Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Texas GOP’s Closed-Primary Push Hits Pause. The Next Fight Is in Austin

News

Texas Capitol building

Texas Capitol, Austin

Austin, Texas—A federal court effectively told the Republican Party of Texas Friday that—at least for now—if they want primary elections closed, they will have to convince their members in the legislature to do it. This puts the matter on hold until the 2027 legislative session.

It wasn’t a dismissal. The court did not rule on the constitutionality of Texas’ open primary system. Instead, US District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk paused the GOP’s lawsuit, stating that the Legislature may soon take steps to close the state’s primary elections on its own.


“Prominent Texas politicians support similar legislative action,” Kacsmaryk wrote.

Notably, there are also prominent Republicans who either oppose or are skeptical of the state moving to a closed primary system. In fact, this fight may further expose a growing divide within the party.

Gov. Greg Abbott and Attorney General Ken Paxton support the change, but outgoing US Sen. John Cornyn has publicly warned that it could hurt the GOP, going so far as to say, “closed primaries are a threat to Texas voters.”

X

Cornyn shared an op-ed in The Dallas Morning News written by Suzanne Bellsnyder, editor of the Texas Rural Reporter.

“Closing primaries will not broaden participation; it will narrow it further,” Bellsnyder wrote. “That should concern Texans regardless of party. Democracy becomes more representative when more people participate.”

“It becomes less representative when fewer people do.”

As previously noted on IVN, participation in May’s Republican primary was roughly 7.4% of all registered voters. That number could shrink even more if the independent voters who chose a GOP ballot are suddenly excluded from these taxpayer-funded elections.

Support for closed primaries has existed within the Texas GOP for years. Yet, the legislature has not moved to change the law. Will 2027 be different? That is the question Kacsmaryk wants answered before this case moves any further.

How Did Texas Get Here?

In September 2025, the Texas GOP sued then-Secretary of State Jane Nelson, also a Republican, arguing that allowing independents and Democrats to participate in Republican primaries violates the party’s First Amendment right of association.

Under current law, Texas does not register voters by party affiliation. Any registered voter can select either a Republican or Democratic primary ballot, but voters who participate in a primary cannot switch parties for that election cycle’s runoff.

Republican leaders argue that the system allows voters who do not support the party to influence its nominees. They blame “crossover voting” for helping incumbent Republicans fend off challengers backed by the party in competitive primaries.

Gov. Abbott told the Texas Republican Convention in June that he wants to ensure “only Republicans vote in Republican Primaries.” It’s worth noting that Abbott easily won this year’s primary under a system he claims is producing weaker party candidates.

The lawsuit also created an unusual divide among Texas officials.

Attorney General Ken Paxton, whose job it is to defend the state in court, sided with the GOP rather than defending the state's existing election law. Nelson maintained that the Legislature, not the courts, should determine whether the primary system changes.

Her successor, Robert Howden, confirmed in August that his office would continue defending the current system, while acknowledging lawmakers could change it.

In May, Veterans for All Voters sought to intervene in the debate through an amicus brief opposing the Texas GOP's effort. The organization argued that closing primaries would exclude millions of Texans who do not affiliate with either major political party.

What Does This Mean for Independent Voters?

For now, nothing changes. Independent voters can still participate in Texas primaries without registering with a political party.

The next statewide primaries are scheduled for 2028. What their rights look like then will depend entirely on what the Texas Legislature does next year.

Texas GOP’s Closed-Primary Push Hits Pause. The Next Fight Is in Austin is republished as part of The Fulcrum’s partnership with IVN and the Latino News Network to expand voter‑first journalism and strengthen public‑centered coverage of democracy.


Read More

Vote pins

Vote pins

Photo provided

Sharp Gender Divide Among Latino Voters

A new analysis from the UCLA Latino Policy and Politics Institute (LPPI) and the UC Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies (IGS) reveals significant political differences between Latinas and Latino men in California — especially among younger voters and those without bachelor’s degrees. The findings, drawn from the May 2026 Berkeley IGS Poll of 1,912 Latino registered voters, challenge the notion that California’s Latino electorate behaves as a single political bloc.

California Latinas are more likely than Latino men to prioritize protecting immigrant communities, opposing the Trump administration’s agenda, and defending democracy and voting rights. According to the report, 69% of Latinas say protecting immigrant communities is “very important,” compared with 52% of Latino men. On “fighting the Trump agenda,” the gap is identical: 68% of Latinas versus 51% of Latino men. Democracy and voting rights receive the strongest support across both groups, with 87% of Latinas and 77% of Latino men rating the issue as very important.

Keep Reading Show less

Alaska Is Voting on More Than Ranked Choice Voting. It’s Voting on Who Gets to Vote

Alaska voters will once again vote on a measure to repeal its nonpartisan election system. Those fighting to preserve the system have gone to the courts to make a simple case: It’s only fair that voters know exactly what is on their ballot.

Specifically the consequences of Ballot Measure 2, which would give parties the ability to shut out 60% of Alaska voters registered as independents. This is what attorney Scott Kendall argued before the Alaska Supreme Court last week.

Keep Reading Show less
vote pins

vote pins in red, white, and blue with stars and stripes.

Getty Images

The Long Fight to Secure Voting Rights for All Americans

Many Americans think that all US citizens aged 18 or older are entitled to vote. In fact, that has never really been the case in the USA. It has been a tremendously long, hard road to get to where we are today.

The easy part is that the Twenty-Sixth Amendment to the US Constitution lowered the voting age from 21 to 18 in 1971, in response to the Vietnam War. It was considered unjust to draft men to war who were denied the right to vote. In several states felons are denied the right to vote for life.

Keep Reading Show less
Woman checking mail

Close-up of woman's hand putting or receiving letter with voting ballot near a mailbox near her house -

Getty Images

Why Having a Ballot at Home Strengthens Civic Engagement

A legal challenge regarding mail-in voting rules and postal service regulations is currently moving through the federal court system as the midterm elections approach. The dispute involves administrative directives and postal regulations concerning ballot delivery standards and state requirements. Lower courts have previously addressed how these rules are implemented, prompting appeals and legal filings from various administration officials, state attorneys general, and election administrators over operational timelines and voter access.

Brian Miller is the executive director of Nonprofit VOTE, a nationwide organization that works to help nonprofits engage the communities they serve in voting and elections.
In the article "Voting Is Not a Closed-Book Test," Miller explores mail-in voting and why giving voters time and access is critical to a healthy democracy.

Keep Reading Show less