Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Trump’s First-Year Economy: Growth, Tariffs, and Rising Public Anxiety

Trump’s First-Year Economy: Growth, Tariffs, and Rising Public Anxiety

Opinion

Trump’s First-Year Economy: Growth, Tariffs, and Rising Public Anxiety
1 U.S. dollar
Photo by Annie Spratt on Unsplash

As we kick off a new year, it’s a good time to assess President Donald Trump’s performance on the economy. He came into office a year ago with his “America First” philosophy. He promised to bring down the cost of living, create jobs, reduce illegal immigration at the border, enact big corporate and income tax cuts, and more. So, how is he doing on his campaign promises?

Below are ten specific economic indicators, which reveal a split-screen reality of positives and negatives. Most ominously, Americans are turning increasingly gloomy over their own economic futures.


1. Robust economic growth -- the White House can brag about the US economy expanding in the third quarter of 2025 at a robust annual clip of 4.3%, the fastest pacein two years, driven primarily by strong consumer and government spending.

2. Global tariffs – pre-Trump tariff rates were on average a mere 2.4%, but now ring the bell at an average 16.8%, the highest since 1935. While destabilizing trade relationships with allies and competitors worldwide, the tariffs have also increased federal revenue by around $200 billion in 2025. That is providing a significant new source of government income, which the US will need to offset large increases in the federal debt arising from huge tax cuts for wealthy Americans in Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill, which was passed last July. However, this fiscal windfall comes at a cost to consumers. If we break it down, the additional revenue amounts to approximately $1,600 per household annually that consumers had to pay in tariff-induced higher prices, illustrating the tension between government gains and household costs.

3. Inflation from the tariffs has not increased as much as experts warned. But the inflation numbers may be unreliable because the 43-day government shutdown—the longest in US history—disrupted data collection, muddying the picture. It’s possible that we have not yet seen the full impact of the tariffs on the cost of living.

4. Stock market gyrations – After a roller coaster in the Spring, the stock market has reached new record highs in late 2025, with the S&P 500 up over 17% for the year. But unfortunately, that does not actually benefit many Americans, since the top 10% of affluent Americans own 93% of all stocks. And by other measures, the stock market roller coaster is turning into a bubble that portends future trouble. Signs include: the S&P 500 price-to-earnings ratio (P/E ratio) is sky-high, even higher than before the dot-com bubble crash in 2001. Also, just like an investment casino, a vast amount of money has poured into the AI sector in a very short period.

Spending on AI development, including on massive data centers and research, has become an enormous growth engine for the US economy, accounting for anywhere from 50% to 90% of total GDP growth in 2025, according to various estimates. What happens if this bubble blows? Whether AI investment will lead to a boom or a bubble will dominate economic news for the rest of Trump’s term.

5. Immigration battles -- with the Trump administration’s ICE patrolling the streets and violently detaining even some US citizens and green card holders, border “encounters” have fallen to their lowest level in decades, averaging 15,400 per month (through November), compared with 137,200 in 2024. But the White House has also sharply curtailed legal immigration, which is adding to existing labor shortages, including in jobs usually filled by highly sought-after skilled professionals. Trump has imposed a $100,000 fee on new H-1B visas, which allow employers to temporarily hire skilled foreign workers in "specialty occupations" like health, tech, and science, especially important in rural areas.

Those are, more or less, five of the positives of Trumponomics so far. But there are significant storm clouds on the horizon, and falling consumer sentiment is increasingly reflecting that.

6. Increase in unemployment -- unemployment has climbed to 4.6% in November, the highest in over four years. More alarmingly, the rate of unemployment among young people and Black workers rose disproportionately, a kind of “canaries in the mine shaft” effect revealing a weakening job market. Job creation has slowed significantly, with the US creating only 55,000 jobs per month on average in the first 11 months of Trump’s second term, compared with 192,000 per month in the last two years of Biden’s term. The number of manufacturing jobs — a cornerstone of Trump’s job-creation strategy — also has fallen.

7. “Affordability gap” -- While the inflation rate hasn’t increased much under Trump, the “affordability gap” that plagued Joe Biden continues to squeeze everyday Americans. Many household items, groceries, utilities, and housing costs remain significantly more expensive than in 2024, leaving many families feeling financially pinched.

8. Soaring deficits/debt -- Donald Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill, which significantly cut taxes for high-income taxpayers, will add at least $3 trillion to the deficit over the next 10 years and send the ratio of debt to GDP to a nearly Greece-like 130%, from just under 100% today. In an alarming sign, the federal deficit for 2025 now stands at $1.8 trillion, with interest payments on the debt hitting $1 trillion for the first time.

9. Health care breakdown -- Tens of millions of Americans are about to lose their health care as a result of the One Big Beautiful Bill. An estimated 10 million of the poorest and most disabled Americans will be forced off Medicaid, leaving them with no other health care than a hospital emergency room. In addition, a significant chunk of the 24 million Americans who lost their insurance premium supplements as of January 1, because the Trump administration failed to reauthorize them, will see their premiums approximately double, making health care unaffordable. As they drop off the rolls, much of the progress made by President Barack Obama’s Affordable Care Act in providing universal access is being undone.

10. Erosion of consumer and business sentiment -- frustrated by ongoing high prices for key goods and services, Americans’ anger and dissatisfaction have reached near-record levels. In November, consumer sentiment fell to the second-lowest level since tracking began in 1952 (behind only June 2022 during the COVID pandemic,c when inflation reached 9% and unemployment hit 14.8%). Business optimism has also taken a hit. From billion-dollar giants to mom-and-pop shops, bankruptcies are piling up across the US, with large corporate bankruptcies already hitting their highest level in 15 years as import-dependent businesses struggle with high tariffs.

As Joe Biden found out: Denial is not an economic policy

Mark Twain once said, “There are three kinds of lies – lies, damned lies, and statistics.” The partisan sides each have their preferred measurements about the state of the economy. Joe Biden and Kamala Harris never figured out that, while economic statistics describe the system as a whole, they don’t always reveal the actual lived experiences of everyday people.

President Trump continues to insist that America has “the greatest economy” with “no inflation,” but 74% of people think the economy is mostly poor and at best fair, with over half saying Trump’s economic policies have made it worse. Consequently, as President Trump prepares to kick off 2026, his popularity has sunk to a historic low. Only 36% of Americans approve of his presidency, the lowest of any president at the end of his first year in the past five decades, lower even than Joe Biden’s 40% approval rating when he left office.

It's worth noting that, in pursuit of his struggling economic vision, President Trump has sidelined even his own Republican-controlled Congress. He has issued a total of 225 executive orders in less than a year, more than he did in his entire first term and nearly three times as many as any other first-year president in over 40 years. Many of these likely exceeded the president’s authority. And this Do-Nothing Congress passed just 61 laws, only a small fraction of the number enacted annually between 1975 and 2005.

As the saying goes, “If you break it, you bought it.” This is Trump’s economy now; he can no longer blame Joe Biden.

Steven Hill was policy director for the Center for Humane Technology, co-founder of FairVote, and political reform director at New America. You can reach him on X @StevenHill1776.


Read More

A gavel.

Analysis of President Donald Trump’s tariffs after a record $901.5B U.S. trade deficit in 2025. Explore the economic realities behind trade imbalances, the United States Supreme Court ruling on tariff authority, and the growing debate over executive power and trade policy.

Getty Images, Phanphen Kaewwannarat

What’s Next After the Court’s Tariffs Decision?

A Stubborn Imbalance

After a year of President Trump’s sweeping tariffs, sold as a reset of global trade, the promise was simple: the U.S. trade deficit would shrink. It did not. The Commerce Department instead reported a $70.3 billion deficit in December and a staggering $901.5 billion for all of 2025, one of the largest totals on record. The gap between imports and exports barely narrowed at all.

These figures matter because they undermine the central premise of the strategy: make imports more expensive, reduce foreign purchases, and bring production back to the United States. But that approach overlooks a key reality. Trade balances are not driven by tariffs alone. They reflect deeper forces such as consumer demand, domestic savings rates, the strength of the dollar, and global capital flows. Those forces do not yield easily to executive action.

Keep ReadingShow less
Trump Frames Economy As ‘Stronger than Ever Before’ in State of the Union, but Lawmakers Question the Claim

President Donald Trump delivered his State of the Union address before a joint session of Congress on Tuesday night.

(Cayla Labgold-Carroll/MNS)

Trump Frames Economy As ‘Stronger than Ever Before’ in State of the Union, but Lawmakers Question the Claim

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump used the longest State of the Union address in U.S. history on Tuesday night to argue that Americans are already experiencing “a turnaround for the ages” thanks to his agenda. But moments of disruption inside the House chamber and reactions from lawmakers afterward suggested Democrats and even some Republicans dispute his claims.

Trump’s address offered a snapshot of how the White House is trying to frame the economy heading into an election year. The administration sought to present easing inflation, falling prices, and rising wages as settled facts.

Keep ReadingShow less
U.S. Capitol

A shrinking deficit doesn’t mean fiscal health. CBO projections show rising debt, Social Security insolvency, and trillions added under the 2025 tax law.

Getty Images, Dmitry Vinogradov

The Deficit Mirage

The False Comfort of a Good Headline

A mirage can look real from a distance. The closer you get, the less substance you find. That is increasingly how Washington talks about the federal deficit.

Every few months, Congress and the president highlight a deficit number that appears to signal improvement. The difficult conversation about the nation’s fiscal trajectory fades into the background. But a shrinking deficit is not necessarily a sign of fiscal health. It measures one year’s gap between revenue and spending. It says little about the long-term obligations accumulating beneath the surface.

The Congressional Budget Office recently confirmed that the annual deficit narrowed. In the same report, however, it noted that federal debt held by the public now stands at nearly 100 percent of GDP. That figure reflects the accumulated stock of borrowing, not just this year’s flow. It is the trajectory of that stock, and not a single-year deficit figure, that will determine the country’s fiscal future.

What the Deficit Doesn’t Show

The deficit is politically attractive because it is simple and headline-friendly. It appears manageable on paper. Both parties have invoked it selectively for decades, celebrating short-term improvements while downplaying long-term drift. But the deeper fiscal story lies elsewhere.

Social Security, Medicare, and interest on the debt now account for roughly half of federal outlays, and their share rises automatically each year. These commitments do not pause for election cycles. They grow with demographics, health costs, and compounding interest.

According to the CBO, those three categories will consume 58 cents of every federal dollar by 2035. Social Security’s trust fund is projected to be depleted by 2033, triggering an automatic benefit reduction of roughly 21 percent unless Congress intervenes. Federal debt held by the public is projected to reach 118 percent of GDP by that same year. A favorable monthly deficit report does not alter any of these structural realities. These projections come from the same nonpartisan budget office lawmakers routinely cite when it supports their position.

Keep ReadingShow less
A New Democratic Approach: Guardrails That Speed, Not Stop, Progress

A take on permitting reform, deregulation, and DHS accountability—arguing for economic growth with guardrails that protect communities, health, and the environment.

Getty Images, Javier Ghersi

A New Democratic Approach: Guardrails That Speed, Not Stop, Progress

For far too long, our national conversation has been framed around a false choice. On one side, Republicans frequently argue that the best way to strengthen the economy and improve the lives of everyday Americans is to give businesses maximum freedom by having fewer rules, fewer constraints and more incentives to grow. On the other side, Democrats have stressed the need for guardrails to protect our environment, our health, and our communities from the unintended effects of unchecked growth.

But this debate has always been too narrow. It assumes that we must choose between action and accountability, between getting things done and doing them responsibly.

Keep ReadingShow less