Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Local news is in crisis, but there is hope

Opinion

local news
Zerbor/Getty Images

Kleman is executive director of Report for America .

If you want to understand the depth of need among America’s local newsrooms — plus their depth of passion for serving their communities — there’s no better way than to read the hundreds of applications they send to organizations like mine, Report for America.

We recruit early-career journalists for local newsrooms and pay a good part of their salaries over two to three years, so they can cover what the newsrooms identify as critically underserved topics or communities. We also teach newsrooms how to fundraise and make themselves more financially sustainable.

In recent weeks our team finished selecting the 50 or so newsrooms we’ll be adding to our cohort next year, for a total of roughly 200. We’ll announce those results in December, but here’s a flavor of the enormous coverage gaps local newsrooms are trying to fill:


From Arkansas: “Today there is not a single ag reporter in the state, yet agriculture is Arkansas’s largest industry. This is crazy.”

From Pennsylvania: “This reporter would also keep an eye on the roughly 8-10 small local governments in our northern area. These councils are usually full of untrained community members with the best intentions. Or, occasionally, bad intentions. One town manager ... was recently arrested for allegedly stealing more than $600,000.”

From Michigan: “Southwest Detroit ... hosts a petroleum refinery and other heavy industry and deals with heavy truck traffic that is about to worsen with the construction of a new international border crossing. Residents struggle with air pollution, asthma, lead paint in homes and lead in water service lines, flooding, heat, and many other environmental and public health threats. ... This community is woefully undercovered.”

News craters like these exist throughout the country — and they’re only getting worse, according to the State of Local News 2023 report from the Medill Local News Initiative at Northwestern University. The report’s November release served as a grim backdrop to our work judging newsroom applications and making agonizing choices. Among the alarming findings:

  • More than half of the nation’s 3,143 counties have no local news source or only one remaining outlet.
  • The country has lost 2,900 newspapers — nearly one-third — since 2005.
  • We’re losing 2.5 newspapers per week, a rate that’s accelerating.
  • Alternative local news outlets have not been viable replacements for shuttered papers, especially in non-metro areas.

Bottom line: Our growing news deserts are leaving far too many people without a trusted source of information.

Yes, there’s been positive news lately, namely the Press Forward initiative — $500 million pledged by a coalition of donors to support local news over the next several years.

The Medill report features additional bright spots — newsrooms throughout the country that are doing relatively well. All are privately held, most are locally owned, and all have gone to great lengths to engage with their communities and foster deep local relationships. I’m happy to say that 14 of the 17 newsrooms featured in the report are current or former host newsrooms of Report for America. Our team knows them as generous sharers of their ideas with other newsrooms. A vibrant network effect is key to more widespread adoption of these practices and ideas.

Our team has been doing this work for six years, fielding more than 600 journalists at 340 partner newsrooms. We’ve also helped newsrooms raise more than $21 million from local donors, and we’ve contributed $19 million in salary support. Each year we perform a juggling act, incorporating in our selections rural, suburban and urban newsrooms, for-profits and nonprofits, a variety of mediums and beats, and more. The need is so great, though, that we’ve had to turn away far more newsrooms than we can help.

I wish more people could know what a difference a single reporter can make in a community. That might inspire more people, and public and private institutions, to support local news.

Last year, the application from one newsroom – The People-Sentinel in Barnwell, S.C. – stuck with me above the hundreds of others. “The coverage area is a rural, high-poverty news desert,” wrote publisher Jonathan Vickery, who had recently bought the paper. He proposed to hire a reporter for neighboring Allendale County, which nobody had covered in a decade.

So with our help, The People-Sentinel hired corps member Elijah de Castro. At his first Allendale City Council meeting, de Castro told us he was swarmed by grateful residents. Just last week, he reported that in another town, the outgoing mayor had tried to cancel the meeting at which her replacement would be sworn in.

“I don’t know if I can claim that my reporting made the mayor agree to leave, but people told me that my reporting helped them understand what was going on,” de Castro told me. “Without a voice in local media, they’ve become totally confused as to what is happening around them.”


Read More

This 3D rendered image shows a central AI processing chip sitting atop a glowing blue printed circuit board.

Can AI profit-sharing help workers? Examining public wealth funds, AI taxes, economic transition policies, and the future of work.

Jason marz / Getty Images

There’s No Easy Path Through the AI Transition

“Trending” policy ideas tend to garner attention for all the wrong reasons: they seem like silver bullet solutions that will save us from taking on much harder reforms. Proposals to share profits from leading AI companies with the public are the latest example. It’s the rare policy scheme that seems to have united President Donald Trump, Senator Bernie Sanders, and CEOs at the leading AI labs. While the proposals for AI profit sharing vary in their precise details, a quick review of their likely outcomes should quickly deflate the popular excitement that has formed in response to calls for new taxes, public wealth funds, and the like. It’s important to reveal such limitations so that the AI policy discourse can move on to mechanisms more likely to address the real concerns of the American people.

In our first hypothetical world, the two leading AI labs—Anthropic and OpenAI—give away 3% of their equity. That’s not nothing! Based on current figures, such a contribution could kickstart a public wealth fund of about $55 billion. Let’s then imagine that fund earns 10% a year (a big “if” but let’s run with it). Per The Economist, this AI would reach a staggering $140 billion within ten years. How much would that benefit Americans? If annual payouts were 4% — what the publication reports is a proper amount to keep the fund going and growing — Americans would have an extra $20 in their pocket.

Keep ReadingShow less
For Imre Huss, Fixing Democracy Starts With Talking to a Stranger
a couple of people sitting at a table with cups of coffee

For Imre Huss, Fixing Democracy Starts With Talking to a Stranger

The Democracy Architects Council, presented by The Bridge Alliance Education Fund and Civics Unplugged, offers a paid, one-year fellowship for eight fellows ages 18 to 28, each selected for their work across a distinct sector of democratic life.

The youngest member of the Democracy Architects Council is building AI-powered civic tech, but he says the real work of democracy still happens face to face.

Keep ReadingShow less
Vote Badge with Rising Social Media Like Icons and Hearts – Digital Engagement and Online Voting
J Studios / Getty Images

Democratic Autopsy and AI

After every defeat, organizations conduct autopsies. The good ones are honest, like NASA’s Rogers Commission report after the Space Shuttle Challenger exploded shortly after takeoff. In addition to identifying the infamous O-rings as the proximal culprit, it looked at organizational culture, communication failures, normalization of risk, management pressures, and institutional blind spots. The best ones are uncomfortable, and make a serious effort to understand “why did we mess this up so badly?” I’ve personally seen both good “autopsies” and bad ones throughout my decades of experience in true life-or-death realms: the SEAL Teams and as an Emergency Medicine physician.

Following the 2024 election, the Democratic National Committee produced a lengthy report titled Build to Win. Build to Last. Yet it is not a serious document because it does nothing to prepare for the unstoppable and very near future staring us right in the face. It is nearly 200 pages long and attempts to explain what went wrong and how the party should prepare for the future. It discusses organizing, communications, coalition building, fundraising, digital strategy, and voter outreach. It is filled with references to data, analytics, and technology.

Keep ReadingShow less
My Generation Can Spot the Deepfake. That’s Not Enough.
Smartphone with ai text in jeans pocket
Photo by Immo Wegmann on Unsplash

My Generation Can Spot the Deepfake. That’s Not Enough.

Thomas Massie, a seven-term Republican congressman from Kentucky, lost his primary on May 19. The race cost $32.6 million, making it the most expensive congressional primary in U.S. history. Among the weapons deployed against him: an AI-generated video showing him checking into a hotel room with Representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Ilhan Omar, with their hands clasped. The narrator called it "worse than adultery." A disclaimer at the bottom of the screen, in small text, read: "This satirical ad was created with artificial intelligence."

I watched the ad. It looks ridiculous. The movements are slightly too smooth, the lighting is off, and the scenario is so cartoonish that I genuinely could not tell at first whether it was meant to be taken seriously. But I'm 17, and I've spent the last four years watching AI-generated content get better in real time. I know what the seams look like. Massie, in his post-loss interview on Meet the Press, was blunt about who the ad actually reached: "It was actually very effective on the boomers."

Keep ReadingShow less