Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

A national voice to fight Trump's rogue election tactics: Coming soon?

Tom Ridge

We need someone, perhaps Tom Ridge, to be the leading voice fighting the president's voter suppression efforts, writes Michael Golden.

NurPhoto/Getty Images
Golden is the author of "Unlock Congress" (Why Not Books) and a senior fellow at the Adlai Stevenson Center on Democracy. He is a member of The Fulcrum's editorial advisory board.

The Democrats begin what is sure to be a novel-looking national political convention on Monday. Next week, the Republicans will return the favor. But for millions of Americans, political persuasion has already taken a back seat to the imperative of ensuring that our decisions will actually matter.

If we want a presidential election this year where all voters get to cast their ballots — and every last ballot gets counted — we need a focused and high-profile communications campaign. Quickly.

While voter suppression and ballot chicanery are far from new concepts in our elections, the difference in 2020 is that an American president has openly announced he is trying to cheat and is using the power of the federal government to do so. On national TV and social media, Donald Trump has touted his strategy to defund and disrupt the Postal Service to steal the election.

The second part of Trump's strategy is to consistently declare the election is "going to be a mess" and "fraudulent" and "the most rigged in American history." Trump repeats these mantras again and again as a conditioning mechanism. He drills them into Americans' heads to prime us for his next phase, which begins on Election Day. If Nov. 3 doesn't go his way, Trump will take his claims and actions to a whole new level.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

It's an intentional communications strategy. It's right in his wheelhouse. And it's the kind of thing that works.

In fact, a Washington Post/ABC poll last month revealed that 49 percent of Americans now believe that mail-in ballots are susceptible to significant fraud.

As the president has been doing this, commentators who support a fair and accurate election have been trying to respond through countless social media posts and hourly TV segments.

But when all these righteous pronouncements get made in such a dispersed fashion, they don't have nearly the collective power required to effectively dispute all the president's garbage and misfeasance.

Theodore Roosevelt first described the powerful platform of the presidency as "the bully pulpit" for a reason. Historian Doris Kearns Goodwin explained it in her biography of the 26th president, which she subtitled "The Bully Pulpit":

"What he meant was that the president has an unparalleled platform to educate the country and to have moral fervor delivered to the country so that the people themselves will become extraordinarily interested in certain programs."

"Educate the country," or miseducate the country. In Trump's playbook, there's zero difference, as long as the tactics are aligned with the goal. And he leverages the messaging power of the Oval Office as well as any president in history.

The stakes in this election are sky high. And the power and reach of the bully pulpit — especially the one occupied by Trump — is second to none. So if you're going to push back against that massive and focused sound, you'd better maximize the impact of your message. Doing so at this moment in time requires two big steps:

First, one person must be chosen to be the singular voice on this issue. Election Day is in 11 weeks. As soon as possible, there must be one high-profile, designated spokesperson who is laser-focused on delivering messaging that advocates for ensuring a fully fair election.

This spokesperson would ideally be someone who has a well-established reputation for integrity and has a proven track record as an excellent live communicator.

Second, a nonpartisan and nationwide coalition must be launched, not only to work on the ground toward the goal of a fair election but also to serve as the ballast behind the public voice representing this initiative.

Over the past few months, I have not seen or heard one consistent public voice on this predicament. So in recent days I reached out to a few veteran strategists and asked them two questions: Doesn't our country need this? Does anything like this exist?

The answers kept coming back "yes" to the first and "no" or "I don't know" to the second. Each time, my head felt like it was inching closer and closer to spontaneous combustion.

Then I had the talk I'd been hoping for.

It was with Nick Penniman, the founder and CEO of Issue One, an ethics and campaign finance reform organization chock full of former officeholders from both sides of the aisle. (He and I started working together three years ago designing a nonpartisan reform news and opinion website — which has now become The Fulcrum. Issue One owns it but has no journalistic control.)

Before I got a paragraph of my pitch out of my mouth, Penniman told me he agreed — and that Issue One and another bipartisan group formed this spring, VoteSafe, are "mobilizing a bipartisan communications campaign to push back on attempts to discredit the vote and ensure a peaceful transition of power."

Boom!

Issue One has a bipartisan "ReFormers Caucus" of more than 200 former members of Congress, governors and administration officials. I asked if that caucus might be involved. He said it was possible. Then I noted that Republican Tom Ridge, who was the first secretary of Homeland Security after six years as governor of Pennsylvania, is one of the most prominent leaders at both VoteSafe and the ReFormers Caucus. I asked if Ridge might become more visible soon. He said it was possible.

Finally — a reason to exhale.

There is no time to waste. But the good news is that a movement is afoot and a plan is near completion. Be on the lookout for more information on real ways you can support this effort of ensuring a fair and accurate election on Nov 3.

Every last ballot must be counted. It is the backbone of our entire system.

Read More

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Jesus "Eddie" Campa, former Chief Deputy of the El Paso County Sheriff's Department and former Chief of Police for Marshall Texas, discusses the recent school shooting in Uvalde and how loose restrictions on gun ownership complicate the lives of law enforcement on this episode of YDHTY.

Listen now

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

There's something natural and organic about perceiving that the people in power are out to advance their own interests. It's in part because it’s often true. Governments actually do keep secrets from the public. Politicians engage in scandals. There often is corruption at high levels. So, we don't want citizens in a democracy to be too trusting of their politicians. It's healthy to be skeptical of the state and its real abuses and tendencies towards secrecy. The danger is when this distrust gets redirected, not toward the state, but targets innocent people who are not actually responsible for people's problems.

On this episode of "Democracy Paradox" Scott Radnitz explains why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies.

Your Take:  The Price of Freedom

Your Take: The Price of Freedom

Our question about the price of freedom received a light response. We asked:

What price have you, your friends or your family paid for the freedom we enjoy? And what price would you willingly pay?

It was a question born out of the horror of images from Ukraine. We hope that the news about the Jan. 6 commission and Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Supreme Court nomination was so riveting that this question was overlooked. We considered another possibility that the images were so traumatic, that our readers didn’t want to consider the question for themselves. We saw the price Ukrainians paid.

One response came from a veteran who noted that being willing to pay the ultimate price for one’s country and surviving was a gift that was repaid over and over throughout his life. “I know exactly what it is like to accept that you are a dead man,” he said. What most closely mirrored my own experience was a respondent who noted her lack of payment in blood, sweat or tears, yet chose to volunteer in helping others exercise their freedom.

Personally, my price includes service to our nation, too. The price I paid was the loss of my former life, which included a husband, a home and a seemingly secure job to enter the political fray with a message of partisan healing and hope for the future. This work isn’t risking my life, but it’s the price I’ve paid.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Given the earnest question we asked, and the meager responses, I am also left wondering if we think at all about the price of freedom? Or have we all become so entitled to our freedom that we fail to defend freedom for others? Or was the question poorly timed?

I read another respondent’s words as an indicator of his pacifism. And another veteran who simply stated his years of service. And that was it. Four responses to a question that lives in my heart every day. We look forward to hearing Your Take on other topics. Feel free to share questions to which you’d like to respond.

Keep ReadingShow less
No, autocracies don't make economies great

libre de droit/Getty Images

No, autocracies don't make economies great

Tom G. Palmer has been involved in the advance of democratic free-market policies and reforms around the globe for more than three decades. He is executive vice president for international programs at Atlas Network and a senior fellow at the Cato Institute.

One argument frequently advanced for abandoning the messy business of democratic deliberation is that all those checks and balances, hearings and debates, judicial review and individual rights get in the way of development. What’s needed is action, not more empty debate or selfish individualism!

In the words of European autocrat Viktor Orbán, “No policy-specific debates are needed now, the alternatives in front of us are obvious…[W]e need to understand that for rebuilding the economy it is not theories that are needed but rather thirty robust lads who start working to implement what we all know needs to be done.” See! Just thirty robust lads and one far-sighted overseer and you’re on the way to a great economy!

Keep ReadingShow less