Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Three takeaways from election meddling by Russia and Iran

Three takeaways from election meddling by Russia and Iran
FBI Announces Iran, Russia Interfering In Election | The ReidOut | MSNBC

Last week we learned Russia and Iran are interfering in the 2020 presidential election. That's concerning, but hardly surprising. It's a reminder that Americans need to be vigilant as the election approaches. And there are some common-sense actions we all can take to make sure these adversarial countries don't succeed in undermining the U.S. vote.


A brief word about Russia and Iran. Russia remains the most significant threat, and its actions in 2016 are well documented. In fact, there's a lot of evidence that Russia has tried to undermine American democracy continuously for the past four years.

Iran may not have the same capabilities as Russia, but it has a long-standing goal of attacking democracy at home and abroad. In November 2019, the Departments of Justice, Defense and Homeland Security, along with the director of national intelligence, the FBI, the National Security Agency and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Administration all warned that a number of foreign malicious actors, including Russia, China and Iran would "seek to interfere in the voting process or influence voter perceptions" in 2020.

Iran's toolkit includes cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns and malign finance (which entails secretly funding political parties, candidates, campaigns and influential groups). No one seriously questions its ability to acquire publicly available voter data and use it to send spoofed emails to intimidate voters, as DNI John Ratcliffe outlined last week.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

There's no evidence any foreign country has been able to change votes or alter voter data in the United State. Still, last week's disclosures underscored that attempts to interfere in the 2020 presidential election are real, and they're ongoing.

There are three important takeaways from the latest developments.

First, the American public must remain vigilant. Election officials must continue monitoring their election systems regularly for signs of unusual activity. Social media companies need to observe their platforms closely for disinformation campaigns. And voters who haven't yet voted should make a plan to do so. They should bring documentation showing their eligibility to vote as a precaution.

Second, all Americans need to be assessing election-related news over the next couple of weeks calmly and cautiously. Check the sources of any information before sharing. If you see something that comes from a reputable source, but aren't sure of its validity, verify it through other reliable sources. And if you're seeking election information, go to the people running your elections — your state and local elections officials.

Finally, if you see something, say something. Potential election crimes — such as disinformation about the manner, time or place of voting — can be reported to the FBI. Make use of tools offered by social media companies to alert them about posts that appear to be spreading false or inconsistent election information. And if you see any potential problems while voting, be sure to raise them immediately with your local officials. That increases the likelihood they can be resolved.

Let's all do our part to help ensure that Americans are the only ones deciding the fate of the 2020 presidential election.

David Levine is an elections integrity fellow at the Alliance for Securing Democracy. Read more from The Fulcrum's Election Dissection blog or see our full list of contributors.

Read More

The election went remarkably well. Here's how to make the next one even better.
Jeff Swensen/Getty Images

The election went remarkably well. Here's how to make the next one even better.

We haven't yet seen evidence that would cast doubt on the legitimacy of the 2020 presidential election — even with the unprecedented challenges of a global pandemic, the threat of foreign interference, civil unrest and greater turnout than any time since 1900. That counts as a resounding success.

Once the final tallies are certified, we need to thank the election administrators and poll workers whose heroic efforts preserved American democracy. After that, we need to assess what worked best and what needs to improve, so we can identify achievable steps to make future elections even more secure.

Based on what we know so far, here are five things that should be on the U.S. elections to-do list:

Keep ReadingShow less
Georgia voting stickers
Stop the presses, says appeals court, even if that means longer Georgia voting lines
Jessica McGowan/Getty Images

The three steps to ensure a well-run runoff in Georgia

Hold the champagne: The 2020 Election Season isn't over just yet. Neither of Georgia's Senate races resulted in a victor on Election Day, sending both contests to January runoffs that will likely determine control of the U.S. Senate. And while many folks are understandably focused on the political repercussions of these races, I'm pulling for a different candidate: democracy.

While Georgia will likely conduct a risk-limiting audit and recount of the presidential election later this month, the state appears to have done a good job administering the 2020 presidential election. As a former election administrator and expert on the integrity of elections, my assessment is there is no reason to question the integrity of the election outcome. If any concrete evidence suggesting that wrongful disenfranchisement has or will affect the accuracy of the outcome, that assessment could change. Right now, there isn't.

Regardless, these are three steps Georgia officials could take now to ensure the integrity of the state's runoff elections in January:

Keep ReadingShow less
Even if it's not official, Republicans should acknowledge Biden's win

Even if it's not official, Republicans should acknowledge Biden's win

The nation has a new president-elect, Joe Biden. At the same time, there is no official president-elect, because the electoral process itself hasn't yet reached that point.

How can both these assertions be true? And if they are, how are Americans supposed to understand that? Most importantly, how can Americans of opposite parties get on the same page, so that we can move forward together as one country, as our new president-elect in his impressive victory speech is urging us to do?

When it comes to ending elections, there are actually two different processes at work, and they operate on different timelines.

Keep ReadingShow less
What's next for U.S. democracy after the president's stress test?
Jay Cross/Flickr

What's next for U.S. democracy after the president's stress test?

In another assessment of the 2020 vote so far, Election Dissection sat down with Laura Williamson, who works on voting rights and democracy at Demos. We spoke about President Trump's election night remarks as a stress test for the United States. Williamson had plenty to say about the state of the elections and some things that need fixing after the votes are finally counted.

What was your reaction to the president?

The president's remarks and actions are a test of our ability to show up, as a people, to mass mobilize and resist his authoritarian calls to end the counting. The basis of our democracy is that we pick our leaders. It's not the president or the courts that choose. So it's a test of our ability as a people to resist what is so clearly an anti-democratic attack.

And Americans are rising to the test. We're seeing masses of people calling for every vote to be counted. They're showing up and exercising their political power. We flexed our political power one way, by voting before or on Election Day. Now we're exercising it again in a different way — showing up in the streets and demanding every eligible vote is counted.

Keep ReadingShow less
Why street protests may not be the best strategy to protect the election

Why street protests may not be the best strategy to protect the election

In the months leading up to Election Day, civil society organizations carried out an extraordinary effort to make sure people across the country knew what to expect. That laid the groundwork for the core messages that have dominated in recent days: Every vote needs to be counted; the system is not broken just because it is taking longer to determine the winner; and election officials are in charge and will get the job done.

News organizations have amplified these messages. They have impressively stepped up to the challenge of covering this complicated, highly contentious election. The result has been much more calm during an uncertain post-election period than might have been expected. A development that many feared could trigger chaos — President Trump unilaterally declaring victory — has been a bit like the proverbial barking dog ignored by the passing truck.

Keep ReadingShow less