Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Why Microsoft's Trickbot crackdown shows 2020 election security is improving

hacker

Election security has been much improved since 2016, says David Levine.

xijian/Getty Images

Election Dissection caught up with David Levine of the Alliance for Securing Democracy about this week's news that Microsoft launched a preemptive strike against Trickbot, one of the world's most notorious hacker computer networks. Criminals have used Trickbot to attack banks, hospitals and local governments with ransomware in recent years. There's fear that Russia or other foreign entities could launch a ransomware attack to disrupt the 2020 count.

The actions by Microsoft, the U.S. Cyber Command and others indicate that the U.S. is in a far stronger position than it was in 2016, Levine said. Here are highlights from our interview.


Why was the Microsoft action against Trickbot important?

Trickbot is one of the world's most prolific distributors of ransomware, and ransomware is one of the biggest threats to the 2020 election. It can be used to hijack people's computers and IT systems. It can force victims to pay up to get them unlocked.

We know that Russian intelligence sources have commandeered cyber criminal botnets before. Microsoft's actions are really important because they're not only taking steps to protect against botnets, they're also trying to be proactive and reduce their capabilities.

Do the actions by Microsoft, the U.S. Cyber Command and the Department of Homeland Security show we're in a better position in 2020, compared with the last presidential election?

This is a perfect example of how we've made strides since 2016. We have a greater understanding of potential foreign threats, as well as more tools in the toolbox for how to prevent them, detect them and recover from them.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Election officials have done a number of things to help ensure our infrastructure is more resilient this time around. There's more information sharing between state and federal agencies. There's much more cyber training. There's much more testing of systems to identify vulnerabilities and fixing them.

In 2016, we were just trying to wrap our arms around the threat, what foreign interference might look like. Today, the FBI and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency [part of DHS] have been warning us every couple of days about emerging threats, including ransomware. This threat shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone.

What should state and local authorities be doing to guard against these threats?

Some of it is making sure they've got paper processes in place and backups of voter registration databases on hand to be able to recover. Election officials need to change passwords at appropriate intervals. They need to be doing the training.

Some big jurisdictions have their own IT and information security support. Others don't. If they identify issues in any of their networks, they need to loop in state and federal resources, like DHS, to identify, investigate and mitigate threats if possible.

If you see something unusual, something that looks different, it's incumbent to say something, to bring in IT and security experts as soon as possible.

Read More

The election went remarkably well. Here's how to make the next one even better.
Jeff Swensen/Getty Images

The election went remarkably well. Here's how to make the next one even better.

We haven't yet seen evidence that would cast doubt on the legitimacy of the 2020 presidential election — even with the unprecedented challenges of a global pandemic, the threat of foreign interference, civil unrest and greater turnout than any time since 1900. That counts as a resounding success.

Once the final tallies are certified, we need to thank the election administrators and poll workers whose heroic efforts preserved American democracy. After that, we need to assess what worked best and what needs to improve, so we can identify achievable steps to make future elections even more secure.

Based on what we know so far, here are five things that should be on the U.S. elections to-do list:

Keep ReadingShow less
Georgia voting stickers
Stop the presses, says appeals court, even if that means longer Georgia voting lines
Jessica McGowan/Getty Images

The three steps to ensure a well-run runoff in Georgia

Hold the champagne: The 2020 Election Season isn't over just yet. Neither of Georgia's Senate races resulted in a victor on Election Day, sending both contests to January runoffs that will likely determine control of the U.S. Senate. And while many folks are understandably focused on the political repercussions of these races, I'm pulling for a different candidate: democracy.

While Georgia will likely conduct a risk-limiting audit and recount of the presidential election later this month, the state appears to have done a good job administering the 2020 presidential election. As a former election administrator and expert on the integrity of elections, my assessment is there is no reason to question the integrity of the election outcome. If any concrete evidence suggesting that wrongful disenfranchisement has or will affect the accuracy of the outcome, that assessment could change. Right now, there isn't.

Regardless, these are three steps Georgia officials could take now to ensure the integrity of the state's runoff elections in January:

Keep ReadingShow less
Even if it's not official, Republicans should acknowledge Biden's win

Even if it's not official, Republicans should acknowledge Biden's win

The nation has a new president-elect, Joe Biden. At the same time, there is no official president-elect, because the electoral process itself hasn't yet reached that point.

How can both these assertions be true? And if they are, how are Americans supposed to understand that? Most importantly, how can Americans of opposite parties get on the same page, so that we can move forward together as one country, as our new president-elect in his impressive victory speech is urging us to do?

When it comes to ending elections, there are actually two different processes at work, and they operate on different timelines.

Keep ReadingShow less
What's next for U.S. democracy after the president's stress test?
Jay Cross/Flickr

What's next for U.S. democracy after the president's stress test?

In another assessment of the 2020 vote so far, Election Dissection sat down with Laura Williamson, who works on voting rights and democracy at Demos. We spoke about President Trump's election night remarks as a stress test for the United States. Williamson had plenty to say about the state of the elections and some things that need fixing after the votes are finally counted.

What was your reaction to the president?

The president's remarks and actions are a test of our ability to show up, as a people, to mass mobilize and resist his authoritarian calls to end the counting. The basis of our democracy is that we pick our leaders. It's not the president or the courts that choose. So it's a test of our ability as a people to resist what is so clearly an anti-democratic attack.

And Americans are rising to the test. We're seeing masses of people calling for every vote to be counted. They're showing up and exercising their political power. We flexed our political power one way, by voting before or on Election Day. Now we're exercising it again in a different way — showing up in the streets and demanding every eligible vote is counted.

Keep ReadingShow less