Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

New Rules of the Game: Weaponization of Othering

Opinion

Divided American flag

Rev. Dr. F. Willis Johnson writes on the serious impacts of "othering" marginalized populations and how, together, we must push back to create a more inclusive and humane society.

Jorge Villalba/Getty Images

By now, you have probably seen the viral video. Taylor Townsend—Black, bold, unbothered—walks off the court after a bruising match against her white European opponent, Jelena Ostapenko. The post-match glances were sharper than a backhand slice. Next came the unsportsmanlike commentary—about her body, her "attitude," and a not-so-veiled speculation about whether she belonged at this level. To understand America in the Trump Redux era, one only needs to study this exchange.

Ostapenko vs. Townsend is a microcosm of something much bigger: the way anti-democratic, vengeful politics—modeled from the White House on down—have bled into every corner of public life, including sports. Turning “othering” into the new national pastime. Divisive politics has a profound impact on marginalized groups. Neither Ostapenko nor Donald Trump invented this playbook, yet Trump and his sycophants are working to master it. Fueled by a sense of grievance, revenge, and an insatiable appetite for division, he—like Ostapenko—has normalized once somewhat closeted attitudes.


The U.S. Open incident is just the latest stop on a long, ugly tour. Disgruntled opponents have employed similar scripts against Serena Williams and Simone Biles, as well as many other athletes of color who have dared to excel and remain unapologetic about it. Here's how it goes: a Black woman achieves something extraordinary—something that should be cause for celebration. Instead, the conversation instantly pivots to her body (too muscular), her demeanor (too aggressive), her confidence (too much). Her white opponent, meanwhile, is cast as the default—graceful in defeat, sportsmanlike, a 'true' competitor. Yet, despite these challenges, these athletes continue to excel, inspiring hope and resilience in all of us.

However, it is not just about sport. We're facing a nefarious trend—the weaponization of othering—modeled and sanctioned by those in power, and spreading rapidly across sectors and domains. From the highest governmental office to group chats of Peloton, the playbook is the same: keep 'others' in their place and ensure everyone knows the cost of stepping out of line. This is present in workplaces, where people of color are often overlooked and disrespected. It is rampant in media, where certain voices are amplified while others are silenced. The language of othering is subtle and not-so-subtle, and it shapes everything from hiring decisions to who gets the benefit of the doubt in a viral video.

Trump 2.0 isn't hiding the ball here. The administration has gone out of its way to dismantle anything that even smells like progress for people of color, women, and anyone who doesn't fit the American template of whiteness. Affirmative action? Gone. DEI initiatives? Vilified and defunded. Voting rights? Gutted wherever possible. Even the basic act of telling the truth about American history becomes known as "indoctrination" or "leftist propaganda." It's not enough to win politically—this brand of governance is about revenge. Retribution. Making the "others" pay for daring to demand a seat at the table.

Even higher education—the tone of the last bastion of meritocracy—hasn't escaped the purge. Universities, under threat and strong-arm tactics, are abandoning programs that support first-generation students, women in STEM, or historically Black fraternities and sororities. The message, again, is clear: if you're not already on the inside, don't expect a hand up. In fact, don't even expect the rules to stay the same. Powers that will be changed rules the minute the “other-ed” team gets close.

Here's the thing, though: the playbook only works if we let it. The weaponization of othering relies on exhaustion, on making the marginalized feel isolated and hopeless. But Townsend didn't shrink. She didn't apologize for her body, her game, or her presence. And in not backing down, she forced the rest of us to reckon with what's really at stake.

Resistance is the refusal to accept 'just the way things are' as anything but a challenge to do better. Athletes who keep showing up. Students who refuse to hide. Voters who refuse to have their rights suppressed. It's important to remember that we are not alone in this fight. By standing together and refusing to accept the status quo, we can push back against 'weaponized othering' and create a more inclusive, equitable, respectful, and humane society.

Suppose there's anything to take from Ostapenko's unmerited tongue lashing of Townsend is othering can only prevail if we stop calling it out, stop pushing back, and stop insisting on a more inclusive, equitable, respectful, and humane game. We all need to ask ourselves: what game are we really playing? Which and whose rules apply? Because in the end, the story of America, at her best, is written by those who refuse to stay in their place.

Rev. Dr. F. Willis Johnson is a spiritual entrepreneur, author, scholar-practioner whose leadership and strategies around social and racial justice issues are nationally recognized and applied.

Read More

Communication concept with multi colored abstract people icons.

Research shows that emotional, cognitive, and social mechanisms drive both direct and indirect contact, offering scalable ways to reduce political polarization.

Getty Images, Eoneren

“Direct” and “Indirect” Contact Methods Likely Work in Similar Ways, so They Should Both Be Effective

In a previous article, we argued that efforts to improve the political environment should reach Americans as media consumers, in addition to seeking public participation. Reaching Americans as media consumers uses media like film, TV, and social media to change what Americans see and hear about fellow Americans across the political spectrum. Participant-based efforts include dialogues and community-based activities that require active involvement.

In this article, we show that the mechanisms underlying each type of approach are quite similar. The categories of mechanisms we cover are emotional, cognitive, relational, and repetitive. We use the terms from the academic literature, “direct” and “indirect” contact, which are fairly similar to participant and media consumer approaches, respectively.

Keep ReadingShow less
The American Experiment Requires Robust Debate, Not Government Crackdowns

As political violence threatens democracy, defending free speech, limiting government overreach, and embracing pluralism matters is critical right now.

Getty Images, Javier Zayas Photography

The American Experiment Requires Robust Debate, Not Government Crackdowns

The assassinations of conservative leader Charlie Kirk and Democratic lawmakers in Minnesota have triggered endorsements of violence and even calls for literal war on both the far right and far left. Fortunately, an overwhelming majority of Americans reject political violence, but all of us are in a fight to keep our diverse and boisterous brand of democracy alive. Doing so requires a renewed commitment to pluralism and a clear-headed recognition of the limits of government, especially when proposals entail using the criminal justice system to punish speech.

Pluralism has been called the lifeblood of a democracy like ours, in which being an American is not defined by race or religion. It requires learning about and accepting our differences, and embracing the principle that, regardless of them, every person is entitled to be protected by our Constitution and have a voice in how we’re governed. In contrast, many perpetrators of political violence rationalize their acts by denying the basic humanity of those with whom they disagree. They are willing to face the death penalty or life in prison in an attempt to force everyone to conform to their views.

Keep ReadingShow less
A woman sitting down and speaking with a group of people.

The SVL (Stories, Values, Listen) framework—which aims to bridge political divides with simple, memorable steps for productive cross-partisan conversations—is an easy-to-use tool for making an impact at scale.

Getty Images, Luis Alvarez

Make Talking Politics Easier and More Scalable: Be SVL (Stories, Values, Listen)

How can one have a productive conversation across the political spectrum?

We offer simple, memorable guidance: Be SVL (pronounced like “civil”). SVL stands for sharing Stories, relating to a conversation partner’s Values, and closely Listening.

Keep ReadingShow less
St. Patrick’s Cathedral’s Mural: Art, Immigration, and the American Spirit

People attend a mass and ceremony for a new mural dedicated to New York City’s immigrant communities and honoring the city’s first responders at St. Patrick’s Cathedral on September 21, 2025 in New York City.

(Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

St. Patrick’s Cathedral’s Mural: Art, Immigration, and the American Spirit

In a bold fusion of sacred tradition and contemporary relevance, artist Adam Cvijanovic has unveiled a sweeping new mural at St. Patrick’s Cathedral in New York City—one that reimagines the historic narthex as a vibrant ode to peace, migration, and spiritual continuity.

In an age of polarization and performative politics, it’s rare to find a work of art that speaks with both spiritual clarity and civic urgency. Yet that’s exactly what “What’s So Funny About Peace, Love and Understanding” accomplishes. The piece is more than a visual upgrade to a “dreary” entranceway—it’s a theological and cultural intervention, one that invites every visitor to confront the moral stakes of our immigration discourse.

Keep ReadingShow less