Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Ask Not What AI Can Do for You

Opinion

Two people looking at a computer screen at work.

On America’s anniversary, a call for young innovators to embrace AI, drive prosperity, and lead through the new U.S. Tech Corps initiative.

Getty Images, pixdeluxe

Just about 250 years ago, young Americans risked everything to fight for a better future--one in which their loved ones, neighbors, and progeny could exercise individual liberty and collective prosperity. Their fight for democracy was regarded by many as a fool’s errand. People aren’t to be trusted. Only the enlightened should govern. Top-down, tyrannical approaches to governance were the only path forward.

But the American people rallied behind an optimistic vision and refused to accept the status quo. Where’s that spirit of liberty and commitment to building a better future today?


It’s fitting that as the nation celebrates an important anniversary, we’re once again in a position that demands a new generation of founders. Young Americans today are in that rare historical position of having the opportunity and means to redesign tired systems, expand the scope of individual autonomy, and drive economic prosperity. AI and related emerging technologies have made change inevitable. The only question is who will drive that change and in which directions.

AI is an imperfect tool, yet it is the greatest disseminator and generator of knowledge that humankind has ever created. Its most boring use cases—consolidating information, distilling patterns, spotting errors, and generating novel ideas—have transformative potential when deployed in proper contexts. These AI use cases have already increased human flourishing. Hospitals have reported that doctors equipped with AI have cut down on charting time--spending more time with patients and improving care. Schools have documented AI tutors accelerating literacy gains as the nation still recovers from the immense learning losses incurred during the pandemic. New startups are opening the garage doors and looking for new employees to help create the next big thing.

These AI stories rarely make headline news. If sex sells, then pessimism profits. Diffused benefits such as marginal, yet meaningful improvements to the basics of a good life don’t make for clickbait. Instead, AI coverage by the New York Times, for example, tends to suggest that acceptance and adoption of AI is the surest path to a dark future. Here are a few recent headlines: “The A.I. Disruption We've Been Waiting for Has Arrived,” “A.I. Isn’t Coming for Every White-Collar Job. At Least Not Yet.,” “People Loved the Dot-Com Boom. The A.I. Boom, Not So Much.”

It’s no wonder that many Americans have developed a fear of AI. Supposedly trustworthy and objective sources of news are unquestionably adding a subjective, doom-based lens to their AI coverage. Such framing robs people of their autonomy and agency. Regardless of the substantive content of those articles, it’s no secret that many of us are headline-readers—plenty of people share articles online without ever reading more than the first paragraph. The framing of the story can be its most consequential contribution to popular discourse. By tipping the scales away from reasoned analysis of AI’s pros and cons, such coverage turns the American people into passive actors in an era that will be won by people with a high degree of agency, curiosity, and grit.

Thankfully, young people have a new means to escape the predominant anti-tech narrative. The Peace Corps has officially launched the U.S. Tech Corps. Here’s a summary of the new program:

The Tech Corps deploys technologists to support last-mile adoption of American AI. The Tech Corps leverages the Peace Corps' existing infrastructure while turbocharging the Peace Corps' historic mission of promoting world peace and friendship by working with communities in host nations to meet their needs for trained individuals. The Tech Corps creates a new pathway for service-minded technologists to serve in the Peace Corps and support AI adoption across sectors such as health, education, and agriculture.

This is a chance to receive practical AI training, to put that training to productive use, and to increase adoption of a tool that is wonderfully boring in the vast majority of its use cases, yet incredibly capable.

The first set of U.S. Tech Corps volunteers will require the same fierce commitment to optimism, risk-taking, and building that defined our nation’s founders. These volunteers will return with proven AI experience that can spark necessary changes at home. What an incredible opportunity.

Ask not what AI can do for you – ask how you can use AI to benefit humanity.

That’s the opportunity that’s on the table for young Americans today. Will you seize it?


Kevin Frazier is a Senior Fellow at the Abundance Institute, directs the AI Innovation and Law Program at the University of Texas School of Law, and is an Affiliated Research Fellow at the Cato Institute.


Read More

An illustration of a block with the words, "AI," on it, surrounded by slightly smaller caution signs.

Efficient AI may not mean less energy. The Jevons paradox shows why demand can grow, and why no one can say yet where AI’s real limits will be.

Getty Images, J Studios

The People Selling You the Future Don’t Know It Either

Artificial Intelligence is everywhere and can no longer be avoided. Will there ever be a ceiling for the expansion of this technology? AI companies are not just selling software. The story about the inevitability that AI will have in transforming work, education, medicine, art, government, and daily life is much more profitable. People must accept the transformation or be left behind. They are selling behind a mask of certainty.

The court of public opinion on AI has concluded that this technology is too energy-consuming for the benefits it allegedly brings and the ways many people use it. Therefore, companies have shifted their agendas to presenting efficiency as a solution to the technology’s enormous need for power. Smaller, better models and chips, and more efficient data centers may reduce the energy required for a single text-based request or generated image. If those improvements make AI cheaper to use, it will be invited into more daily life right?

Keep ReadingShow less
AI chip
a computer chip with the letter a on top of it
Photo by Igor Omilaev on Unsplash

We Should Regulate AI to Make It Grow Faster

The debate over artificial intelligence has become divided between two powerful ideas: that we need a “moratorium” to slow AI until we can make it safe, and that regulating AI will slow the innovation we need for our economy and national security. Both concerns are legitimate. But “moratorium” and “slowing AI growth” are divisive terms: they reassure those concerned about AI's safety, economic and environmental consequences while alarming those who see AI competition and national security as urgent priorities. We need a different starting point—meaningful regulation that provides the safeguards necessary to protect people, communities and the environment while creating the conditions for AI to continue growing. The experiences of Europe and China challenge the assumption that regulation must slow AI.

China has combined increasingly detailed, technology-specific AI regulation with substantial government support for AI development. Recent studies provide evidence that this approach can promote innovation. One 2026 study of Chinese companies from 2017 through 2023 found that the creation of national AI innovation and development pilot zones significantly increased corporate digital transformation, in part through increased research and development, human capital and reduced transition costs. Another 2026 study, covering Chinese manufacturing companies from 2014 through 2024, found that the same policy significantly promoted the adoption of intelligent technologies.

Keep ReadingShow less
person reading a computer screen
man using computer inside room

Student-Led AI Initiative Aims to Tackle Misinformation

PRINCETON JUNCTION, NJ — As generative artificial intelligence reshapes the digital landscape, a New Jersey student researcher is using the technology to combat media bias. Shaurya Jindal, an AI researcher and student at West Windsor-Plainsboro High School South, has launched Cogito News, an educational platform designed to build modern media literacy skills.

Cogito News was founded in response to growing concerns about partisan framing and selective sourcing in contemporary journalism. Recognizing that cognitive biases often influence how news is packaged and consumed, Jindal sought to build a tool that helps users critically evaluate the information they encounter daily. The platform's real-world impact and timely relevance were highlighted when Jindal was my guest on The Fulcrum Democracy Forum, an interview series dedicated to civic renewal and examining innovative approaches to strengthening democratic systems.

Keep ReadingShow less
An aerial view of a Flock camera

An aerial view of a Flock camera in Burbank, California. U.S. President Donald Trump expressed support for Flock cameras, saying he likes the AI-powered surveillance technology because of its use by law enforcement, despite concerns that it infringes on privacy.

(Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

Flock Cameras Are Coming Down – but We Need More To Dismantle the Surveillance State

Chances are, you’ve seen one in your neighborhood. Flock cameras have become a major flashpoint for voters in the leadup to the midterms. The concept sounds straight out of 1984 — a network of government-owned cameras that track your movements — it’s no wonder that Americans across party lines are demanding their states and towns sever ties with the controversial company. Surveillance fears are only getting stronger as we enter the AI era.

But the problem isn’t just Flock. These cameras, Automated License Plate Readers or ALPRs to be exact, are a symptom of a larger “surveil first, ask questions later” attitude that has been adopted by local and federal government for decades. In recent years, the federal government has been dramatically expanding the nation’s surveillance infrastructure. This has taken many forms, from facial recognition technology at the airport, to law enforcement monitoring your mail, to the government watching what you’re posting on your personal social media pages. Since April, many Democrats and Republicans in Congress have united to stop what would effectively be a blank check for surveillance via FISA reauthorization, demanding surveillance reforms such as closing the “data broker loophole”, which allows the government to buy Americans’ personal data without a warrant.

Keep ReadingShow less