Skip to content

Latest Stories

Top Stories

How Joe Manchin would rewrite the For the People Act

Joe Manchin

Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin outlined his democracy reform wish list on Wednesday.

Alex Wong/Getty Images

Senators finally got a glimpse into the mind of their colleague Joe Manchin when he laid out his priorities for democracy reform Wednesday.

The moderate Democrat from West Virginia had not previously revealed what parts of the wide-ranging For the People Act he was willing to support, saying only that he believed any election reform bill should be bipartisan. But now he has outlined his policy demands.

It's not yet clear if Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer will consider changes to the bill when it is brought to the chamber floor next week. And even if Democrats reach a compromise with Manchin, convincing 10 Republicans to get on board to avoid a filibuster will be a steep task.

The three-page memo mostly listed what parts of the legislation Manchin supports, but it also included some provisions he wanted to add or adjust. Notable omissions on Manchin's wish list include public financing of elections and a blanket prohibition on voter ID requirements — both of which are included in the current draft.

What Manchin wants to add or change

  • Make Election Day a public holiday. (This provision is included in the House version of the bill, but not the Senate's.)
  • Require identification in order to vote. (Utility bills would be an allowable alternative to an ID.)
  • Require states to send absentee ballots to eligible voters before an election if a voter is not able to cast a ballot in person during early voting or on Election Day due to eligible circumstances, and allow civil penalty for failure.
  • Allow for maintenance of voter rolls by utilizing information derived from state and federal documents. (Many Democrats have historically opposed this type of provision over concerns it would lead to voter roll "purges.")
  • Ban partisan gerrymandering and use computer models to draw district lines.
  • Require the attorney general to develop a state-based response system and hotline to provide information on voting. (This provision is included in the House version of the bill, but not the Senate's.)

What Manchin wants to keep

  • Mandate at least 15 consecutive days of early voting for federal elections, including weekends.
  • Establish automatic voter registration through motor vehicle departments, while also giving individuals the ability to opt out.
  • Require states to promote voter registration and voting access for disabled and elderly people.
  • Prohibit providing false information about elections to hinder or discourage voting, and increase penalties for voter intimidation.
  • Require the Election Assistance Commission to develop model training programs for poll workers, and award grants to states for such training.
  • Require states to notify an individual, no later than seven days before election, if the location of their polling place has changed.
  • Send absentee ballots expeditiously and with postage paid.
  • Establish standards for election vendors based on cybersecurity concerns.
  • Allow provisional ballots to count for all eligible races regardless of precinct.
  • Amend the Federal Election Campaign Act to create a requirement for disclosing reportable foreign contacts.
  • Bolster campaign finance transparency and close loopholes that allow foreign spending in elections with the DISCLOSE Act.
  • Strengthen disclosure requirements for online political advertisements with the Honest Ads Act.
  • Create a "coordinated spender" category to ensure single-candidate super PACs do not operate as arms of campaigns.
  • Increase resources for the Foreign Agents Registration Act office.; create a FARA investigation and enforcement unit in the Department of Justice; provide FARA the authority to impose civil penalties.
  • Require all presidential appointees to recuse themselves from any matter in which a party is the president, the president's spouse or an entity in which the president or president's spouse has a substantial interest.
  • Prevent lobbyists from working on the behalf of foreign entities.
  • Require the president and the vice president, within 30 days of taking office, to divest of any financial interests that pose a conflict of interest or to disclose information about their business interests.
  • Require the disclosure of individual tax returns and certain business tax returns by presidents and vice presidents, as well as candidates for president and vice president.

Manchin's stance on the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act

In addition to the For the People Act, Manchin also outlined several updates he would like to see made to the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act. The moderate senator has appeared more open to supporting this voting rights legislation than the sweeping democracy reform package.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

The Voting Rights Advancement Act would restore the Justice Department's power to preemptively review voting laws in places with a history of racial discrimination, also known as "preclearance." One of Manchin's adjustments to this bill would be to require "objective measures" for determining whether a jurisdiction has a history or pattern of discrimination.

Read More

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Jesus "Eddie" Campa, former Chief Deputy of the El Paso County Sheriff's Department and former Chief of Police for Marshall Texas, discusses the recent school shooting in Uvalde and how loose restrictions on gun ownership complicate the lives of law enforcement on this episode of YDHTY.

Listen now

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

There's something natural and organic about perceiving that the people in power are out to advance their own interests. It's in part because it’s often true. Governments actually do keep secrets from the public. Politicians engage in scandals. There often is corruption at high levels. So, we don't want citizens in a democracy to be too trusting of their politicians. It's healthy to be skeptical of the state and its real abuses and tendencies towards secrecy. The danger is when this distrust gets redirected, not toward the state, but targets innocent people who are not actually responsible for people's problems.

On this episode of "Democracy Paradox" Scott Radnitz explains why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies.

Your Take:  The Price of Freedom

Your Take: The Price of Freedom

Our question about the price of freedom received a light response. We asked:

What price have you, your friends or your family paid for the freedom we enjoy? And what price would you willingly pay?

It was a question born out of the horror of images from Ukraine. We hope that the news about the Jan. 6 commission and Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Supreme Court nomination was so riveting that this question was overlooked. We considered another possibility that the images were so traumatic, that our readers didn’t want to consider the question for themselves. We saw the price Ukrainians paid.

One response came from a veteran who noted that being willing to pay the ultimate price for one’s country and surviving was a gift that was repaid over and over throughout his life. “I know exactly what it is like to accept that you are a dead man,” he said. What most closely mirrored my own experience was a respondent who noted her lack of payment in blood, sweat or tears, yet chose to volunteer in helping others exercise their freedom.

Personally, my price includes service to our nation, too. The price I paid was the loss of my former life, which included a husband, a home and a seemingly secure job to enter the political fray with a message of partisan healing and hope for the future. This work isn’t risking my life, but it’s the price I’ve paid.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Given the earnest question we asked, and the meager responses, I am also left wondering if we think at all about the price of freedom? Or have we all become so entitled to our freedom that we fail to defend freedom for others? Or was the question poorly timed?

I read another respondent’s words as an indicator of his pacifism. And another veteran who simply stated his years of service. And that was it. Four responses to a question that lives in my heart every day. We look forward to hearing Your Take on other topics. Feel free to share questions to which you’d like to respond.

Keep ReadingShow less
No, autocracies don't make economies great

libre de droit/Getty Images

No, autocracies don't make economies great

Tom G. Palmer has been involved in the advance of democratic free-market policies and reforms around the globe for more than three decades. He is executive vice president for international programs at Atlas Network and a senior fellow at the Cato Institute.

One argument frequently advanced for abandoning the messy business of democratic deliberation is that all those checks and balances, hearings and debates, judicial review and individual rights get in the way of development. What’s needed is action, not more empty debate or selfish individualism!

In the words of European autocrat Viktor Orbán, “No policy-specific debates are needed now, the alternatives in front of us are obvious…[W]e need to understand that for rebuilding the economy it is not theories that are needed but rather thirty robust lads who start working to implement what we all know needs to be done.” See! Just thirty robust lads and one far-sighted overseer and you’re on the way to a great economy!

Keep ReadingShow less
Podcast: A right-wing perspective on Jan. 6th and the 2020 election

Podcast: A right-wing perspective on Jan. 6th and the 2020 election

Peter Wood is an anthropologist and president of the National Association of Scholars. He believes—like many Americans on the right—that the 2020 election was stolen from Donald Trump and the January 6th riots were incited by the left in collusion with the FBI. He’s also the author of a new book called Wrath: America Enraged, which wrestles with our politics of anger and counsels conservatives on how to respond to perceived aggression.

Where does America go from here? In this episode, Peter joins Ciaran O’Connor for a frank conversation about the role of anger in our politics as well as the nature of truth, trust, and conspiracy theories.

Keep ReadingShow less