Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Trump Frames Economy As ‘Stronger than Ever Before’ in State of the Union, but Lawmakers Question the Claim

Entering an election year with low approval ratings, Trump used the joint address to convey a message of national strength.

News

Trump Frames Economy As ‘Stronger than Ever Before’ in State of the Union, but Lawmakers Question the Claim

President Donald Trump delivered his State of the Union address before a joint session of Congress on Tuesday night.

(Cayla Labgold-Carroll/MNS)

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump used the longest State of the Union address in U.S. history on Tuesday night to argue that Americans are already experiencing “a turnaround for the ages” thanks to his agenda. But moments of disruption inside the House chamber and reactions from lawmakers afterward suggested Democrats and even some Republicans dispute his claims.

Trump’s address offered a snapshot of how the White House is trying to frame the economy heading into an election year. The administration sought to present easing inflation, falling prices, and rising wages as settled facts.


“He talked about affordability and how everything is cheaper now — beef, vegetables, gas, automobiles — none of which is true,” Rep. Adelita Grijalva, D-Ariz., told reporters on her way out of the chamber.

Throughout the address, Trump repeatedly argued that inflation is no longer a defining economic problem. He said inflation is “plummeting,” arguing that after one year in office, Americans are already benefiting from lower everyday costs, including groceries, gasoline, and housing.

“After just one year, I can say with dignity and pride that we have achieved a transformation like no one has ever seen before and a turnaround for the ages,” Trump said.

Recent inflation data showed some cooling, but prices continued to rise. According to the latest Consumer Price Index, headline inflation eased from 2.7% in December 2025 to 2.4% in January 2026, indicating that price increases were slowing rather than outright falling. Core inflation, which excludes food and energy, remains elevated, underscoring that many household costs are still rising, just at a slower pace. Still, slower inflation does not translate into lower prices, particularly for goods and services that surged during the peak inflation period.

The White House reinforced the president’s message during the speech. At 9:37 p.m., while Trump was addressing Congress, the administration released an article declaring that “Trump is delivering real relief” and “reversing Biden’s economic disaster.” The release closely mirrored the president’s remarks, signaling a coordinated effort to frame the economic moment as one of improvement rather than transition.

Inside the chamber, Democrats reacted skeptically to that portrayal. Some visibly shook their heads as Trump listed examples of falling prices. The pushback reflected a broader dispute over whether aggregate economic indicators align with voters’ lived experiences.

After the address, Rep. Adelita Grijalva, D-Ariz., said the president’s description of affordability did not match what she hears from businesses and families in her district. Small business owners continue to report the risk of closure due to higher costs, she said.

Questions about credibility extended beyond domestic policy. When Trump claimed to have ended eight wars during his time in office, Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., shouted that the statement was false. The president was referring to the Cambodian-Thai border crisis, which escalated into a direct armed conflict on July 24, 2025.

That tension resurfaced later in the speech when Trump turned to Russia and Ukraine. While he said he was working to bring an end to the war, he did not explicitly name Russia as the aggressor. The omission drew visible reactions from both parties, particularly given that the address coincided with the fourth anniversary of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

“He did not call out who is the aggressor and say that we stand with Ukraine,” Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del., told reporters in the Capitol's National Statuary Hall.

Criticisms were also raised inside Trump’s party.

“If I had to pick two items of the speech that were on the bad side, that would be one of them,” Rep. Don Bacon, R-Neb., told reporters in the Capitol.

The economic and foreign policy moments underscored the stakes of the address in an election year. Public opinion data suggests he faces a skeptical electorate. A recent Pew Research Center survey found that 61% of Americans disapprove of the way Trump is handling his job as president. A separate CNN/SSRS poll conducted in mid-February showed a similar pattern, with 63% disapproval

The same CNN/SSRS survey found that 57% of Americans said the economy and cost of living were the issues they most wanted Trump to address in his State of the Union.

André Hiroki covers business for Medill on the Hill.

The Fulcrum is committed to nurturing the next generation of journalists. Learn how by clicking HERE.



Read More

​A Lebanese girl returns with her family to live amid the ruins of an apartment wrecked by Israeli strikes.

A Lebanese girl returns with her family to live amid the ruins of an apartment wrecked by Israeli strikes in the Houch neighborhood, after being displaced for weeks by war between Israel and the Iran-backed Hezbollah militia that has displaced 1.2 million Lebanese, on April 28, 2026, in Tyre, Lebanon.

Scott Peterson / Getty Images

Please Don't Feed the Warmongers

I was recently catching up with an old friend from my Navy Reserve Officer Training Corps days who told me about some young sailors he knew in Bahrain tasked with intercepting hostile drones. Critically, as highly disciplined professionals, they have become extraordinarily good at it. My friend and I, with over twenty years of active duty service as military officers between us, discussed the extent to which their competence and vigilance are keeping them, and other Americans deployed in the area, alive, all while their leadership in Washington treats war with an increasingly terrifying callousness.

As brave servicemembers risk their lives on the front lines, Trump brags about how much money he’s making as president. It is true that for those invested in the types of industries that thrive during armed conflict, this war in Iran is a windfall. Trump himself invested between $9.7 million and $24.3 million in arms manufacturers and Pentagon contractors in 2025. Why would he end the war?

Keep ReadingShow less
A father voting, with his young son standing by him, watching him.

Citizens cast their vote during the 2026 presidential runoff in Colombia on June 21, 2026 in Barranquilla, Colombia. Ivan Cepeda, candidate for the Pacto Historico party and Abelardo de la Espriella, candidate for the Salvación Nacional, face in a tight runoff to rule Colombia from 2026 to 2030.

Leonardo Castañeda/Getty Images

Colombia’s Election Matters—Especially to Ecuador and the U.S.

In a closely fought election on June 21, conservative outsider Abelardo De La Espriella prevailed over Iván Cepeda, an ally of current leftist president, Gustavo Petro. Central to the electorate’s choice were distinct policy proposals to fight criminality and the drug cartels, who control large swaths of Colombian territory. The policies president-elect De La Espriella will bring to the fight against these issues matter greatly, not only to Colombia, but to neighboring Ecuador and the United States.

Earlier in March, Ecuadorian President Noboa, desperate to gain traction in his own drug war, announced a partnership with the U.S. to conduct joint operations against drug cartels. The partnership quickly went awry. A New York Times investigation of the first strike indicates that what the joint militaries considered a drug camp was in fact a dairy farm, with no drug connection. Then, on March 17, Colombia accused Ecuador of bombing within its territory with U.S. involvement. These incidents resulted in U.S. lawmakers calling for a suspension of joint operations on May 13. Very quickly, the U.S. partnership has reopened the scars of the Plan Colombia era of the early 2000s, where an overly militaristic approach to the drug war funded by the U.S. resulted in human rights abuses and false positives.

Keep ReadingShow less
Adult grandson teaching his grandfather to use laptop, close-up.

Social Security faces a funding crisis by 2032 that could cut retirement benefits by 22%. Learn what's driving the shortfall and how it could be fixed.

Westend61 / Getty Images

Social Security Faces a 2032 Crisis with Deep Benefit Cuts Ahead

A financial tsunami of giant proportions is heading our way. And it is due to arrive in about six years. Policymakers have known about this tsunami for some time, but in June, we found out the Big Wave is taller than anyone knew.

That’s when the Social Security Trustees released their latest report on the financial health of the popular Social Security retirement program. According to the trustees’ report, the outlook is not good – Social Security’s solvency is in danger. By 2032, the Social Security fund will fall short by about $2.5 trillion of the money needed to pay the 52 million American retirees their full retirement benefits. Previously, it was thought that the tsunami would make landfall in 2034, but the finances are deteriorating faster than expected. If no presidential and congressional intervention is mounted, retirees will take about a 22 percent haircut, meaning any senior beneficiary who was receiving $3000 per month will see that chopped to about $2300 per month, a loss of about $8000 per year.

Keep ReadingShow less
 Lego Bricks in child hands

How imagination shapes our future and the American spirit.

Ekaterina79 / Getty Images

The Dreams That Built America—and Will Carry Us Forward

Ah love, let us be true

To one another! For the world, which seems

Keep ReadingShow less