Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The Quiet Campaign That Could Rewrite the 2028 Election

A little‑known interstate compact is nearing the 270‑vote threshold that could shift presidential power to the national popular vote.

News

People voting at voting booths.

A little-known interstate compact could change how the U.S. elects presidents by 2028, replacing the Electoral College with the national popular vote.

Getty Images, VIEW press

Most Americans are unaware, but a quiet campaign in states across the country is moving toward one of the biggest changes in presidential elections since the nation was founded.

A movement called the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC) is happening mostly out of public view and could soon change how the United States picks its president, possibly as early as 2028.


If the compact reaches 270 electoral votes and overcomes likely legal challenges, the national popular vote winner would become president for the first time in U.S. history. Although this effort is not widely known, it could reshape the balance of power for years.

So far, 17 states and Washington, D.C., have joined the NPVIC, giving it control of 209 electoral votes. This is about 39% of the Electoral College and 77% of the 270 votes needed for the compact to take effect. Member states include large ones like California, New York, and Illinois, as well as medium-sized states such as Colorado, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Minnesota, and Washington. Smaller members include D.C., Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, Rhode Island, and Vermont.

The compact needs just 61 more electoral votes to take effect. The most likely progress will come from states where the bill has already passed one legislative chamber. This has happened in seven states—Arkansas, Arizona, Michigan, North Carolina, Nevada, Oklahoma, and Virginia—which together have 74 electoral votes.

Nevada stands out because its legislature has passed the NPV bill several times, but the governor has always vetoed it. In Michigan, North Carolina, and Virginia, the compact has passed at least one chamber before, so with the right political conditions, these states could move forward.

All these states are important, and different combinations could help the compact succeed. If states like Nevada, Virginia, Michigan, and North Carolina join, the total could rise from 209 to between 240 and 280 electoral votes. This means the compact could reach 270 before 2028 if the political climate is right.

Even if the compact gets to 270 electoral votes, another challenge is whether it will actually be put into practice. The process seems simple, but the legal details are complicated. The Constitution lets state legislatures choose presidential electors, and member states promise to give all their electors to the national popular vote winner once the compact reaches 270 votes. Supporters say this is allowed under Article II of the Constitution.

Opponents raise two main legal and constitutional concerns. First, they question whether this can happen without Congress’s approval. Some legal experts say such a big change to presidential elections needs Congress to sign off. Others argue that since each state can choose this method on its own, agreeing together does not give them more power over the federal government, so Congress’s approval is not needed. Critics also say the compact might be an improper way to change the presidential election system without a constitutional amendment. They believe that making the national popular vote winner president is such a big change that it cannot be done by state law alone.

If there are future conflicts between state popular votes, recounts, and the national total, lawsuits could follow, as seen in cases like Bush v. Gore. The Supreme Court might have to decide if the compact fits with the Constitution. So, the national popular vote effort is moving on two fronts: politically, where a few more states could push it past 270 votes, and legally, where Congress and the courts will decide if the change is real or just symbolic.


David L. Nevins is the publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.


Read More

The Supreme Court’s Voting Rights Decision Could Reshape Local Government Across Texas

A landmark Supreme Court ruling on the Voting Rights Act could reshape Latino and Black political representation in Texas. Guillermo Ramos and other leaders warn the decision may weaken protections against discriminatory election systems in school boards and city councils.

The Supreme Court’s Voting Rights Decision Could Reshape Local Government Across Texas

Guillermo Ramos remembers seeing few elected leaders who looked like him while he was growing up in the 1980s in Farmers Branch, a fast-growing affluent suburb northwest of Dallas.

Over the years, Latino representation continued to lag, he said. In 2015, after he had become a lawyer, he decided to do something about it.

Keep ReadingShow less
Republican, Democratic and independent checkboxes, with the third one checked

Analysis of California’s open primary system, political reform, and voter empowerment amid gubernatorial tensions and calls to restore party control.

zimmytws/Getty Images

California Schemin’

Both before and after Eric Swalwell’s resignation, the California Gubernatorial race has partisan insiders screaming that California’s innovative, voter-friendly, open primary system should be scrapped. Why? Seven Democrats and two Republicans are running. If all the Democrats stay in the race, and none surges, there is a statistical possibility that the two Republicans advance to the general election.

The attacks are pure opportunism, from people who oppose open primaries, period. Never mind that seven million independent voters have been enfranchised and elections are much more competitive, according to these critics, the fact that the Gubernatorial race might feature two Republicans is absolute proof that the old system needs to be restored.

Keep ReadingShow less
Official ballots with a chain and lock over them, and the USA flag behind them.

The impact of election fraud claims and voting laws on democracy in the United States. Daniel O. Jamison examines voter suppression concerns, mail-in ballot policies, and the broader political struggle over election integrity.

Getty Images, JJ Gouin

If It Ain’t Broke, Don’t Fix It

For nearly ten years, claims that our elections are riddled with fraud have threatened the foundation of our democratic republic.

It is alleged that Democrats have flooded the country with illegal immigrants who then illegally vote for Democrats. Purportedly to protect the country from this, Republicans seek legislation that would, among other provisions, restrict vote-by-mail, require potentially expensive and onerous proof of citizenship to register to vote, and require potentially expensive photo identification to vote.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Fahey Q&A with Elizabeth Rasmussen

An in-depth interview with Elizabeth Rasmussen of Better Boundaries on Utah’s redistricting battle, Proposition 4, and the fight to protect ballot initiatives, fair maps, and democratic accountability.

The Fahey Q&A with Elizabeth Rasmussen

Since organizing the Voters Not Politicians 2018 ballot initiative that put citizens in charge of drawing Michigan's legislative maps, Fahey has been the founding executive director of The People, which is forming statewide networks to promote government accountability. She regularly interviews colleagues in the world of democracy reform for The Fulcrum.

Elizabeth Rasmussen is the Executive Director for Better Boundaries, a Utah-based organization fighting for fair maps, defending the citizen initiative process, preserving checks and balances, and building a better future. Currently making headlines in the state, Better Boundaries is working to protect Proposition 4, and with it, the rights of Utah voters.

Keep ReadingShow less