Amelia Minkin is a research associate at Issue One, the leading crosspartisan political reform group in Washington, D.C. Navas is an election protection intern at Issue One.
More than 10,000 officials across the country run U.S. elections. This interview is part of a series highlighting the election heroes who are the faces of democracy.
Amy Burgans, a registered Republican, has served as the clerk-treasurer for Douglas County, Nev., since she was appointed to the position in December 2020. In November 2022, she won an election to continue in the role.
Douglas County has a population of about 50,000 people and is located just south of Nevada’s capital, Carson City. Among its attractions are the southeastern shore of Lake Tahoe and Carson Valley, which includes many hiking trails. The county was named for former Sen. Stephen Douglas (D-Ill.) who famously debated Abraham Lincoln in 1858 while both men campaigned for the Senate.
Burgans has roughly four years of experience in election administration and became a certified elections/registration administrator in 2023 — the highest professional designation for an election official in the country. She also serves as the secretary/treasurer of the Nevada Association of County Clerks and Election Officials.
Before becoming clerk-treasurer for Douglas County, Burgans served as a military police officer in the U.S. Army for 10 years. After completing her military service, she moved to Douglas County in 2005, where she was a stay-at-home mom to her five children. In 2012, she returned to the workforce, working for the South Lake Tahoe Police Department. She later served as administrative assistant to the Douglas County Board of County Commissioners.
When Burgans is not working, she enjoys spending time with her family. Burgans has led her county through many challenges since assuming her role as clerk-treasurer, including running elections amid the Covid-19 pandemic and transitioning to vote-by-mail elections.
Since March 2024, Burgans has been a part of Issue One’s Faces of Democracy campaign, advocating for protections for election workers and for regular, predictable, and sufficient federal funding of elections.
This interview has been edited for length and clarity.
Issue One: How did you end up in this profession?
Amy Burgans: I previously worked for the county manager's office as the assistant to the Board of Commissioners. In December of 2020, the previous clerk resigned. She and I knew each other well. She emailed me to ask if I had ever thought about her job. After speaking with her and talking with family and friends, I threw my name into the hat, and two days later, the Board of Commissioners appointed me. The next day, I took office. It was a very fast turnaround.
IO: You were in the military for nearly 10 years. What types of skills did you develop in the military that you have been able to bring into your current line of work?
AB: More than anything, the organizational aspect. I still approach a lot of things from the same organizational standpoint as the military chain of command, knowing who and what your resources are — and during stressful situations, being able to pull those in.
IO: Some local election officials focus strictly on running elections. Others have to wear many hats. Your official title is “county clerk-treasurer.” What portion of your time is devoted to running to elections? What other responsibilities are you responsible for in addition to running elections?
AB: Douglas County is a rural county, but we are not tiny. We have about 45,000 registered voters. I am very fortunate that I have amazing staff in every department. I have the clerk's office, the treasurer's office and the elections office. I have managers over all three of those departments that really run the day-to-day. In an election year, I would say 90 percent of my time is focused on the election. During off-election years, I try to divide my time equally between the three departments. I am very fortunate to know that when I am not able to be in the clerk's office or in the treasurer's office doing the daily tasks, I have staff who are capable of doing that.
IO: What part of the election administration story in your area do you think isn’t told enough or isn’t widely understood enough?
AB: It is really all of elections. I wish everyone had a knowledge base about what we actually do instead of the stories that are being told. Two of the biggest pieces of election misinformation that I try to be as vocal as I can about in my community are about mail ballots and the safety and security of the equipment we use.
IO: In recent years, election-related misconceptions, conspiracy theories and lies have proliferated. How has this impacted your daily work?
AB: I am really lucky in that it has not really impacted my daily work other than taking very seriously the way that the community sees elections and the transparency that we have within our office. We are the first and only rural county in Nevada that live streams our mail ballot processing 24/7 during the election. You can go to YouTube and watch every step of the process.
IO: What are the main challenges of a jurisdiction of your size?
AB: I really like the size of my jurisdiction. It is perfect. It is one of the largest rural counties in Nevada, and there are enough people to keep it fun and interesting. It is a challenge to figure out how I am going to get information to all of those voters, but at the same time, it is small enough that the people know who I am and feel comfortable reaching out and talking to me directly.
IO: What are some of the ways you have been successful in combating the spread of false information surrounding election administration in your community?
AB: I speak everywhere, and I try to be at every event. Fortunately, because Douglas County is rural and a smaller community, I am very lucky that I know most of the community. I have lived here for almost 20 years. I speak to women's groups and to political groups, for example. If there is an invitation, I always raise my hand and say yes, because the more I am out there and the more I am able to be the voice of truth, the better. And people do trust me, so I try to stay out in the community so that people know me and they feel comfortable asking me questions.
IO: Given all these challenges, what inspires you to stay in this line of work?
AB: I look at the big picture. It is so amazing that my team is running elections and putting processes into place that secure it and make it safer and more transparent.
My favorite part of the election process is the legislative session when I get to talk to my legislature about election processes — what we are doing in Douglas County and across the state. It’s important to help legislators understand the implications of laws that they are trying to push through.
I absolutely love what I do. It is a lot of work and responsibility, but ultimately the pride that I get at the end of election night is a very good feeling. Knowing that we were a part of running elections is just a very fulfilling feeling.
IO: Many people are surprised to learn that the federal government doesn’t routinely fund the costs of running elections. Why do you think the federal government should help supplement the cost of election administration?
AB: I don’t believe that the federal government should pay for the whole cost of elections, but the federal government should proportionately pay for the candidates that are on their ballots. In Douglas County and Nevada, we have laws in place that if a general improvement district or one of the local districts is on the ballot, I allocate the cost of running their race to them. It would be nice if it worked that way structurally to save counties some money.
IO: What is the price tag of running an election in your jurisdiction, and where does funding for election administration in your jurisdiction come from?
AB: If we take wages out of the equation, it is about $100,000 to $150,000 each election. It is funded primarily by the county, though we do receive some reimbursements from the state. What we get reimbursed for changes, but right now, we are reimbursed for postage for outgoing and incoming ballots and also for ballot stock, envelopes, and paper, basically the paper products for mail ballots.
IO: If your jurisdiction had extra funding, how would you spend it?
AB: Right now, we are looking at additional equipment. We are not sure how we are going to fund it. We are actually doing a little bit of budget cutting this year for the next fiscal year, just kind of tightening the belt. There is no funding for anything additional. But I would love to have a budget for more equipment and more outreach. Actually, I would like to see the state fund more voter outreach. Any additional funding I would get would probably go into equipment.
IO: Four years ago, Nevada became a universal vote-by-mail state. Some high-profile Republicans have criticized voting by mail. What should the public know about why voting by mail is safe and secure?
AB: Assembly Bill 321 made mail ballots universal. We try and make the process as transparent as possible. I’ve implemented a live stream, so you can watch the entire process, from the signature verification to the ballot deconstruction to the tallying of the mail ballots.
I am also always happy to talk to the public about the signature verification process and how difficult it is to actually manufacture someone else's signature onto a ballot.
Even though about 75 percent of the ballots that are cast in Douglas County are mail ballots, we verify the signature on every single one manually. We do not have a machine that does it. We have staff members doing that all day during elections. It’s a misconception that someone could come in and drop off hundreds of ballots with fake signatures without getting caught. That is not going to happen.
IO: We understand that the United States Postal Service recently made a decision to route all Reno mail — including mail ballots — to Sacramento. Since Douglas County’s mail currently goes through Reno, how will this decision affect Douglas County’s processing of mail ballots?
AB: If they move forward with this change, it is going to be devastating. The interstate that goes from Reno to Sacramento closes down all the time. Our mail ballots having to go over the mountains to Sacramento, which is a three-hour drive from me, and then back before I can receive them to process them is going to be devastating to the timelines that we have in place, that are set in law for me to be able to accept those ballots.
IO: Outside of being passionate about running safe and secure elections, what are your hobbies, or what is a fun fact that most people might not know about you?
AB: I have five kids. My free time revolves around being a taxi for them. My world revolves around elections and my kids.
IO: What is your favorite book or movie?
AB: My favorite movie is probably “The Notebook.” I love that movie because I like a feel-good movie, something that I can sit and watch over and over, and it never gets old.
IO: Which historical figure would you have most liked to have had an opportunity to meet?
AB: Honestly, it would probably be the Founding Fathers because of the wisdom they had when they created the Constitution. I would love to just be there and be part of the conversations during the formation of the United States — the ideas they put in place and the reasoning behind why they put them in place. Being able to be a part of the conversations that led to the laws that we have in place would have been amazing.



















A golden tray sits on the Resolute Desk as President Donald Trump speaks during an announcement on American nuclear innovation in the Oval Office at the White House on July 24, 2026, in Washington, D.C. Trump is signing multiple executive orders targeting the nuclear energy sector and easing rules for new reactors and nuclear fuel supply chains.
Trump’s hubris rivals the fallen heroes of ancient Greek mythology
In January, the New York Times asked President Donald Trump if there were any limits on his global powers.
“Yeah,” the president responded, “there is one thing. My own morality. My own mind. It’s the only thing that can stop me.”
That was eight months ago, but fortunately Christopher Nolan’s blockbuster adaptation of “The Odyssey” has made ancient Greek literature newly relevant. Before that window closes, I’d like to talk about hubris.
Today, the term mostly means excessive pride or arrogance. That’s part of what the Greeks meant by it too, but the meaning was a bit richer and more specific. Hubris was an insolent or outrageous act that offended the gods, often because the transgressor was claiming abilities or authorities that solely belonged to supreme beings.
Nolan renamed and slightly modified the concept of xenia for the film, calling it “Zeus’ law.” In the director’s telling, mortals should follow the rules laid out by the gods, specifically the requirement to treat strangers with respect lest they be gods in disguise.
In a sense, hubris is the opposite, or at least the rejection, of xenia. The hubris of the suitors, and at times Odysseus himself, invites punishment by the gods and their mortal instruments.
Which brings me back to Donald Trump. His claim that there are no constraints on his personal power to dictate events on the global stage was one of the greatest expressions of hubris ever uttered by a political leader.
Trump’s claim was obviously false when he made it.
He vowed that he could end the Russia-Ukraine war in 24 hours. He’s proved powerless to make that happen. If he had divine powers to work his will, why would he have balked at implementing his tariffs so often that Wall Street adopted the “TACO trade” term for his deals? “TACO” stands for “Trump always chickens out.”
And why would Trump have made so many embarrassing concessions to China — from rescinding tariffs on Chinese goods to allowing them to buy crucial and incredibly valuable computer chips?
But Trump saw his success at capturing Venezuelan strongman Nicolas Maduro as proof of his ability to launch missiles to the same effect as Zeus’ lightning bolts. Trump believed he was the most powerful man who ever lived.
This is no exaggeration. In March, when the Iran invasion seemed successful, Trump gave a document penned by“Presidential Historian David King” to New York Times reporters Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan purporting to prove that Trump was “the most powerful person to have EVER walked this planet.” King was, in fact, a businessman and occasional caddy for legendary golfer Gary Player.
King compared Trump favorably to many of history’s most powerful, and often heinous, figures: Alexander the Great, Attila the Hun, William the Conqueror, Napoleon Bonaparte, Joseph Stalin, Genghis Khan, Mao Tse Tung, Adolf Hitler and Vladimir Lenin. Many of these men thought they were the most powerful person in the world, too. And many were defeated precisely because they believed it.
At least Napoleon and Hitler had a string of truly impressive victories before they learned the folly of hubris. The limits on Trump’s power have been exposed by far less august forces than the combined might of the allies in World War II or the fearsome Russian winter.
Iran is a comparatively middling power. But the regime’s ability to absorb punishment while imposing its will on the Strait of Hormuz has proved to be a greater constraint on Trump’s power than his morality or mind. We should note that, at least rhetorically, his morality has not proved much of a constraint. He has repeatedly promised to destroy Iranian “civilization” if the regime refuses to capitulate.
But they haven’t — and won’t anytime soon — because the regime’s tolerance for pain far outstrips Trump’s. The combined fear of skyrocketing oil prices, outrage of Gulf state potentates, diminishing weapon supplies and domestic unpopularity is doing the work that international law, congressional oversight and the collective opinion of foreign policy experts can’t or won’t do.
If I considered Trump more heroic than reason and facts could allow, I would say his Sisyphean predicament has the whiff of Greek tragedy to it. Trump is vexed by the fact that the Iranians won’t honor deals or ratify his countless premature claims of victory — giving new meaning to his vow that his presidency would make people tired of winning. It’s almost like they’re out-Trumping Trump.
Things might have gone better if he’d heeded that great Greek tragedian Sophocles: “For Zeus utterly abhors the boasts of a proud tongue.”
____
Jonah Goldberg is editor-in-chief of The Dispatch and the host of The Remnant podcast. His Twitter handle is @JonahDispatch.