Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Breast Cancer Awareness Month is a model for blurred lines

Woman with pink ribbon
Issarawat Tattong/Getty Images

Johnson is a United Methodist pastor, the author of "Holding Up Your Corner: Talking About Race in Your Community" and program director for the Bridge Alliance, which houses The Fulcrum.

It is rare to find issues that bridge partisan lines and unite Americans across the ideological spectrum. Breast Cancer Awareness Month stands as a powerful exception.

Observed annually in October, BCAM has evolved from grassroots beginnings into a global movement, reshaping our understanding of breast cancer and, in the process, demonstrating the potential for collective action to address a shared health crisis. Almost every American citizen knows someone experiencing some form of cancer, particularly breast cancer. The BCAM model, I purport, offers valuable lessons in how to participate in our nation's social contract more faithfully in polarizing times.


The seeds of BCAM were planted in the early 20th century, with a few pioneering women speaking publicly about their breast cancer diagnoses. However, it wasn't until the 1980s that breast cancer awareness began to gain mainstream momentum. This shift was fueled by the courage of high-profile women like Betty Ford and Nancy Reagan, who shared their battles with the disease, helping to shatter the stigma surrounding breast cancer.

The turning point came in 1985, when the American Cancer Society and Imperial Chemical Industries (now part of AstraZeneca) launched the first Breast Cancer Awareness Month. The initial goals were modest: educate women about the importance of breast cancer screening and early detection. However, the movement quickly took on a life of its own, with the iconic pink ribbon becoming a universal symbol of solidarity and hope.

BCAM has surged in growth and impact for nearly 40 years, becoming a powerful global movement. Thousands of events, ranging from charity runs and walks to fundraising galas and auctions, occur each October, mobilizing communities and raising vital funds. Since its inception, BCAM has been instrumental in generating hundreds of millions of dollars in research funding. This influx of support has fueled groundbreaking discoveries, improving detection methods and treatment options and significantly boosting survival rates.

Interestingly, BCAM's importance extends beyond the medical arena. The movement has been a catalyst for a profound cultural shift, helping to dismantle the stigma and silence that once surrounded breast cancer. By fostering greater openness, empathy and understanding, BCAM has empowered survivors to share their stories and ensured that those affected by the disease feel seen and supported. Many social advocates and spiritual innovators believe these encouraging signs transfer into practices and results.

BCAM's true superpower lies in its ability to transcend the traditional boundaries that often divide us effortlessly. It doesn't matter if you identify as conservative or progressive. When we all come together, donning pink, it becomes a powerful expression of solidarity with everyone fighting the good fight against breast cancer. BCAM's influence extends beyond raising awareness; it bridges cultural and geographic divides, reminding us of a significant and profoundly shared concern: the health and well-being of our fellow human beings. In a world where differences often dominate the headlines, BCAM shines as a unifying force, highlighting our common humanity and the importance of compassion and support in the face of adversity.

The BCAM model offers a roadmap for building bridges and finding common ground. By focusing on something shared — a commonly acute health crisis — instead of a myriad of partisan differences, BCAM is an open invitation that rallies around a common purpose. All that is required is empathy, the willingness to see the humanity in others and the otherness that often mislabels our fellow humans. Also, the curating of open, honest dialogue and interplay spaces where diverse yet similar experiences are welcomed and valued.

The BCAM movement has shown that even the most daunting challenges can be overcome when we come together. It has mobilized millions of people worldwide, transforming the way we think about, diagnose and treat breast cancer. It stands as a testament to the power of collective action, demonstrating that, through unity and determination, we can reshape the world around us. From funding groundbreaking research to supporting those affected by the disease, the impact of BCAM is immeasurable.

This October, join in recognition of BCAM, teaming up with thousands of others committed to building a society with greater empathy, understanding and cooperation around a shared hope. Together, we can educate communities, advance medical breakthroughs and save countless lives. Ultimately, it is only by living in this expression of the social contract more faithfully that we can create a more just, compassionate, united and cancer-free world.

Read More

Multi-colored speech bubbles overlapping.

Stanford’s Strengthening Democracy Challenge shows a key way to reduce political violence: reveal that most Americans reject it.

Getty Images, MirageC

In the Aftermath of Assassinations, Let’s Show That Americans Overwhelmingly Disapprove of Political Violence

In the aftermath of Charlie Kirk’s assassination—and the assassination of Minnesota state legislator Melissa Hortman only three months ago—questions inevitably arise about how to reduce the likelihood of similar heinous actions.

Results from arguably the most important study focused on the U.S. context, the Strengthening Democracy Challenge run by Stanford University, point to one straightforward answer: show people that very few in the other party support political violence. This approach has been shown to reduce support for political violence.

Keep ReadingShow less
Two speech bubbles overlapping each other.

Political outrage is rising—but dismissing the other side’s anger deepens division. Learn why taking outrage seriously can bridge America’s partisan divide.

Getty Images, Richard Drury

Taking Outrage Seriously: Understanding the Moral Signals Behind Political Anger

Over the last several weeks, the Trump administration has deployed the National Guard to the nation’s capital to crack down on crime. While those on the right have long been aghast by rioting and disorder in our cities, pressing for greater military intervention to curtail it, progressive residents of D.C. have tirelessly protested the recent militarization of the city.

This recent flashpoint is a microcosm of the reciprocal outrage at the heart of contemporary American public life. From social media posts to street protests to everyday conversations about "the other side," we're witnessing unprecedented levels of political outrage. And as polarization has increased, we’ve stopped even considering the other political party’s concerns, responding instead with amusement and delight. Schadenfreude, or pleasure at someone else’s pain, is now more common than solidarity or empathy across party lines.

Keep ReadingShow less
Two speech bubbles overlapping.

Recent data shows that Americans view members of the opposing political party overly negatively, leading people to avoid political discourse with those who hold different views.

Getty Images, Richard Drury

How To Motivate Americans’ Conversations Across Politics

Introduction

A large body of research shows that Americans hold overly negative distortions of those across the political spectrum. These misperceptions—often referred to as "Perception Gaps"—make civil discourse harder, since few Americans are eager to engage with people they believe are ideologically extreme, interpersonally hostile, or even threatening or inferior. When potential disagreement feels deeply uncomfortable or dangerous, conversations are unlikely to begin.

Correcting these distortions can help reduce barriers to productive dialogue, making Americans more open to political conversations.

Keep ReadingShow less
Divided American flag

Rev. Dr. F. Willis Johnson writes on the serious impacts of "othering" marginalized populations and how, together, we must push back to create a more inclusive and humane society.

Jorge Villalba/Getty Images

New Rules of the Game: Weaponization of Othering

By now, you have probably seen the viral video. Taylor Townsend—Black, bold, unbothered—walks off the court after a bruising match against her white European opponent, Jelena Ostapenko. The post-match glances were sharper than a backhand slice. Next came the unsportsmanlike commentary—about her body, her "attitude," and a not-so-veiled speculation about whether she belonged at this level. To understand America in the Trump Redux era, one only needs to study this exchange.

Ostapenko vs. Townsend is a microcosm of something much bigger: the way anti-democratic, vengeful politics—modeled from the White House on down—have bled into every corner of public life, including sports. Turning “othering” into the new national pastime. Divisive politics has a profound impact on marginalized groups. Neither Ostapenko nor Donald Trump invented this playbook, yet Trump and his sycophants are working to master it. Fueled by a sense of grievance, revenge, and an insatiable appetite for division, he—like Ostapenko—has normalized once somewhat closeted attitudes.

Keep ReadingShow less