Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Your Take: DeSantis and Disney World

Your Take: DeSantis and Disney World

Recently, Gov. Ron DeSantis and the Florida Legislature voted to revoke Disney World’s special tax district. The move was made in response to Disney’s criticism of Florida’s controversial education bill limiting the discussion of sex in schools.

We asked our readers:

Can it be appropriate for a state government to punish a corporation that is critical of its agenda? Should Disney World have received special treatment in the first place?

While many people questioned whether an individual business should get special treatment, most objected to what they viewed as retaliatory tactics by the government.


Your responses, edited for clarity and length:

I would say that an initial special tax treatment/district control by the state for a private corporation is warranted if approved by the state's and muncipality's voters. It should probably be limited and not permanent, to sunset after several years. Disney should not receive special treatment permanently as that sounds anti-competitive. A private corporation must be mindful of the political preferences of the community in which it resides and does business. Thus it must weigh the interests of its more narrow stakeholders against the larger population that sets political priorities. Disney foolishly ignored this caveat that left itself vulnerable to political entrepreneurship by Gov. DeSantis. -Michael Harrington

Our government is supposed to enact policies that serve the public good, protect its citizens and commit to rule of law. What DeSantis does is violate these guidelines and acts more in the tradition of an authoritarian ruler. Punishment of those who do not “toe the line” is not in the interest of democracy. -Rhoda Schermer

This is wrong on so many levels. Bad governance, bad judgment, bad faith with Disney, bad faith with voters. In addition it achieves nothing except chaos. -Ray Curtis

I don't agree with what DeSantis has done. It is retaliation for a private company’s opinion. Republicans are supposed to be the business party. There are many more of these tax deals throughout Florida, The Villages for example. If Florida decides to extend this type of program I don't see a problem with it. -Cristy Heckller

Whether or not Disney World’s special treatment was a good idea is not the issue. Rather, what is the motivation behind the Florida Legislature’s vote to revoke it? If the motivation is to punish The Walt Disney Company for expressing its opinion about Florida’s education bill, then the vote is a violation of Disney’s speech rights as expressed in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. But more worrisome is the adoption of the thuggish practices that dictatorships use to intimidate citizens and companies. The Florida vote is exactly the type of actions that Chavez took in Venezuela, Ortega in Nicaragua, Orban in Hungary, Erdogan in Turkey, Mugabe in Zimbabwe. De Santis is in great company. -Felix Bergel

Disney vs. DeSantis is a ridiculous weaponization of the culture wars that seem to be all the rage in Republican circles, at least here in Florida. In 13 months, it may well cost Florida taxpayers millions of dollars, jeopardize the retirement and health care benefits of Disney employees, and seriously affect employment in at least two Florida counties. To be clear, I am categorically against state and/or local governments giving tax breaks to individual businesses. Not even to businesses as important to local economies as Disney has been. But I am outraged over the idea that a governor — or any other government official — can use the power of his office expressly to harm a company for disagreeing with him. Do we no longer recognize free speech rights, or is that reserved only for speech we agree with? We seem to be using the power of incumbency to punish people who disagree with our political positions. Two years ago I thought this was limited to the former president and perhaps a few others. Now it seems to be swallowing both parties. I’m not sure we can recover from this, and I’m frightened. -Kathleen Finderson

Read More

A Place for Women of Color: Woman Made Gallery

Building a Home Out of Dirt (2018)

A Place for Women of Color: Woman Made Gallery

While the Trump administration seeks to erase places for those with historically marginalized identities, Woman Made Gallery offers more than representation—it offers response. Through exhibitions like the most recent Acts of Care, the gallery creates an intentional space where women, women of color, and nonbinary artists don't have to ask for permission to belong—they build that belonging themselves. As a nonprofit rooted in justice and community dialogue, Woman Made Gallery continues to model what inclusive, women-of-color-led spaces can look like: ones that honor lineage, complexity, and care as forms of resistance.

For Program Coordinator Corinne Pompéy, the mission of Woman Made Gallery is more than just representation—it’s about creating an entry point for connection and care. “Our goal is to ensure women and nonbinary artists are seen in the art world,” she said. “But more than that, we want people to feel something when they walk in—whether that’s reflection, joy, or even release.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Combating ICE Through Sound and Solidarity

"Juan Carlos Vargas, frontman for the Southwest side hardcore band Augment, performs to an energetic crowd at the "No One Is Illegal On Stolen Land" benefit show in Pilsen on February 27, 2025."

Photo taken by Felix Gama

Combating ICE Through Sound and Solidarity

In late February, Chicago cold- a little over a month into Trump’s second term as president- a hundred or so eager hardcore fans crowded in the cramped basement of a skateboard shop in Pilsen for a benefit show raising money for immigrants affected by Immigration and Customs Enforcement arrests.

Amid dust flying up from the cold concrete floor, sweaty bodies shoulder to shoulder, and a violent mosh pit, Yaretzi, an undocumented young Latina college student from the Southwest side of Chicago who frequents the city’s hardcore scene, was in the crowd, standing in solidarity with her community that is under attack.

Keep ReadingShow less
Trump Slams Washington Commanders and Cleveland Guardians Over Name Changes

President Donald Trump speaks to the media as he departs the White House in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

Trump Slams Washington Commanders and Cleveland Guardians Over Name Changes

Washington, D.C. — President Donald Trump has reignited controversy surrounding the Washington Commanders football team, demanding the franchise revert to its former name, the “Redskins,” a term widely condemned as a racial slur against Native Americans.

In a series of posts on Truth Social this past weekend, Trump declared, “The Washington 'Whatever's' should IMMEDIATELY change their name back to the Washington Redskins Football Team.” He went further, threatening to block the team’s $3.7 billion stadium deal in Washington, D.C., unless the name change is reversed.

Keep ReadingShow less