Mediators Foundation supports and enhances the work of many of the best bridge-builders, peace-makers, and civic thought-leaders in America. Also helps a new generation of civic agents test and launch their initiatives. The overarching purpose of Mediators Foundation is to prevent and reduce conflicts and promote collaboration. The Foundation develops and promotes proven methods for increasing the human capacity for peaceful, creative problem-solving in ways that motivate participants to become more aware and engaged citizens. In addition, the Foundation provides fiscal sponsorship to organizations and projects that reflect and enhance our mission.
Site Navigation
Search
Latest Stories
Start your day right!
Get latest updates and insights delivered to your inbox.
Top Stories
Latest news
Read More

From New York to San Francisco, millions of Americans are expected to hit the streets to voice their anger over President Donald Trump's policies at nationwide "No Kings" protests.
(AFP via Getty Images)
Lessons from history
Nov 01, 2025
People who are protesting and complaining that President Trump is behaving like a dictator apparently skipped history classes or took them at liberal universities where professors have re-written the subject to conform to their worldview.
Someone who is doing what history teachers used to do may surprise you. He is Mark Levin, who hosts a daily syndicated radio program and weekend programs on Fox News Channel. Watch and listen if you are skeptical.
Last weekend, Levin reminded his audience that some who are regarded as some of our best presidents did things far worse than what Trump is accused of doing.
Levin reminded us that John Adams, one of America’s Founding Fathers, imprisoned several citizens under the Sedition Act, including four journalists. The Insurrection Act was used by Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson, Ulysses S. Grant (Grant put down the Ku Klux Klan in the South). These and other presidents used the military to achieve political and social objectives.
Abraham Lincoln “shut down pro-peace newspapers, or papers thought to be sympathetic to the Confederacy during the Civil War. He suspended habeas corpus. Only Congress can do that.” Lincoln also “confiscated printing materials and sometimes imprisoned reporters, editors and publishers.”
Woodrow Wilson, “a favorite of the Democrats, was a racist and a bigot. He believed in eugenics. He also passed the Espionage Act in 1917 and a Sedition Act in 1918, so opponents of Wilson were charged and imprisoned on a scale never seen in American history.” These included 2,000 people, 1,200 of whom were imprisoned, among them “the Socialist candidate for president of the United States.”
Franklin Roosevelt, says Levin, “had a war against the press.” He established the Federal Communications Commission in 1934 and reduced the length of broadcast radio licenses from three years to six months to make sure they “abide(d) by the policies of the government.”
Levin notes FDR “appointed a political confidant to run the IRS. He would order this director to conduct audits on political opponents and newspaper publishers.” He also “ordered the IRS to lay off a young congressman they were investigating (named) Lyndon Johnson.”
Want more? “At FDR’s direction,” says Levin, “Senate Democrats subpoenaed tens of thousands of telegrams from Western Union because they… thought it was run by Republicans.”
President Kennedy, says Levin, “appointed a loyalist to be IRS Commissioner and he would routinely read tax filings of political opponents, people…who were wealthy…for the fun of it…and leak(ed) to Ben Bradley,” who wrote for Newsweek magazine and later became editor at The Washington Post.
Lyndon Johnson, says Levin, “used the IRS, the FBI, the CIA…and went after his political opponents, businesses, publishers. He spied on the Goldwater campaign and had bugs by the FBI placed in the Goldwater headquarters.” Johnson also ordered the phones of Martin Luther King Jr. and other Black civil rights leaders to be bugged
Barack Obama, about whom so many say was free of scandal, had his Justice Department subpoena and seize “20 Associated Press phone lines used by 100 reporters,” says Levin, “and communications between reporters and the CIA.”
Levin chronicled so many more actions ordered by mostly Democrat presidents that taken together, or individually, pale in comparison to President Trump’s efforts to uphold the law. Levin calls Democrats the real authoritarians. “They’re the ones who reject the outcomes of elections…they’re the ones who seek to change the citizenry of this country because they don’t much like the way that we vote and that way they can pick up more congressional seats…And if they can’t let’s get rid of the Electoral College so only the 11 or 12 most populous states, almost all of which are Democrat, (will) control the country, and we’ll call it democracy.”
Probably no history teacher, if they get around to the subject, calls any of those former presidents or today’s Democrat party “dictators.”
Readers may email Cal Thomas at tcaeditors@tribpub.com. Look for Cal Thomas’ latest book “A Watchman in the Night: What I’ve Seen Over 50 Years Reporting on America" (HumanixBooks).
Keep ReadingShow less
Recommended

With millions of child abuse images reported annually and AI creating new dangers, advocates are calling for accountability from Big Tech and stronger laws to keep kids safe online.
Getty Images, ljubaphoto
Parents: It’s Time To Get Mad About Online Child Sexual Abuse
Oct 31, 2025
Forty-five years ago this month, Mothers Against Drunk Driving had its first national press conference, and a global movement to stop impaired driving was born. MADD was founded by Candace Lightner after her 13-year-old daughter was struck and killed by a drunk driver while walking to a church carnival in 1980. Terms like “designated driver” and the slogan “Friends don’t let friends drive drunk” came out of MADD’s campaigning, and a variety of state and federal laws, like a lowered blood alcohol limit and legal drinking age, were instituted thanks to their advocacy. Over time, social norms evolved, and driving drunk was no longer seen as a “folk crime,” but a serious, conscious choice with serious consequences.
Movements like this one, started by fed-up, grieving parents working with law enforcement and law makers, worked to lower road fatalities nationwide, inspire similar campaigns in other countries, and saved countless lives.
But today, one of the biggest dangers to children comes with almost no safeguards: the internet. Parents know the risks, yet there is no large-scale “movement” when it comes to keeping our kids safe online.
This is a big missed opportunity. The internet is not going anywhere, but in order to make it safer for children and young people, parents are key - and they need to get mad on a much larger scale.
In 2024, there were 20.5 million reports of child sexual abuse material made to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children’s CyberTipline, and underreporting is a serious problem. These images represent real children who have been abused, their photos and videos of the abuse shared – exponentially – on platforms that we use every day. Add to that the rising number of teens who have died by suicide after being groomed and extorted, and the number of kids who are exposed to pornographic material on sites that are supposedly “safe” for children.
AI is complicating matters further, suggesting extreme dieting to teens and offering advice on how to commit suicide. According to Common Sense Media, 3 out of 4 kids have used an AI chatbot, and many parents have no idea.
Despite widespread acknowledgement of child sexual abuse, imagery, and exploitation on all major platforms, tech companies are still not required to proactively search for, detect, or remove content unless it is reported to them. Online safeguards are, by and large, voluntary, and tech companies are still rarely held accountable for crimes committed on their sites, creating a virtual playground for predators to groom children without consequences.
Much like the lax culture around drunk driving before MADD, the dangers online are often seen as an unfortunate risk that parents are forced to accept in order to let their children and teens exist in the digital world. Instead of anger, there is a sense of overwhelm and apathy at the scale and the ubiquity of online risks. Parents are mostly forced to throw up their hands, put in place whatever precautions they can, and just go along with it. This is unacceptable.
Congress is making some progress towards passing legislation that will help hold tech companies accountable and let law enforcement better prosecute these crimes. Other countries around the world, like Australia, the U.K., and Brazil, are starting to pass online safety legislation, too. But these achievements are largely uncoordinated, and they exist on a national scale, not a global one.
Since most Big Tech companies are based in the U.S., Congress must take the lead in making companies accountable for the risks children face online. We also need a collective, organic movement led by parents and the public that will drive a global movement for sustainable, meaningful change.
It is not up to parents to solve this crisis. But parents can – and should – be angry. And we must use that anger to fuel change. We must educate ourselves about the risks and not be afraid to talk to others about the risks our kids are facing. The tech companies will not bring themselves down, so parents, teachers, and adults who care about children must continue putting pressure on Congress to act. We can end online child sexual abuse and make the internet a much safer place for everyone, but only if we come together first.
Keep ReadingShow less
African American Roundtable: Building Power and Liberation
Oct 31, 2025
In the heart of Milwaukee, the African American Roundtable (AART) is reshaping civic engagement and community power through a bold, Black-led vision of liberation. Founded to serve as a political home for Milwaukee’s Black residents, AART is a transformative force—organizing, nurturing, and amplifying leadership to challenge systemic inequities and reimagine public policy.
AART’s mission is clear and unapologetic: to build power in service of Black liberation. Rooted in values of authentic relationships, love, organization, and community transformation, the group envisions a Milwaukee where Black people thrive in interconnected, joyful communities. Their work spans grassroots organizing, participatory budgeting, food access campaigns, and cultural programming—all designed to center Black voices and shift decision-making power into the hands of those most impacted.
"We nurture, develop, and support Black people in Milwaukee and give them a place to call their political home," said Markasa Tucker-Harris, Executive Director at AART. "We do that through organizing, campaigns, and opportunities for people to do their own self-work so they can transform."
- YouTube www.youtube.com
One of AART’s most visible initiatives has been LiberateMKE, a campaign launched in 2019 to reallocate public funds away from policing and toward community priorities. The campaign galvanized residents to demand investments in housing, mental health services, youth employment, and violence prevention. Over the years, LiberateMKE has not only influenced budget conversations but also cultivated a new generation of civic leaders.
"We saw in the City budget that too much money was going to the police," said Devin Anderson, Campaign and Membership Director with AART. "Extract money from their budget, over $300 million year after year, and invest in the programs that people care about."
"There are good people that are police, but if you continue to try to build on a soil that is polluted, you're going to continue to bring forth things from that soil that's polluted. No matter how you try to build something else on top of it, the foundation and the roots of it is to protect property, and it's never to protect people," said Tucker-Harris.
I spoke with Tucker-Harris and Anderson while on assignment in the Badger State, producing an episode of The 50, a four-year multimedia project in which the Fulcrum visits different communities across all 50 states to learn what motivated them to vote in the 2024 presidential election and see how the Donald Trump administration is meeting those concerns and hopes.
- YouTube www.youtube.com
AART’s approach is not just strategic—it’s deeply relational. The organization fosters spaces where Black residents can be their authentic selves, share stories, and build collective power. Whether through town halls, storytelling workshops, or civic trainings, AART centers dignity and joy as essential components of liberation work.
As Milwaukee grapples with challenges of racial equity, economic justice, and democratic participation, the African American Roundtable stands as a beacon of possibility. Their work reminds the city—and the nation—that transformative change begins with organized communities, courageous leadership, and a radical commitment to love and liberation.
-
Hugo Balta is the executive editor of the Fulcrum. He is also the publisher of the Latino News Network.
Keep ReadingShow less
The Lone Woman Who Staged a ‘No Kings’ Protest in Small-Town West Virginia
Oct 31, 2025
When Kendra Sullivan woke up on Wednesday, the 43-year-old West Virginian was surprised to see that she’d gone viral overnight — in a good way.
The night before, more than 40,000 people had joined YouTube for a what’s-next meeting following the 2,700 “No Kings” pro-democracy demonstrations on Saturday attended by as many as 7 million across the country. The livestream was organized by the same broad coalition of good-government, religious and advocacy groups that arranged the protests. Ash-Lee Woodard Henderson, an Appalachian activist and the first Black woman to serve as co-executive director at the Highlander Research & Education Center, a social justice leadership school in Tennessee that dates back to before the Civil Rights Movement, revved up participants by showing photos they’d submitted of Saturday’s events.
She shared a dispatch from Chattanooga, Tennessee, “my hometown, the town I was born in,” Henderson said, where “over 2,000 people came out to declare that Appalachians don’t lick boots and that ICE belongs in sweet tea, not in Tennessee!”
She thanked the thousands of people who marched in Washington for “holding down this resistance movement right on Trump’s freaking doorstep.” She gave a shoutout to senior citizens at an assisted living center in White Plains, New York, whose protest drew 350 people from 2 to 102 years old. She also relayed that pouring rain did not stop 8,000 people in Fort Worth, Texas, from “turning out to say that we see this administration for what it is, and we will not stand for rising fascism.”
Then, as the call drew to a close, Henderson concluded with a Saturday demonstration that was notable for its attendance — a single person: Sullivan.
“And last but not least, in Beckley, West Virginia, Kendra Sullivan staged a one-woman ‘No Kings’ action. Y’all didn’t hear me. I’m gonna say it one more time: In Beckley, West Virginia, Kendra Sullivan — shout out to Kendra Sullivan! — staged a one-woman ‘No Kings’ action. People confronted her. They called the cops on her. They physically threatened her, but she stayed, and she stood up for what she believed in. Kendra, we are with you,” Henderson said.
Sullivan wasn’t on Tuesday night’s call. But on Wednesday, she started seeing messages from people who’d heard about her protest during Henderson’s roundup.
“The majority are people I’ve never met, I’m not Facebook friends with and have no connection to,” Sullivan told The 19th. “I just read a message from a woman who said, ‘You make me feel so much less alone.’ Lots of them feel like a tiny blue speck in a red state.”
She never anticipated it, she said — “I forget about the power of the Internet.” On Saturday, though, “I felt pretty lonely.”
Sullivan knew that she’d attend a “No Kings” event on Saturday. She described herself as more politically engaged than the average person and said she has participated in past events, but had no idea until she woke up that morning that it would be a one-woman stand.
On Friday, after work, she’d driven the two-plus hours from where she lives in Clarksburg, West Virginia, to Beckley, where she grew up, a city of about 16,000 in the southern part of the state. Her mother was headed out of town on a “girls trip” to Bermuda, Sullivan said, and had asked her to look after her dogs.

One of the signs Kendra Sullivan held up during her lone No Kings protest. (Courtesy Kendra Sullivan)
“I knew that there wasn’t a ‘No Kings’ rally in Beckley, so initially I thought I’d go to one in Charleston or Fayetteville or Lewisburg, but all of that was going to require more travel for me when I’d already driven two hours to dog sit for my mom,” Sullivan explained.
On Saturday, she woke up and told herself, “You know what? My mom lives off basically a main drive through town, so I could just walk down, hold up my sign for an hour, and call it a day — because there was no way I wasn’t going to participate.”
Sullivan ran the idea past her father, who also lives in town; he told her it was a good plan. She put in her AirPods and grabbed her handmade signs — “This aggression will not stand, man” and “ICE? Let’s get ICE off our streets and into our beverages, man,” both references to Jeff Bridges’ character “The Dude” in the film “The Big Lebowski.” Bridges had recently appeared on Jimmy Kimmel’s late-night show and Sullivan found what he had to say “inspiring,” she said. She walked down the street to the main road and started “singing and dancing around on the street corner.”
Twenty minutes in, an older man came out of the house she was standing in front of and hung a sign supporting President Donald Trump. Then a police car pulled up, followed by another. “It was one of those moments of, ‘Oh my goodness, are they here for me?’ I wasn’t blocking traffic, I wasn’t cursing, I was just exercising my First Amendment rights,” Sullivan said.
Sullivan asked if she’d done anything wrong. The first officer, a man, told her absolutely not; they were just following up on a report that had been phoned in. The second officer, a woman, had joined him because they knew the protester was a woman on her own. The officers confirmed everything was OK and left.
Ten minutes later, a car pulled into the house where the man, still on his porch, had hung the Trump sign. A younger man got out and mentioned that his grandfather was a Korean War veteran. “I said that’s cool, but that’s not ICE,” Sullivan said. He crossed the street and told her as he took photos of her: “You can smile real pretty.”
She called 9-1-1.
The police came back, this time with a third officer. Sullivan started to cry a little. The officers, she said, “were so comforting.” They stayed with her for a half-hour or so and then went on their way. Sullivan ended up staying longer than she’d originally planned, close to two hours.
“I do know people in Beckley who went to alternate locations on Saturday, but I think you need to show your face to your actual neighbors” — or, in this case, her parents’ neighbors, as well as people she grew up with. “It’s not enough to put up a sign,” she said. “It’s important to let people know what those who don’t support this look like, that we’re just like everybody else: We are America.”
Amanda Becker is The 19th’s Washington correspondent.
The Lone Woman Who Staged a ‘No Kings’ Protest in Small-Town West Virginia was originally published by The 19th and is republished with permission.
Keep ReadingShow less
Load More
















