Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The Surge of Independent Voters: Why Open Primaries Are Democratically Necessary

In this Fulcrum Roundtable discussion, Jeremy Gruber of Open Primaries explains why voters are leaving the major parties, how closed primaries limit participation, and what reforms could expand representation for nearly half the country.

Opinion

A person receiving a "I voted" sticker

After voting for the first time, the proud mother puts an "I voted" sticker on her daughter.

Getty Images

Across the United States, traditional political affiliations are shifting as a growing segment of the electorate steps away from major-party labels. Jeremy Gruber, senior vice president at Open Primaries, a national nonpartisan organization dedicated to expanding nonpartisan voter access, highlighted this dramatic evolution in voter registration and the structural hurdles these voters face in the latest episode of The Fulcrum Roundtable.

The decline in major-party allegiance is not temporary but a sustained movement that has been building over several decades.


"Until the 1980s, 90% of voters in this country were part of the Republican and Democratic parties," Gruber explained. "And ever since, the fastest-growing group of voters in this country has been independent voters. Now today, independent voters are 47% of the country in terms of identification."

- YouTube youtu.be

Gruber notes that independents now represent "the largest group of voters in 10 states by registration and the second largest group of voters in most others." States like Kentucky exemplify this trend, where "more Kentuckians registered as independents than as Republicans or Democrats combined" during recent registration periods.

According to Gruber, voters are leaving established parties, or not registering with them in the first place, because they're frustrated with polarization and a lack of progress.

"Voters are tired. They're tired of red meat partisan politics. They're tired of the partisanship and polarization that are driving both parties," Gruber said. "They're just tired of the parties not achieving what they are claiming that they're there to achieve, which is progress, right? Which is to make their lives better as voters and as Americans."

He adds that major party platforms have narrowed over time, driving voters to look elsewhere for solutions.

"Both parties had a much larger, more broadly outlooked platforms for a very long time, and both parties' platforms have tended to contract and become much more ideologically focused," Gruber noted. "That has pushed a lot of voters to say, 'Look, there are parts of this party's platform that may appeal to me, and there are parts of this other party's platform that may appeal to me, but one party or the other is not where I live politically anymore.'"

Instead of ideological purity, Gruber emphasizes that "what most Americans want is common sense. They want common-sense answers, common-sense solutions. And neither party is providing that for a lot of Americans, and that's why they're looking for something else."

Despite paying taxes that fund primary elections, millions of independent voters across the country remain barred from participating in closed primaries. However, Gruber argues that party leadership already possesses the legal authority to change those rules without legislative overhauls.

"The Supreme Court has ruled that the political parties have the unilateral right... We have a First Amendment right of association," Gruber pointed out. "Parties are private entities... and the Supreme Court has said either party, Democrat or Republican, can open their primary to independent voters in any state."

While state parties in several jurisdictions have opened their primaries, others remain closed due to internal party dynamics.

"In a lot of places, the leadership of the parties is oftentimes very distanced from the average voter who's a member of that party," Gruber said. "It's much more ideological, and it's much more focused on power and control rather than the simple issues of fundamental fairness... Party leadership has their own interests, and those interests don't necessarily align with opening the primary to voters who are not affiliated with that party."

To bridge that gap and advance election reform, Gruber stresses the importance of grassroots organizing and direct voter storytelling.

"Independent voters in particular in this country are so misunderstood in a widespread way, and everybody puts their fears of the 'other' onto independent voters," Gruber observed. "There's nothing strange about or unusual about them. They're just like everybody else in their community. They just don't want to join a party in order to participate in a public election."

Gruber concluded that achieving nonpartisan access depends on voters demanding equal representation.

"It's only when the voters, independents and party voters alike, put pressure on their party officials and their elected officials that change... is going to start to happen in even more effective ways."

The Fulcrum Roundtable is a program where columnists join for deeper, on‑the‑record discussions about issues shaping American governance and civic participation.

This episode is part of The Fulcrum's partnership with IVN and The Latino News Network to expand voter‑first journalism and strengthen public‑centered coverage of democracy.

Hugo Balta is the executive editor of The Fulcrum and the publisher of the Latino News Network,.


Read More

Person holding a "I VOTED" sticker
person holding white and blue round plastic container
Photo by Manny Becerra on Unsplash

AI, Elections and the Making of an Informed Electorate

In 1994, as a recent college graduate, I joined what was then Project Vote Smart (PVS), an organization that provided factual nonpartisan information about political candidates. Voters would call the PVS hotline to learn about specific candidates, and volunteers, myself among them, would answer their questions. More than three decades later, this type of information is available at our fingertips — but having easier access does not necessarily make us better informed.

I believed deeply then — and still do — in James Madison’s warning, contained in an 1822 letter to William T. Barry: “A popular Government, without popular information, or the means of acquiring it, is but a Prologue to a Farce or a Tragedy; or, perhaps both.” If an educated electorate is essential to protecting democracy, helping people be informed voters felt like a valuable way to contribute.

Keep ReadingShow less
U.S. Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA)

U.S. Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA) speaks to reporters at the U.S. Capitol on November 09, 2026 in Washington, DC. Johnson spoke about the midterm elections that resulted in Democrats taking control of the House and Senate.

(Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

The Customer Is Always Right: Why Speaker Johnson’s Post-Midterm Arrogance Misses the Mark

In business, there is a golden rule that separates thriving enterprises from bankrupt ones: The customer is always right. When consumers stop buying what you are selling, you do not stand at the storefront door and scold them for having bad taste. You go back to the drawing board, listen to their needs, and fix your product.

Apparently, House Speaker Mike Johnson never got that memo.

Keep ReadingShow less
A voter in California

A voter marks their ballot in the Kern County Elections Office on November 03, 2026 in Bakersfield, California.

(Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images)

A Republic, If You Can Keep It: The People Have Spoken

For almost two years, I have written about our constitutional Republic. I have worried about it. And I have even written to members of Congress about it.

For months, I have asked a question I never imagined would trouble me so deeply: Can the American people help keep our Republic when its guardrails are being weakened?

Keep ReadingShow less
Hand placing VOTE sticker on shirt

Hand placing VOTE sticker on shirt

Photo provided

The Latino Vote Keeps Changing. Why Do We Keep Calling It a Realignment?

After the 2024 presidential election, the headlines suggested that Latino voters were moving toward the Republican Party. Donald Trump’s gains were interpreted as evidence of a possible political realignment, particularly among working-class Latino voters and younger men.

Two years later, the story has reversed. Latino voters, we are told, are returning to the Democrats.

Keep ReadingShow less