Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Voting by mail is still secure. Here’s why.

Whether it's the outlandish claim that expanded vote by mail will lead to massive fraud or that the mail-in voting process can be easily exploited by foreign adversaries, the White House has persistently spread dangerous myths about the integrity of our elections.

Foreign adversaries, such as Russia, China and Iran, are out to discredit our electoral process and undermine our democracy. Such rhetoric does the dirty work for them.

As former election directors who have worked for both Republicans and Democrats, we know how important it is to cut through the noise and reassure our electorate what we know to be true: Voting by mail is a secure and important voting option, particularly amid the pandemic.


There's no question this year's election will be different, with more expected to cast ballots remotely than ever before. This is why election officials at all levels of government have been working hard to protect their election infrastructure.

For example, with help from state and local officials, the Department of Homeland Security recently published a resource analyzing the risks of mail-in voting systems in order to help states, localities and vendors run smooth and secure elections. The National Vote At Home Institute released two toolkits, one focused on communications and one focused on operations. The aim is to help election officials create messaging around expanded vote-by-mail options and prepare their polling places for large numbers of in-person voters by analyzing staffing levels, space and other resources each polling place needs.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

The Alliance for Securing Democracy, with the help of other organizations, has published papers focused on election security and integrity. They examine the equipment, staff, supplies and other costs during the pandemic and provide recommendations to help protect voters and election workers from the coronavirus while ensuring elections remain secure.

Many states are also taking appropriate steps to ensure their election offices can handle an influx of mail ballots: Public education campaigns encouraging return of ballots as early as possible, close coordination with postal officials, increasing the number of ballot drop boxes, voter-friendly online ballot tracking systems, and redesigned ballots with clearer instructions.

Recently, Georgia took the step of building an online voter portal for voters to request mail-in ballots. South Carolina approved pre-paid postage for all mail-in ballots to remove another barrier to voting that some voters might face. In California, statewide ballot tracking was implemented to ensure voters can know the status of their ballot after casting it.

After Postmaster General Louis DeJoy faced tough questioning from Congress, the Postal Service needs to reassure the electorate that mail-in voting is secure. While the USPS recently announced it was suspending until after the election operational changes that had resulted in delivery delays across the country, DeJoy told lawmakers he will not be reversing cost-cutting moves made earlier. This could affect Americans' ability to cast votes through the mail — making the proactive steps of election officials even more important in protecting our vote by mail systems.

Not every American will vote by mail. Some are only eligible to do so if they have a valid excuse — and for some, the pandemic does not count. For others, such as voters in certain Native American tribes or with certain disabilities, voting by mail may be less convenient. And some simply prefer to vote in person. It's important to give all voters the option to do what's best for them, but that means every method must be safe and secure.

What's most important is that voters who are considering voting by mail feel confident about the process. At a time when some Americans might not trust our elections to be fair, accurate and secure, false information about voting by mail isn't just problematic, it's downright dangerous.

To their credit, many election officials have implemented protections and improvements to their systems in an effort to make sure every ballot is counted. Despite what some with a vested interest in the election outcome may have said, we are confident voting by mail is safe and secure — in a pandemic and beyond.

David Levine is an elections integrity fellow at the Alliance for Securing Democracy. Amber McReynolds is CEO of the National Vote at Home Institute. Read more from The Fulcrum's Election Dissection blog or see our full list of contributors.

Read More

The election went remarkably well. Here's how to make the next one even better.
Jeff Swensen/Getty Images

The election went remarkably well. Here's how to make the next one even better.

We haven't yet seen evidence that would cast doubt on the legitimacy of the 2020 presidential election — even with the unprecedented challenges of a global pandemic, the threat of foreign interference, civil unrest and greater turnout than any time since 1900. That counts as a resounding success.

Once the final tallies are certified, we need to thank the election administrators and poll workers whose heroic efforts preserved American democracy. After that, we need to assess what worked best and what needs to improve, so we can identify achievable steps to make future elections even more secure.

Based on what we know so far, here are five things that should be on the U.S. elections to-do list:

Keep ReadingShow less
Georgia voting stickers
Stop the presses, says appeals court, even if that means longer Georgia voting lines
Jessica McGowan/Getty Images

The three steps to ensure a well-run runoff in Georgia

Hold the champagne: The 2020 Election Season isn't over just yet. Neither of Georgia's Senate races resulted in a victor on Election Day, sending both contests to January runoffs that will likely determine control of the U.S. Senate. And while many folks are understandably focused on the political repercussions of these races, I'm pulling for a different candidate: democracy.

While Georgia will likely conduct a risk-limiting audit and recount of the presidential election later this month, the state appears to have done a good job administering the 2020 presidential election. As a former election administrator and expert on the integrity of elections, my assessment is there is no reason to question the integrity of the election outcome. If any concrete evidence suggesting that wrongful disenfranchisement has or will affect the accuracy of the outcome, that assessment could change. Right now, there isn't.

Regardless, these are three steps Georgia officials could take now to ensure the integrity of the state's runoff elections in January:

Keep ReadingShow less
Even if it's not official, Republicans should acknowledge Biden's win

Even if it's not official, Republicans should acknowledge Biden's win

The nation has a new president-elect, Joe Biden. At the same time, there is no official president-elect, because the electoral process itself hasn't yet reached that point.

How can both these assertions be true? And if they are, how are Americans supposed to understand that? Most importantly, how can Americans of opposite parties get on the same page, so that we can move forward together as one country, as our new president-elect in his impressive victory speech is urging us to do?

When it comes to ending elections, there are actually two different processes at work, and they operate on different timelines.

Keep ReadingShow less
What's next for U.S. democracy after the president's stress test?
Jay Cross/Flickr

What's next for U.S. democracy after the president's stress test?

In another assessment of the 2020 vote so far, Election Dissection sat down with Laura Williamson, who works on voting rights and democracy at Demos. We spoke about President Trump's election night remarks as a stress test for the United States. Williamson had plenty to say about the state of the elections and some things that need fixing after the votes are finally counted.

What was your reaction to the president?

The president's remarks and actions are a test of our ability to show up, as a people, to mass mobilize and resist his authoritarian calls to end the counting. The basis of our democracy is that we pick our leaders. It's not the president or the courts that choose. So it's a test of our ability as a people to resist what is so clearly an anti-democratic attack.

And Americans are rising to the test. We're seeing masses of people calling for every vote to be counted. They're showing up and exercising their political power. We flexed our political power one way, by voting before or on Election Day. Now we're exercising it again in a different way — showing up in the streets and demanding every eligible vote is counted.

Keep ReadingShow less
Why street protests may not be the best strategy to protect the election

Why street protests may not be the best strategy to protect the election

In the months leading up to Election Day, civil society organizations carried out an extraordinary effort to make sure people across the country knew what to expect. That laid the groundwork for the core messages that have dominated in recent days: Every vote needs to be counted; the system is not broken just because it is taking longer to determine the winner; and election officials are in charge and will get the job done.

News organizations have amplified these messages. They have impressively stepped up to the challenge of covering this complicated, highly contentious election. The result has been much more calm during an uncertain post-election period than might have been expected. A development that many feared could trigger chaos — President Trump unilaterally declaring victory — has been a bit like the proverbial barking dog ignored by the passing truck.

Keep ReadingShow less