Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Arkansas anti-gerrymander group joins fight for relief from signature rules

Arkansas state Senate districts
Arkansas Department of Transformation and Shared Services

Redistricting reformers in Arkansas are the latest to ask the courts to relax petition signature requirements in the time of coronavirus.

Arkansas Voters First filed a lawsuit Wednesday asking a federal judge to loosen the state's rules given the unprecedented circumstances.

While much of the focus at the intersection of democracy and the pandemic has centered on delayed primaries and altered rules for the November presidential contest, the plight of grassroots groups to register voters and get their measures on the ballot has also intensified.


A federal judge in Arizona this week dismissed a request from two ballot measure campaigns, which wanted permission to get signatures online instead of in person, while the top court in Massachusetts relaxed the timetables and signatures required from would-be candidates there.

But the number of court fights has so far been exceeded by those who have given up: At least 21 efforts to get proposals on the ballot in 11 states have been paused if not outright abandoned in the face of Covid-19, and legions of potential candidates across the country have put their aspirations on hold.

Arkansas Voters First wants the people to be allowed to decide this fall to turn over the drawing of both congressional and legislative maps to an independent commission starting next year, after the census provides the population details for each state. Thirteen other states have already done so at least for some maps.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

The maps drawn by the Republican-majority Arkansas General Assembly a decade ago have produced an all-GOP congressional delegation and a state Capitol in Little Rock where just a quarter of the lawmakers are Democrats -- even though the party got 35 percent of the statewide vote two years ago. Only seven states have a more partisan gerrymandered set of maps, according to the University of Southern California's Schwarzenegger Institute.

Polling by Arkansas Voters First found 58 percent in favor of an independent commission.

"We don't have the luxury of waiting until next year," said the group's director, Bonnie Miller. "If we are denied access to the ballot this year, Arkansas could be stuck with unfair and unrepresentative districts for another 10 years."

State law requires 89,000 registered voters to sign a petition in the presence of a canvasser by July 3, and the group said it had only begun the process when the pandemic took hold. GOP Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson is one of only eight governors who has never issued a stay-at-home order, however.

The anti-gerrymandering group wants the federal court to suspend the witness requirement, reduce the signature minimum, extend the deadline and permit the use of electronic signatures.

"Every voice should be heard in our democracy, and every vote should count equally," said Paul Smith of the Campaign Legal Center, which is representing the group. "Arkansans deserve the right to decide whether their voting district maps will be drawn by a neutral commission or politicians pursuing a partisan agenda."

Read More

MERGER: The Organization that Brought Ranked Choice Voting and Ended SuperPACs in Maine Joins California’s Nonpartisan Primary Pioneers

A check mark and hands.

Photo by Allison Saeng on Unsplash. Unsplash+ License obtained by the author.

MERGER: The Organization that Brought Ranked Choice Voting and Ended SuperPACs in Maine Joins California’s Nonpartisan Primary Pioneers

Originally published by Independent Voter News.

Today, I am proud to share an exciting milestone in my journey as an advocate for democracy and electoral reform.

Keep ReadingShow less
Half-Baked Alaska

A photo of multiple checked boxes.

Getty Images / Thanakorn Lappattaranan

Half-Baked Alaska

This past year’s elections saw a number of state ballot initiatives of great national interest, which proposed the adoption of two “unusual” election systems for state and federal offices. Pairing open nonpartisan primaries with a general election using ranked choice voting, these reforms were rejected by the citizens of Colorado, Idaho, and Nevada. The citizens of Alaska, however, who were the first to adopt this dual system in 2020, narrowly confirmed their choice after an attempt to repeal it in November.

Ranked choice voting, used in Alaska’s general elections, allows voters to rank their candidate choices on their ballot and then has multiple rounds of voting until one candidate emerges with a majority of the final vote and is declared the winner. This more representative result is guaranteed because in each round the weakest candidate is dropped, and the votes of that candidate’s supporters automatically transfer to their next highest choice. Alaska thereby became the second state after Maine to use ranked choice voting for its state and federal elections, and both have had great success in their use.

Keep ReadingShow less
Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

The United States Supreme Court.

Getty Images / Rudy Sulgan

Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

Fourteen years ago, after the Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional the popular blanket primary system, Californians voted to replace the deeply unpopular closed primary that replaced it with a top-two system. Since then, Democratic Party insiders, Republican Party insiders, minor political parties, and many national reform and good government groups, have tried (and failed) to deep-six the system because the public overwhelmingly supports it (over 60% every year it’s polled).

Now, three minor political parties, who opposed the reform from the start and have unsuccessfully sued previously, are once again trying to overturn it. The Peace and Freedom Party, the Green Party, and the Libertarian Party have teamed up to file a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Their brief repeats the same argument that the courts have previously rejected—that the top-two system discriminates against parties and deprives voters of choice by not guaranteeing every party a place on the November ballot.

Keep ReadingShow less
Ranked Choice Voting May Be a Stepping Stone to Proportional Representation

Someone filling out a ballot.

Getty Images / Hill Street Studios

Ranked Choice Voting May Be a Stepping Stone to Proportional Representation

In the 2024 U.S. election, several states did not pass ballot initiatives to implement Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) despite strong majority support from voters under 65. Still, RCV was defended in Alaska, passed by a landslide in Washington, D.C., and has earned majority support in 31 straight pro-RCV city ballot measures. Still, some critics of RCV argue that it does not enhance and promote democratic principles as much as forms of proportional representation (PR), as commonly used throughout Europe and Latin America.

However, in the U.S. many people have not heard of PR. The question under consideration is whether implementing RCV serves as a stepping stone to PR by building public understanding and support for reforms that move away from winner-take-all systems. Utilizing a nationally representative sample of respondents (N=1000) on the 2022 Cooperative Election Survey (CES), results show that individuals who favor RCV often also know about and back PR. When comparing other types of electoral reforms, RCV uniquely transfers into support for PR, in ways that support for nonpartisan redistricting and the national popular vote do not. These findings can inspire efforts that demonstrate how RCV may facilitate the adoption of PR in the U.S.

Keep ReadingShow less