Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Meet the Faces of Democracy: Amy Burgans

Nevada Republican and U.S. Army veteran discusses voter engagement, mail-in voting and running elections

Amy Burgans riding a horse
Issue One

Amelia Minkin is a research associate at Issue One, the leading crosspartisan political reform group in Washington, D.C. Navas is an election protection intern at Issue One.

More than 10,000 officials across the country run U.S. elections. This interview is part of a series highlighting the election heroes who are the faces of democracy.

Amy Burgans, a registered Republican, has served as the clerk-treasurer for Douglas County, Nev., since she was appointed to the position in December 2020. In November 2022, she won an election to continue in the role.

Douglas County has a population of about 50,000 people and is located just south of Nevada’s capital, Carson City. Among its attractions are the southeastern shore of Lake Tahoe and Carson Valley, which includes many hiking trails. The county was named for former Sen. Stephen Douglas (D-Ill.) who famously debated Abraham Lincoln in 1858 while both men campaigned for the Senate.


Burgans has roughly four years of experience in election administration and became a certified elections/registration administrator in 2023 — the highest professional designation for an election official in the country. She also serves as the secretary/treasurer of the Nevada Association of County Clerks and Election Officials.

Before becoming clerk-treasurer for Douglas County, Burgans served as a military police officer in the U.S. Army for 10 years. After completing her military service, she moved to Douglas County in 2005, where she was a stay-at-home mom to her five children. In 2012, she returned to the workforce, working for the South Lake Tahoe Police Department. She later served as administrative assistant to the Douglas County Board of County Commissioners.

When Burgans is not working, she enjoys spending time with her family. Burgans has led her county through many challenges since assuming her role as clerk-treasurer, including running elections amid the Covid-19 pandemic and transitioning to vote-by-mail elections.

Since March 2024, Burgans has been a part of Issue One’s Faces of Democracy campaign, advocating for protections for election workers and for regular, predictable, and sufficient federal funding of elections.

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

Issue One: How did you end up in this profession?

Amy Burgans: I previously worked for the county manager's office as the assistant to the Board of Commissioners. In December of 2020, the previous clerk resigned. She and I knew each other well. She emailed me to ask if I had ever thought about her job. After speaking with her and talking with family and friends, I threw my name into the hat, and two days later, the Board of Commissioners appointed me. The next day, I took office. It was a very fast turnaround.

IO: You were in the military for nearly 10 years. What types of skills did you develop in the military that you have been able to bring into your current line of work?

AB: More than anything, the organizational aspect. I still approach a lot of things from the same organizational standpoint as the military chain of command, knowing who and what your resources are — and during stressful situations, being able to pull those in.

IO: Some local election officials focus strictly on running elections. Others have to wear many hats. Your official title is “county clerk-treasurer.” What portion of your time is devoted to running to elections? What other responsibilities are you responsible for in addition to running elections?

AB: Douglas County is a rural county, but we are not tiny. We have about 45,000 registered voters. I am very fortunate that I have amazing staff in every department. I have the clerk's office, the treasurer's office and the elections office. I have managers over all three of those departments that really run the day-to-day. In an election year, I would say 90 percent of my time is focused on the election. During off-election years, I try to divide my time equally between the three departments. I am very fortunate to know that when I am not able to be in the clerk's office or in the treasurer's office doing the daily tasks, I have staff who are capable of doing that.

IO: What part of the election administration story in your area do you think isn’t told enough or isn’t widely understood enough?

AB: It is really all of elections. I wish everyone had a knowledge base about what we actually do instead of the stories that are being told. Two of the biggest pieces of election misinformation that I try to be as vocal as I can about in my community are about mail ballots and the safety and security of the equipment we use.

IO: In recent years, election-related misconceptions, conspiracy theories and lies have proliferated. How has this impacted your daily work?

AB: I am really lucky in that it has not really impacted my daily work other than taking very seriously the way that the community sees elections and the transparency that we have within our office. We are the first and only rural county in Nevada that live streams our mail ballot processing 24/7 during the election. You can go to YouTube and watch every step of the process.

IO: What are the main challenges of a jurisdiction of your size?

AB: I really like the size of my jurisdiction. It is perfect. It is one of the largest rural counties in Nevada, and there are enough people to keep it fun and interesting. It is a challenge to figure out how I am going to get information to all of those voters, but at the same time, it is small enough that the people know who I am and feel comfortable reaching out and talking to me directly.

IO: What are some of the ways you have been successful in combating the spread of false information surrounding election administration in your community?

AB: I speak everywhere, and I try to be at every event. Fortunately, because Douglas County is rural and a smaller community, I am very lucky that I know most of the community. I have lived here for almost 20 years. I speak to women's groups and to political groups, for example. If there is an invitation, I always raise my hand and say yes, because the more I am out there and the more I am able to be the voice of truth, the better. And people do trust me, so I try to stay out in the community so that people know me and they feel comfortable asking me questions.

IO: Given all these challenges, what inspires you to stay in this line of work?

AB: I look at the big picture. It is so amazing that my team is running elections and putting processes into place that secure it and make it safer and more transparent.

My favorite part of the election process is the legislative session when I get to talk to my legislature about election processes — what we are doing in Douglas County and across the state. It’s important to help legislators understand the implications of laws that they are trying to push through.

I absolutely love what I do. It is a lot of work and responsibility, but ultimately the pride that I get at the end of election night is a very good feeling. Knowing that we were a part of running elections is just a very fulfilling feeling.

IO: Many people are surprised to learn that the federal government doesn’t routinely fund the costs of running elections. Why do you think the federal government should help supplement the cost of election administration?

AB: I don’t believe that the federal government should pay for the whole cost of elections, but the federal government should proportionately pay for the candidates that are on their ballots. In Douglas County and Nevada, we have laws in place that if a general improvement district or one of the local districts is on the ballot, I allocate the cost of running their race to them. It would be nice if it worked that way structurally to save counties some money.

IO: What is the price tag of running an election in your jurisdiction, and where does funding for election administration in your jurisdiction come from?

AB: If we take wages out of the equation, it is about $100,000 to $150,000 each election. It is funded primarily by the county, though we do receive some reimbursements from the state. What we get reimbursed for changes, but right now, we are reimbursed for postage for outgoing and incoming ballots and also for ballot stock, envelopes, and paper, basically the paper products for mail ballots.

IO: If your jurisdiction had extra funding, how would you spend it?

AB: Right now, we are looking at additional equipment. We are not sure how we are going to fund it. We are actually doing a little bit of budget cutting this year for the next fiscal year, just kind of tightening the belt. There is no funding for anything additional. But I would love to have a budget for more equipment and more outreach. Actually, I would like to see the state fund more voter outreach. Any additional funding I would get would probably go into equipment.

IO: Four years ago, Nevada became a universal vote-by-mail state. Some high-profile Republicans have criticized voting by mail. What should the public know about why voting by mail is safe and secure?

AB: Assembly Bill 321 made mail ballots universal. We try and make the process as transparent as possible. I’ve implemented a live stream, so you can watch the entire process, from the signature verification to the ballot deconstruction to the tallying of the mail ballots.

I am also always happy to talk to the public about the signature verification process and how difficult it is to actually manufacture someone else's signature onto a ballot.

Even though about 75 percent of the ballots that are cast in Douglas County are mail ballots, we verify the signature on every single one manually. We do not have a machine that does it. We have staff members doing that all day during elections. It’s a misconception that someone could come in and drop off hundreds of ballots with fake signatures without getting caught. That is not going to happen.

IO: We understand that the United States Postal Service recently made a decision to route all Reno mail — including mail ballots — to Sacramento. Since Douglas County’s mail currently goes through Reno, how will this decision affect Douglas County’s processing of mail ballots?

AB: If they move forward with this change, it is going to be devastating. The interstate that goes from Reno to Sacramento closes down all the time. Our mail ballots having to go over the mountains to Sacramento, which is a three-hour drive from me, and then back before I can receive them to process them is going to be devastating to the timelines that we have in place, that are set in law for me to be able to accept those ballots.

IO: Outside of being passionate about running safe and secure elections, what are your hobbies, or what is a fun fact that most people might not know about you?

AB: I have five kids. My free time revolves around being a taxi for them. My world revolves around elections and my kids.

IO: What is your favorite book or movie?

AB: My favorite movie is probably “The Notebook.” I love that movie because I like a feel-good movie, something that I can sit and watch over and over, and it never gets old.

IO: Which historical figure would you have most liked to have had an opportunity to meet?

AB: Honestly, it would probably be the Founding Fathers because of the wisdom they had when they created the Constitution. I would love to just be there and be part of the conversations during the formation of the United States — the ideas they put in place and the reasoning behind why they put them in place. Being able to be a part of the conversations that led to the laws that we have in place would have been amazing.


Read More

Trump never actually had a plan

President Donald Trump speaks to reporters before boarding Air Force One at Palm Beach International Airport in West Palm Beach, Florida, on March 23, 2026. President Donald Trump said Monday that there are "major points of agreement" in US- Iran talks which he said must result in Tehran giving up its nuclear ambitions and enriched uranium stockpile.

(TNS)

Trump never actually had a plan

US President Trump spoke at the Saudi Future Investment Initiative on Friday, March 27. He offered a pristine example of what he calls “the weave.” What detractors take for incontinent verbal rambling is, in his own telling, genius-level embroidery of a rhetorical mosaic.

While spinning his tapestry of soundbites, the wartime president declared that the Iranians “have to open up the Strait of Trump — I mean, Hormuz. Excuse me, for — I’m so sorry, such a terrible mistake. The fake news will say he ‘accidentally said’ (chuckle), now there’s no accidents with me. Not too many. If there were, we’d have a major story. No. Well, we had that with the Gulf of Mexico. Remember the Gulf of Mexico? And one day I said, ‘Why is it the Gulf of Mexico?’ ”

Keep ReadingShow less
Border Communities Know ICE’s Impunity All Too Well

Close-up of a rusty iron fence painted with stars and stripes at the American-Mexican border in Tijuana.

Border Communities Know ICE’s Impunity All Too Well

The Department of Homeland Security shutdown has officially passed one month as lawmakers continue to debate limits on ICE’s use of force. Though we’ve arrived at this legislative standoff due to aggressive, and sometimes fatal, immigration enforcement actions in cities in our country’s interior, for communities along the U.S.–Mexico border, such abuses are nothing new. As I reveal through my academic research, immigration agents have operated with near-total impunity at the border for decades.

I uncovered patterns of excessive violence, coercion, and abuse at land ports of entry, through which more than 200 million people including workers, students, and visitors legally enter the U.S. every single year. The link between agents’ actions on the streets of American cities and the way they operate at the southern border is inevitable—yet something the current conversation about ICE and potential reforms overlooks.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Exit Coalition: A Bipartisan Chance to Defend the Institution
us a flag on pole under cloudy sky

The Exit Coalition: A Bipartisan Chance to Defend the Institution

In the year marking the United States Semiquincentennial, dozens of members of Congress—from both parties—will quietly make a consequential decision: they will not return. Most coverage treats this as routine political churn—retirements, career moves, the normal rhythm of electoral life. But in a Congress defined by constraint and dysfunction, these departures create something rare and fleeting: freedom to act independently.

Fifty-plus lawmakers across the House and Senate are not seeking reelection in 2026—well above the typical 25 to 35 members who step aside in most election cycles. Republicans account for roughly 40 of those departures, including nearly 35 in the House. Some are retiring outright. Others are pursuing higher office. A smaller number are simply stepping away.

Keep ReadingShow less
Protestors outside, holding signs that read, "Justice for survivors" and "National Organization for Women."

Protesters gather as Harvey Weinstein arrives at a Manhattan court house on January 06, 2020 in New York City.

Getty Images, Spencer Platt

We Teach Prevention to Victims, Not Accountability to Power

Each time a major sexual assault case comes to light, the public conversation follows a familiar pattern. Awareness campaigns are launched. Safety tips are shared. People are reminded to watch their drinks, walk in groups, and trust their instincts. The focus quickly turns to what potential victims should do differently.

But the harder question remains: Why does sexual assault continue to happen on such a large scale?

Keep ReadingShow less