Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

The Loneliest Rooms on the Maternity Ward

Opinion

The Loneliest Rooms on the Maternity Ward
a dimly lit room with a hospital bed
Photo by fitra zulfy on Unsplash

Imagine two babies born at the same hospital, at the same time, to a different set of parents. Both babies look and act as similar as most newborns do – the wrinkly hands and feet, the thick vernix within the creases of their elbows and knees, the squinted eyes against the fluorescent hospital lights. The most reliable way to differentiate them is the ID band and medical record number around each of their ankles.

Now imagine those mothers’ rooms. One has a colorful assortment of ‘Congratulations’ balloons next to a bouquet of roses by the window. The baby’s bassinet is filled with personalized covers and a custom-engraved wooden sign bearing the baby’s name. Amid the large suitcases of clothes and toiletries, Dad is placing pillows behind Mom’s back, and both sets of grandparents are peering over one another to try to get a picture of the baby; there’s barely any room for anyone else.


The other mother’s room, in comparison, is bare. The only additions to it since the last patient are a large handbag on a chair and a coat draped over it. The mother is lying in bed with just her newborn in the bassinet next to her.

The latter is a scene that is not uncommon in the postpartum experience of migrant mothers. As a pediatrician, I have had the immense privilege of taking care of newborns from all backgrounds, including those whose mothers are undocumented and have recently arrived from their home countries. Their prenatal and postpartum courses are strikingly different than what most of us imagine or experience because of the mountain of barriers that exist for them in our healthcare system.

One of the simplest and arguably the easiest to fix is that of language. Although technology has advanced enough for me to pull up a live interpreter on a rolling iPad screen in a patient's room, the age-old frustrations of internet connectivity and equipment malfunction remain timeless. Between the repetitive “can you hear me nows?” and “please repeats,” information between providers and non-English-speaking mothers can be missed, misinterpreted, or withheld, and cultural context is often lost in the soundbites of cyberspace. Studies have shown lower accuracy in interpretation when using longer sentences and incorporating medical terminology. When health complications to either the mother or baby are added, the disconnect between providers and patients can grow exponentially.

Additionally, one of the most difficult barriers a migrant mother can commonly face is social isolation. I have learned to be cautious when asking a new mother who will live at home with her and the baby. It is not an isolated incident to encounter a teary look and hesitancy in response to the question. The immense burden of migration often forces families to be separated, and mothers to live here with friends or unrelated roommates. Sometimes, spouses need to separate, and at other times, one or more children are left behind with relatives or neighbors in their native country as a temporary solution.

After delivery in the U.S., mothers can also face further loss of support with their partners’ quick return to work and a lack of a social circle. Added stressors like economic hardships, transportation limitations, and concerns for immigration status all accumulate and impact the course of pregnancy and postpartum recovery. Unauthorized migrant women statistically and anecdotally have lower rates of sufficient prenatal care or are often late to present for care. They are also twice as likely to experience postpartum depression and anxiety compared to those who are authorized migrants or citizens.

Many may argue that the multitude of barriers mentioned above should prevent families from migrating here in the first place. I would say that leaving one’s home is not a decision made lightly by anyone. Migrants leave their countries because of severe political instability, rise in violence, and economic insecurity – they travel for safety, something we all strive for ourselves and our loved ones. Why shouldn’t they?

The two babies born at the same hospital and at the same time may have the same physical exam and hospital care. But the rest of their lives will be shaped by the doors of the homes they enter. We need to support migrant mothers with more social services, financial resources, and culturally sensitive, trauma-informed care – not less. The proposed federal budget cuts to the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), a program that commonly supports underserved populations, can substantially reduce already scarce resources for breastfeeding mothers and young children. Similarly, efforts by the federal government to defund Planned Parenthood can block many essential services for expectant and new mothers, such as prenatal care, referrals to specialty care, and postpartum services.

To give all infants and children an equal chance to live healthy, happy, and safe lives, we need to reduce the inequities migrant women face even before their babies arrive in our hospital rooms. That is the least we can do as healthcare providers.

Sevde Felek Boyvat, MD, is a board-certified pediatrician with a focus on newborn medicine at the Yale School of Medicine, the medical director of the newborn nursery at Bridgeport Hospital, and a Public Voices Fellow of The OpEd Project in partnership with Yale University.


Read More

Nationalization by Stealth: Trump’s New Industrial Playbook

The White House and money

AI generated image

Nationalization by Stealth: Trump’s New Industrial Playbook

In the United States, where the free market has long been exalted as the supreme engine of prosperity, a peculiar irony is taking shape. On August 22, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick announced that the federal government had acquired a stake of just under 10% in Intel, instantly making itself the company’s largest shareholder. The stake - roughly 433 million shares, valued at about $8.9 billion, purchased at $20.47 each - was carved out of the Biden-era CHIPS Act subsidies and repackaged as equity. Formally, it is a passive, non-voting stake, with no board seat or governance rights. Yet symbolism matters: Washington now sits, however discreetly, in Intel’s shareholder register. Soon afterward, reports emerged that Samsung, South Korea’s industrial giant, had also been considered for similar treatment. What once would have been denounced as creeping socialism in Washington is now unfolding under Donald Trump, a president who boasts of his devotion to private enterprise but increasingly embraces tactics that blur the line between capitalism and state control.

The word “nationalization,” for decades associated with postwar Britain, Latin American populists, or Arab strongmen, is suddenly back in circulation - but this time applied to the citadel of capitalism itself. Trump justifies the intervention as a matter of national security and economic patriotism. Subsidies, he argues, are wasteful. Tariffs, in his view, are a stronger tool for forcing corporations to relocate factories to U.S. soil. Yet the CHIPS Act, that bipartisan legacy of the Biden years, remains in force and politically untouchable, funneling billions of dollars into domestic semiconductor projects. Rather than scrap it, Trump has chosen to alter the terms: companies that benefit from taxpayer largesse must now cede equity to the state. Intel, heavily reliant on those funds, has become the test case for this new model of American industrial policy.

Keep ReadingShow less
Impartiality Under Fire: A Federal Judge’s Warning on Judicial Independence
brown mallet on gray wooden surface
Photo by Wesley Tingey on Unsplash

Impartiality Under Fire: A Federal Judge’s Warning on Judicial Independence

In times of democratic strain, clarity must come not only from scholars and journalists but also from those who have sworn to uphold the Constitution with impartiality and courage.

This second piece in a series in The Fulcrum, “Judges on Democracy,” where we invite retired federal judges to speak directly to the American public about the foundational principles of our legal system: the separation of powers, the rule of law, and the indispensable role of an independent judiciary to our democratic republic.

Keep ReadingShow less
Could Trump’s campaign against the media come back to bite conservatives?

US President Donald Trump reacts next to Erika Kirk, widow of Charlie Kirk, after speaking at the public memorial service for right-wing activist Charlie Kirk at State Farm Stadium in Glendale, Arizona, on September 21, 2025.

(Photo by Mandel NGAN / AFP) (Photo by MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images)

Could Trump’s campaign against the media come back to bite conservatives?

In the wake of Jimmy Kimmel’sapparently temporary— suspension from late-night TV, a (tragically small) number of prominent conservatives and Republicans have taken exception to the Trump administration’s comfort with “jawboning” critics into submission.

Sen. Ted Cruz condemned the administration’s “mafioso behavior.” He warned that “going down this road, there will come a time when a Democrat wins again — wins the White House … they will silence us.” Cruz added during his Friday podcast. “They will use this power, and they will use it ruthlessly. And that is dangerous.”

Keep ReadingShow less
A stethoscope lying on top of credit cards.

Enhanced health care tax credits expire at the end of 2025 unless Congress acts. Learn who benefits, what’s at risk, and how premiums could rise without them.

Getty Images, yavdat

Just the Facts: What Happens If Enhanced Health Care Tax Credits End in 2025

The Fulcrum strives to approach news stories with an open mind and skepticism, striving to present our readers with a broad spectrum of viewpoints through diligent research and critical thinking. As best we can, we remove personal bias from our reporting and seek a variety of perspectives in both our news gathering and selection of opinion pieces. However, before our readers can analyze varying viewpoints, they must have the facts.

There’s been a lot in the news lately about healthcare costs going up on Dec. 31 unless congress acts. What are the details?

The enhanced health care premium tax credits (ePTCs) are set to expire at the end of 2025 unless Congress acts to extend them.

Keep ReadingShow less