Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

On the day of the biggest partisan loyalty test, time to start thinking for ourselves

New York voter

A voter cast an early ballot at the Hunter-Bellevue School of Nursing in New York.

David Dee Delgado/Getty Images

Tangirala is a first-year student planning to major in math at the University of Texas at Austin.


The Republican Party isn't our do-all end-all. The Democratic Party isn't our do-all end-all. And neither President Trump nor Joe Biden will, by themselves, determine the fate of our country for the next four years.

It may be tough to remember this Election Day, but most people do not entirely conform to any political denomination. In fact, even as we're picking a president in what ends up being the ultimate partisan decision, many of us are beginning to realize that partisan politics have eroded to a point beyond rational thought. Both the right and the left are governed by forms of mob rule and simplistic slogans. "Pro-life" or "pro-choice," for example. It's utterly absurd how the debate over such a life-altering matter has devolved into a political war-cry instead of an active effort to find a resolution that acknowledges the non-binary nature of the issue.

This is not to say partisan politics is unimportant or that we should neglect it. However, we must remember that no political party has all the answers or is wrong on all its solutions. And so we, the people, should be controlling politics.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Far too many times this year, people on both the right and the left have valued the opinions and ideologies of their elected representatives above the notion they should be formulating their own. Most notably, Trump has persuaded millions of his fans not to accept wearing a face mask as the best way to avoid becoming a coronavirus pandemic victim, and his wavering on that view does not erase the fact that thousands have claimed the president's mask-are-pointless position as their own. It is, to say the least, unfortunate that people cannot think for themselves in a country that prides itself on free speech.

Therefore, we must learn to pursue change at the grassroots and not allow powerful political agendas to influence our social equity goals. When I vote, I always consider the candidate before the party. This — the constitutional notion of the power belonging to the people — will elicit far more progress than purely putting your faith in a politician who speaks using flowery language. This is the true power of democracy.

According to Gallup, 25 percent of Americans identify as Republicans, 31 percent as Democrats and 40 percent — a plurality — as independents. If all of them had aligned behind one like-mindedly independent candidate, we would not be on the verge of re-electing Trump or replacing him with Biden. If our politics reflected our views, we would end up with a president who doesn't conform to the two-party system. This in itself speaks volumes as to the hyper-polarized nature of the two-party system.

Before graduating from high school this year I launched the Anti-Racist Curriculum Reform effort to persuade school districts to teach more about racism and include more perspectives of people of color in social studies. Other fellow teenagers in the Houston suburbs have launched another nonpartisan initiative to reform policing by tightening the rules for officers using body cameras.

Yes, we utilize the help of political figures who may help further our causes, but we won't depend on them. Our mindsets as civilians and constituents require the same approach.

Politicians are our representatives, not the other way around. As constituents, our duties include informing our representatives of our concerns in society and utilizing their help, if applicable, to ensure necessary improvements.

However, we should not be digesting every word of theirs as gospel and then treating every other view as sacrilege. This is happening far too much in the present climate. It needs to stop. We aren't living in a movie where Biden is our hero, and Trump the villain. Remember, the former vice president has acted as a champion of people of color like me — and said some pretty insensitive things about race along the way. Maybe they were slips of the tongue or hyperbole, and most don't doubt he wants to do some good. But intention is often not the same as the reality that accordingly befalls.

And while Trump is wrong on many different accounts, being wrong doesn't automatically make the views of everyone opposing him correct. Some of them may also be wrong. We don't live in a world where everything said about policy and politics is mutually exclusive.

Regardless of our political denomination, we need to be open to discourse and treat every sentence coming out of every politician's mouth with the sort of skepticism we now too often apply only to those we view as political opponents.

In a few hours, voting will be over. Now learn to think for yourself. If you are a devotee of any politicians, remember they are humans just like the rest of us. Remember that at the end of the day, your voice — and your individuality of thought — is what matters most.

Read More

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Jesus "Eddie" Campa, former Chief Deputy of the El Paso County Sheriff's Department and former Chief of Police for Marshall Texas, discusses the recent school shooting in Uvalde and how loose restrictions on gun ownership complicate the lives of law enforcement on this episode of YDHTY.

Listen now

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

There's something natural and organic about perceiving that the people in power are out to advance their own interests. It's in part because it’s often true. Governments actually do keep secrets from the public. Politicians engage in scandals. There often is corruption at high levels. So, we don't want citizens in a democracy to be too trusting of their politicians. It's healthy to be skeptical of the state and its real abuses and tendencies towards secrecy. The danger is when this distrust gets redirected, not toward the state, but targets innocent people who are not actually responsible for people's problems.

On this episode of "Democracy Paradox" Scott Radnitz explains why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies.

Your Take:  The Price of Freedom

Your Take: The Price of Freedom

Our question about the price of freedom received a light response. We asked:

What price have you, your friends or your family paid for the freedom we enjoy? And what price would you willingly pay?

It was a question born out of the horror of images from Ukraine. We hope that the news about the Jan. 6 commission and Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Supreme Court nomination was so riveting that this question was overlooked. We considered another possibility that the images were so traumatic, that our readers didn’t want to consider the question for themselves. We saw the price Ukrainians paid.

One response came from a veteran who noted that being willing to pay the ultimate price for one’s country and surviving was a gift that was repaid over and over throughout his life. “I know exactly what it is like to accept that you are a dead man,” he said. What most closely mirrored my own experience was a respondent who noted her lack of payment in blood, sweat or tears, yet chose to volunteer in helping others exercise their freedom.

Personally, my price includes service to our nation, too. The price I paid was the loss of my former life, which included a husband, a home and a seemingly secure job to enter the political fray with a message of partisan healing and hope for the future. This work isn’t risking my life, but it’s the price I’ve paid.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Given the earnest question we asked, and the meager responses, I am also left wondering if we think at all about the price of freedom? Or have we all become so entitled to our freedom that we fail to defend freedom for others? Or was the question poorly timed?

I read another respondent’s words as an indicator of his pacifism. And another veteran who simply stated his years of service. And that was it. Four responses to a question that lives in my heart every day. We look forward to hearing Your Take on other topics. Feel free to share questions to which you’d like to respond.

Keep ReadingShow less
No, autocracies don't make economies great

libre de droit/Getty Images

No, autocracies don't make economies great

Tom G. Palmer has been involved in the advance of democratic free-market policies and reforms around the globe for more than three decades. He is executive vice president for international programs at Atlas Network and a senior fellow at the Cato Institute.

One argument frequently advanced for abandoning the messy business of democratic deliberation is that all those checks and balances, hearings and debates, judicial review and individual rights get in the way of development. What’s needed is action, not more empty debate or selfish individualism!

In the words of European autocrat Viktor Orbán, “No policy-specific debates are needed now, the alternatives in front of us are obvious…[W]e need to understand that for rebuilding the economy it is not theories that are needed but rather thirty robust lads who start working to implement what we all know needs to be done.” See! Just thirty robust lads and one far-sighted overseer and you’re on the way to a great economy!

Keep ReadingShow less