hardened positions and non-relationship.

AI generated illustration

Our Doomsday Machine

Political polarization is only one symptom of the national disease that afflicts us. From obesity to heart disease to chronic stress, we live with the consequences of the failure to relate to each other authentically, even to perceive and understand what an authentic encounter might be. Can we see the organic causes of the physiological ailments as arising from a single organ system – the organ of relationship?

Without actual evidence of a relationship between the physiological ailments and the failure of personal encounter, this writer (myself in 2012) is lunging, like a fencer with his sword, to puncture a delusion. He wants to interrupt a conversation running in the background like an almost-silent electric motor, asking us to notice the hum, to question it. He wants to open to our inspection the matter of what it is to credit evidence. For believing—especially with the coming of artificial intelligence, which can manufacture apparently flawless pictures of the real, and with the seething of the mob crying havoc online and then out in the streets—even believing in evidence may not ground us in truth.

Keep ReadingShow less