In this episode of the "Collage" podcast, Rev. F. Willis Johnson interviews Rev. Aaron Rogers, director of the St. Stephens Episcopal Church in Ferguson, Mo.. Their conversation acknowledges the forthcoming 10-year remembrance of Michael Brown's death and the Ferguson uprising. Johnson and Rogers discuss the "pilgrimage" that introduced them to one another and impacted their vocational endeavors.
Site Navigation
Search
Latest Stories
Start your day right!
Get latest updates and insights delivered to your inbox.
Top Stories
Latest news
Read More
Trump’s "anti-" rhetoric answer to great replacement theory
Feb 03, 2025
The Fulcrum’s Executive Director Hugo Balta, whose social media platform exhibits highly factual and credibility ratings from the Media Bias/Fact Check, recently wrote in an op-ed, “This is the time to advance on DEI [diversity, equity, and inclusion] initiatives,” as opposed to President Trump and Elon Musk’s anti-DEI movement.
Let’s explore Mr. Balta’s contention from a research-based and reference-laden perspective to see if his position is true or false.
First, Mr. Trump issued “a sweeping executive order directing federal agencies to terminate DEI programs,” reported Reuters on January 24. Next, on January 27, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth announced that DEI endeavors at the Pentagon, with about 27,000 employees, would also be eliminated.
The Reuters article noted if companies comply with Trump’s anti-DEI executive order, they are “exposing themselves to more discrimination lawsuits by workers.” Companies that abandon DEI policies are specifically violating the Civil Rights Act of 1964. That law prohibits employment discrimination based on race, sex, religion, color, and national origin.
Alan Blinder, former vice chair of the Federal Reserve and economics professor at Princeton University, scolded Trump for his “attacks on DEI and affirmative action” in his January 28 Wall Street Journal op-ed. Every company and educational institution that depends on federal funding or holds government contracts is in jeopardy with Trump’s edict.
Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter
On January 27, the Wall Street Journal countered Trump’s anti-DEI and anti-affirmative action order by stating, in a rather blunt manner, that “discrimination in hiring isn’t allowed.” Mr. Trump has, for many years, also veered into the anti-woke world, which means he discounts the value of social justice, equal rights, and equal opportunity.
Jessica Guynn, a journalist for USA Today, made three observations about the new administration in her January 26 column. First, Trump’s anti-DEI initiative “began in earnest during Trump’s first term and grew after he left office.” Secondly, Stephen Miller, Trump’s deputy chief of staff for policy, “has filed dozens of legal actions against woke corporations.” Finally, Miller praises Harmeet Dhillon, Trump’s lawyer to lead the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department, for “suing corporations who use woke policies to discriminate against their workers.”
A November 4, 2024 article in Bloomberg Law speculates some Republicans and Trump’s anti-DEI, anti-woke, and anti-affirmative action stances are a direct reaction to the “Great Replacement Theory”? This white nationalist far-right conspiracy theory preaches that “racial minorities are displacing the traditional white American population and taking control of the nation. Versions of the theory have become commonplace in the Republican Party of the United States and have become a major issue of political debate,” according to a New York Times piece published on May 15, 2022.
A May 2022 poll by Yahoo! News and YouGov found that 61 percent of people who voted for Trump in 2020 agree with the core tenet of the great replacement theory that “a group of people in this country are trying to replace native-born Americans with immigrants and people of color who share their political views.”
Regarding immigration, Alan Blinder wrote in the Wall Street Journal, “Reducing illegal immigration has been a perplexing problem for decades, has bipartisan support and began happening in the Biden administration.” In Trump’s first term, he expelled 2,011,280 undocumented migrants, as compared to Biden deporting 4,677,460 undocumented migrants as of July 2024, according to Newsweek.
Related to the great replacement theory, an official with the U.S. Air Force confirmed to USA Today on January 25—the end of Donald Trump’s first week of office—that: “The U.S. Air Force will no longer teach its recruits about the Tuskegee Airmen, the more than 15,000 Black pilots (first Black aviators), mechanics, and cooks in the segregated Army of World War II.”
Trump’s edict is viewed as an attempt to erase the history of active Black fighters from 1940 to 1952, who flew in over 15,000 sorties and destroyed more than 100 German aircraft. Trump’s action is reminiscent of George Orwell’s “1984” dystopian novel whereby Big Brother eliminated history he didn’t like.
It gets worse about members of the great replacement theory cult. Joseph Uscinski and Casey Klofstad, political science professors at the University of Miami, found in their research that “those who believed in these conspiracy theories were also more likely to believe in other conspiracy theories and to be supportive of violence as a means to political ends.” January 6, 2021 anyone?
Research is replete that Hugo Balta’s assertion that now is the time to advance—versus retreat —DEI endeavors, is spot on. The same advancement should occur for social justice, equal rights, equal opportunity, and employment discrimination based upon race, sex, religion, color, and national origin.
Request your congressional delegates to uphold the Civil Rights Act that we’ve embraced since 1964 and to reject the anti-DEI, anti-woke, and anti-affirmative action endeavors that may be in play to solve the great replacement conspiracy theory.
Steve Corbin is a professor emeritus of marketing at the University of Northern Iowa.
Keep ReadingShow less
Recommended
Advance DEI, do not retreat from it
Jan 26, 2025
- President Donald Trump has directed that employees of federal offices focused on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) be placed on paid administrative leave.
This action is part of a broader initiative led by Elon Musk, who heads the newly established Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Musk has previously criticized DEI initiatives, labeling them as detrimental.
The ongoing debate around DEI laws and programs has seen significant opposition from some Republican leaders, who argue that these initiatives may undermine merit-based systems in hiring and education, particularly for white individuals.
Trump's stance on DEI programs is having a significant impact not only within the federal government but also on American business practices, state policies, and higher education institutions.
In It is time to rethink DEI, Fulcrum co-publisher David Nevins wrote: In the coming months, The Fulcrum will reexamine the complexities of DEI. We must ask ourselves if diversity means a granting of privileges to those who are not deserving or whether it means an equality of opportunity so that our nation can merely live into the diversity that is America. As politicians will use fear to appeal to the hearts and minds of Americans, The Fulcrum will instead lead through deep inquiry and analysis.
Nevins, Kristina Becvar (co-publisher, Fulcrum), and I discussed the challenges and opportunities of diversity, equity, and inclusion in a recent episode of the Fulcrum Democracy Forum.
Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter
- YouTubeyoutu.be
“The piece that David wrote; I saw what he saw,” said Becvar. “Instant reaction to words, and that is to me the crux of the whole debate around DEI because the term has been used by those that are looking to sew conflict and benefit from it. And we’ve gotten away from the discussion of what that (DEI) even means.”
As the persons charged with the editorial focus of the Fulcrum, we firmly believe this isn’t a time to cower to political pressure and retreat from programs necessary to ensure that institutions meet the needs of increasingly diverse populations. This is the time to advance on DEI initiatives.
I am a diversity, equity, and inclusion trainer and practitioner. As such, I share in the support and criticism of programs that, while well-intentioned and necessary, have often missed their goal. It’s been my experience that this is largely due to the short-sightedness of C-suite decision-makers who see DEI as a problem to be solved rather than an opportunity to be realized. A negative rather than a positive.
When faced with a problem, people tend to rush to fix it. That’s when mistakes are made. The intent is far from the impact. When faced with an opportunity, people tend to take a step back to strategize on how to acquire it. They invite others to do the same.
Also, initiatives fail when they’re conceptualized as superficial corporate marketing; “lipstick on a pig.”DEI initiatives should be transformative workplace culture tools examining if the status quo is reflective of and relevant to our ever changing society.
The Fulcrum welcomes the discussion and debate on redefining DEI to serve all communities best, leveraging the rich complexity of their diversity, and not just the optics of it.
David Nevins is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.
Kristina Becvar is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and executive director of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.
.Hugo Balta is the executive editor of the Fulcrum and a board member of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund, the parent organization of The Fulcrum. He is the publisher of the Latino News Network and a trainer with the Solutions Journalism Network.
Keep ReadingShow less
One faction in Congress DOES look like America
Jan 22, 2025
Congress is often criticized for being “out of touch” with the American public. One biting critique is that Congress just doesn’t “look like” the constituents they represent. Its members are overwhelmingly more male, white, educated, and older than the general U.S. population. And while this holds true for most of Congress, there is one faction where it is not true: Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives. House Democrats more closely align with the demographic breakdown in the U.S. than any other party and chamber. There are some disparities—there are almost twice as many Black Democratic House members (25 percent) compared to the 14 percent in the U.S. population. And women are still a minority in the House Democratic Caucus (43 percent). But in other areas, House Democrats closely track America by race and gender. Hispanic and Latino House Democrats are at 17 percent, compared to 19 percent in the U.S. Even the ratio of LGBTQ members of the House is rising—with about five percent among House Democrats compared to seven percent in the U.S.
This is more than just a symbolic exercise. As the Native American saying goes, “Never judge a person until you walk a mile in his moccasins.” When our elected representatives share the living experiences of those they represent, it increases the likelihood they will be responsive to the needs and aspirations of the public. By comparison, House Republicans are woefully overrepresented by men (85 percent), and only one percent are Black and six percent are Latino. After being ousted as Speaker of the House, Rep. Kevin McCarthy in an interview lamented the sorry state of diversity in the Republican Conference. “I’d just become leader and I’m excited and President Trump’s there. And I look over at the Democrats and they stand up. They look like America,” he said. “We stand up. We look like the most restrictive country club in America.”
Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter
Beyond the moral arguments in favor of a more diverse Congress, there are economic and performance benefits as well. A 2017 study showed that more diverse companies produce 19 percent more revenue than less diverse teams. (Yes, it is actually more profitable to diversify your team.) One of the great proponents and success stories of the benefits of diversity is an unusual source: the United States Army. At West Point, about 38 percent of its 2027 class will be of a racial/ethnic minority group—composed of Black, Latino, Asian American, and Native American students. “The cultural and ethnic differences of its Soldiers are the unique assets that our adversaries lack,” said Sgt. Maj. Alexander Aguilastratt in an Army University Press article. “Diversity in the U.S. Army is its strength and combat multiplier,” he said.
Much work also has been done to increase diversity in the ranks of congressional staff. The Joint Center on Political and Economic Studies has produced excellent research showing the imbalance of Black staffers in senior positions compared to the American population. In 2020, a bipartisan effort to increase staff diversity included the launching of a House Office of Diversity and Inclusion under the supervision of the Speaker of the House. In 2023, when Republicans gained a majority in the House, nearly all staff from this office were moved to the chamber’s administrative human resources offices. The jury is still out as to whether this new arrangement will produce intended results. Yet, it could be argued that recruiting and hiring diverse staff is better in the hands of H.R. professionals than a political operation like the Speaker’s office.
The current backlash against diversity programs in the U.S. is probably only a temporary setback. The predictable demographic trends dictate that business, academia, and government adequately respond to the inevitable changes an increasingly diverse nation will demand. Elected officials should play their part by recruiting more diverse candidates for public office, as both government and constituents will benefit from legislatures that look more like the people they represent.
Bradford Fitch is a former congressional staffer and the author of The Citizen’s Handbook to Influencing Elected Officials.
Keep ReadingShow less
Bridging Hearts in a Divided America
Jan 20, 2025
This story is part of the We the Peopleseries, elevating the voices and visibility of the persons most affected by the decisions of elected officials. In this installment, we share the hopes and concerns of people as Donald Trump returns to the White House.
An Arctic blast is gripping the nation’s capital this Inauguration Day, which coincides with Martin Luther King Jr. Day. A rare occurrence since this federal holiday was instituted in 1983. Temperatures are in the single digits, and Donald J. Trump is taking the oath of office inside the Capitol Rotunda instead of being on the steps of the Capitol, making him less visible to his fans who traveled to Washington D.C. for this momentous occasion. What an emblematic scenario for such a unique political moment in history.
The country is experiencing a polar vortex, both literally and figuratively. Americans seem to be frozen in their perceptions of reality. Some are truly upbeat about the prospect of a second Trump presidency, while others are terrified and believe we are headed toward an autocratic regime.
Mikey Johnson, a caricature artist living in Virginia, is hopeful and excited about the next four years. From an economic standpoint, he believes everyone’s life will improve under President Trump. “I feel like the grown-up is finally in the White House, and he is going to do the things grown-ups do. People will be held responsible for criminal acts, and the border will be finally sealed off. Only people who apply legally will be able to come to America. This is, after all, a nation of immigrants.”
Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter
Asked whether President Trump could represent all Americans, Johnson said, “Absolutely, he wants to be everyone’s president. I have been listening to him since the first time he ran for president. You never hear anything derogatory towards any race. Even as a businessman, it did not matter the gender or the race of a person. He is a man who didn't have to run for president. He loves this country, has big plans and is for whatever is best for all Americans.”
Cathy Harmon Christian, Executive Director for Alternatives to the Death Penalty, is concerned about “the spoken and unspoken dehumanization of the most vulnerable.” The Atlanta, Georgia resident says there is a movement in the country to ostracize people who are transgender, immigrant, and incarcerated. “I believe that everyone belongs and that we are all interconnected. My experience has been that President Trump does not see the world the way that I do. He likes to pit one person against another.”
(From left to right, beginning at the top) Patricia Gomez (WI), Reginald Robinson (DC), Vicky Chen (MA), Mikey Johnson (VA), Cathy Harmon Christian (GA)
Modern psychology tells us that our perspectives and worldviews are shaped by culture, our life experiences, and the context we live in. Where and how we consume information is also an important factor influencing how we think about the world. Social media algorithms, which determine what content appears as we scroll, have faced intense scrutiny recently for deepening America's political divide and reinforcing our ideological bubbles. This may, in part, explain the diametrically opposed views.
“As a mother of two boys in kindergarten, I feel America has changed, and not for the better. We are not as crime-free as before. I feel more confident and safer with Trump as president, and I know he will grow the economy,” says Vicky Chen, a restaurant owner in Boston, Massachusetts. Chen says that sexuality is a taboo topic in traditional Chinese culture, and she does not feel comfortable with LGBTQ ideas. “I don’t want that ideology to influence my children. President Trump said the term LGBTQ only stands for two words: male and female, and that works for me.”
But, concepts of safety and sexuality are subjective and rooted in lived experiences. Patricia Gomez, a bilingual teacher in a charter school in Wisconsin, is worried about the safety of her students. “As a Latina who works with underprivileged communities, I carry with me the history, culture, and resilience of these communities. I worry about the impact of mass deportations on the families I work with and on the economy.” “She admits that she cannot think beyond this month and wants “to bring more awareness to the parents I work with in case something drastic happens to them or to my students.”
Reginald Robinson, a distinguished law professor at Howard University, considers himself an outlier at his undergraduate alma mater, but stands firmly by his convictions. “President Trump plans to sunset the IRS and replace it with the external revenue service that deals with tariffs and trade. This will increase the country’s revenue and relieve us of an oppressive tax burden.” Robinson believes that since 1871, America has been run as a private corporation, not a constitutional republic. “Trump will return our country to the people. He will have four years of re-growing the prosperity of America for all of us.”
Many people nationwide feel vindicated that Trump got elected for a second term. Robinson, who believes that Trump overwhelmingly won the last election, says, “We have seen what happens when we push a narrative inconsistent with the desires of the majority of the country.” He blames legacy media for misleading us, especially around January 6. “People who participated in the so-called insurrection have been wasting away in prison.” While he supports holding individuals accountable for destroying public property, he urges President Trump to pardon the wrongfully convicted promptly.
Can we agree to disagree and simultaneously stay focused on our shared humanity? What Americans have in common may be surprisingly more than what separates us. After all, there is ample evidence that most Americans care about essential issues such as equitable access to quality health care, support of fundamental democratic principles, immigration reform, and stricter gun control measures. Those interviewed for this story share a genuine concern for family, community, and country.
When asked what he would tell a fellow American who's afraid of a second Trump presidency, Johnson said, “Give him [President Trump] the benefit of the doubt. Don’t be afraid unless he demonstrates a real reason to fear his presidency. Keep in mind that over half of the country voted for him, and they trust that he will do what’s best to lead us for the next four years,” says Johnson. “We don’t always get the candidate, or political party, that we want in office, but we all must try to relax and accept what is.”
Harmon Christian wants those who voted for Trump to “be sensitive and alert to vulnerable people and communities, especially if they lose their rights, representation and respect. Believe them when they say what’s happening to them.”
As an Indigenous woman from Colombia, Gomez says that First Nations people have a tradition of healing circles where individuals are invited to come together, transcend their differences, and connect as human beings, speaking from the heart.
Maybe it is not a coincidence that the second inauguration of President Trump overlaps with Dr. King’s Day. The message in these polarized times is to try and connect to each other from the heart. As Dr. King said during a sermon reproduced in his 1963 book Strength to Love, “Love is the greatest force in the universe. It is the heartbeat of the moral cosmos. He who loves is a participant in the being of God.”
Beatrice Spadacini is a freelance journalist who writes about social justice and public health.
Keep ReadingShow less
Load More