Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Federal Funding Cuts Are Only One Problem Facing America’s Colleges and Universities

News

Federal Funding Cuts Are Only One Problem Facing America’s Colleges and Universities
Getty Images, tc397

Higher education is under stress. The highest-profile threat has been the Trump administration’s efforts to cut funding to several universities, including Harvard, Columbia and Northwestern.

Research universities heavily depend on federal money to conduct research and carry out other areas of work. For example, after tuition, federal money allocated for research made up 40% of the total revenue for two major research universities – Johns Hopkins University and Massachusetts Institute of Technology – in the 2022-23 academic year.


Since January 2025, the Trump administration has terminated various federal grants for universities valued between US$6.9 billion and $8.2 billion.

While there’s been a lot of public attention to the federal government’s financial pressure on universities, universities have been experiencing financial pressure from other sources.

Understanding that is key for applicants and parents to understand their bargaining position when choosing whether and where to pursue a college degree.

As scholars of public administration and economics and former university administrators, we think parents and college applicants need to understand this economic landscape to make smart choices about making such a major investment. Here are four key things to know.

1. Universities are an industry

Most American private colleges and universities are nonprofits, but they still care about revenue. These schools aren’t responsible to shareholders, but they may respond to pressure from alumni, students, employees, donors, boards, the federal government and, if the schools are public universities, state governments.

And like businesses, nonprofit colleges and universities need money. As a result, despite what you might think, most colleges are not particularly selective. Though they don’t advertise that fact, hundreds of schools will take any student who meets minimal academic requirements and can pay tuition.

The added cost of teaching additional students is minimal when there are empty seats, so admitting more students can lead to an increase in revenue for most schools.

This is important because colleges’ costs – largely staff salaries and building maintenance – are hard to cut and are mostly fixed. Those costs must be spread across fewer students when there are unfilled seats.

As the number of people who go to college is declining, colleges need to respond to people’s skepticism about the value of degrees – but change is difficult

Becoming a smaller school is challenging. If students show less interest in foreign language study and more interest in data science classes, the school cannot have a German language professor suddenly teach data science.

As a result, colleges can become stuck with faculty who teach course students don’t want to take.

Unlike business leaders, who may be rewarded for fixing a failing company by laying off workers, university leaders who eliminate faculty positions become unpopular among their peers. This can reduce their chance to advance their careers at their current universities or switch to a new school.

A young woman hangs a plant under a lofted bed with a brick wall against it. Another woman stands nearby her near a window.A college freshman gets her new dorm room ready with her mother at Colorado State University in Fort Collins, Colo., in August 2025. RJ Sangosti/MediaNews Group/The Denver Post via Getty Images

2. Schools have to work to admit students

Colleges enrolled 8.4% fewer students in 2024 than when attendance peaked at 21 million in 2010. As a result, schools must increasingly compete harder to attract students.

One way is to offer a better price, meaning lower tuition. Like most elite schools, Harvard has a listed price of about $60,000 for tuition alone in one academic year – and nearly $87,000 when food, housing and other services are included. Few students actually pay that amount, though the exact percentage getting a discount is not public information.

The average net price a Harvard student paid in 2023-24 was $17,900, as colleges offered either financial aid, straight-up discounts or scholarships.

Most schools engage in this sort of price discrimination, the term economists use to describe charging different prices to different customers based on their willingness to pay. In some ways, this is much like airlines selling seats on the same flights at different prices.

3. Schools have a declining foreign customer base

Another enrollment remedy for colleges and universities to boost tuition revenue has been focusing on admitting international students, who typically pay full price.

One-fourth of all international students in the U.S. come from China, while another quarter come from India.

Most schools have not pursued this strategy of expanding foreign enrollment as aggressively as Columbia University, where international students approach 40% of the student body.

By comparison, international undergraduate students made up 6% of Columbia’s undergraduate student population in 2000, and 12% in 2011.

But the revenue that international students generate is not a guarantee. Foreign student enrollment declined 17% from fall of 2024 to 2025.

In part, that’s because of some students’ inability to get a visa or fear their authorization to study in the U.S. will be revoked.

Rising competition from universities in Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom, combined with stricter U.S. visa policies and geopolitical tensions with China, have led to rapid declines in Chinese students enrolling at American schools.

The number of Chinese undergraduate and graduate students attending U.S. colleges and universities has dropped from 317,299 in 2019 to 265,919 in the 2024-25 school year.

This change has increased the financial strain on American colleges and universities, many of which have grown accustomed to having large numbers of international students who pay their own way.

A group of young people wear light blue graduation robes and throw their caps into the air. They stand outside of a large building with columns.Chinese graduates throw their hats into the sky at their graduation from Columbia University in May 2016. Xinhua/Li Muzi via Getty Images

4. The value of the product is in question

With recent changes to federal loan forgiveness programs, some students and their parents are questioning the value of a college degree.

Just 22% of Americans said in 2024 that a college degree is worth the cost, if a student has to borrow money to get it.

The University of Texas system – made up of nine universities and four medical schools – shares information on the average income of graduates for every degree program after graduation.

In the case of the University of Texas at Arlington, the average salary for a drama, theater arts and stagecraft major is $14,933 one year after graduation. This amount goes up to $39,608 10 years after graduation, resulting in a negative $324,210 return on the price of college over that first decade.

Of course, some degrees pay off. A University of Texas at Arlington graduate with a degree in civil engineering earns an average of $67,920 one year after college and $105,377 10 years after graduation, demonstrating a positive return on investment of $1.15 million.

We believe that universities and colleges should reform to address the next generation’s uncertainty about higher education.

College applicants should be asking hard questions. What is the data on graduates’ earnings compared to the cost of their program? Where are graduates employed?

If more people treated buying a college degree with the same care they use to buy their first home – an equivalent investment – colleges and universities would feel pressure to become more transparent for students and parents. They would also become more aligned with the rapidly evolving demands of the workplace.


Federal Funding Cuts Are Only One Problem Facing America’s Colleges and Universities was originally published by The Conversation and is republished with permission.

Read More

Ensuring Care on Campus: Inside the College Student Continuation of Mental Health Care Act

The proposed 2025 Act promises continuous telehealth for students, but critics warn of tech barriers, privacy issues, and the limits of virtual care. What will this mean for campus mental health?

Getty Images, Tanja Ivanova

Ensuring Care on Campus: Inside the College Student Continuation of Mental Health Care Act

Introduction

The damage to intervention systems on college campuses has caused a drastic decline in students’ mental health, exponentially heightening the demand for improved mental health services provided by universities. With increased pressure on college administrations, telehealth appointments—providing faster and wider access to care—have become more widely used within universities. While digital mental health services have decreased anxiety and depression in students, the gaps in continuous care caused by holidays and semester breaks impede this.

Thus, the College Students Continuation of Mental Health Care Act of 2025 was introduced to address such issues by requiring virtual mental health coverage for all students enrolled in participating institutions. The Act focuses on two core issues: geographic barriers and insurance. By allowing students to access treatment remotely and regardless of insurance status, this legislation guarantees the permanent and continuous care needed to prevent and de-escalate students’ mental health struggles. Despite the plan’s potential benefits, issues arise when it comes to students’ varying preferences for care and technological inaccessibility.

Keep Reading Show less
Jamaal Durr: An Artist Embracing a Public Role

Jamaal Durr

Credit: Jamaal Durr

Jamaal Durr: An Artist Embracing a Public Role

Dayton Democracy Fellow Jamaal Durr realized as early as five or six that he wanted to go beyond crayons and coloring books. He soon began to create and color his own characters. With the encouragement of the adults in his life, he continued focusing on art through high school in Dayton and the Pratt Institute in Brooklyn, New York, where he entered what he calls the “art adjacent” field of architecture.

But he didn’t want art to be adjacent to his life. He wanted it to be central.

Keep Reading Show less
For the Sake of Democracy, We Need to Rethink How We Assess History in Schools

classroom

Photo by Ivan Aleksic on Unsplash

For the Sake of Democracy, We Need to Rethink How We Assess History in Schools

“Which of the following is a right guaranteed by the Bill of Rights of the United States Constitution?"

  1. Right to public education
  2. Right to health care
  3. Right to trial by a jury
  4. Right to vote

The above question was labeled “medium” by the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) for the 2022 8th-grade U.S. history assessment.

Keep Reading Show less
Barney, Big Bird, and Immigrant Children Need You!
Big Bird and the Count | Selena N. B. H. | Flickr

Barney, Big Bird, and Immigrant Children Need You!

Barney the purple dinosaur was my first English teacher. Through songs, make-believe, and games, I learned how to greet people, ask kids if they wanted to play, and talk about the weather, which turned out to be useful for conversation in the United States. I also learned about sharing, respecting others, and finding the fun in learning.

Now, with the Presidential administration’s disinvestment in the education system and the cancellation of federal funding geared toward learning, Barney and other PBS favorites like Sesame Street, Arthur, and my personal favorite–The Magic School Bus - have been put on the chopping block by a political system that alleges to prioritize children’s learning. PBS is just one branch under the umbrella of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), which also includes National Public Radio (NPR) and accounts for hundreds of national and local television shows and radio stations. This information war disenfranchises everyday people from learning and knowledge. Still, it will especially affect the next generation of children, like my son, who, unlike me (and the last six decades of viewers), won’t have the experience of running home from school to turn on the television and learn about thesaurus and jazz music while watching Arthur at 4 pm.

Keep Reading Show less