Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Federal Funding Cuts Are Only One Problem Facing America’s Colleges and Universities

News

Federal Funding Cuts Are Only One Problem Facing America’s Colleges and Universities
Getty Images, tc397

Higher education is under stress. The highest-profile threat has been the Trump administration’s efforts to cut funding to several universities, including Harvard, Columbia and Northwestern.

Research universities heavily depend on federal money to conduct research and carry out other areas of work. For example, after tuition, federal money allocated for research made up 40% of the total revenue for two major research universities – Johns Hopkins University and Massachusetts Institute of Technology – in the 2022-23 academic year.


Since January 2025, the Trump administration has terminated various federal grants for universities valued between US$6.9 billion and $8.2 billion.

While there’s been a lot of public attention to the federal government’s financial pressure on universities, universities have been experiencing financial pressure from other sources.

Understanding that is key for applicants and parents to understand their bargaining position when choosing whether and where to pursue a college degree.

As scholars of public administration and economics and former university administrators, we think parents and college applicants need to understand this economic landscape to make smart choices about making such a major investment. Here are four key things to know.

1. Universities are an industry

Most American private colleges and universities are nonprofits, but they still care about revenue. These schools aren’t responsible to shareholders, but they may respond to pressure from alumni, students, employees, donors, boards, the federal government and, if the schools are public universities, state governments.

And like businesses, nonprofit colleges and universities need money. As a result, despite what you might think, most colleges are not particularly selective. Though they don’t advertise that fact, hundreds of schools will take any student who meets minimal academic requirements and can pay tuition.

The added cost of teaching additional students is minimal when there are empty seats, so admitting more students can lead to an increase in revenue for most schools.

This is important because colleges’ costs – largely staff salaries and building maintenance – are hard to cut and are mostly fixed. Those costs must be spread across fewer students when there are unfilled seats.

As the number of people who go to college is declining, colleges need to respond to people’s skepticism about the value of degrees – but change is difficult

Becoming a smaller school is challenging. If students show less interest in foreign language study and more interest in data science classes, the school cannot have a German language professor suddenly teach data science.

As a result, colleges can become stuck with faculty who teach course students don’t want to take.

Unlike business leaders, who may be rewarded for fixing a failing company by laying off workers, university leaders who eliminate faculty positions become unpopular among their peers. This can reduce their chance to advance their careers at their current universities or switch to a new school.

A young woman hangs a plant under a lofted bed with a brick wall against it. Another woman stands nearby her near a window.A college freshman gets her new dorm room ready with her mother at Colorado State University in Fort Collins, Colo., in August 2025. RJ Sangosti/MediaNews Group/The Denver Post via Getty Images

2. Schools have to work to admit students

Colleges enrolled 8.4% fewer students in 2024 than when attendance peaked at 21 million in 2010. As a result, schools must increasingly compete harder to attract students.

One way is to offer a better price, meaning lower tuition. Like most elite schools, Harvard has a listed price of about $60,000 for tuition alone in one academic year – and nearly $87,000 when food, housing and other services are included. Few students actually pay that amount, though the exact percentage getting a discount is not public information.

The average net price a Harvard student paid in 2023-24 was $17,900, as colleges offered either financial aid, straight-up discounts or scholarships.

Most schools engage in this sort of price discrimination, the term economists use to describe charging different prices to different customers based on their willingness to pay. In some ways, this is much like airlines selling seats on the same flights at different prices.

3. Schools have a declining foreign customer base

Another enrollment remedy for colleges and universities to boost tuition revenue has been focusing on admitting international students, who typically pay full price.

One-fourth of all international students in the U.S. come from China, while another quarter come from India.

Most schools have not pursued this strategy of expanding foreign enrollment as aggressively as Columbia University, where international students approach 40% of the student body.

By comparison, international undergraduate students made up 6% of Columbia’s undergraduate student population in 2000, and 12% in 2011.

But the revenue that international students generate is not a guarantee. Foreign student enrollment declined 17% from fall of 2024 to 2025.

In part, that’s because of some students’ inability to get a visa or fear their authorization to study in the U.S. will be revoked.

Rising competition from universities in Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom, combined with stricter U.S. visa policies and geopolitical tensions with China, have led to rapid declines in Chinese students enrolling at American schools.

The number of Chinese undergraduate and graduate students attending U.S. colleges and universities has dropped from 317,299 in 2019 to 265,919 in the 2024-25 school year.

This change has increased the financial strain on American colleges and universities, many of which have grown accustomed to having large numbers of international students who pay their own way.

A group of young people wear light blue graduation robes and throw their caps into the air. They stand outside of a large building with columns.Chinese graduates throw their hats into the sky at their graduation from Columbia University in May 2016. Xinhua/Li Muzi via Getty Images

4. The value of the product is in question

With recent changes to federal loan forgiveness programs, some students and their parents are questioning the value of a college degree.

Just 22% of Americans said in 2024 that a college degree is worth the cost, if a student has to borrow money to get it.

The University of Texas system – made up of nine universities and four medical schools – shares information on the average income of graduates for every degree program after graduation.

In the case of the University of Texas at Arlington, the average salary for a drama, theater arts and stagecraft major is $14,933 one year after graduation. This amount goes up to $39,608 10 years after graduation, resulting in a negative $324,210 return on the price of college over that first decade.

Of course, some degrees pay off. A University of Texas at Arlington graduate with a degree in civil engineering earns an average of $67,920 one year after college and $105,377 10 years after graduation, demonstrating a positive return on investment of $1.15 million.

We believe that universities and colleges should reform to address the next generation’s uncertainty about higher education.

College applicants should be asking hard questions. What is the data on graduates’ earnings compared to the cost of their program? Where are graduates employed?

If more people treated buying a college degree with the same care they use to buy their first home – an equivalent investment – colleges and universities would feel pressure to become more transparent for students and parents. They would also become more aligned with the rapidly evolving demands of the workplace.


Federal Funding Cuts Are Only One Problem Facing America’s Colleges and Universities was originally published by The Conversation and is republished with permission.


Read More

A person reaches for a book on a shelf in a library.

A daughter of Cultural Revolution survivors argues U.S. school book bans are about power, not protection, and how a freedom-to-read law offers a way forward.

LAW Ho Ming/Getty Images

My Parents Lived through a Book Ban. Americans Should Demand the Freedom to Read.

At the start of this school year, a Texas schoolteacher from my home school district went nationally viral. In a video, Darius Williams sobbed as he explained that after he “gave them the answers,” his high school seniors still could not complete an exercise comprising two sentences to read and one to write. Reading scores in the country currently languish at a twenty-year low. In the new year, a historic set of new state lawmakers around the country should prioritize reversing ineffective policies that have kept critical reading materials out of school libraries.

Since 2021, book bans have reached a level “never before seen in the life of any living American” (34,000 total in public schools across the country, according to PEN America). Some institutions are even preemptively removing materials to avoid controversy, a phenomenon termed “soft censorship.”

Keep ReadingShow less
U.S. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth stands for anthems at the Pentagon on October 15, 2026 in Arlington, Virginia. The two defense officials discussed NATO financial commitments by European countries.

Hegseth’s order ending tenure at the service academies punishes scholars and leaves future officers less prepared for war. Here’s why Congress should step in.

Finn Gomez/Getty Images

Secretary Hegseth's Tenure Ban Fails Our Officers and the Academy

Yesterday, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth fired another round of shots in his war on higher education, and once again he fought it in his own backyard. After pulling books off the shelves of the Naval Academy and cutting the Pentagon’s ties to graduate programs at Harvard and Princeton, he signed a memo ordering the service academies to stop granting tenure to civilian professors, effective immediately. Tenure, he wrote, breeds “academic stagnation, faculty complacency,” and belongs to a broader academic structure that serves to “dilute our focus on lethality.” This assault on the academy is a mistake, both wronging the scholars who teach at the academies, and leaving the cadets and midshipmen who learn from them less prepared for war.

In his depiction of the tenure system's shortcomings, Hegseth mischaracterizes it as a finish line, where receiving tenure marks the moment a professor stops running. Granted, there is a grain of truth here: a study of over 12,000 American faculty members published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences found that in non-lab-based fields like political science and sociology, publication rates do fall once tenure is secured. Lab-based fields, meanwhile, sustain high research output. More importantly, however, the same study found that after receiving tenure, scholars turn toward newer, riskier questions, also known as the kind that occasionally transforms a field.

Keep ReadingShow less
Students in a classroom.​

Civics is a practice, not a quiz. See how immigrant and Indigenous communities are teaching schools to build, not blend in, as America turns 250.

Getty Images, andresr

Schools Can’t Teach Democracy Without Valuing Students’ Lived Experiences

Recently, I gathered with a group of dads outside Philadelphia to clear out a neighborhood park through Dads for All, the organization I co-founded. Some of us grew up in that neighborhood, some had never set foot in it, and plenty of us had no idea what we were doing. Our kids, ages three to seventeen, hauled branches and swung tools nearly as long as they were tall — and they were delighted.

Here's what I watched them figure out: A park is where a kid gets to be free. It's where you run, where you pretend to be a superhero, where the ground belongs to you. And you assume it just shows up. That morning, our children learned that it doesn't. Somebody has to see what it could be. Somebody has to partner with the people who own it and the people who use it. And then somebody has to pick up the loppers. That was the most honest civics lesson my son has ever had, and unfortunately, that is where the problem is.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Window to Safely Managing the Education Freedom Tax Credit is Closing Fast
Empty wooden tables and chairs in a library with shelves of books
Photo by Tuyen Vo on Unsplash

The Window to Safely Managing the Education Freedom Tax Credit is Closing Fast

There is a major change in how students, schools, and educational programs can be funded, taking effect on January 1, 2027, with a small window of time to ensure the program is well managed. We have to move fast.

The Education Freedom Tax Credit (EFTC) creates a new federal tax credit for taxpayers who make qualified contributions to approved nonprofit Scholarship Granting Organizations (SGOs). SGOs, in turn, use that money to award scholarships for tutoring, tuition, or other qualified education expenses for students, regardless of whether they attend public, private, or charter schools. The money is contributed directly to SGOs by taxpayers, who can receive a dollar-for-dollar tax credit on their 2027 tax filing, up to $1,700 for individuals and $3,400 for married taxpayers filing jointly.

Keep ReadingShow less