Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Ask Not What AI Can Do for You

Opinion

Two people looking at a computer screen at work.

On America’s anniversary, a call for young innovators to embrace AI, drive prosperity, and lead through the new U.S. Tech Corps initiative.

Getty Images, pixdeluxe

Just about 250 years ago, young Americans risked everything to fight for a better future--one in which their loved ones, neighbors, and progeny could exercise individual liberty and collective prosperity. Their fight for democracy was regarded by many as a fool’s errand. People aren’t to be trusted. Only the enlightened should govern. Top-down, tyrannical approaches to governance were the only path forward.

But the American people rallied behind an optimistic vision and refused to accept the status quo. Where’s that spirit of liberty and commitment to building a better future today?


It’s fitting that as the nation celebrates an important anniversary, we’re once again in a position that demands a new generation of founders. Young Americans today are in that rare historical position of having the opportunity and means to redesign tired systems, expand the scope of individual autonomy, and drive economic prosperity. AI and related emerging technologies have made change inevitable. The only question is who will drive that change and in which directions.

AI is an imperfect tool, yet it is the greatest disseminator and generator of knowledge that humankind has ever created. Its most boring use cases—consolidating information, distilling patterns, spotting errors, and generating novel ideas—have transformative potential when deployed in proper contexts. These AI use cases have already increased human flourishing. Hospitals have reported that doctors equipped with AI have cut down on charting time--spending more time with patients and improving care. Schools have documented AI tutors accelerating literacy gains as the nation still recovers from the immense learning losses incurred during the pandemic. New startups are opening the garage doors and looking for new employees to help create the next big thing.

These AI stories rarely make headline news. If sex sells, then pessimism profits. Diffused benefits such as marginal, yet meaningful improvements to the basics of a good life don’t make for clickbait. Instead, AI coverage by the New York Times, for example, tends to suggest that acceptance and adoption of AI is the surest path to a dark future. Here are a few recent headlines: “The A.I. Disruption We've Been Waiting for Has Arrived,” “A.I. Isn’t Coming for Every White-Collar Job. At Least Not Yet.,” “People Loved the Dot-Com Boom. The A.I. Boom, Not So Much.”

It’s no wonder that many Americans have developed a fear of AI. Supposedly trustworthy and objective sources of news are unquestionably adding a subjective, doom-based lens to their AI coverage. Such framing robs people of their autonomy and agency. Regardless of the substantive content of those articles, it’s no secret that many of us are headline-readers—plenty of people share articles online without ever reading more than the first paragraph. The framing of the story can be its most consequential contribution to popular discourse. By tipping the scales away from reasoned analysis of AI’s pros and cons, such coverage turns the American people into passive actors in an era that will be won by people with a high degree of agency, curiosity, and grit.

Thankfully, young people have a new means to escape the predominant anti-tech narrative. The Peace Corps has officially launched the U.S. Tech Corps. Here’s a summary of the new program:

The Tech Corps deploys technologists to support last-mile adoption of American AI. The Tech Corps leverages the Peace Corps' existing infrastructure while turbocharging the Peace Corps' historic mission of promoting world peace and friendship by working with communities in host nations to meet their needs for trained individuals. The Tech Corps creates a new pathway for service-minded technologists to serve in the Peace Corps and support AI adoption across sectors such as health, education, and agriculture.

This is a chance to receive practical AI training, to put that training to productive use, and to increase adoption of a tool that is wonderfully boring in the vast majority of its use cases, yet incredibly capable.

The first set of U.S. Tech Corps volunteers will require the same fierce commitment to optimism, risk-taking, and building that defined our nation’s founders. These volunteers will return with proven AI experience that can spark necessary changes at home. What an incredible opportunity.

Ask not what AI can do for you – ask how you can use AI to benefit humanity.

That’s the opportunity that’s on the table for young Americans today. Will you seize it?


Kevin Frazier is a Senior Fellow at the Abundance Institute, directs the AI Innovation and Law Program at the University of Texas School of Law, and is an Affiliated Research Fellow at the Cato Institute.


Read More

Vote Badge with Rising Social Media Like Icons and Hearts – Digital Engagement and Online Voting
J Studios / Getty Images

Democratic Autopsy and AI

After every defeat, organizations conduct autopsies. The good ones are honest, like NASA’s Rogers Commission report after the Space Shuttle Challenger exploded shortly after takeoff. In addition to identifying the infamous O-rings as the proximal culprit, it looked at organizational culture, communication failures, normalization of risk, management pressures, and institutional blind spots. The best ones are uncomfortable, and make a serious effort to understand “why did we mess this up so badly?” I’ve personally seen both good “autopsies” and bad ones throughout my decades of experience in true life-or-death realms: the SEAL Teams and as an Emergency Medicine physician.

Following the 2024 election, the Democratic National Committee produced a lengthy report titled Build to Win. Build to Last. Yet it is not a serious document because it does nothing to prepare for the unstoppable and very near future staring us right in the face. It is nearly 200 pages long and attempts to explain what went wrong and how the party should prepare for the future. It discusses organizing, communications, coalition building, fundraising, digital strategy, and voter outreach. It is filled with references to data, analytics, and technology.

Keep ReadingShow less
My Generation Can Spot the Deepfake. That’s Not Enough.
Smartphone with ai text in jeans pocket
Photo by Immo Wegmann on Unsplash

My Generation Can Spot the Deepfake. That’s Not Enough.

Thomas Massie, a seven-term Republican congressman from Kentucky, lost his primary on May 19. The race cost $32.6 million, making it the most expensive congressional primary in U.S. history. Among the weapons deployed against him: an AI-generated video showing him checking into a hotel room with Representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Ilhan Omar, with their hands clasped. The narrator called it "worse than adultery." A disclaimer at the bottom of the screen, in small text, read: "This satirical ad was created with artificial intelligence."

I watched the ad. It looks ridiculous. The movements are slightly too smooth, the lighting is off, and the scenario is so cartoonish that I genuinely could not tell at first whether it was meant to be taken seriously. But I'm 17, and I've spent the last four years watching AI-generated content get better in real time. I know what the seams look like. Massie, in his post-loss interview on Meet the Press, was blunt about who the ad actually reached: "It was actually very effective on the boomers."

Keep ReadingShow less
An illustration with the words, "AI," in the middle - Icons on a computer, robot, lock, and a car are around

AI is unpopular yet widely used. Explore how citizen-led “crackpot schemes” could shape AI policy, protect jobs, strengthen democracy, and maximize AI’s benefits while reducing its risks.

Andriy Onufriyenko / Getty Images

In Defense of “Crackpot Schemes” for AI Governance

AI is unpopular. And nearly a billion people use ChatGPT.

AI is destroying jobs. And fields predicted to have been eliminated by AI, like radiology, continue to grow and leverage the technology to improve their work.

Keep ReadingShow less
Digital illustration of robot's hand holding and supporting man who is working on his desk using computer, represent themes of artificial intelligence (AI), the future of work, and the intersection of humanity and technology.

A critique of Steven Rosenbaum's The Future of Truth and the irony of AI-generated errors in a book warning about AI, truth, trust, and democratic responsibility.

Andriy Onufriyenko / Getty Images

On Truth, Shame, and the Abuse of AI

A democracy is only as robust and vibrant as the citizens who sustain it. Self-government depends upon people willing to deliberate honestly, reason carefully, and exercise judgment responsibly. With the emergence of AI, this obligation becomes even more consequential because these powerful systems can either deepen human agency or quietly erode it. They can either help citizens think more clearly and participate more meaningfully, or they can encourage the outsourcing of judgment itself and the slow substitution of synthetic plausibility for human responsibility.

Imagine, then, publishing a book warning humanity about the epistemological collapse supposedly ushered in by artificial intelligence. Imagine assembling endorsements from solemn guardians of the humanities, critics of automation, custodians of truth, defenders of interpretation against probabilistic sludge. Imagine presenting yourself as a kind of intellectual fire marshal standing before a burning building, yelling that people must immediately stop playing with matches.

Keep ReadingShow less