Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Are you “woke” or “asleep” to racial and social justice issues?

Are you “woke” or “asleep” to racial and social justice issues?
Getty Images

Steve Corbin is Professor Emeritus of Marketing, University of Northern Iowa

Charlie Chaplin once said, “A day without laughter is a day wasted.” Life around my Dad (Lester Corbin, 1909-2000) was filled with jokes, teasing and what became known as “Lester’isms.” Raised around the humor of Red Skelton, Redd Foxx, Jonathan Winters, Rodney Dangerfield, Richard Pryor, George Carlin, Laurel and Hardy, plus a subscription to MAD Magazine, I was programmed to seek out laughter.


If these comedians were living today, their take on the GOP’s recent “cancel woke culture” would even make card-carrying Republicans laugh. There are over 400 companies, products and individuals GOP party leaders are calling for to be “canceled” (i.e., boycotted) because they either questioned Donald Trump’s leadership or took a stance on racism, sexuality, gender, race, diversity, equity, inclusion, social injustices, wellness and life balance that counters Republican values. Here are some examples:

  • United, American and Delta Airlines? Canceled!
  • Avis, Budget, Enterprise and Hertz car rental? Canceled!
  • McDonalds, Starbucks, Chick-Fil-A, Cracker Barrel, Golden Corral, Taco Bell, IHOP and Red Lobster? Canceled!
  • Sports lovers: NFL, NBA and MLB? Canceled!
  • HBO and Netflix? Canceled!
  • French fries? Yes, French fries. Canceled!
  • Harley-Davidson? Couldn’t be canceled!
  • Hershey, Procter & Gamble, Kelloggs, Nabisco, Coca-Cola and Pepsi-Cola? Canceled!

You just have to do an internet search on “list of things conservatives have canceled” as well as “Nebraska Taxpayers for Freedom.” Guaranteed, you will laugh.

It’s ironic the Republican Party purport to believe in free enterprise yet are opposed to corporations’ pro-environmental, pro-social and pro-governance (ESG) woke factors of running a successful business. Plus, GOP candidates must be oblivious to the fact that the majority of registered Republicans support corporations’ ESG endeavors (Center for American Progress Action Fund).

Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines “woke” as being “aware of and actively attentive to important facts and issues—especially issues of racial and social justice.” Being woke is about being alert to racial prejudice and discrimination, being vigilant toward social issues and challenging oppression.

Martin Luther King once said, “Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.” Racial and social justice issues matter. For this reason alone, there is a “compelling case to be woke and choose growth.”

The younger strata of America (Millennials; ages 27-42 and Generation Z; ages 11-26) are America’s most pro-woke culturally aware group who are fighting for social justice, equal rights and equal opportunity. Next, they are the most active social media users who readily broadcast their fight against injustice, intolerance and discrimination. Finally, Millennials are the largest electorate population and the Gen. Z voter turnout in 2022 was higher than that of Gen. X’ers (43-58 age range) and Millennials.

Logic reasons that with the Republican Party touting their cancel woke culture belief, more young voters (ages 42 and under) will purposely avoid GOP candidates in the 2024 election. Voters older than 42 will soon – if not already – also rebel against the GOP’s cancel woke culture folly.

Which Republican presidential candidates support the cancel woke culture and aren’t grasping issues like gender pay gap, gender discrimination, racial inequality, racial injustice, LGBTQIA rights, sexual harassment, sexual assault, environmental and climate change, First Amendment rights, Nazi-like book banning, fair voter registration and unencumbered voting opportunity? They include former president Donald Trump, former vice-president Mike Pence, Gov. Ron DeSantis, Gov. Doug Burgum, former Gov. Nikki Haley, Sen. Tim Scott and Vivek Ramaswamy. Former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie has rejected his GOP peers’ cultural war rhetoric.

The GOP’s 2020 presidential election campaign had no platform and we saw how that worked out. The Republicans’ 2024 cancel woke culture platform, which only 24% of Republican voters support, will be quite the joke come Nov. 5, 2024.

Americans must be compassionately woke to racial and social justice issues. Otherwise, you must be asleep. Are you woke or asleep?

References:

  1. Jordan Wolman, GOP’s `anti-woke’ campaigns have voters hitting snooze, Politico, Aug. 23, 2023
  2. Naia Toke, Wokeism: What does it mean, why is it important and why we need to support it, Diversity for Social Impact, July 13, 2023
  3. Nebraska Taxpayers for Freedom, https://www.netaxpayers.org/archives/4956, 2001-2023
  4. Shantini Rajasingam, Woke culture: The good, the bad and the ugly, The Karyawan, Oct. 15, 2021
  5. William S. Becker, Actually, it’s good to be woke, The Hill, Nov. 19, 2022
  6. Cathleen A. Cerny-Suelzer and Susan Hatters Friedman, Be woke, choose growth, Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, March, 2022
  7. Rex Huppke, The Republican Party has become the very cancel culture it presents to rail against, USA Today, May 7, 2023
  8. List of things Conservatives have “canceled,” https://www.thealmightyguru.com/Wiki/index.php?title=List_of_things_Conservatives_have_%22canceled%22
  9. Jonathan Weisman, Are G.O.P. voters tiring of the war on `wokeness’?, The New York Times, Aug. 6, 2023
  10. Kara Voght, Young Republicans are begging party elders to stop saying `woke’, Rolling Stone, March 5, 2023
  11. Fabiola Cineas, Where the war on woke goes from here, Vox, Sept. 1, 2023
  12. Philip Elliott, Some in GOP see `woke’ rhetoric as lazy. Then there’s Ron DeSantis, Time, June 7, 2023
  13. Patrick Coffee, Marketers maintain diversity focus despite outside pressures, lawsuits, The Wall Street Journal, Sept. 26, 2023
  14. Pew Research Center Staff, Americans, Politics and Social Media, Pew Research Center, Oct. 15, 2022

Disclosure: Steve is a non-paid freelance opinion editor and guest columnist contributor (circa 2013) to 172 newspapers in 32 states who receives no remuneration, funding or endorsement from any for-profit business, not-for-profit organization, political action committee or political party.


Read More

Disinformation Wins: Justifying ICE Murders through Transphobia

Street scenes next to the site where Alex Pretti was shot and killed by two Federal agents, February 1, 2026, on Nicollet Avenue in Minneapolis, Minnesota. As part of President Trump's plan to deport immigrants, over 3,000 Immigration Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents were sent to Minneapolis, against the wishes of most of the community, the mayor, and the governor.

(Photo by Andrew Lichtenstein/Corbis via Getty Images)

Disinformation Wins: Justifying ICE Murders through Transphobia

The global reverberation following the murders in Minneapolis of Renee Good and Alex Pretti by ICE agents is highlighted in the newly released U2 song, “American Obituary.”

What is slightly encouraging is that responses to the shooting deaths of intensive care surgeon Pretti by United States Customs and Border Protection last month, following Good’s murder, have also led to the replacement of Gregory Bovino as U.S. Border Control Commander and 700 immigration officers leaving the state.

Keep ReadingShow less
A gavel.

Analysis of President Donald Trump’s tariffs after a record $901.5B U.S. trade deficit in 2025. Explore the economic realities behind trade imbalances, the United States Supreme Court ruling on tariff authority, and the growing debate over executive power and trade policy.

Getty Images, Phanphen Kaewwannarat

What’s Next After the Court’s Tariffs Decision?

A Stubborn Imbalance

After a year of President Trump’s sweeping tariffs, sold as a reset of global trade, the promise was simple: the U.S. trade deficit would shrink. It did not. The Commerce Department instead reported a $70.3 billion deficit in December and a staggering $901.5 billion for all of 2025, one of the largest totals on record. The gap between imports and exports barely narrowed at all.

These figures matter because they undermine the central premise of the strategy: make imports more expensive, reduce foreign purchases, and bring production back to the United States. But that approach overlooks a key reality. Trade balances are not driven by tariffs alone. They reflect deeper forces such as consumer demand, domestic savings rates, the strength of the dollar, and global capital flows. Those forces do not yield easily to executive action.

Keep ReadingShow less
A person grabbing a gallon of milk from an aisle.

New U.S. dietary guidelines from Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Brooke Rollins promote more milk in schools—but widespread Lactose Intolerance raises questions about equity and nutrition policy.

Getty Images, Theerawit Jirattawevut

Lactose Intolerant? You’re Not Alone

Last month, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Secretary Brooke Rollins announced new dietary guidelines for Americans that were a major reset of federal nutrition policy. Among the new recommendations: drink more milk, eat more yogurt and cheese. While nutritionists continue to debate the scientific basis of the recommendations, changes in federal meal programs, including school meals, are already in the works.

Any school that participates in federal meal programs must offer milk with every meal, and new guidelines support whole milk in addition to 2% and skim milk already available in schools. While there is debate about the level of saturated fats in whole milk, there’s a deeper problem with the dairy recommendation for school lunches: the widespread prevalence of lactose intolerance. The vast majority of people on this planet, approximately 70%, are lactose intolerant. While it is estimated that only about 35% of the US population is lactose intolerant, that number is much higher depending on your ancestral history: 75% of African Americans; 90% of Asian Americans; 50% of Latinos; 50% of Ashkenazi Jews; and 70-90% of Native Americans are lactose intolerant. For school districts with large populations of descendant groups, the recommendation to just drink more milk doesn’t work for millions of kids.

Keep ReadingShow less
Supreme Court weighs pipeline deadline fight with stakes far beyond the Straits of Mackinac

Supreme Court of the United States

Cayla Labgold-Carroll

Supreme Court weighs pipeline deadline fight with stakes far beyond the Straits of Mackinac

WASHINGTON – A dispute over a missed court filing deadline landed before the U.S. Supreme Court on Feb. 24, but legal scholars warned the decision could reshape whether federal or state courts get to decide the fate of major energy projects, and whether states retain meaningful power to enforce their own environmental laws.

The case, Enbridge Energy, LP v. Nessel, asks whether federal courts have the authority to waive a 30-day deadline for removing a case from state to federal court. While the case is procedural, the flexibility Enbridge requested could allow companies to pick the court they prefer.

Keep ReadingShow less