Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Walling In, Walling Out

An old friend yelled at me online. Or at somebody. Hard to tell anymore.

Opinion

Walling In, Walling Out
A person holding a smart phone with social media on the screen
Photo by Berke Citak on Unsplash

In the 1980s, comedian Steven Wright had a bit about Smokey the Bear. When we were kids, we must’ve seen the old PSA a thousand times. “Only you can prevent forest fires.” As Wright recalls Smokey’s warning, he points at himself with a questioning look as if to say, “Me?”

That bit came to mind the other day when I saw the post of a friend from high school that started out by saying, “If you weren’t sure, this is censorship. You know, what you like to accuse President DJT of…”


Me?

Jennifer and I are still in touch. We talk occasionally. We see each other at all the reunions. And we were in a close enough circle of friends that we get together outside of the larger gatherings.

Having posted this on her public social media page, Jen wasn’t necessarily addressing me directly. But it does raise some questions. Namely, who exactly is she calling out? Is she responding to someone she's actually had this conversation with, or is she under the impression that this is the homogeneous position of all those who don't align with her political affinities?

Also, why did this platform serve this post at the top of my feed on an otherwise serene Saturday morning? Perhaps “good fences make good neighbors,” but this one went up without my consent, placing me on a side I didn’t choose.

Before I built a wall I’d ask to know
What I was walling in or walling out,
And to whom I was like to give offense.
Something there is that doesn’t love a wall,
That wants it down…

My lifelong friend went on. She had a list of grievances partly against the “MSM,” but mostly against unnamed masses who don’t share her thinking.

To be fair, Jennifer touched upon a smattering of issues, any of which we could discuss, such as whether a broadcast network should air a sitting president’s address to the American people, how long it took for many outlets to cover President Biden’s health concerns, and the failures of his administration to secure the southern border.

But the combative nature of her post had me thinking less about the merits of the scattershot of issues she brought up and more about why she’s yelling. Like, is she okay?

Candidly, I’m uninterested in the potpourri of complaints my old friend touched upon. But I am curious about who Jennifer thinks she’s reaching, whether she believes these sorts of protestations are accomplishing anything, and if so, what.

I’m also curious and somewhat concerned about one of the people who commented on this thread, who I also know. Jill is someone I went to Hebrew School with for many years—from the time that we were in 1st grade through my Bar Mitzvah and her Bat Mitzvah. We even attended Hebrew High School together, a program my father implemented for our synagogue. Jill’s comment was, “They’re afraid of the truth.”

They? Who are “they”? The “MSM”? The unnamed masses our mutual friend is yelling at? Anyone who didn’t vote for Trump? Or me?

Jenny and Jill seem to be on the same page. Or at least on the same channel. It’s not one that I’m on except as part of my work to see how certain partisans are framing news events, which stories get covered, and what’s not even making it into their programming.

We are, however, in the same virtual room. I just wonder how a conversation like this might go if we were all in the same actual room together.

I let my neighbor know beyond the hill;
And on a day we meet to walk the line
And set the wall between us once again.
We keep the wall between us as we go.

Walls and fences aren't the trouble. The trouble is that we’ve reached a point where calling out to our neighbor beyond the hill can feel like a trespass, or even a danger.

At the dawn of this century, Robert Putnam’s Bowling Alone was prophetic. First published in June of 2000, the book deals with social capital: “…connections among individuals—social networks and the norms of reciprocity and trustworthiness that arise from them.” Twenty years later, in the anniversary edition, he poses the founding question again:

Were more and more Americans indeed bowling—as well as worshipping, picnicking, politicking, and engaging in countless other “social” activities—alone (or not at all)? If so, why? And what could it mean for a nation that supposedly counted community and collective action as founding virtues?

Look, I can identify with gravitational pulls toward isolation. Last week, I decided to go to a local sports bar to catch one of the semi-final World Cup matches. I figured it’d be good to be among others taking in all the excitement. Maybe get a taste of that collective effervescence. But the moment I spotted their lunch special on the menu and put in my order for a “crispy coup” (their spelling, not mine) with a side of tots (don’t judge me), I was longing for the comfort of my own chair, my own TV that I could watch at my own preferred volume, without any obstructions to my view, and the A/C dialed in to the exact temperature of my preferred comfort.

Yet being among neighbors at a sports bar, coincidentally called The Local, is a healthier choice. Much the same way that getting a side salad would have been a healthier choice than those tots. By mid-afternoon, there was a coup underway in my gut, another price paid for that fried chicken and those fried potatoes. At least that bill came due the same day. There are also costs for denying our human need to connect with others.

My friend Liz Joyner, the founder and president of the Village Square, has an expression: “It’s hard to hate somebody up close.”

Growing up, Jill and I were two of the many kids running the halls of that place every week, with classrooms marked Aleph, Bet, Gimmel, Daled, Hay, in our Hebrew School with Morah Baum and Shabbos services with Rabbi Klein. The tattooed numbers on the arms of the alta bubbes and zaides reminded us who we are and what we have endured. There was a “we.”

Beyond the synagogue, Jennifer and I were part of efforts with a number of our other high school buddies to raise money for the Muscular Dystrophy Association, along with all kinds of other formal and informal gatherings that always seemed to end up at the Manalapan Diner on Route 9 when Jenny would let me have her coleslaw.

Yeah, it’s hard to hate somebody up close. Especially when they let you have their coleslaw.

These days, we’re not running into each other at the diner. We’re just seeing a post here and there. Posts that mostly serve as presentations, but not necessarily connections. “Here’s my kid who just graduated summa cum something or other.” “Ain’t my dog cute?” “Happy birthday to the most brilliant, beautiful, blah blah blah…” Or on occasion, “Hey you! You’re what’s wrong with this country.” Followed by some version of, “Yeah, they are.”

Sure, I could pick up the phone. Or hop on a Zoom. I could even make a trip back East and grab a coffee with my old high school pal. But if every time you saw something of theirs, it made you feel like you were getting yelled at, would you?

Then again, maybe I will go back East and just invite her out to go bowling. I’d bet the Lucky Strike Cafe at Howell Lanes still has some great coleslaw.

Corey Nathan hosts Talkin' Politics & Religion Without Killin' Each Other and writes about faith and civic life on Substack. He came to Christian faith from an observant Jewish upbringing.


Read More

ladder inside head silhouette illustration
ladder inside head silhouette illustration

Father-Daughter Bonding: The Art of Disagreeing Well

From the moment my youngest daughter was born, she carved out her own space in my world. I remember the pediatrician remarking on her long eyelashes, my brief panic when she didn't cry right away, and then the overwhelming relief and joy of holding her as she looked up and seemed to smile.

Growing up in the United States, most children called their fathers “Dad.” She chose something different. She called me Nanna—the Telugu word for father. It was a small, sweet choice that signaled the unique intellectual and emotional bond we would share. I have three daughters, and while my relationships with her older sisters are deep and powerful in their own ways, this is the daughter who shares this particular story with me.

Keep ReadingShow less
ball under basketball ring
ball under basketball ring
Photo by Markus Spiske on Unsplash

Fairness and Inclusion in Women’s Sports

Two former NBA players have said they want to play in the Women’s National Basketball Association (WNBA). Enes Kanter Freedom and Royce White announced their intent to enter the WNBA draft, claiming—falsely—that they identify as women to force the WNBA to clarify its policy, which restricts participation to women without defining what it means to be a woman. The players’ announcement followed closely on the heels of WNBA player Sophie Cunningham’s public comments that it was “common sense” that only “biological women” be permitted to compete in the WNBA. Cunningham’s comments drew competing rallies to her games, either supporting or denouncing her stance. Her statement was preceded by the first Supreme Court ruling on eligibility for female sports competitions at the school and college level, a ruling that does not apply to professional sports. In West Virginia v. B. P. J., the Supreme Court affirmed that U.S. states may legally bar transgender girls and women from female school or collegiate sports teams, leaving states to decide.

Public discussion of this issue has been deeply polarized. Some on the political left have asserted that “trans women are women” and that anyone who opposes their participation in elite women’s sports is a bigot. Meanwhile, some on the political right have presented trans women athletes as male athletes stealing women’s trophies. This is a classic case of affective polarization—a phenomenon in which people feel their identities, values, or rights are at stake. They become less willing to consider alternative perspectives and demonize those with opposing views.

Keep ReadingShow less
Aerial view of a large Google Data Center

Aerial view of a large Google Data Center

Getty images

West Virginia NAACP wants statewide data center moratorium

Local chapters of the NAACP in West Virginia have joined together in unanimously opposing new construction of data centers, signing on to a resolution demanding a statewide moratorium.

Data center growth in the Mountain State is on the rise. It is estimated fewer than a dozen smaller centers are currently in operation and around 10 large-scale projects have been proposed.

Keep ReadingShow less
Study Reveals Sharp Generational Divide in How Latino Identity Influences Daily Life

Study Reveals Sharp Generational Divide in How Latino Identity Influences Daily Life

Latino immigrants and U.S.-born Latinos differ sharply in how much their identity shapes their daily lives, according to recent findings from the Pew Research Center’s 2025 National Survey of Latinos. The survey shows that Latino immigrants are far more likely than U.S.-born Latinos to say their identity is central to who they are, and that it influences their experiences in the United States. Pew researchers Gabriel Piña, Mark Hugo Lopez, Sahana Mukherjee, Dalia Fahmy, and Alexandra Cahn report that the divide reflects differences in cultural connection, lived experience, and generational distance from immigrant roots.

Pew’s analysis finds that Latino immigrants are significantly more likely to say their origins are central to their identity, while U.S.-born Latinos — especially those in the third generation or higher — are less likely to feel that connection. The report notes that “U.S. Hispanics are divided on whether their identity helps or hurts them in America,” with some respondents describing their Latino identity as a source of pride and connection, and others saying it is tied to discrimination or barriers.

Keep ReadingShow less