Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

We are starved for meaningful connections

A sign reading "Trust" cracked in half

A decline in media literacy coincides with a breakdown in trust.

eric1513/Getty Images

Smith is managing director of the Getting Better Foundation and impact producer of the documentary “ Trust Me.”

“We are drowning in data ... and starved for meaningful connection” Peter Meyers and Shann Nix communications and consulting firm Stand & Deliver write in “As We Speak – How to Make Your Point and Have It Stick.” “Real communication can only occur when there is human connection. Without connection, there is no influence, no rapport. There’s no moving listeners, voters, or fellow legislators from point A to point B. There is no bond. Bonding can be a powerful and much needed thing because we live in frightening times. Many people feel they are trapped in a downward spiral, in which they have no control over their fate, no faith that their leaders can save them.”


The problem

In addition to violence, domestic terrorism, and global conflicts stemming from mis- and disinformation, there are far too many people – primarily youth – suffering from anxiety, depression, substance abuse and suicidology. Data shows that adolescent mental health disorders climb alongside the advent of the internet and social media.

“Chronic overconsumption of media since the advent of the internet stimulates addiction to dopamine – similar to how our brains respond to conventional drugs and alcohol. Science, technology, and innovation have allowed us to ‘drugify’ almost every human behavior. If you are not already addicted, it’s coming soon to a website near you,” Anna Lembke, professor of psychiatry at Stanford University School of Medicine, says on an episode of the “ Hidden Brain ” podcast. “[Ri]sing rates of depression, anxiety and suicide, which by the way are rising fastest in the richest nations in the world, are due in part to the fact that we are overloading our brains’ reward pathway with too much dopamine. And that In our brain’s effort to compensate for too much pleasure, we are essentially individually and collectively downregulating our own dopamine production, not just to baseline, but below below baseline levels. So we are in a dopamine deficit state.”

I’d argue that thanks to the internet and smart devices (marvelous tools when used for good), coupled with our growing acceptance and normalization of violence and violent behaviors, what starts out innocently enough as “tiny addictions” change us in a way that resonates deeply. These addictions make us want to recreate those feelings just like opium, heroin and fentanyl. Feelings that transport us, excite us, filling in missing joy that used to come from more simple things like walking in nature or a baby’s laugh. Arguably too, we subconsciously miss and are seeking that simpler joy. Anyone who has bitten into a sweet treat has witnessed this firsthand. That second bite doesn’t appear as rewarding as the first. So, we take another bite and another – trying to recreate that sweet sensation.

Modern society has “drugified” our brains with large quantities of, access to, the potency of, and novelty of media. Quantity has expanded due to an explosion of online content. Access is now readily available via devices that fit the palm of our hand. Potency increases with our tolerance to more graphic content. Novelty of new media since the advent of the printing press, then radio, television, and now the internet, fosters excitement and captivates viewers/users to draw them in further.

The solution

It's time to wake up our sense of purpose and excitement for a meaningful future (not to mention national security). It’s time to raise our standards and those of our children. To give them their best shot at rising to their potential, we need to teach them how to communicate – providing them with hope and resilience. Media literacy education – for every student in rural as well as urban schools, for adult citizens, and for educators – is one of the best solutions to the deep dilemmas posed above. The Bill of Rights, featuring a prized freedom of expression, would make it difficult, if not unconstitutional, to censor what can be said online. And, do we really want to place in the hands of a for-profit social media platform that censorship power? While there are big brains and big agencies working on digital solutions, the answer, it seems, is media literacy education.

These days, trust is the highest currency. The level of trust we win or lose is proportionate to the quality of our communication. Coincidentally, when people are empowered with media, information, and digital literacies, they learn to trust one another more. Connection happens. It’s not easy to hurt one another when we know another person. Even if that relationship is superficial, like exchanges with our daily barista. Differences are set aside to work together on solving the bigger problems our world is facing. When people – students – learn to communicate clearly and credibly, they become “response-abled.” They are armed with advantages – across borders, genders, age, nationality and wealth disparities. They rise to become the best version of themselves, inspiring others to follow toward peaceful resolution and collaboration.

Communication is about creating clarity where there’s confusion. It’s about creating relevance when people feel disconnected. Most importantly, it’s about inspiring people to achieve things they never thought possible. That’s hope. That’s what media literacy does.

Media literacy empowers students – and people in general – with the skills to think critically and for themselves. It teaches them how to consume and evaluate information, to ask critical questions, avoid online manipulation, and to navigate within our complex and ever-changing media landscape. Media lit additionally instructs people how to construct accurate media – becoming citizen journalists themselves. The Department of Homeland Security calls this becoming “upstanders” instead of “bystanders.” To be “response-able” instead of reactive members of society.

It means using the media for peacemaking, not manipulation, conflict and war. In making “ Trust Me ” we explored the possibilities in a feature-length documentary that explores human nature, information technology, and the need for media literacy to help people trust one another and to bring them together for civil discourse in the interests of creating a more resilient population. “Trust Me” explores how an avalanche of negative news and misinformation is making us all terrified of the world. This has led to mistrust of others, which further leads to racism, polarization, mental health disorders and even crime.

Sensational media take advantage of our survival instincts to earn more clicks and ad revenue with scary and shocking headlines – many of which aren’t even true – and we’re enabling them each time we share. When our fear goes up, our trust comes down. When people don’t trust each other, they don’t help each other and progress stalls.

Watch the trailer to learn more:

Official TRUST ME Traileryoutu.be

Read More

Fox News’ Selective Silence: How Trump’s Worst Moments Vanish From Coverage
Why Fox News’ settlement with Dominion Voting Systems is good news for all media outlets
Getty Images

Fox News’ Selective Silence: How Trump’s Worst Moments Vanish From Coverage

Last week, the ultraconservative news outlet, NewsMax, reached a $73 million settlement with the voting machine company, Dominion, in essence, admitting that they lied in their reporting about the use of their voting machines to “rig” or distort the 2020 presidential election. Not exactly shocking news, since five years later, there is no credible evidence to suggest any malfeasance regarding the 2020 election. To viewers of conservative media, such as Fox News, this might have shaken a fully embraced conspiracy theory. Except it didn’t, because those viewers haven’t seen it.

Many people have a hard time understanding why Trump enjoys so much support, given his outrageous statements and damaging public policy pursuits. Part of the answer is due to Fox News’ apparent censoring of stories that might be deemed negative to Trump. During the past five years, I’ve tracked dozens of examples of news stories that cast Donald Trump in a negative light, including statements by Trump himself, which would make a rational person cringe. Yet, Fox News has methodically censored these stories, only conveying rosy news that draws its top ratings.

Keep ReadingShow less
U.S. Flag / artificial intelligence / technology / congress / ai

The age of AI warrants asking if the means still further the ends—specifically, individual liberty and collective prosperity.

Getty Images, Douglas Rissing

Liberty and the General Welfare in the Age of AI

If the means justify the ends, we’d still be operating under the Articles of Confederation. The Founders understood that the means—the governmental structure itself—must always serve the ends of liberty and prosperity. When the means no longer served those ends, they experimented with yet another design for their government—they did expect it to be the last.

The age of AI warrants asking if the means still further the ends—specifically, individual liberty and collective prosperity. Both of those goals were top of mind for early Americans. They demanded the Bill of Rights to protect the former, and they identified the latter—namely, the general welfare—as the animating purpose for the government. Both of those goals are being challenged by constitutional doctrines that do not align with AI development or even undermine it. A full review of those doctrines could fill a book (and perhaps one day it will). For now, however, I’m just going to raise two.

Keep ReadingShow less
An illustration of AI chat boxes.

An illustration of AI chat boxes.

Getty Images, Andriy Onufriyenko

In Defense of ‘AI Mark’

Earlier this week, a member of the UK Parliament—Mark Sewards—released an AI tool (named “AI Mark”) to assist with constituent inquiries. The public response was rapid and rage-filled. Some people demanded that the member of Parliament (MP) forfeit part of his salary—he's doing less work, right? Others called for his resignation—they didn't vote for AI; they voted for him! Many more simply questioned his thinking—why on earth did he think outsourcing such sensitive tasks to AI would be greeted with applause?

He's not the only elected official under fire for AI use. The Prime Minister of Sweden, Ulf Kristersson, recently admitted to using AI to study various proposals before casting votes. Swedes, like the Brits, have bombarded Kristersson with howls of outrage.

Keep ReadingShow less
shallow focus photography of computer codes
Shahadat Rahman on Unsplash

When Rules Can Be Code, They Should Be!

Ninety years ago this month, the Federal Register Act was signed into law in a bid to shine a light on the rules driving President Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal—using the best tools of the time to make government more transparent and accountable. But what began as a bold step toward clarity has since collapsed under its own weight: over 100,000 pages, a million rules, and a public lost in a regulatory haystack. Today, the Trump administration’s sweeping push to cut red tape—including using AI to hunt obsolete rules—raises a deeper challenge: how do we prevent bureaucracy from rebuilding itself?

What’s needed is a new approach: rewriting the rule book itself as machine-executable code that can be analyzed, implemented, or streamlined at scale. Businesses could simply download and execute the latest regulations on their systems, with no need for costly legal analysis and compliance work. Individuals could use apps or online tools to quickly figure out how rules affect them.

Keep ReadingShow less