Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Hispanic neighborhoods in Chicago suffer unequal exposure to chemicals

"Danger PFAS" Caution Warning Barrier Tap

Heavily Hispanic areas near Chicago are home to environmental racism.

filo/Getty Images

Sharp is chief financial officer at Environmental Litigation Group, P.C., a law firm based in Birmingham, Ala., that assists individuals and communities injured by toxic exposure.

The predominantly Hispanic populations in Rosemont, Schiller Park and Bensenville, near Chicago, have long been exposed to toxic chemicals known as PFAS originating from the neighboring O'Hare Air Reserve Station, which was closed in 1999. The phenomenon of environmental racism is not new to Chicago. Sites and facilities hazardous to the environment and human health have been placed near communities predominantly populated by Hispanic and Black people in the city for years.


Environmental racism and injustice have a long history in the United States, and it stems from racial inequalities, discriminatory land-use policies, and spatial segregation. Polluting industrial sites, landfills, highways, airports, and military facilities are commonly established in the proximity of communities of color. A report published by Princeton University states that although African Americans make up 13,6 percent of the U.S. population, they are 75 percent more likely than white people to live in areas near facilities that produce noise, odor and traffic, and 68 percent live near coal-fired power plants. Another study has shown that African American and Hispanic communities have twice as many oil and gas wells in their neighborhoods than white communities.

Contamination of the environment and ecosystems with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), affecting more than 90 percent of Americans, has been declared a national crisis. However, PFAS exposure in communities of color is not well examined yet, and it is something we need to acknowledge and know more about.

In May 2023, Harvard University's School of Public Health published a groundbreaking study that focused on drinking water contamination by PFAS in certain communities of color. The researchers looked at the connection between the level of contamination and the proximity of PFAS pollution sites to the watersheds serving such communities. The scientists concluded that communities with higher rates of Black and Hispanic individuals are more likely to be exposed to higher levels of PFAS — between 10 percent and 108 percent, depending on the type of PFAS — than other communities.

PFAS and Hispanic communities of Chicago

PFAS are thousands of synthetic chemicals used in a wide range of products since the 1950s, such as firefighting foam, food packaging, heat-resistant and non-stick household products, water-repellent clothing, cosmetics and many more. They make their way into the soil, air, ground- and surface water. The highest levels of PFAS are found in drinking water sources.

One of the main issues with PFAS is that they are extraordinarily persistent and resistant. With time, they build up in the bodies of people who are regularly exposed to PFAS, primarily through drinking water, and cause adverse health conditions. The two most widespread types of PFAS — known as PFOA and PFOS — are carcinogenic and have been linked to breast, ovarian, prostate, thyroid, and kidney cancers.

The Environmental Protection Agency introduced its first-ever recommendation for the maximum contamination levels of the various types of PFAS in drinking water in March 2023. For PFOA and PFOS, the EPA established four parts per trillion, meaning there is no safe exposure level for these chemicals.

Rosemont, Schiller Park, and Bensenville villages are near Chicago's most prominent PFAS hot spot, O’Hare International Airport. In 2020, the PFOA and PFOS detected in the airport were 13,800 ppt from the extensive use of the PFAS-based firefighting foam, used since the 1960s to suppress fuel fires. PFAS originating from military installations contaminate private and public drinking water sources of communities living in their proximity, as in this case. In 2022, 45.8 percent of the people in Rosemont were Hispanic. In Schiller Park, the estimated percentage of the Hispanic population in 2023 was 32,6 percent, while in Bensenville, it was 47 percent. These numbers clearly show how environmental racism and PFAS contamination go hand in hand in the villages in question.

The PFAS problem adds to the long list of environmental injustices Chicago’s communities of color, who make up 67,3 percnet of the city’s residents, endure. The southeast and west sides of the city, where most people of color live, are the so-called “ sacrifice zones." In those areas, polluted air and water, illegal dumping and inappropriate storage of hazardous waste put people's health and well-being at a higher risk, with more people having cancer, asthma, respiratory issues and cardiovascular diseases than in the "white neighborhoods."

Chicago’s vulnerable communities need protection against PFAS

Communities of color exposed to life-threatening PFAS are more likely to develop severe illnesses, even if PFAS pollution affects them to a similar extent as it does other groups. This is because they often have less access to medical care or safer drinking water alternatives, and their voices are often neglected.

The Environmental Justice Act of Illinois acknowledges that some segments of the population disproportionately suffer from environmental hazards because the state permitted some facilities to pollute. Acknowledgment is a critical first step, but meaningful policy change and action are urgently needed. Decades of irresponsible and unjust PFAS use threaten the health of already disadvantaged Hispanic communities around Chicago, and we still do not know enough about the level and dangers of it.

Environmental justice organizations based in Chicago have been successfully fighting against environmental racism. The PFAS contamination problem should be added to their agenda. More and more people are joining multidistrict lawsuits against manufacturers responsible for PFAS pollution, hoping to receive some financial support and relief from their suffering. This confirms how impairing exposure to these chemicals is.

Read More

Inclusion Is Not a Slogan. It’s the Ground We Walk On.

A miniature globe between a row of blue human figures

Getty Images//Stock Photo

Inclusion Is Not a Slogan. It’s the Ground We Walk On.

After political pressure and a federal investigation, Harvard University recently renamed and restructured its Office for Equity, Diversity, Inclusion, and Belonging. MIT announced the closure of its DEI office, stating that it would no longer support centralized diversity initiatives. Meanwhile, Purdue University shut down its Office of Diversity, Inclusion, and Belonging and removed cultural center programs that once served as safe spaces for marginalized students. I am aware of the costs of not engaging with ideas surrounding diversity and difference, and I have witnessed the consequences of the current administration's actions— and the pace at which universities are responding. It’s nowhere good.

I was forced to move to the United States from Russia, a country where the words inclusion, diversity, and equality are either misunderstood, mocked, or treated as dangerous ideology. In this country, a woman over fifty is considered “unfit” for the job market. Disability is not viewed as a condition that warrants accommodation, but rather as a reason to deny employment. LGBTQ+ individuals are treated not as equal citizens but as people who, ideally, shouldn’t exist, where the image of a rainbow on a toy or an ice cream wrapper can result in legal prosecution.

Keep ReadingShow less
Leaders Can Promote Gender Equity Without Deepening Polarization − Here’s How
Getty Images, pixelfit

Leaders Can Promote Gender Equity Without Deepening Polarization − Here’s How

Americans largely agree that women have made significant gains in the workplace over the past two decades. But what about men? While many Americans believe women are thriving, over half believe men’s progress has stalled or even reversed.

To make matters more complex, recent research has revealed a massive divide along gender and partisan lines. The majority of Republican men think full gender equity in America has been achieved, while the majority of Democratic women think there’s still work to be done.

Keep ReadingShow less
Trump Is Sabotaging America’s Greatest Demographic Advantage

The U.S. flag, a certification of naturalization, and a U.S. passport.

Getty Images, Thanasis

Trump Is Sabotaging America’s Greatest Demographic Advantage

“A profoundly dangerous and destabilizing thing.” That’s how Vice President J.D. Vance recently described America’s falling birthrate. Recently, the “ inherently pronatalist ” White House is considering a new set of proposals to address it—including government-funded menstrual cycle education and even a national medal for women who bear six or more children. But while Republicans may recognize the problem, their broader agenda actively undermines the most immediate and effective solution to population decline: immigration.

The Trump administration is enacting an all-out assault on immigration. Breaking from decades of Republican rhetoric that championed legal immigration, the current approach targets not just undocumented migration but legal pathways as well.

Keep ReadingShow less
An illustration of diverse people around a heart with the design of the American flag.
An illustration of diverse people around a heart with the design of the American flag.
Getty Images, wildpixel

The Next Hundred Days: America's Latest Test of Democracy

For decades, we have watched America wrestle with its demons. Sometimes, she has successfully pinned them down. Other times, the demons have slipped beyond her grasp. Yet, America has always remained in the ring. There is no difference right now, and the stakes couldn't be higher.

Across America, from small-town council meetings to state legislatures, there's a coordinated effort to roll back the clock on civil rights, geopolitical relations, and the global economy. It's not subtle, and it's not accidental. The targeting of immigrants and citizens of color has become so normalized that we risk becoming numb to it. For example, what happened in Springfield, Ohio, late last year? When national politicians started pushing rhetoric against Haitian immigrants, it wasn't just local politics at play. It was a test balloon, a preview of talking points soon echoed in halls of government and media outlets nationwide. Thus, this is how discrimination, intolerance, and blatant hate go mainstream or viral—it starts small, tests the waters, and spreads like a virus through our body politic and social system.

Keep ReadingShow less