Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Carolyn Lukensmeyer Turns 80: A Life of Commitment to “Of, By, and For the People”

Carolyn Lukensmeyer Turns 80: A Life of Commitment to “Of, By, and For the People”

Carolyn Lukensmeyer.

The National Institute for Civil Discourse and New Voice Strategies

I’ve known Dr. Carolyn Lukensmeyer for over a decade, first meeting her about a decade ago. Dr. Lukensmeyer is a nationally renowned expert in deliberative democracy, a former executive director emerita of the National Institute for Civil Discourse, and a member of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences’ Commission on the Practice of Democratic Citizenship.

On the weekend of her 80th birthday, former colleagues, clients, and friends offered a look at Dr. Lukensmeyer’s extraordinary commitment to “of, by, and for the peoples,” from her earlier days in Iowa and Ohio to the present day.


Her credentials are impressive indeed, but what I admire most about Dr. Lukensmeyer as a friend and a colleague is her life's commitment to our nation and to healing the seemingly intractable divides that separate us people.

Dr. Lukensmeyer spoke several years ago at the Democracy Awards, a project of the Congressional Management Foundation that annually honors the best in congressional non-legislative achievement. These nonpartisan awards celebrate Members of Congress and their staff who exemplify outstanding public service, operational excellence, and innovative practices that strengthen our democracy.

I remember that speech well. The Democracy Awards honored Congressional giants who passed away that year: Senator John McCain and Representative John Dingell. In honoring these great men, she spoke of spirit and reminded us all of the “responsibility of putting country above party.”

Dr. Lukensmeyer quoted John Dingel as he was talking about all the hurdles he had experienced as a sponsor of major legislation:

“All of these challenges were addressed by Congress. Maybe not as fast as we wanted or as perfectly as we’d hoped, the work is certainly not finished, but we’ve made progress. In every case, from the passage of Medicare to the passage of civil rights, we did it with the support of Democrats and Republicans who considered themselves, first and foremost, Americans.” Dr. Lukensmeyer went on to say, “That is a message that needs to be taken to heart in the halls of Congress today,” and “Our responsibilities are important, vitally important to the success of our republic. Our arcane rules and customs are deliberately intended to require broad cooperation in order to function well. The most revered members of this institution accepted the necessity of compromise in order to make incremental progress in solving America’s problems and to defend her from her adversaries.”

Dr. Lukensmeyer has spoken at many important events over the years, always with a consistent message of finding common ground. In 2019, she was the first keynote speaker for a thought-provoking lecture entitled, “The Power of In/Civility: Engaging in Challenging Conversations Across the University, Community, Nation.” Dr. Lukensmeyer encouraged the audience to, no matter how hard, find common ground with someone they disagree with.

If democracy is going to work, she explained, it has to be a conversation — but the quality of that conversation really matters. “How is it that our public and political discourse has become so degraded? People who are researching this and talk about it a lot say this is something that has been building for decades,” Dr. Lukensmeyer said. “It is also true that the presidential election cycle in 2016, both primary and general, really took it to a different level.”

During her keynote, Dr. Lukensmeyer showed a video clip of two people on the opposite ends of the political spectrum who became unlikely friends — How did this happen? One simply invited the other out for coffee, and they discovered that they had a lot more in common than either of them had first thought. “The message is, we don’t have to be enemies when we’re on the opposite side of something,” said Dr. Lukensmeyer. “We just have to learn to see each other as human beings.”

Dr. Lukensmeyer stressed that the issue of civility and incivility greatly matters. “We are absolutely bombarded on a daily basis with profound examples on incivility, disrespect, dehumanizing — and people understand that there’s something about civility that really matters,” she told the diverse group. She went on to say that Americans are living at a distance from one another and making moral judgements about one another because of their differing political views.

For as long as I have known Dr. Lukensmeyer, one of her key beliefs is that democracy thrives when people are actively involved in decision-making. Through her work with AmericaSpeaks that she founded, she emphasized that "citizen voice must be linked with governance" to ensure that leaders are truly representing the people.

She has always highlighted the dangers of political dysfunction, stating that "we must restore our democracy to reflect the intended vision of our Founding Fathers". In many discussions over the years, Dr. Lukensmeyer has been unwavering in her belief in the need for innovative political engagement to heal divides and "chart a collective path forward.”

Ultimately, Dr. Lukensmeyer’s faith in democracy rests with her faith in “We the People.” Many years ago, she said something to me that still resonates with me to this day.

“If, in fact, we are going to do something about this,” she said, “it’s going to come from ‘we the people.’”


David Nevins is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

Read More

Two speech bubbles overlapping each other.

Political outrage is rising—but dismissing the other side’s anger deepens division. Learn why taking outrage seriously can bridge America’s partisan divide.

Getty Images, Richard Drury

Taking Outrage Seriously: Understanding the Moral Signals Behind Political Anger

Over the last several weeks, the Trump administration has deployed the National Guard to the nation’s capital to crack down on crime. While those on the right have long been aghast by rioting and disorder in our cities, pressing for greater military intervention to curtail it, progressive residents of D.C. have tirelessly protested the recent militarization of the city.

This recent flashpoint is a microcosm of the reciprocal outrage at the heart of contemporary American public life. From social media posts to street protests to everyday conversations about "the other side," we're witnessing unprecedented levels of political outrage. And as polarization has increased, we’ve stopped even considering the other political party’s concerns, responding instead with amusement and delight. Schadenfreude, or pleasure at someone else’s pain, is now more common than solidarity or empathy across party lines.

Keep ReadingShow less
Two speech bubbles overlapping.

Recent data shows that Americans view members of the opposing political party overly negatively, leading people to avoid political discourse with those who hold different views.

Getty Images, Richard Drury

How To Motivate Americans’ Conversations Across Politics

Introduction

A large body of research shows that Americans hold overly negative distortions of those across the political spectrum. These misperceptions—often referred to as "Perception Gaps"—make civil discourse harder, since few Americans are eager to engage with people they believe are ideologically extreme, interpersonally hostile, or even threatening or inferior. When potential disagreement feels deeply uncomfortable or dangerous, conversations are unlikely to begin.

Correcting these distortions can help reduce barriers to productive dialogue, making Americans more open to political conversations.

Keep ReadingShow less
Divided American flag

Rev. Dr. F. Willis Johnson writes on the serious impacts of "othering" marginalized populations and how, together, we must push back to create a more inclusive and humane society.

Jorge Villalba/Getty Images

New Rules of the Game: Weaponization of Othering

By now, you have probably seen the viral video. Taylor Townsend—Black, bold, unbothered—walks off the court after a bruising match against her white European opponent, Jelena Ostapenko. The post-match glances were sharper than a backhand slice. Next came the unsportsmanlike commentary—about her body, her "attitude," and a not-so-veiled speculation about whether she belonged at this level. To understand America in the Trump Redux era, one only needs to study this exchange.

Ostapenko vs. Townsend is a microcosm of something much bigger: the way anti-democratic, vengeful politics—modeled from the White House on down—have bled into every corner of public life, including sports. Turning “othering” into the new national pastime. Divisive politics has a profound impact on marginalized groups. Neither Ostapenko nor Donald Trump invented this playbook, yet Trump and his sycophants are working to master it. Fueled by a sense of grievance, revenge, and an insatiable appetite for division, he—like Ostapenko—has normalized once somewhat closeted attitudes.

Keep ReadingShow less
Hand blocking someone speaking

The Third Way has recently released a memo stating that the “stampede away from the Democratic Party” is partly a result of the language and rhetoric it uses.

Westend61/Getty Images

To Protect Democracy, Democrats Should Pay Attention to the Third Way’s List of ‘Offensive’ Words

More than fifty years ago, comedian George Carlin delivered a monologue entitled Seven Words You Can Never Say on Television.” It was a tribute to the legendary Lenny Bruce, whose “nine dirty words” performance led to his arrest and his banning from many places.

His seven words were “p—, f—, c—, c———, m———–, and t—.”

Keep ReadingShow less