Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Ask Not What AI Can Do for You

Opinion

Two people looking at a computer screen at work.

On America’s anniversary, a call for young innovators to embrace AI, drive prosperity, and lead through the new U.S. Tech Corps initiative.

Getty Images, pixdeluxe

Just about 250 years ago, young Americans risked everything to fight for a better future--one in which their loved ones, neighbors, and progeny could exercise individual liberty and collective prosperity. Their fight for democracy was regarded by many as a fool’s errand. People aren’t to be trusted. Only the enlightened should govern. Top-down, tyrannical approaches to governance were the only path forward.

But the American people rallied behind an optimistic vision and refused to accept the status quo. Where’s that spirit of liberty and commitment to building a better future today?


It’s fitting that as the nation celebrates an important anniversary, we’re once again in a position that demands a new generation of founders. Young Americans today are in that rare historical position of having the opportunity and means to redesign tired systems, expand the scope of individual autonomy, and drive economic prosperity. AI and related emerging technologies have made change inevitable. The only question is who will drive that change and in which directions.

AI is an imperfect tool, yet it is the greatest disseminator and generator of knowledge that humankind has ever created. Its most boring use cases—consolidating information, distilling patterns, spotting errors, and generating novel ideas—have transformative potential when deployed in proper contexts. These AI use cases have already increased human flourishing. Hospitals have reported that doctors equipped with AI have cut down on charting time--spending more time with patients and improving care. Schools have documented AI tutors accelerating literacy gains as the nation still recovers from the immense learning losses incurred during the pandemic. New startups are opening the garage doors and looking for new employees to help create the next big thing.

These AI stories rarely make headline news. If sex sells, then pessimism profits. Diffused benefits such as marginal, yet meaningful improvements to the basics of a good life don’t make for clickbait. Instead, AI coverage by the New York Times, for example, tends to suggest that acceptance and adoption of AI is the surest path to a dark future. Here are a few recent headlines: “The A.I. Disruption We've Been Waiting for Has Arrived,” “A.I. Isn’t Coming for Every White-Collar Job. At Least Not Yet.,” “People Loved the Dot-Com Boom. The A.I. Boom, Not So Much.”

It’s no wonder that many Americans have developed a fear of AI. Supposedly trustworthy and objective sources of news are unquestionably adding a subjective, doom-based lens to their AI coverage. Such framing robs people of their autonomy and agency. Regardless of the substantive content of those articles, it’s no secret that many of us are headline-readers—plenty of people share articles online without ever reading more than the first paragraph. The framing of the story can be its most consequential contribution to popular discourse. By tipping the scales away from reasoned analysis of AI’s pros and cons, such coverage turns the American people into passive actors in an era that will be won by people with a high degree of agency, curiosity, and grit.

Thankfully, young people have a new means to escape the predominant anti-tech narrative. The Peace Corps has officially launched the U.S. Tech Corps. Here’s a summary of the new program:

The Tech Corps deploys technologists to support last-mile adoption of American AI. The Tech Corps leverages the Peace Corps' existing infrastructure while turbocharging the Peace Corps' historic mission of promoting world peace and friendship by working with communities in host nations to meet their needs for trained individuals. The Tech Corps creates a new pathway for service-minded technologists to serve in the Peace Corps and support AI adoption across sectors such as health, education, and agriculture.

This is a chance to receive practical AI training, to put that training to productive use, and to increase adoption of a tool that is wonderfully boring in the vast majority of its use cases, yet incredibly capable.

The first set of U.S. Tech Corps volunteers will require the same fierce commitment to optimism, risk-taking, and building that defined our nation’s founders. These volunteers will return with proven AI experience that can spark necessary changes at home. What an incredible opportunity.

Ask not what AI can do for you – ask how you can use AI to benefit humanity.

That’s the opportunity that’s on the table for young Americans today. Will you seize it?


Kevin Frazier is a Senior Fellow at the Abundance Institute, directs the AI Innovation and Law Program at the University of Texas School of Law, and is an Affiliated Research Fellow at the Cato Institute.


Read More

A large group of people is depicted while invisible systems actively scan and analyze individuals within the crowd

Anthropic’s lawsuit against the Trump administration over a Pentagon “supply-chain risk” label raises major constitutional questions about AI policy, corporate speech, and political retaliation.

Getty Images, Flavio Coelho

Anthropic Sues Trump Over ‘Unlawful’ AI Retaliation

Anthropic’s dispute with the Trump administration is no longer just about AI policy; it has escalated into a constitutional test of whether American companies can uphold their values against political retaliation. After the administration labeled Anthropic a “supply‑chain risk”, a designation historically reserved for foreign adversaries, and ordered federal agencies to cease using its technology, the company did not yield. Instead, Anthropic filed two lawsuits: one in the Northern District of California and another in the D.C. Circuit, each challenging different aspects of the government’s actions and calling them “unprecedented and unlawful.”

The Pentagon has now formally issued the supply‑chain risk designation, triggering immediate cancellations of federal contracts and jeopardizing “hundreds of millions of dollars” in near‑term revenue. Anthropic’s filings describe the losses as “unrecoverable,” with reputational damage compounding the financial harm. Yet even as the government blacklists the company, the Pentagon continues using Claude in classified systems because the model is deeply embedded in wartime workflows. This contradiction underscores the political nature of the designation: a tool deemed too “dangerous” to be used by federal agencies is simultaneously indispensable in active military operations.

Keep ReadingShow less
An illustration of a person standing on a giant robotic hand.

As AI transforms the labor market, the U.S. faces a familiar challenge: preparing workers for new skills. A look at a 1991 Labor Department report reveals striking parallels.

Getty Images, Andriy Onufriyenko

We’ve Been "Preparing" for the Future Since 1991—It Hasn't Worked

“Today, the demands on business and workers are different. Firms must meet world-class standards, and so must workers. Employers seek adaptability and the ability to learn and work in teams.”

Sound familiar?

Keep ReadingShow less
News control room
Not news to many: Our polarized view of news brands is only intensifying
Not news to many: Our polarized view of news brands is only intensifying

Non‑Partisan Doesn’t Mean Unbiased: Why America Keeps Getting This Wrong

For as long as I’ve worked in democracy reform, I’ve watched people use non‑partisan and non‑biased as if they meant the same thing. They don’t. This confusion has distorted how Americans judge the credibility of the democracy reform movement, journalists, and even one another. We have created an impossible expectation that anyone who claims to be non‑partisan must also be free of bias.

Non‑partisanship, at its core, is not taking sides in political debates or endorsing a party, candidate, or ideology. It creates space for fair, balanced dialogue accessible to multiple perspectives. Nonpartisan environments encourage discussion and explanation of various viewpoints.

Keep ReadingShow less