Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Meet the Faces of Democracy: Amy Burgans

Nevada Republican and U.S. Army veteran discusses voter engagement, mail-in voting and running elections

Amelia Minkin is a research associate at Issue One, the leading crosspartisan political reform group in Washington, D.C. Navas is an election protection intern at Issue One.

More than 10,000 officials across the country run U.S. elections. This interview is part of a series highlighting the election heroes who are the faces of democracy.

Amy Burgans, a registered Republican, has served as the clerk-treasurer for Douglas County, Nev., since she was appointed to the position in December 2020. In November 2022, she won an election to continue in the role.

Douglas County has a population of about 50,000 people and is located just south of Nevada’s capital, Carson City. Among its attractions are the southeastern shore of Lake Tahoe and Carson Valley, which includes many hiking trails. The county was named for former Sen. Stephen Douglas (D-Ill.) who famously debated Abraham Lincoln in 1858 while both men campaigned for the Senate.


Burgans has roughly four years of experience in election administration and became a certified elections/registration administrator in 2023 — the highest professional designation for an election official in the country. She also serves as the secretary/treasurer of the Nevada Association of County Clerks and Election Officials.

Before becoming clerk-treasurer for Douglas County, Burgans served as a military police officer in the U.S. Army for 10 years. After completing her military service, she moved to Douglas County in 2005, where she was a stay-at-home mom to her five children. In 2012, she returned to the workforce, working for the South Lake Tahoe Police Department. She later served as administrative assistant to the Douglas County Board of County Commissioners.

When Burgans is not working, she enjoys spending time with her family. Burgans has led her county through many challenges since assuming her role as clerk-treasurer, including running elections amid the Covid-19 pandemic and transitioning to vote-by-mail elections.

Since March 2024, Burgans has been a part of Issue One’s Faces of Democracy campaign, advocating for protections for election workers and for regular, predictable, and sufficient federal funding of elections.

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

Issue One: How did you end up in this profession?

Amy Burgans: I previously worked for the county manager's office as the assistant to the Board of Commissioners. In December of 2020, the previous clerk resigned. She and I knew each other well. She emailed me to ask if I had ever thought about her job. After speaking with her and talking with family and friends, I threw my name into the hat, and two days later, the Board of Commissioners appointed me. The next day, I took office. It was a very fast turnaround.

IO: You were in the military for nearly 10 years. What types of skills did you develop in the military that you have been able to bring into your current line of work?

AB: More than anything, the organizational aspect. I still approach a lot of things from the same organizational standpoint as the military chain of command, knowing who and what your resources are — and during stressful situations, being able to pull those in.

IO: Some local election officials focus strictly on running elections. Others have to wear many hats. Your official title is “county clerk-treasurer.” What portion of your time is devoted to running to elections? What other responsibilities are you responsible for in addition to running elections?

AB: Douglas County is a rural county, but we are not tiny. We have about 45,000 registered voters. I am very fortunate that I have amazing staff in every department. I have the clerk's office, the treasurer's office and the elections office. I have managers over all three of those departments that really run the day-to-day. In an election year, I would say 90 percent of my time is focused on the election. During off-election years, I try to divide my time equally between the three departments. I am very fortunate to know that when I am not able to be in the clerk's office or in the treasurer's office doing the daily tasks, I have staff who are capable of doing that.

IO: What part of the election administration story in your area do you think isn’t told enough or isn’t widely understood enough?

AB: It is really all of elections. I wish everyone had a knowledge base about what we actually do instead of the stories that are being told. Two of the biggest pieces of election misinformation that I try to be as vocal as I can about in my community are about mail ballots and the safety and security of the equipment we use.

IO: In recent years, election-related misconceptions, conspiracy theories and lies have proliferated. How has this impacted your daily work?

AB: I am really lucky in that it has not really impacted my daily work other than taking very seriously the way that the community sees elections and the transparency that we have within our office. We are the first and only rural county in Nevada that live streams our mail ballot processing 24/7 during the election. You can go to YouTube and watch every step of the process.

IO: What are the main challenges of a jurisdiction of your size?

AB: I really like the size of my jurisdiction. It is perfect. It is one of the largest rural counties in Nevada, and there are enough people to keep it fun and interesting. It is a challenge to figure out how I am going to get information to all of those voters, but at the same time, it is small enough that the people know who I am and feel comfortable reaching out and talking to me directly.

IO: What are some of the ways you have been successful in combating the spread of false information surrounding election administration in your community?

AB: I speak everywhere, and I try to be at every event. Fortunately, because Douglas County is rural and a smaller community, I am very lucky that I know most of the community. I have lived here for almost 20 years. I speak to women's groups and to political groups, for example. If there is an invitation, I always raise my hand and say yes, because the more I am out there and the more I am able to be the voice of truth, the better. And people do trust me, so I try to stay out in the community so that people know me and they feel comfortable asking me questions.

IO: Given all these challenges, what inspires you to stay in this line of work?

AB: I look at the big picture. It is so amazing that my team is running elections and putting processes into place that secure it and make it safer and more transparent.

My favorite part of the election process is the legislative session when I get to talk to my legislature about election processes — what we are doing in Douglas County and across the state. It’s important to help legislators understand the implications of laws that they are trying to push through.

I absolutely love what I do. It is a lot of work and responsibility, but ultimately the pride that I get at the end of election night is a very good feeling. Knowing that we were a part of running elections is just a very fulfilling feeling.

IO: Many people are surprised to learn that the federal government doesn’t routinely fund the costs of running elections. Why do you think the federal government should help supplement the cost of election administration?

AB: I don’t believe that the federal government should pay for the whole cost of elections, but the federal government should proportionately pay for the candidates that are on their ballots. In Douglas County and Nevada, we have laws in place that if a general improvement district or one of the local districts is on the ballot, I allocate the cost of running their race to them. It would be nice if it worked that way structurally to save counties some money.

IO: What is the price tag of running an election in your jurisdiction, and where does funding for election administration in your jurisdiction come from?

AB: If we take wages out of the equation, it is about $100,000 to $150,000 each election. It is funded primarily by the county, though we do receive some reimbursements from the state. What we get reimbursed for changes, but right now, we are reimbursed for postage for outgoing and incoming ballots and also for ballot stock, envelopes, and paper, basically the paper products for mail ballots.

IO: If your jurisdiction had extra funding, how would you spend it?

AB: Right now, we are looking at additional equipment. We are not sure how we are going to fund it. We are actually doing a little bit of budget cutting this year for the next fiscal year, just kind of tightening the belt. There is no funding for anything additional. But I would love to have a budget for more equipment and more outreach. Actually, I would like to see the state fund more voter outreach. Any additional funding I would get would probably go into equipment.

IO: Four years ago, Nevada became a universal vote-by-mail state. Some high-profile Republicans have criticized voting by mail. What should the public know about why voting by mail is safe and secure?

AB: Assembly Bill 321 made mail ballots universal. We try and make the process as transparent as possible. I’ve implemented a live stream, so you can watch the entire process, from the signature verification to the ballot deconstruction to the tallying of the mail ballots.

I am also always happy to talk to the public about the signature verification process and how difficult it is to actually manufacture someone else's signature onto a ballot.

Even though about 75 percent of the ballots that are cast in Douglas County are mail ballots, we verify the signature on every single one manually. We do not have a machine that does it. We have staff members doing that all day during elections. It’s a misconception that someone could come in and drop off hundreds of ballots with fake signatures without getting caught. That is not going to happen.

IO: We understand that the United States Postal Service recently made a decision to route all Reno mail — including mail ballots — to Sacramento. Since Douglas County’s mail currently goes through Reno, how will this decision affect Douglas County’s processing of mail ballots?

AB: If they move forward with this change, it is going to be devastating. The interstate that goes from Reno to Sacramento closes down all the time. Our mail ballots having to go over the mountains to Sacramento, which is a three-hour drive from me, and then back before I can receive them to process them is going to be devastating to the timelines that we have in place, that are set in law for me to be able to accept those ballots.

IO: Outside of being passionate about running safe and secure elections, what are your hobbies, or what is a fun fact that most people might not know about you?

AB: I have five kids. My free time revolves around being a taxi for them. My world revolves around elections and my kids.

IO: What is your favorite book or movie?

AB: My favorite movie is probably “The Notebook.” I love that movie because I like a feel-good movie, something that I can sit and watch over and over, and it never gets old.

IO: Which historical figure would you have most liked to have had an opportunity to meet?

AB: Honestly, it would probably be the Founding Fathers because of the wisdom they had when they created the Constitution. I would love to just be there and be part of the conversations during the formation of the United States — the ideas they put in place and the reasoning behind why they put them in place. Being able to be a part of the conversations that led to the laws that we have in place would have been amazing.

Read More

The interview that could change history

White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles looks on during a bilateral meeting between U.S. President Donald Trump and Polish President Karol Nawrocki in the Oval Office at the White House on Sept. 3, 2025 in Washington, D.C.

Alex Wong/Getty Images/TCA

The interview that could change history

Susie Wiles has a reputation. Ask anyone in Washington and words like “strategic,” “disciplined,” and “skilled” come up. She’s widely held to be one of the most effective tacticians in modern politics.

She’s also known for her low-key, low-drama energy, preferring to remain behind-the-scenes as opposed to preening for cameras like so many other figures in President Trump’s orbit.

Keep ReadingShow less
After the Ceasefire, the Violence Continues – and Cries for New Words

An Israeli army vehicle moves on the Israeli side, near the border with the Gaza Strip on November 18, 2025 in Southern Israel, Israel.

(Photo by Amir Levy/Getty Images)

After the Ceasefire, the Violence Continues – and Cries for New Words

Since October 10, 2025, the day when the US-brokered ceasefire between Israel and Hamas was announced, Israel has killed at least 401 civilians, including at least 148 children. This has led Palestinian scholar Saree Makdisi to decry a “continuing genocide, albeit one that has shifted gears and has—for now—moved into the slow lane. Rather than hundreds at a time, it is killing by twos and threes” or by twenties and thirties as on November 19 and November 23 – “an obscenity that has coalesced into a new normal.” The Guardian columnist Nesrine Malik describes the post-ceasefire period as nothing more than a “reducefire,” quoting the warning issued by Amnesty International’s secretary general Agnès Callamard that the ”world must not be fooled” into believing that Israel’s genocide is over.

A visual analysis of satellite images conducted by the BBC has established that since the declared ceasefire, “the destruction of buildings in Gaza by the Israeli military has been continuing on a huge scale,” entire neighborhoods “levelled” through “demolitions,” including large swaths of farmland and orchards. The Guardian reported already in March of 2024, that satellite imagery proved the “destruction of about 38-48% of tree cover and farmland” and 23% of Gaza’s greenhouses “completely destroyed.” Writing about the “colossal violence” Israel has wrought on Gaza, Palestinian legal scholar Rabea Eghbariah lists “several variations” on the term “genocide” which researchers found the need to introduce, such as “urbicide” (the systematic destruction of cities), “domicide” (systematic destruction of housing), “sociocide,” “politicide,” and “memoricide.” Others have added the concepts “ecocide,” “scholasticide” (the systematic destruction of Gaza’s schools, universities, libraries), and “medicide” (the deliberate attacks on all aspects of Gaza’s healthcare with the intent to “wipe out” all medical care). It is only the combination of all these “-cides,” all amounting to massive war crimes, that adequately manages to describe the Palestinian condition. Constantine Zurayk introduced the term “Nakba” (“catastrophe” in Arabic) in 1948 to name the unparalleled “magnitude and ramifications of the Zionist conquest of Palestine” and its historical “rupture.” When Eghbariah argues for “Nakba” as a “new legal concept,” he underlines, however, that to understand its magnitude, one needs to go back to the 1917 Balfour Declaration, in which the British colonial power promised “a national home for the Jewish people” in Palestine, even though just 6 % of its population were Jewish. From Nakba as the “constitutive violence of 1948,” we need today to conceptualize “Nakba as a structure,” an “overarching frame.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Ukraine, Russia, and the Dangerous Metaphor of Holding the Cards
a hand holding a deck of cards in front of a christmas tree
Photo by Luca Volpe on Unsplash

Ukraine, Russia, and the Dangerous Metaphor of Holding the Cards

Donald Trump has repeatedly used the phrase “holding the cards” during his tenure as President to signal that he, or sometimes an opponent, has the upper hand. The metaphor projects bravado, leverage, and the inevitability of success or failure, depending on who claims control.

Unfortunately, Trump’s repeated invocation of “holding the cards” embodies a worldview where leverage, bluff, and dominance matter more than duty, morality, or responsibility. In contrast, leadership grounded in duty emphasizes ethical obligations to allies, citizens, and democratic principles—elements strikingly absent from this metaphor.

Keep ReadingShow less
Beyond Apologies: Corporate Contempt and the Call for Real Accountability
campbells chicken noodle soup can

Beyond Apologies: Corporate Contempt and the Call for Real Accountability

Most customers carry a particular image of Campbell's Soup: the red-and-white label stacked on a pantry shelf, a touch of nostalgia, and the promise of a dependable bargain. It's food for snow days, tight budgets, and the middle of the week. For generations, the brand has positioned itself as a companion to working families, offering "good food" for everyday people. The company cultivated that trust so thoroughly that it became almost cliché.

Campbell's episode, now the subject of national headlines and an ongoing high-profile legal complaint, is troubling not only for its blunt language but for what it reveals about the hidden injuries that erode the social contract linking institutions to citizens, workers to workplaces, and brands to buyers. If the response ends with the usual PR maneuvers—rapid firings and the well-rehearsed "this does not reflect our values" statement. Then both the lesson and the opportunity for genuine reform by a company or individual are lost. To grasp what this controversy means for the broader corporate landscape, we first have to examine how leadership reveals its actual beliefs.

Keep ReadingShow less