Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Walling In, Walling Out

An old friend yelled at me online. Or at somebody. Hard to tell anymore.

Opinion

Walling In, Walling Out
A person holding a smart phone with social media on the screen
Photo by Berke Citak on Unsplash

In the 1980s, comedian Steven Wright had a bit about Smokey the Bear. When we were kids, we must’ve seen the old PSA a thousand times. “Only you can prevent forest fires.” As Wright recalls Smokey’s warning, he points at himself with a questioning look as if to say, “Me?”

That bit came to mind the other day when I saw the post of a friend from high school that started out by saying, “If you weren’t sure, this is censorship. You know, what you like to accuse President DJT of…”


Me?

Jennifer and I are still in touch. We talk occasionally. We see each other at all the reunions. And we were in a close enough circle of friends that we get together outside of the larger gatherings.

Having posted this on her public social media page, Jen wasn’t necessarily addressing me directly. But it does raise some questions. Namely, who exactly is she calling out? Is she responding to someone she's actually had this conversation with, or is she under the impression that this is the homogeneous position of all those who don't align with her political affinities?

Also, why did this platform serve this post at the top of my feed on an otherwise serene Saturday morning? Perhaps “good fences make good neighbors,” but this one went up without my consent, placing me on a side I didn’t choose.

Before I built a wall I’d ask to know
What I was walling in or walling out,
And to whom I was like to give offense.
Something there is that doesn’t love a wall,
That wants it down…

My lifelong friend went on. She had a list of grievances partly against the “MSM,” but mostly against unnamed masses who don’t share her thinking.

To be fair, Jennifer touched upon a smattering of issues, any of which we could discuss, such as whether a broadcast network should air a sitting president’s address to the American people, how long it took for many outlets to cover President Biden’s health concerns, and the failures of his administration to secure the southern border.

But the combative nature of her post had me thinking less about the merits of the scattershot of issues she brought up and more about why she’s yelling. Like, is she okay?

Candidly, I’m uninterested in the potpourri of complaints my old friend touched upon. But I am curious about who Jennifer thinks she’s reaching, whether she believes these sorts of protestations are accomplishing anything, and if so, what.

I’m also curious and somewhat concerned about one of the people who commented on this thread, who I also know. Jill is someone I went to Hebrew School with for many years—from the time that we were in 1st grade through my Bar Mitzvah and her Bat Mitzvah. We even attended Hebrew High School together, a program my father implemented for our synagogue. Jill’s comment was, “They’re afraid of the truth.”

They? Who are “they”? The “MSM”? The unnamed masses our mutual friend is yelling at? Anyone who didn’t vote for Trump? Or me?

Jenny and Jill seem to be on the same page. Or at least on the same channel. It’s not one that I’m on except as part of my work to see how certain partisans are framing news events, which stories get covered, and what’s not even making it into their programming.

We are, however, in the same virtual room. I just wonder how a conversation like this might go if we were all in the same actual room together.

I let my neighbor know beyond the hill;
And on a day we meet to walk the line
And set the wall between us once again.
We keep the wall between us as we go.

Walls and fences aren't the trouble. The trouble is that we’ve reached a point where calling out to our neighbor beyond the hill can feel like a trespass, or even a danger.

At the dawn of this century, Robert Putnam’s Bowling Alone was prophetic. First published in June of 2000, the book deals with social capital: “…connections among individuals—social networks and the norms of reciprocity and trustworthiness that arise from them.” Twenty years later, in the anniversary edition, he poses the founding question again:

Were more and more Americans indeed bowling—as well as worshipping, picnicking, politicking, and engaging in countless other “social” activities—alone (or not at all)? If so, why? And what could it mean for a nation that supposedly counted community and collective action as founding virtues?

Look, I can identify with gravitational pulls toward isolation. Last week, I decided to go to a local sports bar to catch one of the semi-final World Cup matches. I figured it’d be good to be among others taking in all the excitement. Maybe get a taste of that collective effervescence. But the moment I spotted their lunch special on the menu and put in my order for a “crispy coup” (their spelling, not mine) with a side of tots (don’t judge me), I was longing for the comfort of my own chair, my own TV that I could watch at my own preferred volume, without any obstructions to my view, and the A/C dialed in to the exact temperature of my preferred comfort.

Yet being among neighbors at a sports bar, coincidentally called The Local, is a healthier choice. Much the same way that getting a side salad would have been a healthier choice than those tots. By mid-afternoon, there was a coup underway in my gut, another price paid for that fried chicken and those fried potatoes. At least that bill came due the same day. There are also costs for denying our human need to connect with others.

My friend Liz Joyner, the founder and president of the Village Square, has an expression: “It’s hard to hate somebody up close.”

Growing up, Jill and I were two of the many kids running the halls of that place every week, with classrooms marked Aleph, Bet, Gimmel, Daled, Hay, in our Hebrew School with Morah Baum and Shabbos services with Rabbi Klein. The tattooed numbers on the arms of the alta bubbes and zaides reminded us who we are and what we have endured. There was a “we.”

Beyond the synagogue, Jennifer and I were part of efforts with a number of our other high school buddies to raise money for the Muscular Dystrophy Association, along with all kinds of other formal and informal gatherings that always seemed to end up at the Manalapan Diner on Route 9 when Jenny would let me have her coleslaw.

Yeah, it’s hard to hate somebody up close. Especially when they let you have their coleslaw.

These days, we’re not running into each other at the diner. We’re just seeing a post here and there. Posts that mostly serve as presentations, but not necessarily connections. “Here’s my kid who just graduated summa cum something or other.” “Ain’t my dog cute?” “Happy birthday to the most brilliant, beautiful, blah blah blah…” Or on occasion, “Hey you! You’re what’s wrong with this country.” Followed by some version of, “Yeah, they are.”

Sure, I could pick up the phone. Or hop on a Zoom. I could even make a trip back East and grab a coffee with my old high school pal. But if every time you saw something of theirs, it made you feel like you were getting yelled at, would you?

Then again, maybe I will go back East and just invite her out to go bowling. I’d bet the Lucky Strike Cafe at Howell Lanes still has some great coleslaw.

Corey Nathan hosts Talkin' Politics & Religion Without Killin' Each Other and writes about faith and civic life on Substack. He came to Christian faith from an observant Jewish upbringing.


Read More

American flag behind barbed wire

American flag behind barbed wire

Photo provided

A Question of Trust: What Maryland’s New Laws Mean for Immigrant Communities

On October 1, Maryland’s Public Safety Law, which bars police officers from wearing face masks, went into effect across the state. Within hours, the U.S. Justice Department sued the state and two of its most liberal counties, Montgomery and Prince George’s, which had passed similar legislation earlier in the year.

The 2020 Census ranked Maryland as the most diverse state on the East Coast and fourth in the nation. As a Democratic-led state with a Democratic governor, Maryland has been in the crosshairs of the Trump administration since the start of the president’s second term. The mask ban is the latest in a series of laws passed in 2026 to protect immigrant communities across the state.

Keep ReadingShow less
Man writing next to a box labeled "Vote."

Man writing next to a box labeled "Vote."

Photo provided

Latino Political Support Alone Doesn’t Tell Us How Strong Latino Identity Is

In 2024, Donald J. Trump made major gains with Latino voters. Pew Research Center found that 48 percent of Hispanic voters backed him, up from 36 percent in 2020. Two years later, polling suggests some of that support may be softening. A Reuters/Ipsos poll released this month found that just 24 percent of Hispanic adults approved of Trump’s performance, the lowest level of either of his terms. In the same poll, 52 percent of Hispanic registered voters favored Democratic congressional candidates, compared with 26 percent for Republicans.

One reading is that some Republican support among Latino voters may now be moving toward Democrats. But what, if anything, does that apparent shift tell us about Latino identity?

Keep ReadingShow less
Man dressed in jaguar costume

NewYorkTlan 2026, a vibrant transnational festival that celebrates the cultural contributions of indigenous immigrants and Native Americans in New York City.

Why Language Access Matters for Indigenous New Yorkers

What good are rights if the people who hold them cannot understand how to exercise them?

Imagine seeking refuge in a strange land, far from everything you know, and being handed papers in a language far from your own. State officials loom overhead as they urge you to sign your name on a dotted line. You can't quite make out what they’re saying, but you get the impression that signing your name will end this experience.

Keep ReadingShow less
Truck parked
black truck on road during daytime
Photo by Sander Yigin on Unsplash

Federal trucking crackdown reaches Wisconsin as English-language rules tighten

Three Wisconsin commercial driver training schools have been removed from a federal registry as the Trump administration increases enforcement of English-language proficiency requirements for truck drivers.

The U.S. Department of Transportation announced in August that more than 110 Entry-Level Driver Training providers would be removed from the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration’s Training Provider Registry.

Keep ReadingShow less